Ex-lovers settle bitter fight over $12.4 million lottery win

Nov 29, 2006, 10:42 am (14 comments)

Canada Super 7

Man pays off woman to resolve civil lawsuit

Ludmila Konickova hadn't known him long. They'd met 18 weeks earlier through an Internet dating service, but she claims it was a trusting and "committed relationship."

She also claims she gave her 52-year-old boyfriend, Kenneth Garbe, $20 to buy a lottery ticket for the June 2 Super 7 draw, saying she took it on faith he would pass on any winnings.

The ticket was a $12.4 million winner.

But Garbe tells a different story about the ticket, saying she has no claim to the money. And he also claims he since found out she was having sex with an 82-year-old man while they were dating — an allegation she denies.

Now, the once-happy couple, who split five months ago, have settled a legal dispute over the lottery winnings, cutting short what could have been a bitter and messy legal battle involving love and money.

The spat is outlined in court documents filed in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver, where Konickova claimed half of the prize.

The case was settled this week, according to Vancouver lawyer John Logan, acting for Garbe, a former Vancouver school board employee.

The story has an interesting beginning. When Garbe checked his winning lottery ticket last June, he thought the winning sum was $12,000. When he went to claim it, he was shocked to learn his winning sum included three more zeroes. A lottery official had to give Garbe a magnifying glass so he could see for himself.

He and Konickova posed for the winning photograph, in which Garbe was in a wheelchair, recovering from knee surgery.

Days later, Garbe dumped Konickova, who then filed a civil lawsuit, claiming she gave Garbe the money that purchased the winning ticket.

In her legal action, Konickova said she should have received at least $6 million, but since Garbe breached his unwritten contract to share the winnings, she should be entitled to the entire $12.4 million, plus interest.

"I am afraid, with respect, that I disagree with that conclusion," B.C. Supreme Court Justice Eric Rice said in an interim ruling earlier this month.

"The evidence of Ms. Konickova potentially supports an entitlement to half of the prize or $6 million plus interest," said the judge, who decided to freeze only half the lottery winnings until the court could resolve the matter.

Kenneth Garbe with then-girlfriend Ludmila (Lida) Konickova on winning a $12.4-million lottery prize. Konickova later claimed she had given Garbe $20 to buy the winning ticket.In evidence filed in court, Garbe denied that Konickova gave him any money to purchase a ticket. He said she never asked him to purchase a ticket for her or for himself. There were no independent witnesses to corroborate either version. But Garbe produced evidence from Konickova's ex-husband, a Mr. Konicek, who recalled his ex-wife initially told him that Garbe had won the lottery. He said she made no mention at that time of Konickova giving Garbe $20 to buy the ticket.

The ex-husband recalled Konickova saying she hoped Garbe would give her enough to pay off the mortgage on her home. The court was told that Konickova lives in North Vancouver.

The defense also spoke to an 82-year-old man who said he had sex with Konickova during the 18-week period she claimed she was in a "committed relationship" with Garbe, whom Konickova met last Feb. 8 through an Internet dating service.

The retired businessman recalled their most recent encounters were within a month or two after last April 11, when he had cancer surgery. The man suggested he didn't want Konickova to be painted as a "floozy."

Garbe's side also contacted another man who said he was also having sex with Konickova during the period she was dating Garbe. He recalled Konickova telling him last June that Garbe had won the lottery.

Garbe's lawyer argued that Konickova failed to make full and frank disclosure that she had a relationship with two other men while she was supposedly in a committed relationship with Garbe.

Konickova, however, denied she was having sex with two other men while she was in a relationship with Garbe.

Garbe's lawyer also pointed out that when Garbe and Konickova went to claim the lottery win, she said nothing to lottery officials about her claim or about providing the money to buy the ticket. He suggested those were telling omissions.

But in the end, the court didn't have to decide the case. Neither Konickova nor her lawyer would discuss Tuesday how much Konickova was paid to settle the civil lawsuit.

"We're not discussing the case," said Konickova's lawyer, John Mendes.

Logan, Garbe's lawyer, said his client was difficult to reach but he had passed along a message that The Vancouver Sun was trying to reach him. The court was told that Garbe had only spent about $400,000 of his winnings on family members and himself. Last June, the lucky man told lottery officials that he planned to buy his son a new truck, retire from his school board job, buy a new house and do some traveling.

Vancouver Sun

Comments

Just6ntlc

Congratulations to them. I hope they settle this issue once in for all. This is a good story.

Editgap

"In her legal action, Konickova said she should have received at least $6 million, but since Garbe breached his unwritten contract to share the winnings, she should be entitled to the entire $12.4 million, plus interest."

Isn't this justice? I guess the guy has to wait to win again before he can get his share.

What some people think of others. If he gave her all the money and then shoots her he would be another crazy man. Who knows how long this man has been dreaming of winning the lottery and buying a piece of faith, hope and dream like we all do every week.

I once wanted to ask some for $5 to buy a big jackpot lottery ticket, but I wasn't gonna tell them what the money was for. But the jackpot was such a buzz she could figure it out so I didn't ask.

orangeman

I think the 82-year-old man deserves a medal for his efforts in this "affair".  Hope everyone gets everything he or she deserves.

Orangeman

White Bounce

murdoog

Quote: Originally posted by orangeman on Nov 29, 2006

I think the 82-year-old man deserves a medal for his efforts in this "affair".  Hope everyone gets everything he or she deserves.

Orangeman

White Bounce

And the other boyfriend is 52. The story gives this 48-year-old man a lot of hope and comfort

weshar75's avatarweshar75

Well she maybe a Floozy but at least she got a chunk of cash.  Now she can be a Floozy all she wants.ROFL-weshar75

DoubleDown

I knew it !!!

I knew it all along !!!That darn Anna Kourikova is a floozy !! No wonder she cannot win a tennis match- having sex with 82 year old men...who does she think she is ? Anna Nicole Smith or something ?

DD

Rick G's avatarRick G

Moral of the story...another s***bag stealing money from a winner.

EDIT:  Weird that the editor won't let me use the word s-k-um.  Is the algae that grows on the surface of a pond considered a dirty word now?

justxploring's avatarjustxploring

Quote: Originally posted by Rick G on Nov 29, 2006

Moral of the story...another s***bag stealing money from a winner.

EDIT:  Weird that the editor won't let me use the word s-k-um.  Is the algae that grows on the surface of a pond considered a dirty word now?

I think you can write scum, but not with the word bag.  Let's see.

justxploring's avatarjustxploring

Yup.  So scum = okay.  scum + bag No No

 

I agree that the 82 year old guy deserves something ..at least a 10 year supply of Viagra.

 

I knew it all along !!!That darn Anna Kourikova is a floozy !!

DoubleDown, maybe she's having trouble with her tennis game because she found out what she really will 'net' after winning a lottery jackpot.  (yuck, yuck, yuck) 

dingo's avatardingo

some people gave her the idea to steal money from this man. They are both undecent anyway. He dumped her after winning the lottery. She sued him for the money.

RJOh's avatarRJOh

I have to wonder if Ludmila Konickova had won the lottery jackpot if she would have felt an e-mail relationship would have entitled someone else to half or all of her winnings, even though there wasn't any proof of such an agreement.

MADDOG10's avatarMADDOG10

Justexploring wrote:   I agree that the 82 year old guy deserves something ..at least a 10 year supply of Viagra.

Hell, if he's doing it now at 82, heeee don't need any viagra honey....!

justxploring's avatarjustxploring

You have a good point, MadDog!  I must be out of my mind.  I've never been a golddigger but I keep meeting old wealthy men, especially living in FL.  Last week I wrote a policy for a man born in 1917...pretty healthy too.  That's the problem.  Chances are these guys would all outlive me!  LOL

mylollipop's avatarmylollipop

Go ahead honey and get your "share" so somebody else that you have a committed relationship can get their share from you!!! Ha, Ha! Green laugh

End of comments
Subscribe to this news story