United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
That's great you guys cracked his "code", ....
But, is it necessary to make a mockery of it like that? Maybe he really felt like he was "using numbers as a way to see the actual future", which is possible.....what do you think will be on the blue print for the world's first time machine? A vast sequence of numbers, number formulas, and number equations.
I think this guy may be on to something....as theology works.
I bet you guys won't believe me when I tell you this...
But, when I post my numbers in the pick 3 section, I don't use any "numbers" system. What I do, is whatever I feel, has happened that day, that is relatively important, I "translate it" to it's "numerical value".
I then translate that phrase to 3 different languages, in this order....english>language 1>language 2>language 3>, and ....language 3 makes it easy to convert the "phrase" to it's numerical value, which I then use.....
And those are the numbers I play.
All part of theology and numerology, the most powerful weapons in gambling.
United States Member #29344 December 26, 2005 317 Posts Online
Posted: January 22, 2006, 12:29 pm - IP Logged
Going to miss your posts when you leave and return to the "real world"...!
I'll miss this board! :)
I'll be back in new years of 2007 though! :)
WOW!!!!!!!!!!
You are one funny cat laverne. But, I'll leave you on your "sitcom" by yourself.
:)
If you actually read through my posts, you'd know, that, I mentioned I wouldn't have much time to be on lotterypost, while working, but, it's appearant I do. But, you didn't read through my posts, you "skimmed" through them, and came to a conclusion. :) (I got that from the quote you posted.....was that necesarry? lol)
Aaron's method didn't prompt me to reveal the guts of my method. I've always said this and that about numerical values, vibration resonance,...countless times. I was just giving some insights so the skeptics won't look at Aaron's method and turn a snickere'd face to it.
The validity of that link, with that method I posted is, like I said in the post.....based on the users ability to "mix" the "base" numbers. I won't post something I don't use. What sense would that make? Ofcourse, however I'm not going to reveal everything.....especially since I use multiple approaches and angles,...remember, I do things like this for a living.
:)
And Tenaj, I didn't take it personal...lol, no way. I just thought mocking it, would make it look bad, when it isn't bad at all. There is no way, you can ever compare any ground numbers method.....like say, the one up one down method, .....to the power of the mystics, spirituality, theology, numerology. No way.
Charlotte NC United States
Member #17,405
June 18, 2005
4,074 Posts
Offline
Cashman, any method that works is powerful, whether it up or down, mystics, theology, dreams, my baby sneezed at 9:19 so I will play 919. I normally don't laugh at anybody's method, but I am skeptic if someone say they can see the future.
United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
I understand, completely.
But, being closed to things like that will only limit your potential. Be skeptic, yes, ....but why make jokes about it? I dunno....just kind of bothered me, lol, I apologize for making a big "noise" outta nothin.
If someone saids they can see the future, I will beleive them, untill their performance prooves me wrong.
Why? Because numerology/Vibration resonance prooves that random is an illusion.
And time is a state of mind. (more or less, imagination).
Crazy mumbo jumbo, but, lol, .....I'm open to anything.
United States
Member #14
November 9, 2001
31,614 Posts
Offline
Sorry I couldn't copy and paste the info, it's white lettering. This guy was on radio last night, some pretty wild claims about the lotto, but for anyone who can understand this (I don't):
Tx United States
Member #4,570
May 4, 2004
5,180 Posts
Offline
Time ago, I also tried "Formulas (Kind of) " that is I found them while looking at past draws, but they worked on the past draws only for a few draws, I do find such things every once in a long while, but as they never work for long I very quickly forget about them, my "Regular" methods seem to be some-what more stable, for what-ever that is worth.
Michigan United States
Member #22,394
September 24, 2005
1,583 Posts
Offline
I am not sure how that equation comes into play. Taking the numbers from his chart, as I posted previously, this is how the equation gets the answers he shows.
INTEGER(075/p +666) =690
Now consider these situations:
Using the lowest 3 digit number INTEGER(000/p +666) =666
Using the highest 3 digit number INTEGER(999/p +666) =984
Do you see what happens? If that equation is to be used to predict numbers, it has to be able to predict as low as 000 and as high as 999. Yet it does neither. 666 is as low as it can go. 984 is as high as it can go. So it isn't clear to me how he uses that whatsoever.
Michigan United States
Member #22,394
September 24, 2005
1,583 Posts
Offline
cashman 87
>Without that, the formula is useless.
Well...you are right but that is understating it.
It is clear from the numbers in his charts that those 3 digit numbers are used. Regardless of how he chose those numbers he is using a broken equation. Go back to either the charts posted or to the website and run a few numbers from the charts. You will see that those are indeed what is inserted into the equation.
How he chose the numbers in his charts is irrelevant.
No matter what 3 digit lottery number is entered, the equation is useless because it does not reach the upper numbers nor does it reach the lower numbers. It is mechanically flawed. Whether the equation actually worked to predict winning numbers is another issue. The fact that it cannot predict numbers such as 233, 444, 455, 988, 999 under any circumstances is what makes it flawed.
I suppose one could say that it is effective if you only use it to predict numbers 666 through 984. But then what do you do the rest of the time?