No match has appeared 353 times in past 12 months.
ABCD 353 52.2%
See how this works out in the next four weeks.
Past Year (Sep 24, 2023 - present)
676 drawings in date range specified Box combinations not drawn during the date range specified (or filtered out): 0136, 0137, 0146, 0159, 0235, 0238, 0256, 0346, 0348, 0458, 0468, 0567, 0578, 1234, 1236, 1246, 1247, 1267, 1268, 1269, 1279, 1378, 1457, 1459, 1569, 1679, 2345, 2347, 2357, 2359, 2367, 2379, 2568, 3678, 3689, 3789, 4569, 4578, 4589
I added these from last drawn wihin past year but being furthest out. I used Oct 2023 as cutoff point. Combo Times Drawn Expected Last Seen Draws Since 2489 1 1.62 Sep 25, 2023 673 0249 1 1.62 Oct 3, 2023 658 1358 1 1.62 Oct 6, 2023 652 0489 1 1.62 Oct 12, 2023 642 0128 1 1.62 Oct 13, 2023 639 0356 1 1.62 Oct 15, 2023 636 1368 1 1.62 Oct 18, 2023 631 3456 1 1.62 Oct 19, 2023 629 1789 1 1.62 Oct 20, 2023 627 0469 1 1.62 Oct 22, 2023 623
Andrew Breitbart was well known in the grassroots Tea Party movement for his ability to turn Alinsky psychological weapons against those who deployed them. In fact, the gift that Breitbart carried was not Andrew’s snarky counter approach toward the Obama teams tactics, but rather his ability to understand the purpose of their approach. This naturally gifted insight always made Andrew a threat.
Well before the Obama Marxists fully activated their weaponized government, Breitbart saw the Alinsky “methods” for what they were, the same tactics deployed by professional abusers. He knew we were headed into an era where “We the People” were in an abusive relationship with government.
In essence, Andrew Breitbart understood that if this tribe of Chicago Marxists were successful in the constructs of the government they envisioned, they would manipulate American politics in much the same manner that an abuser would intimidate, threaten and eventually control their victims. Better yet, Breitbart inherently knew how to defeat them and their predictable gaslighting.
The abuser punches you in the face, intending total control and manifest domination. If you stand up against the abuse, your injuries are then positioned as your fault. When we hit back, our abuser immediately takes the victim role; and with the media spectators on the side of the abuser, the victim never stands a chance. Wash, rinse and repeat.
Breitbart took his counter-offensive skills into the field and when the community activists surfaced to promote their abusive agenda, Andrew immediately began calling attention to their intent. He used their own methods against them, ridiculing them, making them live up to their own message, making them uncomfortably small, speaking big truth to their lies in a very matter-of-fact deconstruction of their psychological nonsense. He was incredibly effective.
What we have witnessed in the past 18 years is exactly this rise of Chicago Marxists into positions of power. They spread throughout government embedding into every institution thanks to the open doors provided by Barack Obama, Eric Holder and a host of like-minded fellow travelers.
We are now fully emersed in an abusive relationship with the system of government institutions demanding and enforcing victim compliance. When an individual member of the people rise in opposition, the weaponized agencies of government use their power to target them quickly. The institutions now perpetuate the abusive process. Victims start feeling entirely powerless against the full weight of the abusers.
The Rise in opposition to a transparently sketchy 2020 election resulted in the January 6th protesters being quickly targeted, framed, prosecuted and used as a lesson to stop further uprisings. The power of the abuser is intended to control the fearfully abused, both physically and more importantly, psychologically.
In the Lawfare side, with full control of the DOJ and FBI the “Ku Klux Klan Act,” an 1871 federal law that bans political violence and intimidation, and the voting rights act of 1965, are now used as weapons to keep the abused American people in line. A current legal effort at a “consent decree” against both the RNC and Trump campaign is working its way through the courts:
CNN – […] First brought in the days following the 2020 election, the lawsuit has moved slowly through the federal courts in Washington, DC, as Trump’s claims of presidential immunity from civil lawsuits were being litigated. It coincidently has landed before US District Judge Tanya Chutkan, the judge handling the federal election subversion charges against Trump.
But now, the case is beginning to show signs of movement.
The case could have enormous implications for this election and future ones: The voters are asking a federal judge to put Trump, his campaign and the Republican National Committee under court supervision that would require them to seek pre-approval before “engaging in any activities related to recounts, certifications, or similar post-election activities,” and to bar the defendants from intimidating voters, poll workers and other election officials.
If the plaintiffs ultimately prevail, their victory could provide them with a significant deterrence against potential intimidation and harassment of election workers and voters from Republicans as Trump and his allies signal that they will again try to undermine the results of the election.
At the heart of the lawsuit are claims by Black voters in Michigan that the defendants worked together in 2020 to unlawfully disenfranchise them and other voters in “major metropolitan areas with large Black voter populations” through “disrupting vote counting efforts, lodging groundless challenges during recounts, and attempting to block certification of election results through intimidation and coercion of election officials and volunteers.” (read more)
The Klu Klux Klan act is also being used in a civil case in Texas against several defendants accused of threatening Kamala Harris and her campaign bus. The jury is currently deliberating whether to award compensation to the plaintiffs.
DNC lawyer Marc Elias has been a key player in the use of weaponized lawfare practices to stop election integrity efforts. Both wings of the professional political UniParty in DC support maintaining the status quo where election outcomes can easily be manipulated. You do not see much opposition from Republicans in congress toward any election fraud, simply because they benefit from it.
In 1980 a generally unapproved candidate, Ronald Reagan, won the election. In response, an apoplectic democrat apparatus feared institutional changes that would disrupt a longer-term plan. The result was a legal challenge by the DNC and an eventual consent decree against the RNC forbidding them from challenging any election result. Those limitations against the republican party lasted from 1982 until 2017.
Again, in 2016 a generally unapproved candidate, Donald Trump, wins the election. The response, yet another legal challenge by activist democrats seeking yet another consent decree against the RNC and Trump campaign. If successful, any challenge to the 2024 election would have to be approved by left-wing federal courts in Washington DC.
Seeding the proactive narrative, the New York Times recently said the results from the 2024 election could be delayed for days or weeks. “For the second straight presidential election, it is becoming increasingly likely that there will be no clear and immediate winner on election night and that early returns could give a false impression of who will ultimately prevail.” [link] If that sounds like a predictive position to assist fraud, it is.
This brings me to a point that many do not quite understand. When you consider the potential for yet another consent decree limiting election challenges and contests, there is a benefit to various election integrity efforts NOT being connected directly to the RNC or Trump campaign.
Regardless of what happens in DC courts, all independent groups and election security efforts would not be covered by a consent decree against the Trump campaign and/or RNC. There is a purpose and benefit to being independent and focused on precinct level integrity issues. However, that approach does make organization difficult from the position of efficiency, tactical administration and cost.
We are hearing about a lot of ballot challenge success in advance of the 2024 election as various grassroots organizations work diligently through a process of reviewing voter rolls and challenging discoveries based on duplicate registrations, expired registrations and more significantly, fraudulent addresses.
It is very difficult, nearly impossible, to challenge a voter roll based on a name or identity of the voter. But 1,000 registrations to an empty parking lot, vacant office building, Wal Mart or post office box are easier to identify, challenge and subsequently remove. Voters just need to understand and accept the removal process is generally (depending on area) against the interests of the people responsible for maintaining fraudulent ballot printing opportunities on the voter rolls.
Intercepting fraudulently attributed ballots in advance of the opportunity for them to be printed, mailed and retrieved is a big way to stop ballot harvesting and scanning fraud. Thousands of those ballots are being intercepted and eliminated daily, this is what is currently creating much of the anxiety amid the various Kamala Harris camps. They are extremely dependent on these fraudulent voter rolls and ballots.
Do not let your heart be troubled with dark imaginings. There are really good people, grassroots earnest people unaffiliated with the RNC or Trump campaign directly, working through a process to remove fraudulent ballot opportunities. We are starting to hear a few ancillary stories about this effort, but there are many simultaneous challenges happening in a multitude of important regions – literally precinct by precinct, and within county offices for local supervisors of elections.
One of the biggest surprises to Satan this election cycle, has to be the unaffiliated organization and scale of this ballot integrity effort. The leftists are facing an army of mosquitos draining their fraudulent ballot supply. The radicals are now left swinging sledgehammer lawfare tools against quick moving mosquitos, and the Marxists are very unhappy about it.
(51) “Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. (52) From now on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against two and two against three. (53) They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.”
(54) He said to the crowd: “When you see a cloud rising in the west, immediately you say, ‘It’s going to rain,’ and it does. (55) And when the south wind blows, you say, ‘It’s going to be hot,’ and it is. (56) Hypocrites! You know how to interpret the appearance of the earth and the sky. How is it that you don’t know how to interpret this present time?”
We can all sense it. Even if we turn away to engage in busyness as a distraction, the sense will not subside.
There is a great urgency needed in our communication with our family, friends, loved ones and overall community. Do not negate your righteousness, nor diminish your instinctual value. Do not fear.
Those who speak out are targeted, ridiculed, belittled, alinsky’d and shouted down until they are proved right.
Again and again, and again, and again, we were made to watch, or to endure the crude, bullying tactics of the social playground. Reasoned debate and argument have long since gone over the hill into uncomfortable history.
Now, the next 45 days, we enter one long slugfest, in which the loudest, angriest and most effectively insulting voices will seek to win by volume alone, so often echoed by mainstream media who hold reasoned voices in contempt; apparently preferring to ridicule and diminish rather than provide genuine space for those who had simple questions in need of non-pretending answers.
However, again and again, those shouted down are revealed as having been right all along.
If you are a regular reader of this site, you are generally a person who engages in intellectual discussion on daily events and more than likely a root cause thinker. You do not pretend. Meaning, you are able to grasp events at their cause and not at their consequence.
The challenge for all of us now is getting those who understand the big picture dynamics to stop being comfortable and sticking their heads in the sand about “motive.”
Most people are still clinging to beliefs around a principle of ‘rule of law’ that applies to national leadership writ large. We need to change that thinking quickly – or we will be left explaining ‘what happened’ again, far too late.
There is also an issue with conservative “ushers” guiding their audience into a state of tactical numbness. A willful blindness within part of the American electorate, a chosen refusal to acknowledge the implications of the unAmerican and unconstititional actions we are seeing on a daily basis.
It can no longer be presumed to be a matter of, “I can’t see what’s happening”, because a whole lot of normal Americans are clean and articulate. “I can’t see it”, just doesn’t cut it.
Perhaps we see what is happening, but it’s scary and complicated and confusing. Worse still, if we admit that we can see it, we become responsible in a way that we are not if we keep pretending, we can’t see it or hear it, or maybe don’t understand it.
Be honest inside your prayers.
Are we a bit afraid that if we give up the willful blindness we will perhaps start screaming, releasing the pent-up anger, and not be able to stop?
Fear not! Do we think we have so little courage? Do we really believe that we have no resources to bring to the battle? Or nothing more to contribute to the turning of the battle? I do not believe this to be true.
I believe in all of us.
My faith is strong. I believe in righteousness. I believe in a loving and purposeful God, and I believe in our ability to win.
We cannot escape the choosing. We must not escape the choosing. Trust me when I say your resolve, while extremely important now, is going to become even more important in the next 47 days.
Whether you want to accept it or not, we are all in this battle.
Believe me – no one gets to avoid this one.
We need to get hard now.
We need to fight like we are the third monkey on the ramp to Noah’s ark,… and brother, it’s starting to rain!
.
President Donald Trump will win, because we will win.
We are having ballot challenging successes in the specific areas that count most.
We will win.
All my deepest love and appreciation for your fellowship,
Put the final coat of paint on my bath and hall ceiling where I removed the popcorn, repaired and primed the drywall.
Went to Home Depot and got a roll of roll out heavy duty floor protection and laid that down on the floor before starting the project. Works really great. Roll it out and tape the edges.
Decided to paint the walls too which has not been done yet.
Jumpin’ ju-ju bones, I think we may have found Wilbur Ross’s replacement. In this segment on CNBC Trump transition team leader Howard Lutnick, explains simple MAGAnomics to the panel. Make this guy both Commerce Secretary and Chairman of the National Economic Council in 2025!
Starting with an explanation of his role within the Trump 2025 transition team, Lutnick then walks through the MAGAnomic principles enmeshed in President Trump’s economic policies. Mr. Lutnick begins the policy part by outlining how energy restrictions are driving inflation through higher costs of goods. Yes. Yes and Yes.
Then Lutnick shifts to talking about tariffs and is one of the only advisors outside the 2017 team (Robert Lighthizer, Wilbur Ross) who factually references ending the insufferable “Marshal Plan.” Again, yes, yes and YES.
Howard Lutnick gets it. The essential core of MAGAnomics. Drive down the cost of goods through expanded energy development, then leverage reciprocity in tariffs to end the exfiltration of wealth. Then cut out regulation and unleash American enterprise. This is the way to reverse this insufferable economic trajectory that creates a “service driven economy.” The entire interview is well worth watching:
.
A bonus video below.
One video with two minutes of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump both answering the same question. Listen to both sets of answers and it is clear who factually understands what needs to be done, and who is totally clueless.
President Trump economic policy -vs- Joe Biden economic policy
When wages (blue line) are above inflation (red line) our income is growing, life is good and the working class has more disposable income to enjoy life. However, when wages (blue line) are lower than inflation (red line) our income is shrinking, life is a struggle and the working class has less disposable income to enjoy life.
♦ Point One – Nothing happens accidentally. The road to a “service-driven economy” is paved with a great disparity between financial classes. The wealth gap is directly related to the inability of the middle class to thrive.
♦ Point Two – There is nothing of value behind the obtuse term “service-driven economy.” The multinationals are paying for this administration, just like they paid the Obama administration; paying for economic policy that advances their interests. Congress goes along with the K-Street demands, because Wall Street is now the primary benefactor of legislative intent. Nothing about their effort is done with American interests in mind.
To go deep, keep reading.
♦ Point Three – Traditional Fascism was defined as an authoritarian government working hand-in-glove with corporations to achieve totalitarian objectives. A centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, using severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.
That governmental system didn’t work in the long-term because the underlying principles driving free people rejected government authoritarianism. Fascist governments collapsed, and the corporate beneficiaries were nulled and scorned. Then along came a new approach to achieve the same objective.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) was created to use the same fundamental associations of government and corporations. Only this time the corporations organized to tell the governments what to do. The WEF was organized for multinational corporations to assemble and tell the various governments how to cooperate to achieve control.
Fascism is still the underlying premise, the WEF just flipped the internal dynamic.
The assembly of the massive multinational corporations, banks and finance offices now summon the government leaders to come to their assembly and receive their instructions. Some have called this corporatism. However, the relationship between government and multinationals is just fascism essentially reversed with the government doing what the corporations tell them to do.
…A massive multinational corporate conglomerate; telling a centralized autocratic government leader what to do; and using severe economic and social regimentation as a control mechanism; combined with forcible suppression of opposition by both the corporations and government.
Then we broke the glass, hit the emergency button and called Batman.
♦ Point Four – Donald J Trump was/is a walking red-pill; a “touchstone”: a visible, empirical test or criterion for determining the quality or genuineness of anything political. I have been deep enough into the network of the Deep State to understand the scale and scope of this enemy. To think that President Trump alone could carry the burden of correcting four decades of severe corruption of all things political, without simultaneously considering the scale of the financial opposition, is naive in the extreme.
POTUS Trump was disrupting the global order of things in order to protect and preserve the shrinking interests of the U.S. He was fighting, almost single-handed, at the threshold of the abyss. Our American interests, our MAGAnomic position, was/is essentially zero-sum. His DC and Wall-Street aligned opposition (writ large) needed to repel and retain the status-quo. They desperately wanted him removed so they could return to full economic control over the U.S, because it is the foundation of their power.
Without Donald J. Trump, these entities would still be operating in the shadows. With Donald J. Trump, we can clearly see who the real enemy is.
In these economic endeavors President Trump was disrupting decades of financial schemes established to use the U.S. as a host for their endeavors. President Trump was confronting multinational corporations and the global constructs of economic systems that were put in place to the detriment of the host (USA) ie YOU. There are trillions at stake; it is all about the economics; everything else is chaff and countermeasures.
In most of the modern post-war industrial era (1950-1980), banking was a boring job and only slide rule bean counters and actuarial accountants moved into that sector of the workforce. Most people don’t like math – these were not exciting jobs. Inside the most boring division of a boring banking industry were the bond departments within the larger bank and finance companies.
The excitement was in the actual economy of Main Street business. The giants of industry created businesses, built things, manufactured products, created innovation and originated internal domestic wealth in a fast-paced real economy. Natural peaks and economic valleys, as the GDP expanded and contracted, based on internal economic factors of labor, energy, monetary policy and regulation.
Main Street generated the pool of political candidates, because the legislative conduct of politicians had more impact on Main Street. Simply, the business agents had a vested interest in political determinations.
Political candidates courted industrialists, business owners, and capitalist giants to support them. As a consequence, Main Street USA was in control of DC outcomes.
Despite the liberal talking points to the contrary, this relationship was a natural synergy of business interests and political influence. It just made sense that way, and the grown-ups were generally in charge of it.
♦ Commercial banks courted businesses because bankers needed deposits. Without deposits banks could not generate loans; without loans banks could not generate profits…. and so it was. By rule, only 10 percent of a commercial bank’s income could stem from securities.
One exception to this 10% rule was that commercial banks could underwrite government-issued bonds. Investment banks (the bond division) were entirely separate entities. The Glass-Steagall banking laws of 1932 kept it that way.
However, mid 1970’s bank regulators began issuing Glass–Steagall interpretations -that were upheld by courts- and permitted banks and their affiliates to engage in an increasing variety and amount of securities activities. After years of continual erosion of the Glass-Steagall firewall, eventually it disappeared.
This became the origin of the slow-motion explosion of investment banking. If you look back historically from today toward 1980 (ish), what you will find is this is also the ultimate fork where economic globalism began overtaking economic nationalism.
Banks could now make money, much more money, from investment divisions issuing paper financial transactions, not necessarily dependent on actual physical assets. The transactions grew exponentially.
The bond market portion ultimately led to the ’07/’08 housing collapse, and derivative trading (collateralized debt obligations or CDO’s) generated trillions of paper dollars. Long before the ’08 collapse, business schools in 1980 began calling this the second economy (a false economy, or the invisible economy).
The second economy, which ultimately became the global economy, is also the Wall Street investment economy. Two divergent economies: Wall Street (paper), and Main Street (real).
There is no real property, real capital, real tangible assets in the Wall Street economy. The false economy is based on trades and financial transactions, essentially opinions. Paper shifts, and buys and sells based on predictions and bets (derivatives).
Ford Motor Company (only chosen as a commonly known entity) has a stock valuation based on their actual company performance in the market of manufacturing and consumer purchasing of their product. However, there can be thousands of financial instruments wagering on the actual outcome of their performance.
There are two initial bets on these outcomes that form the basis for Hedge fund activity. Bet ‘A’ that Ford hits a profit number, or bet ‘B’ that they don’t. There are financial instruments created to place each wager. [The wagers form the derivatives] But it doesn’t stop there.
Additionally, more financial products are created that bet on the outcomes of the A/B bets. A secondary financial product might find two sides betting on both A outcome and B outcome.
Party C bets the “A” bet is accurate, and party D bets against the A bet. Party E bets the “B” bet is accurate, and party F bets against the B. If it stopped there, we would only have six total participants. But it doesn’t stop there, it goes on and on and on…
The outcome of the bets forms the basis for the tenuous investment markets. The important part to understand is that the investment funds are not necessarily attached to the original company stock, they are now attached to the outcome of bet(s). Hence, an inherent disconnect is created.
Subsequently, if the actual stock doesn’t meet it’s expected P-n-L outcome (if the company actually doesn’t do well), and if the financial investment was betting against the outcome, the value of the investment actually goes up. The company performance and the investment bets on the outcome of that performance are two entirely different aspects of the stock market. [Hence two metrics.]
Insurance products create an even larger subdivision within the false economy as hedgers wagered on negative outcomes. The money wagered is exponential – some say more than a quadrillion currently floats.
♦ Now you realize, in hindsight, there had to be a point where the value of the second economy (Wall Street) surpassed the value of the first economy (Main Street). Investments, and the bets therein, needed to expand outside of the USA. Hence, globalist investing.
However, a second more consequential aspect happened simultaneously.
The politicians became more valuable to the Wall Street team than the Main Street team; and Wall Street had deeper pockets because their economy was now larger.
As a consequence, Wall Street started funding political candidates and asking for legislation that benefited their interests.
When Main Street was purchasing the legislative influence the outcomes were beneficial to Main Street, and by direct attachment those outcomes also benefited the average American inside the real economy.
When Wall Street began purchasing the legislative influence, the outcomes therein became beneficial to Wall Street. Those benefits are detached from improving the livelihoods of main street Americans because the benefits are “global” needs. Global financial interests, investment interests, are now the primary filter through which the DC legislative outcomes are considered.
Democrats want power; Republicans want money. Threaten Democrats power, they get vicious. Threaten Republicans money, they get vicious. Democrats use money to get power; Republicans use power to get money. The ideology of the democrats drives their donor activity. The donor activity drives the republican ideology.
This is the core and essential difference between both wings of the DC UniParty, two wings of the same vulture. This is the truth of the thing. Underline it, put it on Post-it notes, remind yourself of this baseline in all review of both parties. This is the core motive behind everything!
♦ Commercial banks courted businesses because bankers needed deposits. Without deposits banks could not generate loans; without loans banks could not generate profits…. and so it was. By rule, only 10 percent of a commercial bank’s income could stem from securities.
