Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited July 5, 2020, 9:12 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

British pro gambler took aim at $25.8M CT Lotto jackpot, buying hundreds of thousands of tickets

Nov 8, 2019, 2:36 pm

Share this news story on Facebook
Tweet this news story on Twitter
Connecticut LotteryConnecticut Lottery: British pro gambler took aim at $25.8M CT Lotto jackpot, buying hundreds of thousands of ticketsRating:

Lottery officials monitored everything as it happened

"Good afternoon, Pete. Just letting you know that we have been monitoring the sales of an individual who is spending an enormous amount of money on the lotto game."

That's what Mark Walerysiak, the security director at the Connecticut Lottery Corp. (CLC), wrote in an email on Oct. 28 to Peter Hsieh, the gaming division director for the state Department of Consumer Protection (DCP).

The email was the beginning of an intriguing yarn about a professional gambler who traveled from Great Britain to Stamford in recent weeks with an audacious plan — to spend as much as $2 million buying "Quick Pick" Lotto tickets by the hundreds of thousands at local convenience stores in hopes of winning the Nov. 1 near-record Connecticut Lotto jackpot of $25.8 million.

"Mr. Bernard Marantelli of the United Kingdom is in Connecticut and is planning to spend as much as $1-2 million on tickets," Walerysiak continued in the email. "He is currently staying in the Stamford area and has already spent about $200,000 since last Wednesday.... I spoke to Marantelli last week on the phone. He is the current CEO of Colossus Bets in the UK, a sports betting agency, and he is also a professional gambler/mathematician.

"He told me that he is planning on winning the lotto jackpot."

Marantelli, co-founder of Colossus, which focuses on pool betting on sports and horse racing, teamed up with a half-dozen or so associates to buy Lotto tickets for hours on end at several small outlets in Stamford.

And — what do you know? — on the night of Nov. 1, for the first time since January 2018, the six numbers drawn (1-9-10-15-41-43) were on a single winning ticket that a customer bought at a Stop & Shop supermarket in Danbury on Lake Avenue Extension.

No winner has yet come forward with that ticket to claim the top prize — he or she has 180 days from Nov. 1 to do so — but things don't look so good for Marantelli because he and his helpers were only known to be buying their tickets in Stamford, where they had hotel lodgings, not in Danbury.

Marantelli wasn't available for comment on that; three Courant inquiries to his Colossus Bets email went unanswered.

But no matter who turns up as the winner, the Englishman's unusual-but-lawful effort colorfully illustrates the realities of the Lotto game's long odds (a 1 in 7,059,052 chance to win the jackpot) and the efforts of security officials to make sure everything's on the up-and-up.

Those security efforts come at a time when the quasi-public lottery corporation and the DCP, its state regulator, are still dealing with recriminations about a 2015 retailer fraud scandal that forced the shutdown of the 5 Card Cash game.

The two key officials involved in overseeing the unusual ticket-buying activities are new in their jobs this year, after replacing longtime administrators who retired. But both have had long law enforcement careers. Hsieh served as a special agent in the FBI and Walerysiak as deputy police chief in Meriden.

Working unnoticed

Marantelli and his associates went about their business without attracting any public notice in Stamford — and their story is surfacing here for the first time, after Government Watch obtained security memos via a public records request.

The lottery agency learned of Marantelli's effort from the gambler himself. He approached the CLC in hopes that special arrangements could be made for him to buy tickets in huge batches.

"He initially asked if CLC would be able to set up additional terminals at lottery headquarters [in Rocky Hill] to accommodate him," Walerysiak wrote in the Oct. 28 email to Hsieh, "but I told him that we could not because we need to treat him just like any other customer He was told that he could use any of our 2,900 retailers to buy his tickets."

"Marantelli was very cordial and understanding in my conversation with him," Walerysiak wrote, adding that "we are getting automated updates and alerts on the retailers he is using and the amount of cash he is spending."

He said he and his people would "continue to monitor" the situation, and on Oct. 31 he sent an email to several officials, including Hsieh and Lottery Corporation CEO Gregory Smith, saying, "Each day I will be updating you all on the Lotto transactions by Bernard Marantelli."

Walerysiak then listed increases above normal Lotto ticket sales for the previous day, Oct. 30, at seven Stamford stores he believed the Marantelli team was using. Of those, Park View Variety at 233 Main St. and Atlantic Market at 209 Atlantic St. had the biggest increases above their normal daily Lotto sales levels ($110,000 and $65,000 above normal, respectively).

He also included an eighth ticket outlet on his list — the CLC headquarters in Rocky Hill, where customers not only can cash big winning tickets, but also can buy them. Marantelli was also buying tickets at the headquarters, where Lotto sales for Oct. 30 were $25,000 above normal, Walerysiak wrote.

Nobody outside of Marantelli and his circle knows exactly how many tickets he purchased, and so far he's not telling. But one indication is that the weekly Lotto ticket sales volume at Atlantic Market alone increased from the normal level of $1,000 or $1,500 to more than $519,000 for the week that ended Nov. 2, the day after the $25.8 million jackpot drawing.

Lotto retailers collect a nickel on every $1 ticket, so $500,000 in ticket sales generates $25,000.

'Never seen anything like it'

"I've never seen anything like it," Atlantic Market owner Sanjay Patel said Thursday. He said in the 14 years he's owned Atlantic, plus another decade of working in a similar store, the most he's seen any customer buy for any Lotto drawing was about $500 worth of tickets.

Patel said that Marantelli or one of a few helpers who came to Stamford with him spent two weeks or more coming to the store daily carrying cloth bags filled with cash, often $20,000 at a time. They would ask for "Quick Picks," an option in which the electronic Lotto system randomly chooses the six numbers instead of the player filling out a paper slip to select his own, which is time-consuming.

"Quick Pick" tickets come out of the lottery terminal with lightning speed. Five lines of six numbers can be printed on each ticket (making each such ticket cost $5) and it takes only about four minutes to print 500, Patel said. Marantelli or his mates would leave for a few hours while a $20,000 batch was printed, and then return to take them away, neatly stacked in the kind of rectangular plastic boxes you can buy at a CVS or Walgreens, Patel said.

Marantelli is an affable fellow with a good sense of humor, Patel said, adding: "He's very smart" and "can talk about any subject." The gambler's associates, all with accents that sounded British to Patel, also were pleasant and polite. Marantelli had left Stamford by Thursday, when Government Watch visited the store, Patel said.

But he said a couple of the gambling CEO's helpers remained in town, and had left a box containing a stack of more than 5,000 tickets they said were winners ranging from $2 (for getting three of six numbers right) to $50 (for getting four numbers right). Larger winning amounts, such as $2,000 or so for hitting five of six numbers (sometimes it varies, depending on how many other players also got five out of six) must be cashed in at either CLC headquarters in Rocky Hill or another regional redemption center.

Patel said it would take him a couple of hours to run the tickets through his terminal to verify they were winners, and then pay the Marantelli associate who came back to pick up the winnings.

Marantelli, the enigmatic sportsman, turned out to be quite a sport, throwing a little party for Patel and other local convenience store owners and employees on Nov. 2, the day after the big drawing, at the nearby Bobby V's Restaurant & Sports Bar, which adjoins a Winners OTB parlor, just down Atlantic Avenue from Patel's store. "Bernard is a good guy," he said.

Representatives of the CLC and DCP visited Atlantic Market during the ticket-buying binge while Marantelli or his associates were there and said it was all proper, Patel said.

According to Patel and others, the gambler and his associates were buying tickets for about two weeks prior to the winning ticket being drawn on Nov. 1. That's about four drawings' worth. Lotto drawings are televised Tuesday and Friday nights about 10:38 p.m. Ticket sales cease at 10:20 and resume at 10:46.

The Nov. 1 drawing of a winner sent the Lotto jackpot back down to its base of $1 million. It will grow if no one wins it, as happened in the 19 months since January 2018.

While it's evident that the growth of the jackpot to more than $25 million attracted Marantelli to Connecticut, it remains unclear — absent any comment from him — what calculations he made in deciding it was worth the risk to buy so many random "Quick Picks." Despite the huge number of tickets purchased, he couldn't come close to covering all 7,059,052 possible combinations of six numbers out of a field of 44.

"Quick Picks" include the possibility (albeit not a huge one) that more than one ticket will contain the same six numbers, lottery officials say.

Patel said he believed most of Marantelli's ticket purchases were at his store and at Park View Variety, a short walk around the corner. Other nearby convenience store owners were worried or skeptical, at least to begin with, about the group of strangers laden with so much cash, he said.

DuPuis hearings continue

While all of that has been happening, hearings continued this past week in the whistleblower case of former lottery security director Alfred W. DuPuis. He retired a year ago when faced with potential disciplinary proceedings in connection with a million-dollar mistake made by his subordinates in the New Year's Super Draw on Jan. 1, 2018.

The latest hearing was conducted for several hours Tuesday in Hartford by Michele Mount, the state chief human rights referee for the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, and at least one more such session will have to be held, lawyers for the lottery and DuPuis said.

DuPuis has complained that a charge of "gross neglect" — lodged against him in the 2018 Super Draw blunder by then-acting lottery CEO Chelsea Turner — was, in reality, belated retaliation for his role as a whistleblower about irregularities and improprieties in the ill-fated 5 Card Cash game about five years ago.

The lottery denies that, and called former CLC lottery board Chairman Don DeFronzo as a witness Tuesday. He testified that Turner had never said anything negative to him about DuPuis, and in fact had told him that she didn't think that any of the three lottery employees whose conduct was questioned in the drawing snafu should be fired.

Turner, now CLC vice president, was herself placed on paid administrative leave July 15 from her $190,000-a-year job by Smith, the lottery president/CEO, under a state personnel regulation that provides for "investigation of alleged serious misconduct which could constitute just cause for dismissal."

Smith has refused to say why he did that. His action came soon after her explosive sworn testimony at a DuPuis complaint hearing on July 9 that around 2014, she contacted a friend in the FBI about what she saw as suspicious actions by Frank Farricker, then the CLC's governing board chairman. The FBI soon had then-lottery president/CEO Anne Noble secretly record at least one conversation with Farricker, using an electronic device hidden in an eyeglass case.

Nothing came of the FBI's criminal investigation five years ago. But the disclosure of it by Turner in July brought renewed scrutiny by legislators and the governor of the quasi-public lottery — which has been accused in recent years of abusing the special autonomy it enjoys in comparison to regular executive branch departments.

Turner still hasn't returned to work, lottery officials say, declining further comment on what they say is a personnel matter.

News story photo(Click to display full-size in gallery)

Thanks to William H. for the tip.

Hartford Courant

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

23 comments. Last comment 7 months ago by Igamble.
Page 1 of 2
Avatar
Billionaires Row 57th street Manhattan
United States
Member #197346
April 9, 2019
4069 Posts
Online
Posted: November 8, 2019, 3:01 pm - IP Logged

These lottery officials must have intentionally let another person win the jackpot instead of Bernerd and take his money for the states

How come some one win now after almost 2 years ? 

    Raven62's avatar - binary
    25
    New Jersey
    United States
    Member #17842
    June 28, 2005
    125885 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 8, 2019, 3:02 pm - IP Logged

    Sometimes Life Laughs At Your Best Laid Plans!

    A mind once stretched by a new idea never returns to its original dimensions!

    Catch-22: A dilemma or difficult circumstance from which there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions.

    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges: When the republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous.

      cottoneyedjoe's avatar - cuonvFT

      United States
      Member #197033
      March 28, 2019
      535 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 8, 2019, 7:12 pm - IP Logged

      Back in the UK all his friends will ask him if he made a trip to NYC while he was there (it's about an hour train ride). Little do they know the real national treasure is right there in Stamford: weekly tapings of the Maury Show. He could have watched national treasure Maury Povich himself utter those famous words, "Daquan, you ARE the father!"

      ... Sooper dooper top seekrit winning numbers: 5 16 17 24 33 52 ...

        Avatar
        Texas
        United States
        Member #86151
        January 30, 2010
        1875 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 8, 2019, 11:12 pm - IP Logged

        Sorry but, what an extremely dumb man and his money in this specific regard.  He was riding on pure, unadulterated hope when he could've actually dropped that same money on a real good stock and made some real good money. More so, a proper multi-play wager online with Pick 4 would've actually MADE him big money but, that would've likely just been chump change to him. He'd rather lose all that money than to actually guarantee winning some chump change. Let it sink in.....

        Small games, frequent wins, and regular payouts 'cause.....

        There are seven days in the week...'Someday' isn't one of them.

        #lotto-4-a-living

          KY Floyd's avatar - lysol avatar.jpg
          NY
          United States
          Member #23834
          October 16, 2005
          4246 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 9, 2019, 3:01 am - IP Logged

          "what an extremely dumb man"

          More likely he just has a different  opinion about the risk:reward ratio than some people. By spending $2 million he'd definitely win based on the game's probability, which should be somewhere in the neighborhood of 600k. That would give him just about a 1 in 4 chance of winning a jackpot worth almost 15 times as much as the $1.4 million he was risking.

          "a proper multi-play wager online with Pick 4 would've actually MADE him big money"

          Because he's not a moron and actually understands random events and probability he realizes that by betting $2 million on pick 4 he'd have won the statistically normal 50 or 60 cents on the dollar that goes to prizes. Risking $1.4 million for a 1 in 4 chances of winning 15 times as much is a calculated risk with a very big upside to offset the downside. Betting anything on the certainty of losing 40 to 50% is a strategy for the truly stupid.

            Avatar

            United States
            Member #198971
            June 16, 2019
            60 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 9, 2019, 2:11 pm - IP Logged

            These lottery officials must have intentionally let another person win the jackpot instead of Bernerd and take his money for the states

            How come some one win now after almost 2 years ? 

            After I checked that CT Lotto is a physical ball set drawing I see why Marantelli  went ahead with it and spoke openly to a lottery official about it. The CT Lottery says "Lottery drawings are open to the public for viewing."

            Marantelli had a 1 in 7 or 2 in 7 chance to win with 1 mil. or 2 mil. plays respectively. 

             

            This reminds me of Jerry and Marge Selbee who made an incredible amount by buying hundreds of thousands of tickets in certain games that at times had profitable odds if the JP wasn't won. Lottery officials knew what they were doing and didn't shut one of the games down for awhile, even though there were some rule violations such as printing the tickets themselves and when the store was closed.

              msharkey2001's avatar - Trek startrek.gif
              New Hampshire
              United States
              Member #136488
              December 12, 2012
              378 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 10, 2019, 6:27 am - IP Logged

              Wow I thought I was bad when I bought 5 lines of Connecticut Lotto! for 26 drawings back in August spending $125. Was down there on vacation and noticed the high jackpot and decided to spend a little cash. I’m not from CT myself, but I hope somebody local won it.

                TheGameGrl's avatar - Lottery-012.jpg
                A long and winding road
                United States
                Member #17083
                June 10, 2005
                6407 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 10, 2019, 12:34 pm - IP Logged

                He assumed no one else could possibly have a winning ticket. Arrogance. 

                Chances don't change .

                3443 2445 1220 1500 1320

                Value that which cannot be bought or sold.

                  Avatar

                  United States
                  Member #198971
                  June 16, 2019
                  60 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 10, 2019, 3:41 pm - IP Logged

                  He assumed no one else could possibly have a winning ticket. Arrogance. 

                  Chances don't change .

                  With enough time and money he could have won it for sure.  The odds are about 1 in 7 mil. which means that's how many different possible combinations of numbers there are. The payout is much more than $7 mil.

                  He knew going in to it he may not win it and that the odds were about 1-2 in 7 for him. He also knew that the drawing is very transparent and open in CT so there wasn't a risk of illegal action by lottery officials towards his efforts behind closed doors.

                    KY Floyd's avatar - lysol avatar.jpg
                    NY
                    United States
                    Member #23834
                    October 16, 2005
                    4246 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 15, 2019, 12:35 am - IP Logged

                    "Arrogance."

                    He's just not stupid. He had about a 1 in 4 chance of winning and the jackpot was worth almost 15 times as much as he was risking. He also knew that while there  was a chance that somebody else would also have a winning ticket he would have know that it was only a very small chance. Based on the expectation value his bet was statistically better than any bet that anybody here has ever made for a jackpot game.

                      Raven62's avatar - binary
                      25
                      New Jersey
                      United States
                      Member #17842
                      June 28, 2005
                      125885 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 15, 2019, 10:30 am - IP Logged

                      Sometimes Life Laughs At Your Best Laid Plans!

                      As it turns out: The Jackpot was Scooped Up by another:

                      https://www.lotterypost.com/news/329739

                      A mind once stretched by a new idea never returns to its original dimensions!

                      Catch-22: A dilemma or difficult circumstance from which there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions.

                      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges: When the republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous.

                        GuesssWork's avatar - NWSqnM
                        I-95
                        United States
                        Member #178805
                        December 17, 2016
                        1828 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: November 22, 2019, 5:20 am - IP Logged

                        "what an extremely dumb man"

                        More likely he just has a different  opinion about the risk:reward ratio than some people. By spending $2 million he'd definitely win based on the game's probability, which should be somewhere in the neighborhood of 600k. That would give him just about a 1 in 4 chance of winning a jackpot worth almost 15 times as much as the $1.4 million he was risking.

                        "a proper multi-play wager online with Pick 4 would've actually MADE him big money"

                        Because he's not a moron and actually understands random events and probability he realizes that by betting $2 million on pick 4 he'd have won the statistically normal 50 or 60 cents on the dollar that goes to prizes. Risking $1.4 million for a 1 in 4 chances of winning 15 times as much is a calculated risk with a very big upside to offset the downside. Betting anything on the certainty of losing 40 to 50% is a strategy for the truly stupid.

                        it remains unclear — absent any comment from him — what calculations he made in deciding it was worth the risk to buy so many random "Quick Picks." Despite the huge number of tickets purchased, he couldn't come close to covering all 7,059,052 possible combinations of six numbers out of a field of 44

                        Um what went wrong here with this guys mathmatical prowess and probability math? Numbers don't lie but he thunk he had an icicles chance in hell to survive,  to win. The dumb lottery officials were scratching their heads or laughing hysterically as to this smart guy's basic math lacking skills. I wonder if he is one of those who know it allThud 

                        Risking $1.4 million for a 1 in 4 chances of winning 15 times as much is a calculated risk with a very big upside to offset the downside. Betting anything on the certainty of losing 40 to 50% is a strategy for the truly stupid.

                         UM you do realize no matter what lottery game a player partakes in it is a losing proposition..Risk reward is an illusion in jackpot games to anyone who plays using math to win..The same holds true for daily game players. The only edge playing these games one can possibly have and it will never come from math unless the game is flawed is,

                         

                        1. a premonition
                        2. pure luck

                        Anything else and whomever is, in denial to themselves 

                        That Man's math did not line up with material order of the universe in this case it seems. lol

                        Pick-3:A Game Of Chance and Guesserie

                            a fool and his money are soon parted

                                          99.46% Luck .54% Skill?Green laugh

                         

                                                                                         

                          GuesssWork's avatar - NWSqnM
                          I-95
                          United States
                          Member #178805
                          December 17, 2016
                          1828 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 22, 2019, 5:35 am - IP Logged

                          With enough time and money he could have won it for sure.  The odds are about 1 in 7 mil. which means that's how many different possible combinations of numbers there are. The payout is much more than $7 mil.

                          He knew going in to it he may not win it and that the odds were about 1-2 in 7 for him. He also knew that the drawing is very transparent and open in CT so there wasn't a risk of illegal action by lottery officials towards his efforts behind closed doors.

                          wait, He knew going in to it he may not win it and that the odds were about 1-2 in 7 for him

                          His take on winning was skewed then through math or lacking of basic math, but hey he's just a hard core gambler and will wager on anything.

                          If 1-2 in 7 is what you're saying he had then he started out to fail.Why, what's the flip side of what your suggesting, is what he was actually up against so therefore he could not have thought up an actual clear win strategy through from the start or maybe he did just a flawed one it seems lol.

                           so is the glass half empty or half full in his case ??.

                           

                          a prime example of,   a fool and his money are soon parted Thud 

                          Pick-3:A Game Of Chance and Guesserie

                              a fool and his money are soon parted

                                            99.46% Luck .54% Skill?Green laugh

                           

                                                                                           

                            GuesssWork's avatar - NWSqnM
                            I-95
                            United States
                            Member #178805
                            December 17, 2016
                            1828 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 22, 2019, 5:50 am - IP Logged

                            "Arrogance."

                            He's just not stupid. He had about a 1 in 4 chance of winning and the jackpot was worth almost 15 times as much as he was risking. He also knew that while there  was a chance that somebody else would also have a winning ticket he would have know that it was only a very small chance. Based on the expectation value his bet was statistically better than any bet that anybody here has ever made for a jackpot game.

                            so let me get this straight.. Would you have taken that same chance if you had the funds to do so based on your 1 in 4 chance example you show he had? Just curious is all??

                            Pick-3:A Game Of Chance and Guesserie

                                a fool and his money are soon parted

                                              99.46% Luck .54% Skill?Green laugh