konane's Blog

For the Record: Democrats Called For Last 4 GOP Presidents To be Impeached

For the Record: Democrats Called For Last 4 GOP Presidents To be Impeached

"While the lying mainstream makes it seem that Democrats are onto something with impeachment talk of President Trump, they fail to show that Democrats have called for the impeachment of GOP presidents in ‘81, ’83, ’84, ’91, ’04, ‘05, and ‘07. ....."

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/record-democrats-called-last-4-gop-presidents-impeached/

Entry #2,949

The Week in Pictures: Can Anyone Trump This Edition (cartoons)

If you're easily offended or triggered, don't click the link.

The Week in Pictures: Can Anyone Trump This Edition

"Another week—though it seems like a month—another turn-it-up-to-11 on the Liberal/Media Trumpomatic Outrage Meter. Can they keep this up? Yes, because it is the most congenial mode of contemporary liberalism. I think the most secure job in America right now is Keith Olbermann’s psychiatrist, or perhaps Michael Moore’s dietitian."

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/05/the-week-in-pictures-can-anyone-trump-this-edition.php

Entry #2,947

If Dems Think They Can Impeach President Trump for Nothing after He Won 30 States in 2016 They Are S

If Dems Think They Can Impeach President Trump for Nothing after He Won 30 States in 2016 They Are Sadly Mistaken

"In spite of having no grounds for impeachment, the liberals are calling for it.  Their calls for Trump’s impeachment are based on unsupported allegations that the President colluded with Russia to steal the election from Democrat Hillary Clinton.  (What a terribly sad joke!)   The Democrats’ arguments are very weak. Even Democrat attorney Alan Dershowitz states that he sees no evidence of collusion and if there was, it would not be a crime.

Liberal Democrats and their MSM somehow forget that Hillary Clinton called President-elect Trump on election night and conceded:

(video)

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/dems-think-can-impeach-president-trump-nothing-won-30-states-election-sadly-mistaken/

Entry #2,946

No, Trump did not break the law in talking classified details with the Russians

Wonder what caused them to backtrack? Blowback from legal experts who know what they're talking about maybe?

The president is essentially the ultimate arbiter of what is classified and what is not.

No, Trump did not break the law in talking classified details with the Russians

"Intelligence officials say President Trump might have damaged relations with allies, who will now be more cautious in sharing sensitive information with the United States. Democrats say he’s a hypocrite, having lambasted Hillary Clinton for her own handling of classified information. But when Trump spoke about highly classified information with Russian officials in a White House meeting last week, he did not break the law, legal analysts say.

The president is essentially the ultimate arbiter of what is classified and what is not. While the heads of particular agencies also have original classification authority — the power to deem material classified or not classified — their authority is limited to their departments and bound by their departments’ particular rules.

The president, as the head of the executive branch, knows no such restrictions — his power on the matter comes straight from the Constitution, legal analysts say. ....."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/no-trump-did-not-break-the-law-in-talking-classified-details-with-the-russians/2017/05/16/e9efd2cc-3a54-11e7-8854-21f359183e8c_story.html?utm_term=.965b05805b35

Entry #2,944