Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 20, 2017, 8:51 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Lottosync v1.7 bug report !

Topic closed. 68 replies. Last post 13 years ago by Guru.

Page 1 of 5
PrintE-mailLink

Belgium
Member #2220
September 2, 2003
553 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 20, 2004, 5:17 am - IP Logged

Hi,

I received an email from a user that was unable to get numbers higher than aprox. 32 in his predictions.

If anyone notices this behaviour too, please report it in this thread or send me an email.

I suspect there may be a bug left in the code that in some occasions kicks in and ignores higher numbers. (although it never showed up in my original testruns)

I'll have a close look at the code next week to see where this comes from.

    Avatar
    N.ireland
    United Kingdom
    Member #2962
    December 6, 2003
    69 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: March 20, 2004, 8:20 am - IP Logged

     same here 32 highest number picked????

      Avatar

      Canada
      Member #2859
      November 23, 2003
      463 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: March 20, 2004, 12:31 pm - IP Logged

      i've never noticed that in 649 games, but i have notice this in 649 games =

      there seems to be ALOT more numbers falling under 25  !!! here's some examples =

      Draw 1=

      sample = 50000 1 2 3 5 7 15 16 17 19 43  = 9 numbers below 25
      sample = 25000 1 2 5 6 8 10 16 18 24 41  = 9 numbers below 25
      sample = 40000 1 2 4 7 16 18 21 27 40 48  = 8 numbers below 25
      sample = 20000 2 3 5 6 14 15 16 17 29 47  = 8 numbers below 25
      sample = 30000 1 2 3 4 7 8 10 16 20 35  = 9 numbers below 25
      sample = 12000 1 2 3 5 18 22 26 28 34 46  = 6 numbers below 25

      Draw 2=         
      sample = 50000 1 6 7 10 14 16 17 19 31 39  = 8 numbers below 25
      sample = 25000 1 2 6 7 10 13 14 17 26 33  = 8 numbers below 25
      sample = 40000 1 6 7 9 10 14 17 18 30 33  = 8 numbers below 25
      sample = 30000 1 2 6 10 14 15 17 21 22 49  = 9 numbers below 25

       

      Seems to be WAY to many numbers under 25 ie not distrubuted evenly etc

        lottoshlep's avatar - super 7-top-over.jpg
        BC
        Canada
        Member #2120
        August 19, 2003
        258 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: March 20, 2004, 1:47 pm - IP Logged

        Same here, predominantly low preds in 01s and 10s so far. Often 2 decades missing, one of the last sets had 3 decades missing which can happen but is very rare. Sent some latest examples via PM.

        if at first you don't succeed ... destroy all evidence you ever tried  Cool 

          Avatar
          N.ireland
          United Kingdom
          Member #2962
          December 6, 2003
          69 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: March 20, 2004, 2:02 pm - IP Logged

          Well tonight 6/42 lotto running 40000 samples one number right again? One of the numbers was above 32.which probably didn't help if it wont pick above 32.Low numbers due but it picked balls in 1 to 10 range in draw it was 14 to 20 range.

            Avatar
            N.ireland
            United Kingdom
            Member #2962
            December 6, 2003
            69 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: March 20, 2004, 2:04 pm - IP Logged

            Vick how do you get time to do all them runs is the computer ever off..

              Avatar

              Canada
              Member #2859
              November 23, 2003
              463 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: March 20, 2004, 8:32 pm - IP Logged

              spock, hehehe, i have 2 computers, and their both pretty fast takes about 1.5 to 2 days to run em all, but i' concentrating on keno more these days, waiting for next keno version to come out )

                Avatar
                N.ireland
                United Kingdom
                Member #2962
                December 6, 2003
                69 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: March 21, 2004, 3:52 am - IP Logged

                I tried an experiment changed from 6/42 Irish lotto to UK 6/49 to see if LS would pick higher numbers well 11 hours later the numbers are 1,2,3,4,5,7,9,19,23,30.now on the Irish low numbers looked due that is not the case on uk lotto.Something is very wrong withLS1.7.

                  lottoshlep's avatar - super 7-top-over.jpg
                  BC
                  Canada
                  Member #2120
                  August 19, 2003
                  258 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: March 21, 2004, 10:40 am - IP Logged

                  Hey synch players, a couple of

                  if at first you don't succeed ... destroy all evidence you ever tried  Cool 

                    Avatar

                    Canada
                    Member #2859
                    November 23, 2003
                    463 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: March 21, 2004, 11:39 am - IP Logged

                    yes it's picking WAY to many LOW numbers !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                      Avatar
                      langley b.c.
                      Canada
                      Member #3313
                      January 10, 2004
                      155 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: March 21, 2004, 11:56 am - IP Logged

                      yeah but my low numbers are winning me money  he! he!


                        Belgium
                        Member #2220
                        September 2, 2003
                        553 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: March 21, 2004, 4:35 pm - IP Logged

                        whoosh.

                        something seems to have gone very wrong with the final 1.7. Did some tests and also got way too many low numbers with the version supplied to our customers. My last testing version seems to perform ok. (strange, they should be identical ??!!??). Something must have slipped from my attention.

                        Well, I'm going to find out and supply you all with a patch to fix it.

                          Avatar

                          United States
                          Member #2460
                          October 7, 2003
                          766 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: March 21, 2004, 6:15 pm - IP Logged

                          I just took a look at my numbers and yes you are all right

                          I got too many low numbers and no high numbers also and on the probability scale the few winning numbers seem to be coming out on the far right 20% and on the far left 50%

                          and some-times around the middle 35%, but mostly on the far right 20%.



                          What about you all, got do you get?

                          EXCALIBUR is no more that "Handle" is dead, gone.
                          Maybe sometime in the future I might come back as LANTERN again, but maybe not, if I don't come back as LANTERN in the future then I won't come back at all, but as I said there is no more EXCALIBUR.

                            Avatar
                            langley b.c.
                            Canada
                            Member #3313
                            January 10, 2004
                            155 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: March 21, 2004, 6:28 pm - IP Logged

                            yes same here on the probability table

                              WILLSELL's avatar - chi
                              NJ
                              United States
                              Member #1924
                              July 28, 2003
                              113 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: March 22, 2004, 7:14 pm - IP Logged

                              Ok we have all been around the bush on this software. So, "the proof is in the pudding"

                               

                              How about posting some of the winnings from this system?