Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 1:02 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Connecticut Gov. considers dumping Powerball

PowerballPowerball: Connecticut Gov. considers dumping Powerball

Connecticut Governor M. Jodi Rell thinks Powerball, the multi-state lottery game that offers huge potential payoffs, is about to become a lousy bet.

The agency that runs the game announced the odds of winning will be a lot higher starting next month, and winners who opt for multi-year payouts will wait longer for the big money.

Rell asked state officials to review the new lottery rules and decide if it is still a good deal for Connecticut lottery players.

"If we don't approve of the rules, in essence we are withdrawing from Powerball," said Paul Bernstein, legislative liaison for the state Division of Special Revenue, the agency charged with approving games for the Connecticut Lottery Corporation. "Games of chance in Connecticut must offer players a fair and reasonable shake. We want to make sure that's the case" with Powerball.

Powerball announced changes that increase the minimum jackpot from $10 million to $15 million, but reduce the odds of winning. Further, annual payments will now start lower and increase over the years; currently the annuity is paid evenly over 30 years.

The new rules take effect for the Aug. 31 drawing. The Special Revenue division is expected to make a decision within two weeks.

When Rell ordered the investigation into the Powerball changes, she wrote a letter to Paul Young, special revenue executive director.

"While I realize that risk is an essential aspect to all games of chance," Rell said, "I do not think that risk should be so high as to be patently unfair to the purchaser of the ticket."

Rell also said the new annuity payment schedule is "unfair and makes a winner a loser."

The number of white balls to draw from will go from 53 to 55, which will drive the odds of winning the jackpot from 1 in 120 million to 1 in 146 million. The number of red powerballs will remain at 42. The average winning payout would be $84.1 million. If taken in a lump sum, the jackpot would amount to $46.9 million after taxes.

But the annuity payments will start lower than they do now and increase by 4 percent each year, so the largest payments would be in last few years of the payout.

Under the new schedule, it would take 14 years for the annual payment to reach the same level as the first payment under the current method.

By year 15, the payment would be higher, and ultimately, the jackpot at the end of the 30-year period would be more, because it will be adjusted for inflation.

The changes could end up being bad for the lottery's business, Danbury resident Patricia Pelletier said.

"I used to play regularly, but it's always getting more complicated," Pelletier said. "You hear about people who can't even get their lump sum because of problems. The lotto is just not a big thing. People want to put their money in other things like real estate or casinos."

The changes in odds of winning and the payouts would discourage Jenny Morelle of Danbury from playing even if the jackpots are higher.

"If I'm older, I would not appreciate that. I would just take the lump sum," Morelle said. "It's hard enough to win as it is now. The chances are so few and far between."

Most players take the lump sum, but two or three per year take the annuity payment, said Charles Strutt, executive director of the Multi-State Lottery Association, the Urbandale, Iowa group that runs Powerball.

Strutt declined to comment on Rell's concerns, but said the new payment system will not hurt winners.

"That's designed to run consistent with the rate of inflation," Strutt said. "It allows a player to maintain a lifestyle. I'm not saying it's a good deal or a bad deal. It's a matter of managing your money."

Strutt said the total dollar amount is higher under the graduated annuity. With equal payments, inflation actually means a winner gets less each year, he said.

Bob Williams, a financial planner and owner of Money Concepts in Danbury, said the new payout could be a good deal depending on how soon someone wants their money.

"If it's a no-lose situation and the graduated payments get higher, and you have a beneficiary and you don't need it all tomorrow, it's clearly smart thinking," Williams said.

The odds were changed, Strutt said, because there were just too many winners last year.

"We had a run of a lot of winners," Strutt said. "We just want to add more to the population."

Last year the Powerball — which operates in 27 states, the Virgin Islands and Washington, D.C. — had 17 winners, the most since 2002 when it had 12 winners. More winners keep the jackpots lower, and when the jackpot is lower, fewer people buy tickets.

Rell, in her letter, said larger prizes aren't necessarily a good thing.

"I am equally concerned that the lure of the mega-jackpot will entice more people to bet beyond their means," Rell said.

According to Rell's office, she has not sought the help of other Powerball state governors in opposing the rule changes.

Lottery officials in other Powerball states like New Hampshire, Vermont, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania and Arizona had no objections to the rules changes.

Since Connecticut adopted the Powerball in November of 1995, it has brought $323 million to the state's general fund. In the last fiscal year, it contributed $42 million into the general fund. Combined, all of the Connecticut lottery games produced $280 million in state revenue last year. The odds of winning the Connecticut Classic Lotto jackpot are 1 in 7 million.

Diane Patterson, spokeswoman for the Connecticut Lottery Corporation, would not comment on the matter.

Bernstein, of special revenue, said he doesn't know what Connecticut will do if it dumps Powerball. He said MegaMillions, the multi-state lottery in New York, California and other states, is usually offered only to states larger than Connecticut.

Last month, Seymour resident Christopher Ewen hit a $59 million Powerball jackpot, the largest jackpot in the 33 years of the Connecticut state lottery. He took the lump sum payment. The winning ticket was drawn eight years to the day from the last time a Connecticut resident won an $8 million Powerball jackpot.

New powerball rules

The folks that run Powerball are changing the way they pay off jackpots for winners choosing a 30-year-annuity.

  • The estimated average jackpot under the new rules will be $84.1 million.
  • If it was paid off in equal amounts, as it is now, winners would get $2.8 million a year, before taxes.
  • Starting Aug. 31, payments will be backloaded, meaning winners will get far less in the early years. The winner of an $84.1 million jackpot will get $1.72 million in year one.
  • The winner won't reach $2.8 million until year 14.
  • The winner will get $5.36 million in year 30. Nearly one-third of the total will come in the last five years.

Danbury News Times

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

65 comments. Last comment 11 years ago by CASH Only.
Page 1 of 5

United States
Member #379
June 5, 2002
11296 Posts
Offline
Posted: July 17, 2005, 1:33 pm - IP Logged

Don't let this happen!

    JAP69's avatar - alas
    South Carolina
    United States
    Member #6
    November 4, 2001
    8790 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: July 17, 2005, 1:35 pm - IP Logged

    "While I realize that risk is an essential aspect to all games of chance," Rell said, "I do not think that risk should be so high as to be patently unfair to the purchaser of the ticket."

    Bravo

    Someone pat him on the back

    WHATT


      United States
      Member #379
      June 5, 2002
      11296 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: July 17, 2005, 1:46 pm - IP Logged

      John:

      Jodi Rell is a FEMALE governor.

        JAP69's avatar - alas
        South Carolina
        United States
        Member #6
        November 4, 2001
        8790 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: July 17, 2005, 1:48 pm - IP Logged

        John:

        Jodi Rell is a FEMALE governor.

        OHHHH really

        Is she good lookin. I will personally take her out to lunch and pat her on the back. LOL

        WHATT


          United States
          Member #379
          June 5, 2002
          11296 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: July 17, 2005, 1:51 pm - IP Logged

          john:

          Why do you want me to go elsewhere to play Powerball?

            Avatar
            Greenwich, CT
            United States
            Member #4793
            May 24, 2004
            1822 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: July 17, 2005, 1:54 pm - IP Logged

            John:

            Jodi Rell is a FEMALE governor.

            OHHHH really

            Is she good lookin. I will personally take her out to lunch and pat her on the back. LOL

            She's been doing a good job since Rowland left...except for this nonsense.

            Ouch...I'd have to start getting friends in NNE or PA to buy my tix.

            Where should we send letters??

              ayenowitall's avatar - rod serling4.jpg

              United States
              Member #4416
              April 22, 2004
              1075 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: July 17, 2005, 2:56 pm - IP Logged

              "The folks that run Powerball are changing the way they pay off jackpots for winners choosing a 30-year-annuity.

              • The estimated average jackpot under the new rules will be $84.1 million.
              • If it was paid off in equal amounts, as it is now, winners would get $2.8 million a year, before taxes.
              • Starting Aug. 31, payments will be backloaded, meaning winners will get far less in the early years. The winner of an $84.1 million jackpot will get $1.72 million in year one.
              • The winner won't reach $2.8 million until year 14.
              • The winner will get $5.36 million in year 30. Nearly one-third of the total will come in the last five years."

              Moral of the story: Notwithstanding the astronomical odds, if you play this game and somehow manage to hit the jackpot, take the lump sum cash payment and manage your own money.

              aye'


                United States
                Member #379
                June 5, 2002
                11296 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: July 17, 2005, 2:57 pm - IP Logged

                I don't want to have to drive to PA (home of Unlucky for Life) to play PB or the Blue Game!


                  United States
                  Member #16612
                  June 2, 2005
                  3493 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: July 17, 2005, 3:10 pm - IP Logged

                  I don't want to see Connecticut withdraw from Powerball.

                    Avatar

                    United States
                    Member #1826
                    July 11, 2003
                    2645 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: July 17, 2005, 4:04 pm - IP Logged

                    Well, there would be pros and cons. One is that we'd have another state minus a multi-state game (plus Florida). And such a move would prove to hurt Powerball's reputation. On the other hand, we'd have a lot more people playing Classic Lotto, and that would mean faster moving jackpots.

                    (insert signature here)


                      United States
                      Member #8747
                      November 16, 2004
                      213 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: July 17, 2005, 5:15 pm - IP Logged

                      Somebody has to threat to pull out of powerball else they would go ahead with their outrageous odds. A steak of winners is gonna make the game very difficult for me. I hope when the matrix is changed, the add a new state. Else CT can go. I think CT might be favoring MM and just thinks that PB is a mistake. I think so too for TN.

                        sirius's avatar - octa feathers.jpg
                        ct
                        United States
                        Member #17717
                        June 25, 2005
                        60 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: July 17, 2005, 5:17 pm - IP Logged

                        So the odds go from next to impossible to incredibly impossible. So what. It's not the odds that determine my playing powerball. I hope they realize die-hard players will purchase their tix out of state anyway.

                        I hope Ct doesn't do away with powerball. 

                          weshar75's avatar - Lottery-042.jpg
                          Mcminnville, Oregon
                          United States
                          Member #3013
                          December 13, 2003
                          3047 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: July 17, 2005, 6:02 pm - IP Logged

                          If she does not like powerball's odds then she definitely won't like mega millions and they would not let a small state in any ways.  That graduated annuity sure does blow chunks I think I will take the cash when I win.

                            Avatar
                            Greenwich, CT
                            United States
                            Member #4793
                            May 24, 2004
                            1822 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: July 17, 2005, 6:32 pm - IP Logged

                            This would take away NYC's closest Powerball outlet.  I think there will be a lot of opposition.