|Posted: August 26, 2007, 2:20 am - IP Logged|
Computerhead- Please go back and re-read the article in its entirety. You are missing some important legal infractions that played a MAJOR part in this judges ruling.
Let me put it to you in kindergarden terms: Johnny stole money from his sisters' piggy bank. Johnny goes and buys lots of candy with it. Momma comes home and finds that Johnny broke into his sisters piggybank. Momma says Bad Deed Johnny, for that you are grounded and have to give all the candy back .
Throw momma off the train....and if were reading the same story the mother was dead and her son had this female friend who continued to use the dead mothers credit card ;
I stick to my ruling ....The judge in this case ruled beyond the juisdiction of his authority and unless the credit card was used to buy that \ lottery ticket he cannot rule the winnings illegal:
legal infractions combined does not give a judge authority to make LAW ;
this is not for kindergarden .......Girl with game !!!!!!!!!!