Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 10, 2016, 4:15 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

California judge rules in favor of Mega Millions lottery

Mega MillionsMega Millions: California judge rules in favor of Mega Millions lottery

California Lottery officials announced Tuesday that the Sacramento Superior Court ruled that California's participation in the multi-state Mega Millions game is legal and that the California Lottery is authorized to operate the game in the state.

The court further stated that the Lottery Commission is lawfully operating and the Mega Millions' joint operation in California does not require specific legislative approval.

The ruling is a crushing blow to a small but vocal anti-lottery group, as well as to California Democrats, who helped to launch the lawsuit in order to disrupt the workings of the Schwarzenegger administration. The Republican Governor pushed California's participation in Mega Millions as a way to help lift the state from financial hardship.

"We're very pleased with the ruling to keep Mega Millions in California," said Joan Borucki, Acting Director of the California Lottery. "Mega Millions will continue to be sold, prizes will be paid and proceeds will benefit public schools".

While the court acknowledged that a remote conflict may exist regarding different jackpot claim periods among partner states, the court has given the Lottery a year to address this issue.

Californians have contributed more than $151 million to public schools from Mega Millions sales since it began on June 22, 2005. The popularity of Mega Millions has continued to grow and sales trends reflect this fact. Sales for the game have been growing since November of 2005 when a group of Kaiser employees won a $315 million Mega Millions jackpot.

Overall Lottery sales for the current fiscal year to date are $2.97 billion (unaudited through April 30, 2006) representing a $162 million increase over last year's revenues for the same period. As a result, for the sixth consecutive year, the California Lottery will transfer more than $1 billion in supplemental funding to California's public schools.

Press Release, Lottery Post Staff

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

9 comments. Last comment 10 years ago by bellyache.
Page 1 of 1
spy153's avatar - maren

United States
Member #28409
December 15, 2005
1198 Posts
Offline
Posted: June 8, 2006, 4:13 pm - IP Logged

I'm glad someone's public shcools are getting the money. You can't really tell that tennessee public schools are getting any money by the way they are charging the students for everything lately. The money might be going somewhere in tn, but it isn't going to my kids' schools. The schools here are just a huge political disappointment. I can't even think of it without getting a migraine these days.

voir-vous dans mes reves!Cool

    chasingadream's avatar - Archangel 01.jpg

    United States
    Member #38687
    May 3, 2006
    315 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: June 8, 2006, 4:13 pm - IP Logged

    its about time.....now CA can safely enjoy MegaMillions Smile

    Oogle  waiting patiently for my jackpot

      LOTTOMIKE's avatar - cash money.jpg
      Tennessee
      United States
      Member #7853
      October 15, 2004
      11338 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: June 8, 2006, 8:47 pm - IP Logged

      when is the government going to butt out of the games??


        Australia
        Member #17096
        June 11, 2005
        225 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: June 8, 2006, 10:28 pm - IP Logged

        The California Lottery ran a subscription service a few years ago, they should do so again. it would raise more revenue for education.


          United States
          Member #16612
          June 2, 2005
          3493 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: June 9, 2006, 2:03 am - IP Logged

          I'm happy that CA kept MM in order to get money raised for education and maybe have a balance budget and/or surplus. However, I'm disappointed that my guess was wrong (guess was CA win lawsuit to stop MM).

            SassyOhio's avatar - Picture012
            Columbus Ohio
            United States
            Member #35946
            March 25, 2006
            234 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: June 9, 2006, 1:11 pm - IP Logged

            when is the government going to butt out of the games??

            I Agree!

            Hopin To Be The Lucky Ones!!

            COME ON MEGA! MEGA-ME-RICH!

             

            Please feel free to visit my sisters memorial page that I have now completed

            www.freewebs.com/wendyinmyheartforever

              Avatar
              Coastal Georgia
              United States
              Member #2653
              October 30, 2003
              1866 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: June 9, 2006, 2:34 pm - IP Logged

              when is the government going to butt out of the games??

              I Agree!

              When will the government butt out of anything ?

               

               

                                             

                            

               

               

                Avatar
                Northern California
                United States
                Member #19948
                August 9, 2005
                151 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: June 9, 2006, 2:50 pm - IP Logged

                Gold Rush - subscription sales in CA were never more than about 1.5% of sales for the available games and because of the way they chose to operate the subscription system (as a phony baloney, unautomated [meaning manual handling of subscriotion requests], make work job support system for state employees) it was actually a drain on profits for CA education.

                 

                I never had a doubt that MM was legal in CA - the wording of the enabling Ammendment and Legislation is not ambiguous in this area. That didn't mean that I didn't worry about a judge mucking it up  :)

                 

                I don't think the 6 months vs. a year to claim a prize will be meaningful. In fact, if they were to change it, one could argue that CA is not really administering the game for themselves. By law, this is the kind of decision the Commission is expressly supposed to make. 

                  bellyache's avatar - 64x64a9wg

                  United States
                  Member #12618
                  March 18, 2005
                  2060 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: June 28, 2006, 3:44 pm - IP Logged

                  when is the government going to butt out of the games??

                  The simple answer is...Never.

                  Dance like no one is watching.