Search

pick 3 reduction using mathematical methods and the scientific calculatorReply
What if I prove that your elimination is wrong?
Jul 28, 2012, 2:54 pm - SergeM - Mathematics Forum

how to use the elimination of gauss in lotteries?
how to use the elimination of gauss in lotteries? target = delete within the matrix of the empty sectors draw near
Jul 14, 2016, 8:54 am - dr san - Mathematics Forum

question about using SASReply
First of all, welcome to LP. Lots of info here to read. I don't know what SAS is or means, but there are some posts in other forums about number elimination. you can find them by using the search function at the top of the page. Personally, I have not tried number elimination to pick my numbers, although technically when one picks numbers to play, they are rejecting other numbers....... Good luck and again welcome.
Feb 12, 2011, 8:33 am - rcbbuckeye - Mathematics Forum

Interest In Backtesting and Simulating Lottery SystemsReply
I'll take the time to backtest someones system, and I'll try making new predictions from the system, however, I do like the sums and rootsums the best, I like playing the bell curve, I know there are more numbers adding up to 12-13-14-15, then 6-7-8, but with some process of elimination and paying attention to what is due, I believe you can get more hits.
Jul 25, 2011, 9:33 am - sully16 - Mathematics Forum

The Most important Lottery StatisticsReply
OK, what you said is true most of the time but there are only few numbers that exhibit the 1) 2) and 3) you mentioned..even if you are right you can only reduce 3-5 numbers...ok i agree with you that eliminating certain unlikely numbers eliminates more combos and leaves better chances for success...however there are still many balls left..a better coverage strategy is needed... thats why i want to get to 5 most important statistical considerations also...you can still do your number elimination
May 21, 2008, 5:13 pm - benmas - Mathematics Forum

what does a prediction formula look like?Reply
We have 5/36, here. Sadly, it doesn't roll anywhere. 50 cents to win 50 Grand. On the other hand, there can be multiple winners, so one could play a buck or two. Like you, I have gone the way of self-limiting code. For me, at least, the hurdle in a winning formula has been more about the elimination of losing combos.
Jun 1, 2006, 2:58 pm - time*treat - Mathematics Forum

A Better Method for Pick3Reply
Back testing in my state did not prove worthy. Some hits but seldom.I like the challenge of tracking.The process of Elimination.The law of averagesThe good system postsThats where its at.No such thing as instant Gratification Have to work at it.
Jan 8, 2006, 6:56 pm - Amazing Grace - Mathematics Forum

Request statistical filtering opinion re Pick 3 number poolReply
From what I'm seeing you could be playing 60/six way singles, or 50/six way singles plus 20/3 way doubles. So depending on what has been happening in the last 120 days, it is very likely you could do elimination. Without knowing what is happening in the last 120 draws, it would be hard to give you hints with any degree of certainty. A scattershot/dump bet is not in your best interest.
Mar 29, 2011, 1:14 am - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum

The Most important Lottery StatisticsReply
What exactly?...Just eliminate some Cold numbers?..Thats not a statistic, its just a thing that occurs because some numbers come up more meaning some others will sit idle for some time... We all do that anyway..we eliminate certain numbers when making our picks...elimination helps but the filters should be geared more towards getting hits because thats where the money is
May 20, 2008, 9:35 pm - benmas - Mathematics Forum

The Most important Lottery StatisticsReply
Hi, I would suggest two catagories for the 5 most important filters. Individual number elimation and elimination of combinations. In either case, it is getting the highest amount eliminated with the least amount of error.
May 20, 2008, 2:54 pm - JKING - Mathematics Forum