Truth tellers, truth managers
3,198 views
7h • 4 tweets • 5 min read •
In research projects about detailed granular events attached to corruption in Washington DC, eventually you reach a point where you have identified the specific people involved. Things get sketchy.
When doing these research projects, you discover that certain DC "insiders," media people and current/former silo staff, names most of you know very well, are also aware of the information you are discovering.
The "insiders" are generally positioned in such a manner as most of the information-aware public consider them "Truth Tellers."
Alternative media gives the Truth Tellers a larger influence voice. This is where it gets interesting.
When you have nailed down the story with direct, irrefutable evidence against the bad actors, you start to notice a pattern emerge about how the Truth Teller media types consistently stay away from certain names.
If you do this long enough, and find the same outcome frequently enough, you realize most of these "Truth Tellers" are not that at all; they are, instead, Truth Managers.
The DC Truth Managers are willfully blind to the activity of certain people they have identified as what can only be reasonably assumed to be CIA operators.
There are bad actors in DC that I can believe are "CIA operators." Why? Because earnestly after years of doing this, I cannot think of any other reason why they would be protected.
Be careful about assigning the label "Truth Teller" toward any alternative media DC insider who is a "reformed journalist" or "former staff member" of the machine.
There are well known voices from inside the system, that exit the corporate media world, and enter the alternative media world, only to carry on the same purpose.
I see the information managers frequently now and identify them easily by who they *do not* talk about.
When a current or former information manager comes across a story of corruption that involves a "CIA designated bad actor," they never discuss that person in their information reveal. They continue the protection.
A good rule of thumb is never to think of anyone from inside the DC information system, regardless of their disposition, as a Truth Teller.
Every Information Manager was matriculated, and are compromised, by the system around them that is entirely based on corrupt activity.
Hang around a one-legged tribe long enough, and inherently you begin limping.
When doing these research projects, you discover that certain DC "insiders," media people and current/former silo staff, names most of you know very well, are also aware of the information you are discovering.
The "insiders" are generally positioned in such a manner as most of the information-aware public consider them "Truth Tellers."
Alternative media gives the Truth Tellers a larger influence voice. This is where it gets interesting.
When you have nailed down the story with direct, irrefutable evidence against the bad actors, you start to notice a pattern emerge about how the Truth Teller media types consistently stay away from certain names.
If you do this long enough, and find the same outcome frequently enough, you realize most of these "Truth Tellers" are not that at all; they are, instead, Truth Managers.
The DC Truth Managers are willfully blind to the activity of certain people they have identified as what can only be reasonably assumed to be CIA operators.
There are bad actors in DC that I can believe are "CIA operators." Why? Because earnestly after years of doing this, I cannot think of any other reason why they would be protected.
Be careful about assigning the label "Truth Teller" toward any alternative media DC insider who is a "reformed journalist" or "former staff member" of the machine.
There are well known voices from inside the system, that exit the corporate media world, and enter the alternative media world, only to carry on the same purpose.
I see the information managers frequently now and identify them easily by who they *do not* talk about.
When a current or former information manager comes across a story of corruption that involves a "CIA designated bad actor," they never discuss that person in their information reveal. They continue the protection.
A good rule of thumb is never to think of anyone from inside the DC information system, regardless of their disposition, as a Truth Teller.
Every Information Manager was matriculated, and are compromised, by the system around them that is entirely based on corrupt activity.
Hang around a one-legged tribe long enough, and inherently you begin limping.
2/ Let me give you a great example using this video shared yesterday.
Listen carefully to what Kash Patel says at the 01:23 moment about the "Russiagate report" that was written, and how the "ICA" (Intelligence Community Assessment) was constructed with fraudulent information from the CIA.
As Patel notes, "Gina buried it." That's Gina Haspel, the Trump CIA Director who replaced Mike Pompeo.
Now, you might think that Patel is a Truth Teller in this segment but stand back and think about it with fresh eyes, non-pretending eyes.
Patel knows, because he (with others) created a report that highlights a fraudulent CIA operation. A report that was absorbed by the CIA and buried.
Put another way, Patel is talking about a body that he knows is buried. Ergo, people might say, "Patel knows where the body is buried," right?
But ask yourself, with the known stakes to the nation as an outcome of horrific fraud, why didn't this self-identified "#2 in the Intelligence Community" bring this information forward regardless of outcome?
Is Patel a "Truth Teller," or is he a "Truth Manager," obeying the Silo rules out of self-interest?
New Eyes - Use them.
What is the difference between Kash Patel and Edward Snowden?
One is a Truth Teller the other is a Truth Manager.
Listen carefully to what Kash Patel says at the 01:23 moment about the "Russiagate report" that was written, and how the "ICA" (Intelligence Community Assessment) was constructed with fraudulent information from the CIA.
As Patel notes, "Gina buried it." That's Gina Haspel, the Trump CIA Director who replaced Mike Pompeo.
Now, you might think that Patel is a Truth Teller in this segment but stand back and think about it with fresh eyes, non-pretending eyes.
Patel knows, because he (with others) created a report that highlights a fraudulent CIA operation. A report that was absorbed by the CIA and buried.
Put another way, Patel is talking about a body that he knows is buried. Ergo, people might say, "Patel knows where the body is buried," right?
But ask yourself, with the known stakes to the nation as an outcome of horrific fraud, why didn't this self-identified "#2 in the Intelligence Community" bring this information forward regardless of outcome?
Is Patel a "Truth Teller," or is he a "Truth Manager," obeying the Silo rules out of self-interest?
New Eyes - Use them.
What is the difference between Kash Patel and Edward Snowden?
One is a Truth Teller the other is a Truth Manager.
Do you guys even understand how amazing this Kash appointment is?!
— Defender of the Republic 🇺🇸 (@realdefender45) x.com/realdefender45…">December 1, 2024
Let me remind you t.co/nLo4aIFuDF">pic.x.com/nlo4aifudf
3/
4/ The "continuing central power" that Patel talks about already exists.
This is part of the problem with people who come from inside the system; and it is a problem for those who cannot spend thousands of hours understanding it.
The IC Silo rules, are followed by people who matriculate surrounded by the IC Silo rules.
The "central power" needed to fracture the system is the physical person of the President of the United States.
The President is, well, Snowden-proof. The President, not the office, the actual physical person, is the power of the system. The epicenter of the system where the atom splits, is the physical President.
Acting in his "official duty," the President of the United States can take a document (any document) and walk into the Brady Room, hand it to a journalist and that document is automatically declassified.
He doesn't need a stamp on it. He doesn't need anyone else's approval or permission. He, the physical person, the President, can simply say, "I view this in my official capacity as President of the United States to be a vital interest to the American public," and hand it to anyone he chooses. That's the central power.
Knowing this, knowing the factual reality of it, is exactly why the concentric circles around the President, intentionally and forcefully stop him from doing it. The silo system, self-protects.
If it can be done this way, then why wasn't it done this way?
Kash Patel, Devin Nunes, Ric Grenell, etc etc. all know this to be true. So why wasn't it done?
Go ask Edward Snowden.
This is part of the problem with people who come from inside the system; and it is a problem for those who cannot spend thousands of hours understanding it.
The IC Silo rules, are followed by people who matriculate surrounded by the IC Silo rules.
The "central power" needed to fracture the system is the physical person of the President of the United States.
The President is, well, Snowden-proof. The President, not the office, the actual physical person, is the power of the system. The epicenter of the system where the atom splits, is the physical President.
Acting in his "official duty," the President of the United States can take a document (any document) and walk into the Brady Room, hand it to a journalist and that document is automatically declassified.
He doesn't need a stamp on it. He doesn't need anyone else's approval or permission. He, the physical person, the President, can simply say, "I view this in my official capacity as President of the United States to be a vital interest to the American public," and hand it to anyone he chooses. That's the central power.
Knowing this, knowing the factual reality of it, is exactly why the concentric circles around the President, intentionally and forcefully stop him from doing it. The silo system, self-protects.
If it can be done this way, then why wasn't it done this way?
Kash Patel, Devin Nunes, Ric Grenell, etc etc. all know this to be true. So why wasn't it done?
Go ask Edward Snowden.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
Keep Current with TheLastRefuge
Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!
This Thread may be Removed Anytime!
Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!
Try unrolling a thread yourself!
- Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!
- From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
Practice here first or read more on our help page!
More from @TheLastRefuge2
Nov 10
Good Sign - President Trump Announces No Position for Nikki Haley or Mike Pompeo in New Administration theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/11/0…
2. ♦ Nikki Haley directly blamed President Trump for the violent events during January 6, 2021, and said, “I don’t think [Trump’s] going to be in the picture,” she said, matter-of-factly. “I don’t think he can. He’s fallen so far.” […] “We need to acknowledge he let us down,” she said. “He went down a path he shouldn’t have, and we shouldn’t have followed him, and we shouldn’t have listened to him. And we can’t let that ever happen again.” politico.com/interactives/2…
3. Haley cares about one thing, her own position and power – that’s it. She really is the worst type of politician you can fathom. Nikki Haley was supported and funded by infamous CIA Acting Director Mike Morell. Haley was a tool of the “six ways from Sunday” group. 
Nov 4
With Mail-in Ballots Assisting, Moldova Votes for Pro-War Alignment With EU/NATO - Conflict is Now Imminent theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/11/0…
2. For more than two years we have been saying to keep an eye on Moldova in the background. Yesterday Moldova held their national election, and while the actual number of people living in Moldova voted for the anti-war position, once the overseas ballots were added the results changed. The nationalists became the minority and the pro-war/pro-EU globalists declared victory. politico.eu/article/moldov…
3. This may seem like a relatively ‘over there’ and small issue. However, the people who control Joe Biden, the U.S. State Dept and the CIA have been positioning themselves in/around Moldova for several years now. Watch out for Moldova to become the spark that leads to escalated conflict with Russia. apnews.com/article/moldov…
Oct 30
Someone once said, "watch Moldova." The last, desperate effort of USAID either creates the backdrop for expanded NATO war with Russia, or the effort dies there. The relevance of A Blinken and S Power is on the Moldovan line.
2. USAID/CIA and Dept of State recently failed in Georgia. [The country, not state] The majority of the people in Georgia do not support the continual bloodshed in Ukraine, they are pragmatic with their views toward Russia, and they don’t want the USA and Brussels determining their politics for them. Georgia Dream is like a Georgia-First party. They had an election last weekend and retained control over parliament. theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/10/2…
3. They failed, because the message underpinning their current geopolitical effort has long been essentially silly. In a 2024 world, the CIA, USAID and DoS are still selling the 1980's "we are the world" narrative.
Oct 10
1. The Aftermath When it comes to the ‘after part’, well, as a long-time CERT recovery member perhaps I can guide you through the expectation and you might find some value. Consider this little word salad a buffet, absorb what might be of value pass over anything else.
2. Hurricanes can be frightening; downright scary. There’s nothing quite like going through a few to reset your outlook on just how Mother Nature can deliver a cleansing cycle to an entire geographic region. The sounds are scary. Try to stay calm despite the nervousness. Telephone and power poles, yes, even the concrete ones, can, and likely will, snap like toothpicks. Trees will bend and break; the sounds are dramatic.
3. Then silence. No birds. No frogs. No crickets. No sound. Nature goes mute. It’s weird. We have no idea how much ambient noise is around us, until it stops.
Oct 8
1. I have been asked to put my hurricane prep into a thread. This might be long. It's a buffet of prepper stuff that others have found to be valuable. Take what you find valuable, ignore what you don't. It's just information.
2. Due to this path, the area north of the impact eyewall will see winds offshore. The area directly south of the impact eyewall will see winds directly onshore. Preparations are always critical within the cone area; however, preparations for a west to east storm are even more critical. A few miles and a little wobble can make all the difference in the storm surge.
3. For those in the cone of uncertainty, remember, planning and proactive measures taken now can significantly reduce stress in the days ahead. As a general rule: take cover from wind – but evacuate away from water.
Sep 3
It’s not just them. Really think about it, shift the paradigm, and OMG 😳 it all makes sense. What the FBI does, and what the FBI doesn’t do. Use this reference and every single example reconciles, like a fuzzy picture that suddenly becomes clear
19 days for the FBI to arrive in Benghazi, Libya. This explains why…
Operation Crossfire Hurricane. This explains why…
Did Thread Reader help you today?
Support us! We are indie developers!
This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.
Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!
Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?
Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)
Or Donate anonymously using crypto!
Ethereum
0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E
Bitcoin
3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi
Thank you for your support!
Entry #5,417
In July 2021, the DOJ OIG produced an absolutely <snip>ing 
Remember, shortly before the 2018 mid-term election, when Ceasar Syoc – a man living in his van – was caught sending “energetic material that can become combustible when subjected to heat or friction”, or what FBI Director Christopher Wray called “
