CajunWin4's Blog

MSM Realizes Obama's Fraud Bombshell

MSM Realizes Obama’s Fraud Bombshell

Monday, May 6, 2013
 

 

Before Obama’s court case before the Alabama Supreme Court people are realizing Obama’s file is empty. They’ve been tricked and they’re finding it out. It’s a hard awakening.

 

OBAMA BACKERS DESPERATE AS ELIGIBILITY CASE HEADS TO ALABAMA SUPREME COURT!

AND IT GETS EVEN MORE INTERESTING…

MORE OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATES APPEAR AND THEY ALL INDICATE FRAUD!

DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE NOW!

URGENT: Things are finally starting to fall apart for Barack Hussein Obama’s little empire building strategy these past four+ years…

Now, in the most advanced eligibility case to date, several “versions” of birth certificates for Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama have been offered – and ALL of them clearly indicate FRAUD!

DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

Even more pathetic than the ploy of introducing multiple fraudulent birth certificates, the Democratic Party, which for so long has fought to dismiss any eligibility questions about Barack Hussein Obama, is now resorting to quoting late night comedian Jimmy Kimmel in an effort to see the case in the Alabama Supreme Court DISMISSED!

You see, they are concerned that patriot Chief Justice Roy Moore, who is already on record questioning Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, will actually weigh the merits of evidence and give a FAIR HEARING on this case!

It’s too bad in the amicus brief that the hard-left party partisans just submitted in defense of Obama’s eligibility, they offered a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR BARACK OBAMA THAN THE ONE POSTED AT THE WHITE HOUSE WEBSITE AS “PROOF” OF HIS NATURAL BORN QUALIFICATIONS BACK IN 2011!

WE MUST SEIZE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO INSIST ON DUE PROCESS AND DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE ONCE AND FOR ALL!

We must make sure WE have our day in court – This could be our ONLY CHANCE FOR THE TRUTH!

HELP SHERIFF JOE AND THE COLD CASE POSSE PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES! DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

Last week, the Alabama Democratic Party filed an amicus brief insisting that the court is required to dismiss this case.

That’s where, as Freedom Outpost points out, there’s “something never before seen” on page 33.

It looks like this:

This is yet ANOTHER Barack Obama birth certificate, a version never seen before – one with HUNDRED OF LAYERS according to Adobe expert Mara Zebest.

“The fact that the document displays another permutation of the Obama birth certificate should come as no surprise. In fact, this recent variation actually proves the argument that the layers displayed in the White House PDF released as Obama’s “official” birth certificate file – are in fact – a big F***ing deal (to quote Joe Biden). This variation not only proves the point that manipulation occurred to create Obama’s PDF, but is further proof that – due to the layers – it is easy for manipulation to continue to occur.”

And then there is no raised seal WHICH MUST BE ON AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT!

We MUST counter this duplicity by the Obama supporters seeking to muddy the record on Obama’s flagrant fraud and forgery! Make sure the media and the Alabama court KNOWS America DEMANDS the truth about Obama’s eligibility for office!

DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

In a PDF copy of an e-filing by the Alabama Democrat Party in this case, the DIAMOND PATTERN IN THE “DOCUMENT PAPER” IS NOT FOUND!

THIS MUST STOP!

“Stated simply,” the brief reads, “there is absolutely nothing any Alabama court can do to change the reality of President Obama’s election to a second term in office. … No Alabama court has the authority to delve into the legality, conduct or results of that election.”

What nerve!

The Alabama court per se may not be able to “delve” into the election issues that result from a legal finding of fraud, forgery, conspiracy and/or obstruction of justice – should Obama be PROVEN INELIGIBLE, but CONGRESS CAN!

Of course, the Democrats and Obama fanatics don’t want you or anyone else to connect the dots…

The implications, the ramifications of this case are HUGE – but first we have to make sure it has its day in COURT!

Furthermore, we must keep up our support of Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Cold Case Posse as they prepare for their THIRD eligibility press conference with still MORE LEGAL EVIDENCE casting still more doubt on Barack Hussein Obama’s standing as a “natural born citizen” and hence, his compromised eligibility to be president of the United States.

HELP SHERIFF JOE AND THE COLD CASE POSSE PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES! DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

The Alabama Democrats falsely denounce the McInnish-Goode case a “baseless attack.”

Then they try to dismiss “birthers” as a “tiny cabal of zealots” – framing their defamation of our efforts with this Jimmy Kimmel quote:

“These people could have personally witnessed Obama being born out of an apple pie, in the middle of a Kansas wheat field, while Toby Keith sang the National Anthem – and they’d still think he was a Kenyan Muslim.”

Somehow a “basket weave” paper pattern magically springs forth from diamonds and THEY all unquestioningly believe it is the same, authentic document – but WE’RE the “ZEALOTS”!

That’s their position, sheer blind zealotry and devotion to the cult of Obama, because that’s all they have as they REFUSE TO FACE THE FACTS!

And, the last we checked, Jimmy Kimmel was a COMEDIAN and NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERT…

However, Chief Justice Roy Moore IS an expert on Constitutional law!

And that is exactly what they are worried about!

DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

Back in a 2010 interview with WND, Moore said he’d seen NO CONVINCING EVIDENCE that Barack Obama is in fact a “natural born citizen” while plenty of evidence has suggested that he is not.

“This is the strangest thing indeed,” he said. “The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law.”

After all, if Obama, the Alabama Democrats, or anyone or else for that matter, are so confident in the soundness of Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility, WHY FIGHT THIS CASE GOING TO COURT?

Why not let it play out on produced evidence that instead Obama has fiercely kept under lock and key, and be settled once and for all?…

BECAUSE THEY ARE SCARED OF THE TRUTH.

Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch and now head of Freedom Watch public interest legal group, filed an appeal earlier this spring with the Alabama Supreme Court asking for oral arguments in an Obama eligibility case after being dismissed by the Montgomery Circuit Court.

In his brief, Klayman says “credible evidence and information from an official source” was presented to Secretary of State Beth Chapman before the election indicating Obama might not have been qualified for Oval Office. The complaint argues she failed her constitutional duty as secretary of state to verify the eligibility of candidates despite a request to do just that – and YOUR dogged persistence is WORKING to MOVE THIS CASE FORWARD TO BE HEARD SOON IN THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT!

You see, Judge Moore – who ten years ago defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building – is openly and publicly on the record questioning Obama’s eligibility!

During an interview with WND in 2010, Judge Moore defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that Obama prove his constitutional eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment orders.

Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Barack Obama is a natural-born, and thus constitutionally eligible, citizen. In fact, he said he had seen plenty in support of the opposite!

This is the open-mindedness and the boldness that WE NEED TO WIN!

“We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND.

Klayman says he and his team “have great respect for Chief Justice Moore and his integrity and legal acumen.”

“He is one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country.”

Among those in public service lacking that kind of courage, apparently is Alabama Secretary of State Beth Chapman as well as the Deputy Secretary of State, Emily Thomson, who in Chapman’s absence on Feb. 2, 2012 let it be known that “her office would not investigate the legitimacy of any candidate,” thus violating their sworn duties of office under the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions!

HELP SHERIFF JOE AND THE COLD CASE POSSE PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES! DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

Like us, Klayman doesn’t believe this fight is over just because the ignorant masses appear to have handed Barack Obama another four years back in November:

“It would be paradoxical beyond measure if the real and grave question of the legitimacy of the de facto President, a question which lies at the very heart of our American Constitutional government, were left unresolved for want of the simplest of documents, a legitimately certified and authenticated birth certificate,” according to Klayman.

“If either a bona fide birth certificate is produced or an admission is made that it does not exist, he writes, “this most important of legal questions will have been answered, the purity of Alabama’s ballot maintained, and the anxiety of Alabama citizens stilled.”

So now as this fight finally heads to ONE COURT where JUSTICE MAY YET PREVAIL, we MUST SHOW OUR SUPPORT FOR EXPOSING THE TRUTH, and turn up the pressure on our other Secretaries of State to actually VET CANDIDATES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL and LEGAL ELIGIBILITY or like BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA find THEMSELVES headed to court!

And let’s not forget – Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Posse are right now prepping for a THIRD press conference complete with NEW EVIDENCE against Barack Hussein Obama!

HELP SHERIFF JOE AND THE COLD CASE POSSE PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES! DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

As you already know, the Cold Case Posse operates WITHOUT taxpayer dollars. In other words, the ENTIRE investigation operates on donations and volunteer hours.

Every trip taken to gather support is paid for with donations from concerned Americans like you or out of the volunteers’ own pockets. So along with your BLAST-FAX of support for the Cold Case Posse investigation to proceed to criminal complaints, and full Congressional and judicial review – you can add a contribution and we will be sending another Proof Positive donation to the Posse’s Obama eligibility investigation!

Thanks to Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Posse we have the evidence, but they still need YOUR help getting through on Capitol Hill with blast-faxes and phone calls! And you better believe, without YOUR incessant demands for an immediate congressional investigation of Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office – because over FOUR YEARS after he first took office, WE STILL DO NOT HAVE THE ANSWERS THAT AMERICA NEEDS AND DESERVES – this case will NOT have the support it needs to stand up to Obama’s stacked courts and congressional cronies!

WE MUST FORCE WASHINGTON TO LISTEN!

Whether it is through a court in Alabama, Arizona, or any other state, or as the result of a congressional hearing, the stonewalling MUST be broken through in a non-partisan review of the evidence! Because while the liberal rags will hurl baseless accusations at any dissenters, they will not do their jobs as so-called journalists! They did not do it in 2008 nor in 2012 – and nothing is going to change until we get this evidence under judicial review!

As Barack Obama moves ever closer to establishing his Marxist utopia in America, WE HAVE SHAKEN OFF THE ELECTION LOSS AND ARE 100% BACK TO WORK before America is lost down this “Hope” and “Change” slippery slope into a Euro-socialist state of no return!

We must not let America become lost to the Euro-socialist, authoritarian regime of his dreams that Barack Hussein Obama seeks to force upon us.

WE MUST MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD and OUR WILL PREVAIL before it’s too late!

AMERICA DESERVES THE WHOLE TRUTH – NOT A SHADOWY DICTATOR!

HELP SHERIFF JOE AND THE COLD CASE POSSE PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES! DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

We must instead break through the media blackout of his malfeasance, his fraud, forgery, conspiracy and obstruction of justice and turn up the pressure to file criminal charges against the Imposter-in-Chief. NOW that Obama’s outrageous gun control edicts have MORE concerned Americans paying attention and wanting to take action to check his tyrannical impulses, there is MUCH GREATER OPPORTUNITY FOR JUSTICE TO PREVAIL.

And honestly, just as our friend and colleague public-interest attorney Larry Klayman, who has been fighting eligibility based election challenges in Alabama and Florida, AND IS NOW IS APPEALING BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, issued a statement on re-inauguration day – what Alan Keyes so rightly called “forswearing day” – REFUSING to recognize Barack Hussein Obama as president of the United States, so do we! We MUST make clear day in and day out our refusal to submit to this fraud!

Each and every time we submit our petitions to our States, our Congress and to Sheriff Joe to investigate, to file a criminal complaint, and to impeach we make our voices and our dissent LOUD and CLEAR – we make headway in public and elite opinion against the Obama lies – but it’s not enough…

Barack Obama is OUT-OF-CONTROL of the Constitution, of Congress and of the American people. The election is over, and his true intentions are now unleashed upon America.

WE MUST FORCE CONGRESS TO LISTEN AND TO ACT.

HELP SHERIFF JOE AND THE COLD CASE POSSE PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES! DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

Barack Obama – the man who in state and federal courts, and in the lap-dog legacy media has STONEWALLED for FOUR LONG YEARS having to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as president of the United States – is making good on his 2008 campaign pledge to “fundamentally transform America” as he sees fit, whether it’s tax-and-spending our free nation into a Marxist society, obliterating our Second Amendment rights or handing off our sovereignty to the United Nations bit by bit.

But we can still save America if we stop Barack Hussein Obama with the irrefutable evidence unearthed by Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Posse!

Natural born citizenship is the FIRST requirement of eligibility to hold the Office of President under Article II, Section 1, Paragraph 5 of the U.S. Constitution, which states:

“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; Neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

If Barack Obama can be PROVEN a non-natural born imposter, ALL of the Executive Orders he has signed while occupying office would be NULL AND VOID – along with every other law he signed and forced on America, like ObamaCare!

Even while we are supporting Sheriff Joe against the Obama-led recall, and attorney Klayman in his appeal before Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Supreme Court of Alabama, we must compel Congress and the States to step up on the issue, take the evidence from the Posse and FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES for the systemic, systematic conspiracy and cover up by Obama and his governing faction! Obama must not be given a pass on his bold fraud to occupy the Oval Office illicitly, and allowed to solidify his Marxist putsch over our Constitution!

With the Imposter-in-Chief ALREADY imposing edicts obliterating our Second Amendment, invading foreign countries, authorizing taxes and spending, and enacting amnesty at any time he should fail to get everything he wants from Congress, there is not a single moment to lose.

If we want ANYTHING of our Constitution and Republic left intact, we must work URGENTLY to force Congress to support Sheriff Joe and the rule of law, and to move forward with criminal indictments on Barack Obama and his crew.

With all the Posse’s evidence, while true conservatives and patriots in the Congress are otherwise in retreat and stinging from Republican Establishment, inter-party betrayal – they just might find the courage to defend the Constitution and our most basic bulwark of liberty, the Second Amendment!

HELP SHERIFF JOE AND THE COLD CASE POSSE PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES! DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

With another Posse press conference on the horizon, there may be evidence of more crimes in this conspiracy that has been uncovered. So far, the Posse has reported to Sheriff Joe that TWO crimes have been committed:

1) The fraud-riddled forgery created for and characterized by the White House, knowingly or unknowingly, as an official birth record of Barack Hussein Obama;

2) The fraudulent presentation of the White House forgery as “proof positive” of Barack Obama’s authentic 1961 long form birth certificate to the residents of Maricopa County, where the investigation originated, and to the American public.

Despite the media blackout, despite the stonewalling, despite the ongoing criminal conduct and conspiracy to conceal the truth, and despite the lack of will in Congress, Obama is cornered with law enforcement expert evidence – criminal acts have been committed, and the force of justice MUST prevail.

Sheriff Joe MUST FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA for fraud, forgery, conspiracy and obstruction of justice – and present the Posse’s evidence against Obama in open court!

And the Congress MUST open investigations on the Cold Case Posse evidence immediately.

WE MUST PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF OUR GOVERNMENT!

WE MUST STOP the dereliction of duty by our elected state and federal representatives who swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America.

Similarly our States are a last stronghold of our unalienable rights, and free and fair elections. Their Governors and Secretaries of State can STILL revise their elections processes and review Obama’s election as is being done in Florida over the election fraud that affected Rep. Allen West.

State officers can at the least require forensically authenticated documents confirming Constitutional eligibility for ALL FUTURE ELECTIONS – including government agency issued original long form birth certificates, evidence of parental U.S. loyalty, legality, and citizenship status, and other necessary evidence of natural born citizenship eligibility. Otherwise, their election results are thrown in doubt as fraudulent, and the precedent being set by the Imposter-In-Chief Obama will be the beginning of the end of ordered liberty for America.

FAX SHERIFF JOE! FAX THE STATE AUTHORITIES! FAX CONGRESS!

DO NOT SURRENDER YOUR CONSTITUTION!

Shout at Congress your demand that they start upholding the Constitution! Tell them to investigate Obama’s eligibility fraud and defend Sheriff Joe and his Posse today!

HELP SHERIFF JOE AND THE COLD CASE POSSE PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES! DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE – SELECT HERE NOW! BLAST FAX THE STATES AND CONGRESS TODAY!

We must act now!

The American people are WAKING UP to Obama’s tyranny, and DESERVE THE TRUTH!

Time to file CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS and COMPEL CONGRESS TO ACT!

TELL SHERIFF JOE YOU’RE BEHIND HIM AND THE COLD CASE POSSE ALL THE WAY!

KEEP SHOUTING AT THE STATES’ AUTHORITIES AND AT CONGRESS THAT OBAMA’S TYRANNY AND DECEIT IS NOT TO BE TOLERATED!

SELECT HERE TO HELP AMERICA DEMAND PROOF POSITIVE!

Keep Faith,

The Editors Proof Positive – www.Proof-Positive.com

P.S. We have the evidence thanks to your enduring support for freedom and justice, but now an even bigger battle lies ahead: GETTING BARACK OBAMA UNDER JUDICIAL REVIEW. Please, SELECT HERE right now to bolster Sheriff Joe and the Posse with a fax – you can also make your best contribution to help re-build the Cold Case Posse Proof Positive war chest and help get their evidence in front of a criminal court AND a Congressional investigative committee!

If you prefer to send a check, please mail to: Proof-Positive National Processing Center PO Box 131728 Houston, TX 77219-1728

 

Proof-Positive is a Project of Patriot PAC Paid for by Patriot PAC Not Authorized by Any Candidate or Candidate’s Committee

   

http://sendgrid.com/wf/webmail?rp=ZTI1bGQzTnNaWFIwWlhKZmFXUTZNVEl6TkN4MWMyVnlYMmxrT2pJMU5qVTBmUWV5SnVaWGR6YkdWMGRHVnlYMmxrSWpvaU1UVXdPREF4T0NJc0ltNWxkM05zWlhSMFpYSmZkWE5sY2w5cFpDSTZNVE0zTlRJMk1qRTNOelY5

Entry #529

Rep. Issa: US Waged Possible 'Cover-Up' in Benghazi

Rep. Issa: US Waged Possible 'Cover-Up' in Benghazi

       
Image: Rep. Issa: US Waged Possible 'Cover-Up' in Benghazi 
     

            Sunday, 05 May 2013

            By Greg Richter

 
 
 
 
   
  •                  
  •            
  •        
  •    
   
                             Rep. Darrell Issa of California charged on Sunday that the  Obama administration made a political decision to deny that terrorists were  responsible for the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in  Benghazi, Libya.
"We can't find a classified reason for it. We can't  find a diplomatic reason for it," said the Republican, appearing on CBS' "Face  the Nation."
Issa’s House Oversight and Government Reform Committee  will begin hearings on Wednesday to find out whether there was a cover-up by the  Obama administration of the attack that resulted in the death of U.S. Ambassador  Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

 Gregory  Hicks, who was second in command at the Benghazi mission, will testify along  with Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant secretary for counterterrorism, and  Eric Nordstrom, diplomatic security officer and former regional security officer  in Libya.
"I thought is was a terrorist attack from the get-go," Hicks  was quoted as telling investigators. "I think everybody in the mission thought  it was a terrorist attack from the beginning."
But U.N. Ambassador Susan  Rice appeared on five Sunday morning news shows five days later blaming the  attack on a spontaneous protest that erupted after a similar protest in Egypt.  The Egyptian protest was blamed on an anti-Muslim video made in the United  States.
Prior to Rice’s appearance on "Face the Nation" at that time,  Libya's newly elected president Mohamed Magarief had just told host Bob  Schieffer that the attack was caused by terrorism.
For Rice to  immediately contradict him was a "loss of face" in his own country and  throughout the world, Hicks said. "The net impact of what has transpired is the  spokesperson of the most powerful country in the world has basically said that  the president of Libya is either a liar or doesn't know what he's talking  about.
"My jaw hit the floor as I watched this," Hicks told  investigators. "I've never been as embarrassed in my life, in my career, as on  that day. I never reported a demonstration; I reported an attack on the  consulate. Chris' last report — if you want to say his final report — is 'Greg,  we are under attack.'"
"You can't insult a foreign leader in a greater  way than happened literally here just those few days later," Issa told Schieffer  on Sunday.
That slap in the face caused Magarief to delay approval of a  request by the U.S. to put FBI investigators on the ground in Benghazi, Issa  said.
"If you tell him he's wrong, that it's not terrorism, what a  surprise that you have a hard time getting FBI to the crime scene," he said. "If  anything, we may have compromised our ability to know what really happened there  as far as catching the culprits, because more weeks went by with no FBI on the  ground."
Hicks said he was known by people in the State Department, yet  was never told Rice would appear on television and deny that an attack had taken  place. Had he known in advance, he could have told her she was wrong, he  said.
And Beth Jones, acting assistant secretary for near-eastern  affairs in the State Department didn't seem like she wanted to talk either,  Hicks recalled.
Issa called the episode a "fatal error" to the U.S.  relationship with Libya for at least a period of time. "And we can't find the  purpose."
Issa said that the reason for the possible cover-up is likely  because requests for additional security had been ignored by the State  Department. "But it does seem like it's bigger than that."
There was a  mentality, he said, that everyone had to pretend things were safe, that the war  on terror was over. That may have caused people to say it couldn't be called  terrorism, "because then the war on terror is back alive."
He said the  war on terror is very much alive, "whether it's Chechen nationals that come  here, or it's what's going on in Syria. It's al-Qaida around the world."
One of the issues Issa's committee will focus on is why talking points were  changed in the days after the attack.
State Department spokesperson  Victoria Nuland had expressed fear that the talking points would be used by  members of Congress to criticize the State Department for not paying attention  to agency warnings about the need for more security, according to Schieffer. 
"We know one thing," Issa responded. "The talking points were right,  and then the talking points were wrong."
Then-Secretary of State  Hillary Clinton should have been "on the same sheet of music with the Libyan  government," Issa said, "and she wasn't."
Hicks himself hasn't been  given access to the classified report, Issa said, so his assertions that the  report is wrong are based on the public report.
Issa called the State  Department's probe "questionable" in that it clearly meets the statutory  requirement to do an investigation, but "it doesn't answer any real questions,  or place blame on people who were involved in this failure."
He  described the effort by the Obama administration "a misinformation campaign at  best, and a cover-up at worst."

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com  http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/RepIssa-Cover-Up-Benghazi/2013/05/05/id/502828?s=al&promo_code=13607-1#ixzz2ST2cHXEY Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

Entry #528

Whites attacked by blacks for walking 'What you got in your pockets, crackers? This is our street'

Whites attacked by blacks for walking

'What you got in your pockets, crackers? This is our  street'

Published:  4 hours ago

       
Shotgun

When a black mob attacked two reporters in Norfolk, Va., last year, the  editor of the Virginian-Pilot newspaper said it was just a “street altercation”  and he had no proof of racial motivation.

But even the most diehard denier of the epidemic of black mob violence around  the country will find this case difficult to explain away: Three white men in  Georgia were allegedly robbed and assaulted and almost killed in April by a  group of black people, all because of the color of their skin.

 

At least that is what the victims told the local sheriff.

Most examples of black mob violence are not that neat. Reporters say they  want some kind of written statement or spoken account from the perpetrators  professing their racial animosity.

Absent that, they say even a tidal wave of evidence of mob violence committed  almost exclusively by black people around the country does not show race had  anything to do with anything. But thanks to WND readers, there is this:

In  Virginia Beach last week, 40,000 black people rampaged through the  Oceanfront at a gathering organized by black promoters, marketed to black  schools and attended by people in buses from black fraternities. Everyone  involved in the violence and lawlessness was black. The videos and eyewitness  accounts and a subsequent town hall meeting remove any doubt about that.

This racial violence was just one of more than 500 episodes documented in “White  Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Racial Violence and How the Media Ignore  It.”

WND reader Carol Finnegan asked some reporters whether they had heard about  this “race  riot.” They were kind enough to be honest with her.

“Relax. It was a Spring Break riot,” said Seattle writer Geov Parrish. “Ask  the beach towns in Florida how often stuff like this happens with drunk white  students. (Answer: a lot.) The problem here isn’t race. It’s young adults with  too much alcohol, and too many people encouraging such civic ‘parties’ because  lots of money gets spent. It’s disgusting behavior no matter where it happens  and who the crowd happens to include.”

Another journalist, who only identified himself as Michael from Analog  Planet, had it all figured out.

“Race riot? Really? Sounds to me like some bad kids acting out. Sounds like  you want to turn it into a ‘race riot.’ NBC covered it so why the right wing  racist paranoia? Oh, right. Meanwhile it was about 150 bad kids out of  30-40,000. You’re tired. On to new things, like fag bashing (etc.)”

Casey Seiler, a reporter at the Times-Union of Albany, also told Finnegan  race had nothing to do with it: “A riot made up primarily of black people  wouldn’t be a ‘race riot’ any more than a post-championship riot at Penn State  made up primarily of white people would be a ‘race riot.’”

Though curiously, these reporters and others never include videoed accounts  of the riots they are referring to.

A reporter from the CBS affiliate in St. Louis said much the same thing: “The  40,000 are never described as all black but described as being mostly from black  colleges,” said Carol Daniel. “No one is hiding anything.”

The problem is not that people are hiding things. But that some people are  not looking.

Just as occasionally a reporter will be honest about his ideas, so will  criminals. For  this we have to thank John Fitzgerald Willis.

Willis lives with his fiancee and his mother in a town outside of Atlanta  called Austell. Last month, he and his fiancee were partying with some friends  when three white guys popped out of the nearby bushes and started walking up the  road.

Says the Douglas County Sentinel: “Three Caucasian males came walking up the  street, and Mr. Willis and his girlfriend began hollering at the men.”

The  men told WSBTV “they were yelling, ‘this is our street, crackers. What you  got in your pockets, crackers? This is our street.’”

It is not known how many people were at the party. But statements say Willis  had a gun and he used it to pistol whip the men. The Sentinel reported “the  statements were racial and that escalated and led Willis to attack the group.  They were all left with visible injuries. In the process he did rob the men,  taking the cell phones, wallets and keys and the items mentioned in the  warrant.”

Sgt. John Sweat of the local sheriff’s department said the men were lucky  they did not get killed.

Willis’ girlfriend said her boyfriend did not commit the crime and it was a  case of mistaken identity.

They found him at home, asleep on the couch, sleeping with a loaded  police-style 12  gauge shotgun, said the Sentinel.

He was charged with three counts of of robbery and assault and denied bail.  Georgia does not have a hate crime law.

See several reports:

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/whites-attacked-by-blacks-for-walking/#j2fcsjx22zIVwxdX.99

Entry #527

Obama's Disturbing Man-Boy Poem Pederasty In The White House.

Obama’s Disturbing Man-Boy Poem Pederasty In The White House.

Saturday, May 4, 2013
 

 

THIS IS THE END. SPREAD THIS GREAT NEWS AND BE SAVED IN HEAVEN.

Obama’s famous poem about pederast love with a man-boy relationship in which the famous words ‘amber stain’ are found. It’s here the driving “Pop takes another shot, neat, Points out the same amber Stain on his shorts that I’ve got on mine, and Makes me smell his smell, coming From me;” paragraph is found which is hair-raising and rivetting. For a US president to write this is unexplainable, unforgiveable and a simple piece of garbage. Reveal this everywhere to the whole world: the US president is a pederast, an abomination and a homosexual (described as filthy in the Bible aka “Abomination”. The Antichrist is described as “The Abomination” see Antichrist-video after the article.). Revealing this is saving the world from evil in it’s purest form, in the person of Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama’s disturbing poem on man-boy relationship

 

When Barack Obama was a 19-year-old student at Occidental College, he published two poems in the Spring 1982 issue of Occidental’s literary magazine, Feast. One is the cringe-worthy “Underground” about “apes that eat figs.” The other poem, “Pop,” is much more interesting, biographical, and disturbing.

“Pop”

Sitting in his seat, a seat broad and broken In, sprinkled with ashes, Pop switches channels, takes another Shot of Seagrams, neat, and asks What to do with me, a green young man Who fails to consider the Flim and flam of the world, since Things have been easy for me; I stare hard at his face, a stare That deflects off his brow; I’m sure he’s unaware of his Dark, watery eyes, that Glance in different directions, And his slow, unwelcome twitches, Fail to pass. I listen, nod, Listen, open, till I cling to his pale, Beige T-shirt, yelling, Yelling in his ears, that hang With heavy lobes, but he’s still telling His joke, so I ask why He’s so unhappy, to which he replies… But I don’t care anymore, cause He took too <snip> long, and from Under my seat, I pull out the Mirror I’ve been saving; I’m laughing, Laughing loud, the blood rushing from his face To mine, as he grows small, A spot in my brain, something That may be squeezed out, like a Watermelon seed between Two fingers. Pop takes another shot, neat, Points out the same amber Stain on his shorts that I’ve got on mine, and Makes me smell his smell, coming From me; he switches channels, recites an old poem He wrote before his mother died, Stands, shouts, and asks For a hug, as I shrink, my Arms barely reaching around His thick, oily neck, and his broad back; ‘cause I see my face, framed within Pop’s black-framed glasses And know he’s laughing too.

The poem reads autobiographical — about a young Obama’s relationship with a much older man whom he calls Pop. In his article for WND on March 7, 2012, Dr. Jack Cashill singles out this passage from the poem:

“Pop takes another shot, neat/ Points out the same amber/ Stain on his shorts that I’ve got on mine, and/ Makes me smell his smell, coming/ From me;”

Cashill writes that the most innocent explanation for the “amber stain” on the shorts of Pop and young Obama or “his smell, coming/ From me” is that Pop got the teenaged Obama drunk, and they both spilled whiskey (Seagrams) on themselves. But that interpretation does not explain why the spill is specifically on their shorts and not on their shirts or how Pop’s smell is also on (“from”) Obama.

A marriage and family therapist who blogs under the tag “Neo-Neocon” senses a darker relationship. She writes:

The lines that begin ‘points out the same amber stain…Makes me smell his smell, coming/?From me’ may be describing outright sexual abuse. But perhaps not; we don’t know, and we’ll never know. But there is no question that the poem is describing a boundary violation on several levels: this child feels invaded—perhaps even taken over—by this man, and is fighting against that sensation.

[...] The poem describes a boundary violation that is both physical and mental. The physical is obvious: he is forced to hug the man who repels him, and as he does so he feels himself shrinking. But the violation is mental, too; earlier in the poem, Obama has described “Pop” as a person who has actually gotten into his brain, and whom he wishes to eliminate from it:

as he grows small,? A spot in my brain, something? That may be squeezed out, like a ? Watermelon seed between? Two fingers.

This mental and emotional usurpation of the young Obama is echoed in the last image of the poem, in which the boy sees his own tiny image framed in ‘Pop’s’ eyeglasses.? The poem describes a struggle against an attempt at identity takeover, a rejection of being reduced to a reflection in the eyes of the stronger, older, more experienced mentor, who has tried to make Obama over in his own image:

I see my face, framed within Pop’s black-framed glasses?…

The sight is chilling to Obama, who is trying to break free. One wonders if he ever fully succeeded.”

So who was Pop?

There were two older men in teen Obama’s life:

1. His maternal grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham, with whom Obama had lived from age 10 to 18 in Honolulu. When Obama was ten years old, his mom, Stanley Ann Dunham, had sent him back to Hawaii to live with her parents while she remained in Indonesia.

2. Frank Marshall Davis, a black long-time friend of Stanley Armour Dunham, whom Dunham had introduced to young Obama to be the latter’s African-American mentor. Davis was a member of the American Communist Party, a writer of poetry and books, including the pornographic novel, Sex Rebel: Black, using the pseudonym “Bob Greene.” Cashill states that there is no doubt Davis wrote Sex Rebel because Davis admitted as much in his memoir, Livin’ the Blues: “I could not then truthfully deny that this book, which came out in 1968 as a Greenleaf Classic, was mine.”

During the presidential campaign season in 2008, I read Sex Rebel, which is out of print, by borrowing the book from the library of the University of California, Berkeley. I therefore can testify from having read the book that Sex Rebel is an account of the unorthodox sexual exploits of a black man “Bob Greene”. Those sexual exploits included marrying a white woman (just as Davis himself did, which was uncommon in the 1960s); “swinging” or wife-swapping with other couples; picking up prospective couples in public parks; sexual orgies; voyeurism; exhibitionism; bisexualism (Greene wrote that “under certain circumstances I am bisexual”); and the seduction by “Greene” and his white wife of a 13-year-old girl named Anne.

(It is the pedophilia that has prompted increasing speculation on the net that “Anne” was actually Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother; and that Frank Marshall Davis had sired Obama. That’s the reason why Obama conceals his birth certificate. This is the subject of a documentary movie that will come out this summer. For more information, go here.)

Joel Gilbert, the maker of the documentary “Dreams From My Real Father,” has uncovered handwritten letters by Davis to Margaret Burroughs, the well-known African-American artist, in which Davis refers to his book “Sex Rebel: Black” as his “thoroughly erotic autobiography.” Davis had a sexual affair with Burroughs which, Davis explains, was included in the novel autobiography. [Read more, here.]

In the introduction to Sex Rebel, an alleged Ph.D. named Dale Gordon goes further. He describes the pseudonymous author, Bob Greene, as having “strong homosexual tendencies in his personality.”

There are those, like Rebecca Mead of The New Yorker, who say “Pop” is a “loving if slightly jaded portrait of Obama’s maternal grandfather.”

But both Jack Cashill and Neo-Neocon point out that Obama, in his memoir Dreams From My Father, called Stanley Armour Dunham not “Pop” but “Gramps.”

There are other reasons pointing to Frank Marshall Davis as “Pop”:

1. “Pop” wrote poetry: Dunham was a life-long furniture salesman whose literary efforts, if any, were confined to making up dirty limericks. In contrast, Davis had written several books of poetry — Black Man’s Verse (1935), I Am the American Negro (1937), Through Sepia Eyes (1938), 47th Street (1948), Awakening and Other Poems (1978).

2. A line in Obama’s poem “he switches channels, recites an old poem/ He wrote before his mother died” also points to Davis as “Pop”. Dunham’s mother died when he was 8 years old, whereas Davis’ mother died when he was 20 and already established as a poet of promise.

3. In his memoir Dreams From My Father, Obama’s description of a seedy and dissipated older man named Frank is strikingly similar to “Pop” in his poem:

“…by the time I met Frank [Obama was around nine years old] he must have been pushing eighty, with a big dewlapped face and an ill-kempt gray Afro that made him look like an old, shaggy-maned lion. He would read us his poetry whenever we stopped by his house, sharing whiskey with gramps out of an emptied jelly jar. As the night wore on, the two of them would solicit my help in composing dirty limericks. Eventually, the conservation would turn to laments about women.

“They’ll drive you to drink, boy,” Frank would tell me soberly. “And if you let ‘em, they’ll drive you into your grave.”

I was intrigued by the old Frank, with his books and whiskey breath and the hint of hard-earned knowledge behind the hooded eyes. The visits to his house always left me feeling vaguely uncomfortable, though, as if I were witnessing some complicated, unspoken transaction between the two men, a transaction I couldn’t fully understand….”

4. Davis fits the “seedy old man” description more than Dunham: Born in 1905, Davis was 56 years older than Obama and would be 66 years old when Obama was ten. Born in 1918, Dunham was 43 years older than Obama and would be a youngish 53 years old when Obama was ten.

Here are some photos I’ve found of Stanley Armour Dunham and Frank Marshall Davis. Decide for yourself which man better fits the physical description of Pop in Obama’s poem: “dark watery eyes”; “ears that hang with heavy lobes”; “thick, oily neck”; “broad back”; “black-framed glasses”.

Stanley Armour Dunham with child Obama (l); Dunham with 19-year-old Obama (r)

Frank Marshall Davis as a young man (l); as an old man (r)

Whether Pop was Davis or Dunham, this much is certain: His relationship with young Obama, as the latter described it in the poem “Pop,” was creepy and disturbingly suggestive of pederasty.

~Eowyn

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/05/01/does-this-obama-poem-sound-man-boy-gay-to-you/

Obama’s the “disgusting” (by the Bible) Antichrist-Abomination; meaning a homosexual. It’s clear he’s the Antichrist by the number 666 being drawn in the Illinois Lottery the day after Obama’s election because Obama’s from Chicago Illinois.

That lottery draw was in his own city and everybody there saw it drawn live on TV and on radios and published throughout the media, everywhere. Chicago’s Lottery is played in the four states surrounding Illinois, so everybody throughout the five Great Lakes’ States (Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, Indiana – Illinois), knew the Antichrist was elected to the Oval Office. More than 50 million people knew – and know today – that the Antichrist is in Washington, DC. See this in the video. Illinois Lottery drew 666 the day after Obama’s election.

Obama – The Lottery and 666 – You have GOT TO SEE THIS! What are the CHANCES?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpBfS5FWVWI

Report abuse

Entry #526

DHS Whistleblower Censored From 60 Minutes, Uncensored Version Here! (Video)

DHS Whistleblower Censored From 60 Minutes, Uncensored Version Here! (Video)

Friday, May 3, 2013 4:31
 
 

 

To answer some of those questions, you seriously want to watch this. Once this gal starts talking you won’t stop listening.

The worst part is the obvious control of the media. You will not hear this on cbs, nbc, abc, cnn, or msm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=feHbP4k_tdk

 

When the government acts beyond the law, like in the recent Fast and Furious, don’t “we the people” have a right to ask questions of our government?

Is asking questions of your government a crime?

Why is the government now labeling people anti government just because they ask legitimate question, on specific issues to hold the government responsible?

Now in Florida they are asking citizens to turn people into Law Enforcement if a person appears to be anti-government, why?

What is the definition anti- government?

To answer some of those questions, you will want to watch this. Once this gal starts talking you won’t stop listening.

Critical Reads: More News Mainstream Media Chooses To Ignore By Josey Wales, Click Here!

(Locked)
Entry #525

THREE Birth Certificates Now Linked to Obama Eligibility Case Appeal in AL Supreme Court

THREE Birth Certificates Now Linked to Obama Eligibility Case Appeal in AL Supreme Court

Tuesday, April 30, 2013
 

 

… And ALL from Democrats.  Whether you believe that Obama is a total fraud or not, here's a story of dizzying fraud and contradiction.  Many people think the long-simmering Obama eligibility issue was settled with the release of the whitehouse.gov digital birth certificate in 2011, to the chagrin of Donald Trump. Even many who didn't thought it was settled after that in the courts, or certainly by the election. They would be wrong, as several cases are being fought out in the shadows. It is clear that the establishment does NOT want this to go any further and are using their levers of power, via courts, Congress, media, to put the kebosh on it.

But, it's like squeezing a toothpaste tube, as there are so many inconvenient truths to manipulate, hide or distort.  Well, one case, McInnish/Goode v Chapman in AL, was appealed to what might be a sympathetic court way down South in Dixie. Alabama, in fact. Must be “racist,” right? Well, no, since multiple cases have already been dismissed. But, one found its way to the AL Supreme Court, via an appeal, with the help of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch USA Founder attorney Larry Klayman.  Larry dutifully included evidence, including the latest “birth certificate” at the time, which had been placed on the whitehouse.gov web site by the “Obama” forces. Incredibly, two more versions have been recently made public by “Obama” allies in recent days. Now, there are THREE versions, all apparently invalid. As far as we know at this time, an actual certified hard copy, which is the standard of legal proof,  has NOT been submitted, nor has one ever been submitted to any court hearing an eligibility proceeding. You can't make up stuff like this.  We can't wait for the hearing.

Here we go:

Plaintiffs’ counsel Larry Klayman submitted the 4-27-11 Obama forgery from whitehouse.gov, Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group fed a second bogus one to the world. Now, birtherreport.com/ORYR  has outed still another one from the Democrats, which they supposedly submitted to the court. How can these obot idiots expect anyone to take them seriously?  This is sooooo ridiculous. Well, so far, MSM has and so have many sheeple. Even those who believe Obama is a fraud think nothing will be done. Let’s show ‘em they”re wrong. Get the word out- raise HELL!  This is good reporting, guy!

 

Eligibility case in Alabama has Barack Obama Long Form 
Birth Certificate filed with the court with new problems arising

The three different copies obtained are:

1. The PDF copy posted by the obot Jack Ryan (Fogbow) shows a completely different background with a diamond pattern (pg 33) and it opens up with hundreds of layers. This poses numerous problems to be discussed later however the issue of greatest significance is the fact that the document is not secure and can be altered by anybody.

We asked Adobe expert Mara Zebest for her opinion on the Fogbow version and here is her response:

“The fact that the document displays another permutation of the Obama birth certificate should come as no surprise. In fact, this recent variation actually proves the argument that the layers displayed in the White House PDF released as Obama’s “official” birth certificate file — are in fact – a big F***ing deal (to quote Joe Biden). This variation not only proves the point that manipulation occurred to create Obama’s PDF, but is further proof that – due to the layers – it is easy for manipulation to continue to occur.” — This here is for Obot eyes. 

 

Additionally, the Fogbow copy does not have a raised seal which is required to be official.

2. The PDF copy e-filed by the Alabama Democratic Party with the Alabama Supreme Court was obtained by Birther Report. The diamond pattern is not found on this e-filing. Pixel Patriot analysis reveals the security paper background extended on the right side farther than the visible area of the PDF copy (clipped/masked version) posted on the White House servers on April 27th, 2011.

McInnish v Chapman - Obama Birth Certificate - Alabama Democratic Party Amicus Brief - Pg 33 - Exhibit B – 4/23/2013

The significance is that there can’t be more from a copy than an original.

3. Pixel Patriot has obtained a certified copy from the Alabama Supreme Court of the Amicus Curiae brief filed by the Alabama DemocraticParty. More to come…

Embedded below is the actual e-filing obtained from the Alabama Democratic Party‘s attorney: FLASHBACK: AL Supreme Court: Serious Questions About Authenticity of Obama’s Birth Certificates - DETAILS HERE.

Entry #524

Explosive Report Contradicts the Obama Administration's Benghazi Story in a Big Way

Government

Explosive Report Contradicts the Obama Administration’s Benghazi Story in a Big Way

Apr. 29, 2013 9:07pm Jason Howerton
Explosive Report: Forces Were Available to Help Americans Under Attack in Benghazi

A man walks near a charred vehicle at the entrance of the U.S. Conulate, in Benghazi, Libya, Saturday, Feb. 16, 2013. The deadly Sept. 11 attack on the consulate killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. Credit: AP

The U.S. government had the ability to “react and respond” to the Benghazi terrorist attack and could have had forces on the ground before the second wave of the assault began, a special operator with knowledge of the response told Fox News in an exclusive interview. Due to the explosive nature of his allegations, the special ops member asked to remain anonymous.

“I know for a fact that C 110 the UComm CIF was doing a training exercise, not in the region of northern Africa, but in Europe. And they had the ability to react and respond,” he told Fox News.

The C 110 is a 40-man Special Ops force capable of rapid response and deployment, a group trained specifically for an event like the Benghazi attack, Fox News reports. The unit was training in Croatia on Sept. 11, 2012, just 3.5 hours away from Benghazi.

“They would have been there before the second attack,” the anonymous special operator said. “They would have been there at a minimum to provide a quick reaction force that could facilitate their exfil out of the problem situation.”

He continued: “Nobody knew how it was going to develop, and you hear a whole bunch of people and a whole bunch of advisors say, ‘Hey, we wouldn’t have sent them there because the security was unknown situation.’ If it’s an unknown situation, at a minimum you send forces there to facilitate the exfil or medical injuries. We could have sent a C 130 to Benghazi to provide medical evacuation for the injured.”

The special operator said there are members of special ops and other officials who are still active and involved in the situation. “They would be decapitated if they came forward with information that could affect high-level commanders,” he added.

While he says he doesn’t “blame them for not coming forward,” the special operator said members of the community feel betrayed and believe the betrayal goes all the way to the top. Further, the Special Ops community feels like the Americans in Benghazi were left to fend for themselves.

The White House has said from the beginning that there were no forces available to assist Americans in Benghazi on Sept. 11. Four Americans were killed in the attack on the U.S. compound, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, State Department worker Sean Smith and former U.S. Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

Watch the exclusive segment via Fox News/WFB :

Entry #523

What The Hell Just Happened? 'Tyranny By Executive Order' | by Constitutional Attorney Michael Conne

What The Hell Just Happened? ‘Tyranny By Executive Order’ | by Constitutional Attorney Michael Connelly, J.D.

Monday, April 29, 2013
 

 

What the hell just happened? That is the question that many Americans should be asking themselves following the news conference where Obama unveiled his plan for destroying the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. At first glance it appeared to be a case of Obama shamelessly using the deaths of innocents, and some live children as a backdrop, to push for the passage of radical gun control measures by Congress. Most of these have no chance of passing, yet, Obama’s signing of Executive orders initiating 23 so called Executive actions on gun control seemed like an afterthought.

Unfortunately, that is the real story, but it is generally being overlooked. The fact is that with a few strokes of his pen Obama set up the mechanisms he will personally use to not only destroy the Second Amendment to the Constitution, but also the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. It will not matter what Congress does, Obama can and will act on his own, using these Executive actions, and will be violating both the Constitution and his oath of office when he does it.

Here are the sections of the Executive Order that he will use:

“1. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background-check system.”

What exactly is relevant data? Does it include our medical records obtained through Obamacare, our tax returns, our political affiliations, our military background, and our credit history? I suggest that all of the above, even if it violates our fourth Amendment right to privacy will now be relevant data for determining if we are allowed to purchase a firearm.

“2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background-check system.”

This should be read in conjunction with section 16 of the order that says:

“16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.”

One of the few amendments successfully placed in Obamacare by conservatives does appear to prohibit doctors from asking such questions. Yet, with these two Executive actions, Obama is illegally amending an act of Congress and setting up a procedure for him to force doctors to gain information from patients about gun ownership, and to get our medical history.

Section 3 of Obama’s order states:

“3. Improve incentives for states to share information with the background- check system.”

Once again, what does this mean? What information does the Federal government want from the states? Copies of state personal and business income tax returns or court records of divorce and child custody cases are possibilities that come to mind as well as our voter registrations showing our party affiliations. How does any of this figure into our right to purchase a firearm?

One of the most dangerous and troubling sections of the Obama order in Section 4 that states:

“4. Direct the attorney general to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.”

This section directs Eric Holder, the architect of Operation Fast and Furious that illegally transferred several thousand semi automatic weapons to Mexican drug cartels and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of Mexican citizens and several U.S. border patrol agents, to now add people indiscriminately to the list of Americans ineligible to purchase firearms. Who might be added to the list?

Well, let’s look at the record of the Obama administration. Shortly after being appointed as the Director of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano sent a list of potential domestic terrorists to law enforcement agencies around the country. The list included individuals who were pro-life, who supported the Second Amendment, who had Ron Paul bumper stickers on their cars, and most disturbing, all members of the military returning from combat in Iraq or Afghanistan.

 

 

The list has recently been supplemented to include individuals who hoard more than a week’s supply of food and water, and those who support individual liberties and oppose big government. I belong on most of these lists and I suspect that Eric Holder will be adding all of us to the list of dangerous people not qualified to own guns. In other words, you will no longer have to be a convicted felon or mentally ill to make the list; you will qualify simply by being an American patriot.

This is not a conspiracy theory, at the United States Justice Foundation we are seeing increasing evidence that military veterans are being specifically targeted by the Obama administration when it comes to prohibitions against purchasing firearms. Any veteran diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is in danger of being banned from owning a firearm. Even those veterans suffering from mild depression are being added. None of these conditions constitute a mental illness that makes them a danger to themselves or others.

However, in Obamaland veterans who took an oath to “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”, are definitely considered a threat to the new Fuehrer and must not be allowed to own firearms.

If we skip to Section 6 of the order we get a good idea of Obama’s real intentions when it comes to gun control. That sections states:

“6. Publish a letter from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers.”

This is particularly interesting because one of the legislative proposals is to require universal background check requirements for any firearm transfer even between private citizens. In other words, you can’t sell your firearm or even give it to someone s a gift without Federal government approval. It is doubtful that this proposal will pass in the House of Representatives, yet Obama is already setting up the mechanism for enforcing the requirement. That is a clear signal that he doesn’t care what Congress does, he is going to violate the Constitution and bypass the Legislative branch in order to push his agenda to disarm the American people. I suspect he will ultimately use Executive orders to ban many weapons including most rifles and pistols.

There are numerous other actions dictated in the Obama order, but I think you get the idea. Our Second Amendment right is going to be taken from us for whatever reasons Obama decides. The simple act of opposing these actions can cause the Attorney General to place you on the list of “dangerous people”. Our privacy will be violated and all of this will be done without due process of law. That is what just happened.

Source: 

http://redflagnews.com/headlines/tyranny-by-executive-order-by-constitutional-attorney-michael-connelly-jd

Entry #522

Obama Is A False Flag Event

OBAMA IS A FALSE FLAG EVENT

 

By            Dr. Laurie Roth         

This           week I faced the fear that had kept me from covering the growing and           endless questions surrounding the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting           December 15th, 2012. Like so many, I wouldn’t dream of hurting           the grieving parents and family members of all the murdered children           by asking what would be perceived and seen as ‘tin helmet’            questions. To openly declare my suspicions would be over the line…or           would it?

Sandy           Hook appears to be a false flag event

Even           big dog, Glenn Beck and the Blaze, took on the Sandy Hook shooting back           in January 2013. In           his article, Beck attempted to refute every question rolling around           on the Internet. He didn’t answer my questions, nor has any other           media. With all due respect for Glenn Beck who has shown great courage           at times, he was wrong on calling those who question Obama’s missing           birth certificate and lack of Constitutional status to be President           as ‘birthers’. He was just as wrong in calling those who           notice the endless discrepancies with the “Sandy Hook event”            as ‘truthers’. Shame on you Beck. You know better.

On           4-22-2013, investigative Journalist and regular on my national radio           show, Sher Zieve, did a 2-hour special on this subject and looked at           real questions that Glenn Beck and the media have simply not answered.           If you want to listen to the special, go to www.therothshow.com,           and click on archives, hour 1 and 2 -- 4-22-2013. You look at the facts           and make up your own mind. If there is a real problem with this event           however, also have the courage to ask “what does this mean and           who could be behind this and why?”

Just           a few verified facts you might not have known

CNN           claimed in their coverage that 20 year old Adam Lanza marched into the           Sandy Hook elementary school, December 15th, 2012 and in only 5 minutes,           shot and murdered 26 people…20 children and 6 adults, then shot           himself.

He           swiped legally owned guns from his Mom, Nancy Lanza who Adam lived with.           She was found in her bed dead from a gunshot wound to her head. The           rifle was found on the floor close to her. We have assumed Adam murdered           her.

The           Daily Mail stated the police found at the school the following guns           Adam Lanza possessed.

1           Bushmaster .223 caliber model XM15 rifle with a 30-round magazine           1 Glock 10 mm handgun           1 9mSig Sauer P226 handgun           1 Saiga 12 shotgun with two magazines containing 70 rounds           6 30-round magazines, three of them emptied

Questions           that don’t add up

Adam           Lanza was a 120 pound punk. To carry in long guns, pistols and 6 30-round           magazines would be massively awkward and heavy for anyone. Then to murder           26 people in just 5 minutes with only 2 injured doesn’t pass the           laugh test with me and other criminologists and military sources I talked           with. A criminologist           did a statistical analysis based on 30 years of mass shootings and concluded           that there would be a 1 in 2000 chance for this shooting to have occurred           like it did.

Was           it even possible? Military trained specialists would have trouble carrying           all this stuff. Then, like timed magic Adam pulled off a shot every           2 seconds without a jam. People drop things and guns jam. Instead, Adam’s           performance was like a high-level military expert and trained assassin           with no delays or mistakes. Hmmmm

 

Gun           control agenda in play

In           the days that followed Obama and the leftist media were all over the           alleged assault weapon, which supposedly mowed down everyone at the           school. Obama, Feinstein and the progressive media wasted no time in           attacking the assault weapons. The message was that anyone who had or           wanted an assault weapon didn’t want school safety and apparently           didn’t love kids. There was only one teensy weensy problem with           the endless and swift attacks on the assault weapon. The assault weapon           never left Adam Lanza’s car trunk. Video evidence, viewed the           next day shows what looks like a shotgun, not the assault weapon in           the school. Never mind about the facts though, Obama is on a hurried           mission to take assault weapons from the people.

The           idiot lectures and distortion grew from Biden, Obama and his whores.           You must remember the absurd comments about women avoiding a rape by           just crying. “They don’t need a gun….cry and apparently           the rapist will just run away.” Maybe the rapest would run to           the church and repent.

Another           Obama operative stated that women don’t need guns to stop rape.           They just need to tell men to stop raping women. What a relief! Let’s           quickly tell the millions of Islamic radicals to stop attacking and           killing anyone who is considered an infidel. I’m sure we can reason           with them and have a coffee.

Going           up the totem pole of Obama absurdity is Rep. Joe Salazar (D-Colo.) He           boldly stated that even women at risk for being raped, shouldn’t           be able to own or have a gun. What they need is a ‘call box’            or ‘whistle’. Those are the protective choices that will           save lives.

Wisdom           I learned from Obama and his goons about avoiding rape

Run           to the call box or blow your whistle. Cry and cry. If that doesn’t           stop the rapist, just tell him not to rape you.

With           a potential rapist, I prefer my plan. 18 years ago a rapist broke into           a big home I was leasing with some other roommates. I had been following           the news about a rapist lose in the section of Portland OR I lived in           and what his MO was to get into houses. I was chilled to the bone watching           this on the news day after day. Shockingly, one morning, I heard my           roommate down stares at the back door with a strange guy asking for           $5 to fix his flat tire…just like the news had said the rapist           was saying. I ran up the stairs and got my 45 and slammed the clip into           it. As I was coming back down the stairs there he was coming up the           stairs. My naive and sweet roommate had run off to get him money. He           froze in place about 20 feet down the sair case from me and I pointed           my gun at him with a cold look from hell. Neither of us said anything.           60 seconds later he bolted and ran out of the house. The cops eventually           caught this serial rapist and that day none of us were raped at my house.           Why, because I blew a whistle? NO; Because I cried? NO; Because I told           him not to rape me…NO; Because I had a Bible study with him…NO;           Because I pointed a 45 pistol at his head and was prepared to shoot           to kill if he took another step…YES.

The           push for Obama gun control came as an organized and planned tsunami           through the media and congress with barely a quick breath after the           shooting. It was as if this event and the following attack on assault           weapons, magazine size and other weapons was planned -- Bills slammed           through congress, endless photo shoots with ‘grieving parents’            and children with Obama.

Photos           of children with Obama and other mystery photos

How           is it that a 6-year-old girl named Emilie was reportedly killed at Sandy           Hook, and then two days later after she died she was seen in a photo           with Obama and several other children? Perhaps she was a modern day            ‘zombie’ that rises from the dead and haunts people.

Then           there was the hideous photo of laid out bodies and ambulances, covered           by ABC news and others. Just a small problem however. That photo was           verified to be from a yacht explosion as Sher Zieve discovered and pointed           out on my show. It has nothing to do with the Sandy Hook event. Check           out photos and strange appearances back from the dead yourself.

Helpful           and empathetic bystander, Jean Rosen was photographed in front of a           mobile sign that stated: “Everyone must sign into movie set”            Is it remotely possible that a movie was being shot at the precise location           of the Sandy Hook elementary school and precise time of the shooting.           Hmmmm Wow! Hollywood gets around these days.

Research           for yourself the endless other discrepancies           that defy common sense and truth.

Handling           of the scene: Where were the EMT workers rushing into the building to           save lives, finding kids and rushing them to hospitals? Instead, bodies           remained in the building overnight. That was verified and is unprecedented.

People           assumed too soon that Adam Lanza was the lone gunman…why?

Why           were there crisis actors around and so much media footage that wasn’t           real?

 

Families           set up memorial donation pages immediately. Think of the odds of a grieving           family setting up a Facebook page on the day of the shooting. It seems           that the Parkers set up their page before the status was even known           and understood at the school. I’m looking at an Emilie Parker           Fund page that was immediately on line. This is the same Emilie, seen           two days after her death photographed with Obama.

No           matter who was behind this ‘mystery’ event at Sandy Hook           and no matter if kids were killed, one thing is for sure, there were           endless lies in media about it and what gun was actually used. There           were 2000 to 1 odds of Adam Lanza being able to pull off the physicality           of the actual shootings within 5 minutes as reported.

Obama           and his minions have long said “never let a crisis go to waste.”            The question I have, is it enough for Obama’s gun control agenda           to take and distort from crisis that comes along OR…is it now           necessary to create them? You decide.

Entry #521

Officials Found Guilty in Obama, Clinton Ballot Petition Fraud

Officials Found Guilty in Obama, Clinton Ballot Petition Fraud

 

 

A jury in South Bend, Indiana has found that fraud put President Obama and Hillary Clinton on the presidential primary ballot in Indiana in the 2008 election.  Two Democratic political operatives were convicted Thursday night in the illegal scheme after only three hours of deliberations. They were found guilty on all counts….

…According to testimony from two former Board of Election officials who pled guilty, Morgan ordered Democratic officials and workers to fake the names and signatures that Obama and Clinton needed to qualify for the presidential race. Blythe, then a Board of Elections employee and Democratic Party volunteer, was accused of forging multiple pages of the Obama petitions…

…Under state law, presidential candidates need to qualify for the primary ballots with 500 signatures from each of the state’s nine congressional districts. Indiana election officials say that in St. Joseph County, which is the 2nd Congressional district, the Obama campaign qualified with 534 signatures; Clinton’s camp had 704.

Prosecutors say that in President Obama’s case, nine of the petition pages were apparently forged. Each petition contains up to 10 names, making a possible total of 90 names, which, if faked, could have brought the Obama total below the legal limit required to qualify. Prosecutors say 13 Clinton petitions were apparently forged, meaning up to 130 possibly fake signatures. Even if 130 signatures had been challenged, it would have still left Mrs. Clinton with enough signatures to meet the 500 person threshold. 

As it is in the past, it doesn’t change anything.  But it does bruise the political machine that is the Democratic Party alittle bit.

Entry #520

Want Obama Out Of Office? Make This Story Go Viral

Want Obama Out Of Office? Make This Story Go Viral

 

 

1.15327534.1330419560

Swiss Asylum News April 23, 2013 After nearly 800 days of being denied political asylum in Switzerland, author, journalist and nuclear terror whistleblower David Chase Taylor has officially gone on a hunger strike since April 15, 2013, his 36th birthday.

After countless letters, emails and phone calls by Taylor to the Swiss government begging for political asylum, the hunger strike was apparently his last resort. Taylor first applied for political asylum on March 8, 2011, after releasing a book entitled “The Nuclear Bible”—a self-proclaimed “work of love” aimed at preventing a nuclear terror attack in his home country of the United States.

Access: DavidChaseTaylor.com

Taylor’s book, released on January 28, 2011, claims to have caught the Obama administration red-handed attempting to conduct an act of nuclear terror at the National Football League’s (NFL) annual championship game entitled the Super Bowl, routinely the most watched television event in America. Why Taylor needs political asylum in Switzerland is not really up for debate; one look at the evidence surrounding Super Bowl XLV in Dallas, Texas, on February 6, 2011, and anyone would conclude that something was clearly amiss that cold Sunday night in Texas.

While there is an overwhelming amount of direct and circumstantial evidence asserting that the premise of Taylor’s book was in fact correct, a few unprecedented news headlines such as “Feds Warn of Disguised Terrorists at Super Bowl” (CBS News), “WikiLeaks: ‘Al-Qaida on Brink of Using Nuclear Bomb’” (Fox News), and “World ‘On Brink of Nuclear 9/11’ as Al Qaeda Plans Large ‘Dirty’ Bomb” (Daily Mail), give a brief glimpse into the sheer terror that Taylor’s journalistic endeavors apparently thwarted.

Interestingly, despite Super Bowl XLVbeing hosted in Dallas, Texas, hometown to life-long Texan and former Texas governor George W. Bush, the former U.S. President was curiously on his way to Switzerland, a country he never cared to visit in all of his 8 years as President. Once the nuclear terror plot was exposed and subsequently postponed, Bush immediately changed his plans and attended the game in Dallas. In the aftermath of the foiled Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot, the head of NFL security suspiciously resigned.

Regardless of the growing evidence indicating that Taylor’s actions prevented a nuclear holocaust, the Swiss government appears to be succumbing to political pressure by the U.S. to deny Taylor political asylum in Switzerland. Whatever the reason, Taylor’s rights, privileges and protections under the Swiss Constitution are grossly being violated, untimely begging the following 10 questions:

Question # 1 Why is the Swiss government denying Taylor political asylum when Officer Ruembeli of the Swiss Federal Police informed Taylor on February 2, 2011, that “U.S. intelligence services” have “demands that we [Switzerland] act“?

[The U.S. government would have no sudden “demands” to interrogate Taylor just 5 days after the release of Taylor’s book entitled “The Nuclear Bible”, if it had not been effective in exposing the Super Bowl XLV nuclear terror plot.]

Question # 2 Why is Swiss government violating their own asylum policy by denying Taylor political asylum when they know for a fact that a) Taylor is being sought out by U.S. intelligence agencies, b) Taylor has repeatedly informed Swiss authorities that he fears for his life, and c) Taylor will more than likely face imprisonment, torture or death if he is ever forced out of Switzerland to the U.S. or a NATO nation?

[Switzerland's asylum policy states that: "Any person who is threatened or persecuted in their home country in accordance with criteria recognized under international law will be granted asylum in Switzerland".]

Question # 3 Why is the Swiss government repeatedly refusing to issue Taylor a legal and binding document which states the exact asylum laws which apply to Taylor, the holder of a valid Swiss “B” residence permit, a U.S. passport and a German passport?

[By treating Taylor as a political refugee in his bid for political asylum, all of Taylor’s inherent rights, privileges and protections as Swiss “B” residence permit holder as well as his rights as a citizen of both the United States and Germany are ultimately null and void.]

Question # 4 Why was Article 19 of the Swiss Asylum Act repealed, effectively removing jurisdiction of Taylor’s asylum case from the Migration Office of the Canton of Zurich, where it belongs, to the Federal Office of Migration in Bern, Switzerland?

[Taylor had effectively managed to force the Migration Office of the Canton of Zurich into legal quandary whereby they would, a) have to give Taylor political asylum, or b) be forced to render a legal and binding document stating the specific asylum laws which pertain to Taylor as the holder of Swiss “B” residence permit, a U.S. passport and a German passport. However, before the Migration Office of the Canton of Zurich could make this decision, the Federal Office of Migration stepped in and altered the legal jurisdiction of Taylor’s case by repealing Article 19 of the Swiss Asylum Act.]

Question # 5 Why is the “urgent” and unprecedented change to Article 19 of the Swiss Asylum Act only effective until September 28, 2015, just 71 days after Taylor’s Swiss “B” residence permit expires on July 19, 2015?

[If this unparalleled change to the Swiss Asylum Act was permanent it would be more understandable, but it expires roughly 2 months after Taylor will be forced out of Switzerland. By circumventing the local asylum process which Taylor had been engaged in with the Migration Office of the Canton of Zurich over the last two years, all of Taylor’s prior progress with the office has effectively been nullified.]

Question # 6 Why is Taylor being forced to surrender his valid Swiss “B” residence permit, his U.S. passport and his German passport before his case for political asylum can even be heard?

[According to Swiss refugee law, upon submitting an application for political asylum, Taylor would subsequently be issued a Swiss “N” residence permit, effectively rendering his current Swiss “B” residence permit null and void. If Taylor’s refugee asylum application is denied, he would be deported from Switzerland within 48 hours, a risk he obviously cannot afford to take.]

Question # 7 Why is a journalist who blew the whistle on the target, date and location of an impending nuclear terror attack being denied political asylum by the Swiss government?

[Just days before Super Bowl XLV, a leading atomic regulator privately warned that the world stands on the brink of a "nuclear 9/11". Furthermore, “diplomatic documents” leaked by Julian Assange of WikiLeaks revealed that Al-Qaida was on the brink of using a nuclear bomb. Since Super Bowl XLV in 2011, the entire notion that Al Qaeda has a nuclear bomb has all but disappeared from the media’s terror narrative.]

Question # 8 In his bid for political asylum, why is Taylor being treated as an illegal-alien/political-refugee with no documents or papers who just entered Switzerland illegally?

[Taylor is being subjugated to Swiss refugee laws and procedures despite the fact that he is the holder of a valid Swiss “B” residence permit, a U.S. passport and a German passport. As the holder of a Swiss “B” residence permit, Taylor is essentially guaranteed the same rights, privileges and protections as a Swiss citizen.]

Question # 9 Why is Switzerland risking their reputation of being politically neutral by acting in a very un-neutral manner in respect to Taylor’s case for political asylum?

[According to the United Nations 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, of which Switzerland is a signatory to (July 28, 1951), "No Contracting State shall expel or return a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion".]

Question # 10 Would Swiss citizens approve of their government denying Taylor political asylum knowing that Super Bowl L will more than likely be hosted in Dallas, Texas, on February 7, 2016, just 6 months after Taylor is forced out of Switzerland on July 19, 2015?

[Although the plot to terrorize America with nuclear weapons was disrupted by Taylor, it apparently has not been canceled. If Taylor is not granted political asylum and is forced out of Switzerland on July 19, 2015, it is highly likely that come February 7, 2016, an act of nuclear terror will take place in Dallas, Texas.

Current Violations of Taylor’s Swiss Constitutional Rights  As a holder of an Ausländerausweis “B” Swiss residence permit, David Chase Taylor is entitled to the same rights and privileges and protections under the Swiss Constitution as a Swiss citizen. As evidenced by the aforementioned legal anomalies, Taylor is being denied basic rights in his bid for political asylum.

1. Taylor’s right to equal treatment before the law has been denied (Art. 8, Sec. 1) 2. Taylor’s right to not be discriminated against based on political convictions has been denied (Art. 8, Sec. 2) 3. Taylor’s right to equal and fair treatment in judicial and administrative proceedings has been denied (Art. 29, Sec. 1) 4. Taylor’s right to have his case for asylum decided within a reasonable time has been denied (Art. 29, Sec. 1) 5. Taylor’s right to have his case for asylum be heard has been denied (Art. 29, Sec. 2) 6. Taylor’s right to have free legal advice, assistance, and representation has been denied (Art. 29, Sec. 3) 7. Taylor’s right to petition the authorities without prejudice has been denied (Art. 33, Sec. 1) 8. Taylor’s right to receive receipt of petitions to authorities has been denied (Art. 33, Sec. 2) 9. Taylor’s fundamental rights have not been upheld throughout Swiss the legal system (Art. 35, Sec. 1) 10. Employees acting on behalf of the Switzerland have denied Taylor his fundamental rights and have forsaken their duty to contribute to their implementation (Art. 35, Sec. 2)

Conclusion Right now, the Swiss government has an opportunity to help the world’s most endangered journalist. There is no question as to why David Chase Taylor needs political asylum, only why he is being denied.

Peace, human rights, rule of law and political sovereignty are touted as being genuine Swiss qualities, yet Taylor’s case for political asylum is repeatedly being ignored, delayed, and ultimately dismissed due to a lack of commitment to the aforementioned principles.

It is therefore imperative that people worldwide collectively call on the Swiss government to act with the boldness and urgency that this case demands. Switzerland cannot stop at making human rights declarations in legal statutes; they must execute them in principle and ultimately put their words into action.

At this critical juncture in world history, Switzerland must reaffirm their commitment to the human rights and act in a way that is genuine and beyond reproach. After all, if Switzerland is unwilling to give political asylum to a nuclear terror whistleblower, then who are they willing to give it to? This material may be copied, forwarded or translated without request.

(Locked)
Entry #519

In A Rare Moment Of Honesty Napolitano Claims The Obama Administration Can Choose What Laws To Enfor

In A Rare Moment Of Honesty Napolitano Claims The Obama Administration Can Choose What Laws To Enforce

 
 

 

This is how the Obama administration has been operating since day one. They have ignored charges of voter intimidation by New black Panthers members and other black groups while actively pursuing white groups like the Hutarees in Michigan.

The administration has ignored the Fast and Furious gun running scandal of the BATFE and stonewalled efforts by the Congress to learn more about it.  Speaking of stonewalling, the administration has ignored efforts to learn why our Ambassador to Libya and three others were allowed to die in an attack on a US compound in Benghazi, Libya.  They then lied about the cause of the attack and the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, lied to Congress when she was called to testify about the attack.

This administration has shown a complete and utter disregard for truth or justice.  They are in the position of determining how justice is handed out and are using it to punish enemies, help friends, and push leftist agendas. 

Now the Director of Homeland Security freely admits that they have been doing this.

Janet Napolitano

 

In a startling and candid admission, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano argued to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday that regardless of oaths to uphold the law, the President and the executive branch can choose what laws are to be enforced.

Tensions rose as the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Napolitano over the enforcement, or lack thereof, of current U.S. immigration policies. … Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions confronted Napolitano about the her role in blocking the enforcement of federal laws…

Napolitano defended herself and the Obama Administration by claiming that the executive branch will declare what laws will and will not be enforced and that she expects ICE agents to comply.

“There are tensions with union leadership, unfortunately, but here’s what I expect as a former federal prosecutor and attorney general, and that is that law enforcement agents will enforce the law in accord with the guidance they’re given from their superiors,” Napolitano said. “That’s what we ask of ICE, that’s what we ask of Border Patrol, that’s what we ask throughout the Department and I believe that would be consistent with all law enforcement. Agents don’t set the enforcement priorities. Those are set by their superiors and they are asked then to obey that guidance in accord with the law.”

Entry #518

New scandal threatens Obama, Hillary

New scandal threatens Obama, Hillary

Report confirms what well-placed sources have been  saying

 

       
hillaryobama

TEL AVIV – Has the White House been misleading the public by repeatedly  denying it was coordinating arms shipments to the rebels in Syria, insurgents  known to consist in large part of al-Qaida and other jihadist groups?

Other top U.S. officials and former officials, including former Secretary of  State Hillary Clinton, have implied in congressional testimony that they didn’t  know about any U.S. involvement in procuring weapons for the rebels.

 

Now, a starkly different picture is emerging, one that threatens the  longstanding White House narrative that claims the Obama administration has only  supplied nonlethal aid to the rebels.

Confirming WND’s exclusive reporting for over a year, the  New York Times two days ago reported that since early 2012, the CIA has been  aiding Arab governments and Turkey in obtaining and shipping weapons to the  Syrian rebels.

While the Times report claims most of the weapons shipments facilitated by  the CIA began after the latest presidential election, Middle Eastern security  officials speaking to WND have said U.S.-aided weapons shipments go back more  than a year, escalating before the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. facilities  in Benghazi.

Aaron  Klein’s New York Times bestseller, “Fool Me Twice,” is more relevant than  ever.

In fact, the Middle Eastern security officials speaking to WND since last  year describe the U.S. mission in Benghazi and nearby CIA annex attacked last  September as an intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels in  the Middle East, particularly those fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s  regime.

The aid, the sources stated, included weapons shipments and was being  coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Recruiting jihadists

Days after the Benghazi attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher  Stevens, WND  broke the story that Stevens himself played a central role in recruiting  jihadists to fight Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian and other  Middle Eastern security officials.

Stevens served as a key contact with the Saudis to coordinate the recruitment  by Saudi Arabia of Islamic fighters from North Africa and Libya. The jihadists  were sent to Syria via Turkey to attack Assad’s forces, said the security  officials.

The officials said Stevens also worked with the Saudis to send names of  potential jihadi recruits to U.S. security organizations for review. Names found  to be directly involved in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq  and Afghanistan, were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria,  said the officials.

Now the New York Times has bolstered WND’s reporting, citing air traffic  data, interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of rebel  commanders describing how the CIA has been working with Arab governments and  Turkey to sharply increase arms shipments to Syrian rebels in recent months.

The Times reported that the weapons airlifts began on a small scale in early  2012 and continued intermittently through last fall, expanding into a steady and  much heavier flow late last year, the data shows.

The Times further revealed that from offices at “secret locations,” American  intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons,  including a large procurement from Croatia. They have vetted rebel commanders  and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive.

The CIA declined to comment to the Times on the shipments or its role in  them.

The Times quoted a former American official as saying that David H. Petraeus,  the C.I.A. director until November, had been instrumental in helping set up an  aviation network to fly in the weapons. The paper said Petraeus had prodded  various countries to work together on the plan.

Petraeus did not return multiple emails from the Times asking for  comment.

Both WND’s reporting, which first revealed the U.S.-coordinated arms  shipments, and the Times reporting starkly contrast with statements from top  U.S. officials who have denied aiding the supply of weapons to the rebels.

Last month, the White House flatly denied involvement in arming the Syrian  rebels, going so far as to say the Obama administration rejected a plan by  former Secretary of State Clinton and then-CIA Director Petraeus to help arm the  rebels.

Nobody has ever raised that with me’

Further, in testimony during the Benghazi hearings, Clinton  claimed she did not know whether the U.S. was aiding Turkey and other Arab  countries in procuring weapons.

The exchange on the subject took place with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

Paul asked Clinton: “Is the U. S. involved with any procuring of weapons,  transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out  of Libya?”

“To Turkey?” Clinton asked. “I will have to take that question for the  record. Nobody has ever raised that with me.”

Continued Paul: “It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from  Libya and that may have weapons, and what I’d like to know is the annex that was  close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons,  and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries, any  countries, Turkey included?”

Clinton replied, “Well, Senator, you’ll have to direct that question to the  agency that ran the annex. I will see what information is available.”

“You’re saying you don’t know?” asked Paul.

“I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”

In testimony last month, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., asked then-Defense  Secretary John Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of  Staff, whether they had supported a plan “that we provide weapons to the  resistance in Syria.”

“We do,” Panetta replied.

“You did support that?” McCain asked again.

“We did,” added Dempsey, who was sitting next to Panetta.

Neither Dempsey nor Panetta elaborated on their positions or commented on any  actual arms shipments.

Rebel training

This is not the first time WND’s original investigative reporting on U.S.  support for the Syrian rebels was later confirmed by reporting in major media  outlets. Other WND reporting indicates support for the Syrian rebels that goes  beyond supplying arms, painting a larger picture of U.S. involvement in the  Middle East revolutions.

A story generating worldwide attention by the German weekly Der Spiegel  earlier this month reporting the U.S. is training Syrian rebels in Jordan was  exclusively exposed  by WND 13 months ago.

Quoting what it said were training participants and organizers, Der Spiegel  reported it was not clear whether the Americans worked for private firms or were  with the U.S. Army, but the magazine said some organizers wore uniforms.

The training in Jordan reportedly focused on use of anti-tank weaponry.

The German magazine reported some 200 men received the training over the past  three months amid U.S. plans to train a total of 1,200 members of the Free  Syrian Army in two camps in the south and the east of Jordan.

Britain’s Guardian newspaper also reported U.S. trainers were aiding Syrian  rebels in Jordan along with British and French instructors.

Reuters reported a spokesman for the U.S. Defense Department declined  immediate comment on the Der Spiegel report. The French foreign ministry and  Britain’s foreign and defense ministries also would not comment to Reuters.

While Der Spiegel quoted sources discussing training of the rebels in Jordan  over the last three months, WND  was first to report the training as far back as February 2012.

At the time, WND quoted knowledgeable Egyptian and Arab security officials  claimed the U.S., Turkey and Jordan were running a training base for the Syrian  rebels in the Jordanian town of Safawi in the country’s northern desert  region.

Any training or arming of the Syrian rebels would be considered highly  controversial. A major issue is the inclusion of jihadists, including al-Qaida,  among the ranks of the Free Syrian Army and other Syrian opposition  groups.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/new-scandal-threatens-obama-hillary/#HRA5gGX8MZePyHh8.99

Entry #517

Islamberg, USA . The Muslim Only Town Where Residents Learn Guerilla Warfare Tactics

Islamberg, USA . The Muslim Only Town Where Residents Learn Guerilla Warfare Tactics

 

 

Islamberg

(Editor’s note: The original source for this story is here: http://kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/islamberg-usa-the-muslim-only-town-where-residents-learn-guerilla-warfare-tactics/)

Islamberg, located in rural upstate New York, is a 70 acre underground-bunkered paramilitary Islamic compound. Here within the compound lives a Muslim only community. The majority of these are black american born males, hardened criminals who converted to radical Islam whilst serving time in state prison. It is also the headquarters of Muslims of the Americas, the International Quranic Open University and the United Muslim Christian Forum. Islamberg is the best known among 35 such compounds, ranging in size from 25 to 300 acres, that already dot 22 states across America. Evidence suggests these Islamic compounds and the convicted criminals who live their are participating in jihad training and using crime to raise funds Islamberg2Islamberg and the other ‘Muslim only towns’ and these organizations are led by a radical cleric in Pakistan named Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani. He is the leader of Pakistani terrorist organization Jamaat al Fuqra . Muslim shoe bomber Richard Ried allegedly was heavily influenced by the group and its leader Gilani. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WubEFsN5pk8Jamaat al Fuqra is the Pakistani Islamic group responsible for a string of murders, bombings and other terrorist acts across the world, including in the USA. Its chapter in America calls itself, ”Muslims of America” (MOA), and actively recruits at mosques and prisons, where African-American inmates are especially targeted.

And Syed Mubarak Ali Shah Gilani is the man whose Al Qaeda links Daniel Berg, the Wall Street Journal reporter, was investigating and on his way to interview in Pakistan as arranged in 2002 when he was betrayed and eventually beheaded. Pakistani police arrested Syed Mubarak Ali Shah Gilani after Berg’s murder.

Islamberg has a makeshift mosque, a shack that is modestly named, ”International Quranic Open University.” and occasionally holds public relations events to project a non-threatening image to the non-Muslims outside.

Away from their eyes, however, Islamberg, which is located near the reservoir that supplies most of New York City’s drinking water, and the other MOA compounds in America train recruits in firearms usage, bomb making and guerilla warfare , as Syed Mubarak Ali Shah Gilani declared in a recruiting video that was not intended for non-Muslim audiences:

“We give [our recruits] specialized training in guerilla warfare. We are at present establishing training camps. You can easily reach us at Open Quranic offices in upstate New York or in Canada or in South Carolina or in Pakistan.” – Syed Mubarak Ali Shah Gilani

In 2001, ATF Special Agent Thomas P. Gallagher testified in court that “Individuals from the organization [Muslims of the Americas] are trained in Han<snip>, N.Y., and if they pass the training in Han<snip>, N.Y., are then sent to Pakistan for training in paramilitary and survivalist training by Mr. Gilani.”

In 2009, Clarion Project National Security Analyst Ryan Mauro obtained a Muslims of the Americas tape showing women at Islamberg receiving guerilla warfare training while dressed in military fatigue. The trainees were seen marching in formation, practicing hand-to-hand combat, learning to use knives and swords and firing guns into a lake. Only the first two digits in the on-screen date could be seen, indicating it was made in 2000 or afterwards

In 2012, a former high-level Muslims of the Americas member that lived at Islamberg for two years described widespread abuse, forced marriages and brainwashing at the commune. He said that almost all of the children are privately schooled and are illiterate. He said that he saw a 50-year old woman tied to a tree and beaten for violating the strict moral code.

Entry #516

Congressmen demand classified info on Saudi 'witness'

Congressmen demand classified info on Saudi 'witness'

Napolitano tight-lipped amid concern man was on terror  list

 

Art  Moore
       
janet-napolitano

The Saudi man initially identified by law enforcement as a “person of  interest” in the Boston Marathon bombing remains a concern of four members of  the House Committee on Homeland Security who have asked DHS Secretary Janet  Napolitano for classified briefings on his case along with an overview of  relevant records.

A spokesman for Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., told WND the committee has not  received a response from Napolitano to a letter issued Friday that he signed  along with Reps. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, the committee chairman; Peter King,  R-N.Y.; and Candice Miller, R-Mich.

Spokesman Allen Klump noted that on the day of the twin bombings in Boston  that killed three people and injured more than 200, law enforcement officials  said that Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, who was hospitalized with injuries resulting  from the blast, was a person of interest.

Within 48 hours, however, after raiding the Saudi citizen’s apartment and  hauling out computers and email records, Alharbi was being described by  authorities only as a “witness” who had suffered injury in the blast. Later,  authorities insisted he was not even a witness.

The letter from the four congressmen was first reported by The Blaze, which  reported  further details Monday about Alharbi after WND  reported last week of questions that arose regarding the Saudi’s handling by  authorities.

Among The Blaze’s reporting today is an allegation that Alharbi was  classified as a terrorist but his file was altered.

Klump clarified that the Homeland Security Committee members are not saying  Alharbi is a suspect in the Boston bombing but are questioning why he was  absolved so quickly, particularly after so much information apparently had been  gathered.

“Common sense would indicate that we don’t need to lose the ability to have  access to this witness until a complete picture is painted,” Klump told WND.

The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to WND’s request for  comment.

In  a hearing last Thursday of the Committee on Homeland Security, Napolitano  reacted with indignation and anger when Duncan questioned her about Alharbi’s  case.

Napolitano insisted she was “unaware of anyone being deported for national  security concerns at all related to Boston.”

The letter notes Napolitano’s response and says that, nevertheless, “media  reports have continued to raise concerns about this individual and adjustments  that may have been made to his immigration status, including possible visa  revocation and terrorist watch-listing, in the days following the bombing.”

“We request the Department provide a detailed overview of the records  associated with this individual to include his law enforcement and immigration  records prior to April 15, 2013, as well as his current status,” the Congress  members state. “We request briefers from the Office of Intelligence and  Analysis, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Customs and Border  Protection.”

The Blaze reported the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s National  Targeting Center issued an event file for Alharbi calling for his deportation  using Section 212, 3B, which is proven terrorist activity. By late Wednesday  afternoon, however, the file had been altered.

The Blaze cited a law-enforcement source who was part of the process of  identifying Alharbi.

Todd Starnes of Fox News, meanwhile, reported that before the bombing Monday,  Alharbi had been flagged on a terrorist watch list and granted a student visa  without being properly vetted.

Sources close to the investigation told Starnes the Saudi is still set for  deportation.

Although Alharbi has been studying in Massachusetts, his student visa  specifically allows him to go to school only in Findlay, Ohio, according to The  Blaze.

Authorities now insist Alharbi had nothing to do with the attack and was not  a witness.

Another Saudi, identified as Noura Al-Ajaji, was similarly reported to have  been merely an injured bystander.

After the attack, Monday, Alharbi, 22, was questioned by federal authorities  for two hours while his roommate, Mohammud Hassan Bada, 20, was questioned for  five hours. Monday evening, FBI and ATF agents, along with Boston police  officers raided their apartment in Revere, Mass., and hauled out bags of  material.

Bada  acknowledged to the Boston Herald that the seized items include computers  and emails.

Saudi national Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi in a Boston  hospital recovering from injuries in the bombing.

But by Wednesday, Revere, Mass., police Lt. Amy O’Hara said federal  authorities “are telling us he’s no longer a person of interest,” the Herald  reported.

Alharbi’s reported deportation is reminiscent of the high-ranking Saudis,  including members of Osama bin Laden’s family, who were precipitously airlifted  back to Saudi Arabia after 9/11, even as U.S. airways were shut down. Fifteen of  the 19 hijackers who carried out the 9/11 attacks came from the Islamic  kingdom.

The developments in Alharbi’s case came as President Obama met Wednesday with  Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal in a meeting that was not on  Obama’s public schedule. The previous day, a meeting Secretary of State John  Kerry held with the Saudi foreign minister was abruptly closed to press  coverage.

Steve Emerson of the Investigative News Project, who  was first to report that Alharbi was set to be deported, said in a Fox News  interview that it’s “the way things are done with Saudi Arabia.”

“You don’t arrest their citizens. You deport them, because they don’t want  them to be embarrassed, and that’s the way we appease them.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/congressmen-demand-classified-info-on-saudi-witness/#RjGtwC0T67XRqeyl.99

Entry #515