2 Russian Scientist & Japan & piPrev Topic Next Topic

New Topic New Poll

MrSteel01

Cleveland,Oh
United States
Member #1,856
July 16, 2003
531 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 2:56 am

What do they have in common They tried to brake down pi.
Pi «py», is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. This ratio is the same for every circle and is approximately 3.14159.
But the 2 Russian Computer Scientist & Japan's most powerful computer could not break down pi the story goes. That the 2 Russian Scientist's who aftery working 9 to 5 came back to their appartmennt and cranked up IBM Computer and spit out millions of numbers that did not come close to pi in a repeating set that Japan jumped on the horn whe the news broke out and with their most powerful computer that they had spit out more zeroes than China had rice and still with no sucess! With all that effort, time and knowlage they could have made a computer program to win or have a better chance to win than most of what they did!
MS

!
goose

China
Member #3,032
December 16, 2003
1,081 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 3:17 am

So theres no such thing to be figured out absoluateacurate but near prefection.......No perfection!
Lottery can never be predicted accurately..Its so stupid a idear to crack it completely.We learnt the lesson again and again.Its time to wake up!
Guru

Belgium
Member #2,220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 5:49 am

Goose:
I don't agree. I have strong proof at hand that all systems that show random behaviour will dventually be recognized as deterministic systems, thus predictable. It is just a matter of time and computing power. But it will be done.
Guru

Belgium
Member #2,220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 5:53 am

The problem with many scientists is that they are afraid to ruin their carreers if they peddle too much in the opposite direction of what is commonly accepted by the scientific world.
goose

China
Member #3,032
December 16, 2003
1,081 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 6:06 am

So you are telling meall random behavior are destinied to happen at at that fixed time?,like we belive in such fate and love at first sight?
goose

China
Member #3,032
December 16, 2003
1,081 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 6:34 am

obviously you refused my question......
Guru

Belgium
Member #2,220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 7:37 am

goose.
if you have a tree, and leaves are falling down from it.
Normally we would say it is the initial position of the leaf on the tree together with the wind and gravity that will determine the landing spot of this leaf when it drops.
Now the wind is the variable value, and is seen as the cause. The landing spot is the effect.
But, if you consider a universe according to einsteins relativity theory where time is not progressing linear or where time is just an inexistent illusion, then cause and effect could as well be inverted.
Meaning that the landing spot of the leaf could dictate how the wind should blow to make the leaf land at the correct spot.
now the landing spot has become the cause and the wind the effect.
Then tell me, what is the true cause ? In my opinion the answer is that there is no true cause.
This can only be explained if the universe is the cumulation of the infinite past, present and future existing in an eternal now moment.
This means that today, tomorrow, yesterday, next year all exist in the same universal time fragment.
This leads to a predestinated world where free will is just an illusion.
goose

China
Member #3,032
December 16, 2003
1,081 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 9:59 am

I know that time is just an illusion.For some real scientist,They have no concept of time.This is what I could understand.
Sometimes the illusion set us traps.Once our thought got trapped,its very hard to get rid of it.Just like in ancient times,people all belive in false truth.
You have emphasize"real cause" and "the effect",If we conside the winner as the effect,can you tell us whats the real cause regardless of time effect?
Another point you made :"cause and effect could as well be inverted.Meaning that the landing spot of the leaf could dictate how the wind should blow to make the leaf land at the correct spot.
from there I guess we assumed there is not at all a regularation to determine the accurate wiiner,Instead,each winner has become the real cause to the next winner.If I am correct,the past 3 winner is enough to produce the unknown one.
More simpler,More understandable.Regardless of time,you focus all your attention to the structure of the winning numbers only.is that correct?If yes,I AGREE!
Now the position must refer to some positions for each number at a certain position I suppose,And the next unkown one's position change a bit from the previous few ones.
wheeling system will solve the rest
goose
goose

China
Member #3,032
December 16, 2003
1,081 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 10:20 am

ok,we dont talk about the real cause.Now we focus time.
the cumulation of the infinite past, present and future existing in an eternal now moment.
This theory is one of the theories to explain nowadays world.I know this theory from the brief history of time.It says that the past,present,and the future of our lives,as well as all the movements of the matter are like diamonds on a necklace.Its doomed to happen.But we never know whats going to happen.
Back to lottery,If your system could explain or prove part of this theory,I belive its an epoch-making system.But whats your predication result?Its not so satisfing though.can you tell us why?
goose
Guru

Belgium
Member #2,220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 10:33 am

Jazzy:
All great things come from theories and speculations.
Einstein's speculations and theories proved to be correct. Although nobody believed him at first.
You say "I don't think so"
I say "I do think so"
(study the subject first, then draw your conclusions)
goose

China
Member #3,032
December 16, 2003
1,081 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 10:45 am

I think 0-9 are basic number to determine how a winner really comes from.we dont mess it up with time.the winning numbersare just complicated expression of basic numbers combos.
hypersoniq

Pennsylvania
United States
Member #1,340
April 6, 2003
2,581 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 10:48 am

The only useless theories are the proprietary ones ;-)
Theories are just the beginning, they exist to be proven (or disproven).

Have an EXCELlent day!
goose

China
Member #3,032
December 16, 2003
1,081 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 11:01 am

lets work hard and make that day come soon
RJOh

100

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 12:02 pm

The day someone at Lottery Post wins a big jackpot, I doubt if they will give a second thought to how they picked the winner. I know of only one person that did, he was a local car dealer who bought lottery tickets for his customers and his crew at the dealerships and after he and a pool of his crew won and split the winnings, he started buying tickets for a pool of one(himself), won again, sold his dealership and moved to Florida.
RJOh

* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
MrSteel01

Cleveland,Oh
United States
Member #1,856
July 16, 2003
531 Posts
Offline

Dec 24, 2003, 1:54 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on December 24, 2003

The problem with many scientists is that they are afraid to ruin their carreers
The had a 9-5 Job this was done on their own time with their own computer!
if they peddle too much in the opposite direction of what is commonly accepted by
the scientific world.
Scientific world is not a commonly known to all it is hit & miss or guess to make it
work!

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

2 Russian Scientist & Japan & piPrev TopicNext Topic

2 Russian Scientist & Japan & piPrev Topic Next Topic