konane's Blog

Teen governor? Kansas youths take on adults in a heartland US state

The kids are rocking it!!!  Hurray!

I hope more decide to get involved with politics and innovate solutions the old guard hasn't even considered. 

Teen governor? Kansas youths take on adults in a heartland US state

"....Emboldened by the Trump era, where anything seems possible in American politics, the teens are challenging the status quo in a deeply Republican state.

"I view this as really an important opportunity to get younger people involved," Ruzich, a Republican, told AFP.

The teenage candidates are taking advantage of the fact that Kansas has no age restrictions on who can run for governor -- one candidate even jokingly suggested that a dog could get on the ballot.

The only other state with such permissive election laws, sparsely populated Vermont, in the northeast, has a 13-year-old gubernatorial candidate.

- People are 'fed up' -

Jack Bergeson, 16, was the first Kansas teen to file election papers in the spring of 2016. The novelty of it landed him on a national late-night talk show and drew the attention of news media.

By this summer, 17-year-olds Ruzich and Ethan Randleas had joined the race; Dominic Scavuzzo announced his candidacy in the fall. And last week, 16-year-old Joseph Tutera Jr. became the latest teen to seek the state's highest office.

"It's an overall good thing. People are showing that the younger generation is here to make an impact," Bergeson told AFP. ...."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-5030235/Teen-governor-Kansas-youths-adults-heartland-US-state.html

Entry #3,371

Of Course It Matters That Team Clinton Funded The Dossier

Highlighting, mine.

OF COURSE IT MATTERS THAT TEAM CLINTON FUNDED THE DOSSIER

"......My sense is that Russia was playing both sides in the 2016 presidential election. Its goal was not to influence the outcome — an achievement the Russians understood to be beyond their capability.

Rather the goal was to undermine the credibility of our democratic system and, in the words of James Comey, to “freak people out.” I advanced this theory in  a post  back in March.

The Russians have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams, thanks to the unwillingness of Hillary Clinton and her backers in the mainstream media to live with the result of last November’s presidential election."

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/10/of-course-it-matters-that-team-clinton-funded-the-dossier.php

Entry #3,370

The Week In Pictures: Happy Halloween Edition

Steven Hayward outdid himself again this week. Enjoy.  Pumpkin Green laughPumpkin

THE WEEK IN PICTURES: HAPPY HALLOWEEN EDITION

"Has there ever been a “scandal” that has backfired as bad as Trump Russiagate? Suddenly I think the Trumpsters who think he should fire special counsel Muller probably now want him to stay on the job until Hillary dons some pumpkin-colored apparel. Trump must be having a great weekend....."

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/10/the-week-in-pictures-happy-halloween-edition.php

Entry #3,368

The Arc Of Regulation, Yesterday And Today

THE ARC OF REGULATION, YESTERDAY AND TODAY

"Big things are afoot in the world of federal regulation. While the media and liberals (but I repeat. . .) obsess over Trump’s tweets and other unconventional speech acts, the Trump Administration is quietly but determinately going about the task of, in Steve Bannon’s words from February, “deconstructing the Administrative State.” Certainly they are rolling back old regulations and stopping new ones at a rate not seen since the best days of the Reagan Administration....."


http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/10/the-arc-of-regulation-yesterday-and-today.php

Entry #3,367

Why the federal government should stop spending billions on private sports stadiums

Why the federal government should stop spending billions on private sports stadiums

Source: Brookings

"When the New York Yankees completed the new Yankee Stadium in 2009, the final construction bill was an estimated $2.5 billion. Of that, nearly $1.7 billion was financed by tax-exempt municipal bonds issued by the city of New York.

Because the interest earned on the municipal bonds is exempt from federal taxes, a large amount of tax revenue that would have been collected—had the bonds been issued as taxable—went toward the construction of the stadium. In other words, the Yankees received a federal subsidy to build their stadium. How much? About $431 million. That’s a lot of money, but it gets worse.

The loss in federal tax revenues was even higher than the subsidy to the stadium. High-income taxpayers holding the bonds receive a windfall tax break, resulting in an even greater loss of revenue to the federal government. In the case of Yankee Stadium, the additional loss was $61 million. That is, the federal government subsidized the construction of Yankee Stadium to the tune of $431 million federal taxpayer dollars, and high-income bond holders received an additional $61 million.†

The Yankees, of course, aren’t the only team to finance their stadium using tax-exempt municipal bonds. Since 2000, 35 other professional sports stadiums have also been financed with tax-exempt bonds.

In “Tax-exempt municipal bonds and the financing of professional sports stadiums,” Brookings Senior Fellow Ted Gayer, Austin J. Drukker, and Alexander K. Gold quantify the federal  subsidies given to finance professional sports stadiums built or majorly renovated since 2000, and the total loss in federal tax revenue.

All together, the federal government has subsidized newly constructed or majorly renovated professional sports stadiums to the tune of $3.2 billion federal taxpayer dollars since 2000. But because high-income bond holders receive a windfall gain for holding municipal bonds, the resulting loss in total revenue to the federal government is even larger at $3.7 billion. ...."

https://www.brookings.edu/research/why-the-federal-government-should-stop-spending-billions-on-private-sports-stadiums/

Entry #3,364

Hillary Clinton Lied, Paid For "Trump Dossier"

This is rather long but recommended reading for both actions taken by certain players and timelines of those actions. 

Hillary Clinton Lied, Paid For "Trump Dossier"

Russia meddling story."

" .... Which then shifts the focus to the person who was, and again is, in charge of it all: former FBI director, and current special prosecutor Robert Mueller:

The agency,  when Mr. Mueller headed it, soft-pedaled an investigation highly embarrassing to Mrs. Clinton as well as the Obama Russia reset policy. More recently, if just one of two things is true—Russia sponsored the Trump Dossier, or Russian fake intelligence prompted Mr. Comey’s email intervention—then Russian operations, via their impact on the FBI, influenced and continue to influence our politics in a way far more consequential than any Facebook ad, the preoccupation of John McCain, who apparently cannot behold a mountain if there’s a molehill anywhere nearby.

Which means that Mr. Mueller has the means, motive and opportunity to obfuscate and distract from matters embarrassing to the FBI, while pleasing a large part of the political spectrum. He need only confine his focus to the flimsy, disingenuous but popular (with the media) accusation that the shambolic Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin.

Mr. Mueller’s tenure may not have bridged the two investigations, but James Comey’s, Rod Rosenstein’s , Andrew Weissmann’s , and Andrew McCabe’s did.  Mr. Rosenstein appointed Mr. Mueller as special counsel. Mr. Weissmann now serves on Mr. Mueller’s team. Mr. McCabe remains deputy FBI director. All were involved in the nuclear racketeering matter and the Russia meddling matter.

The punchline: it's not the Clintons that should be looked at, at least not at first - their time will come. It's the FBI:

By any normal evidentiary, probative or journalistic measure,  the big story here is the FBI—its politicized handling of Russian matters, and not competently so.  To put it bluntly, whatever its hip-pocket rationales along the way,  the FBI would not have so much to cover up now if it had not helped give us Mrs. Clinton as Democratic nominee and then, in all likelihood, inadvertently helped Mr. Trump to the presidency.

We eagerly look forward to Trump's furious tweetstorm once he learns of all of this... and how long before he fires Mueller, in this case with cause."

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-24/wapo-dnc-clinton-campaign-financed-infamous-trump-dossier

Entry #3,361

COLLUSION, CLINTON STYLE (Dossier, who paid for it)

Very short & to the point. The actual article is behind a paywall which I'm not paying to read. 

COLLUSION, CLINTON STYLE

".... The Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous dossier containing allegations about Donald Trump’s connections to Russia and possible coordination between his campaign and the Kremlin, people familiar with the matter said.

Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research. ..."

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/10/collusion-clinton-style.php

Entry #3,360

Rothschild: Donald Trump is threatening to destroy the New World Order

It's happening around the world that the New World Order is being rejected, not just here. However the US is leading the way.

Rothschild: Donald Trump is threatening to destroy the New World Order

"The Rothschilds have used their globalist media mouthpiece to declare that Donald Trump is threatening to destroy the New World Order, for good.Globalism propaganda tool and Rothschild family-owned publication, The Economist has branded the US President a “present danger” to the “New World Order,” and stated that the “internationalists” that formed it are “spinning in their graves. .....

http://www.libertyinfo.net/2017/10/14/rothschild-donald-trump-is-threatening-to-destroy-the-new-world-order/

Entry #3,357