Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 7, 2016, 8:59 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

"Successful Lottery Reasults" -

Topic closed. 47 replies. Last post 11 years ago by Coin Toss.

Page 3 of 4
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar

United States
Member #28973
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
Posted: February 28, 2006, 1:27 am - IP Logged

That's great you guys cracked his "code", ....

 

But, is it necessary to make a mockery of it like that?  Maybe he really felt like he was  "using numbers as a way to see the actual future", which is possible.....what do you think will be on the blue print for the world's first time machine?  A vast sequence of numbers, number formulas, and number equations.

 

I think this guy may be on to something....as theology works.

 

I bet you guys won't believe me when I tell you this...

 

But, when I post my numbers in the pick 3 section, I don't use any "numbers" system.  What I do, is whatever I feel, has happened that day, that is relatively important, I "translate it" to it's "numerical value".

 

I then translate that phrase to 3 different languages, in this order....english>language 1>language 2>language 3>, and ....language 3 makes it easy to convert the "phrase" to it's numerical value, which I then use..... 

And those are the numbers I play.

 

All part of theology and numerology, the most powerful weapons in gambling.

 

:)

 

 

http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/127529

 

So Cashman87 what is the validity of the above link?

Is this a method that you personally use for the pick 3?

It seems as though this post about Aaron has prompted you to reveal to us the "guts" of your prediction methods.

& you said you wouldn't be back until New Years 2007.


Standard Member
Standard Member

United States
Member #29344
December 26, 2005
317 Posts
Online
Top of pagePosted: January 22, 2006, 12:29 pm - IP Logged

Going to miss your posts when you leave and return to the "real world"...!

I'll miss this board!  :)

 

I'll be back in new years of 2007 though!  :)

WOW!!!!!!!!!! 

You are one funny cat laverne.  But, I'll leave you on your "sitcom" by yourself.

 

:)

 

If you actually read through my posts, you'd know, that, I mentioned I wouldn't have much time to be on lotterypost, while working, but, it's appearant I do.  But, you didn't read through my posts, you "skimmed" through them, and came to a conclusion.  :)  (I got that from the quote you posted.....was that necesarry?  lol)

Aaron's method didn't prompt me to reveal the guts of my method.  I've always said this and that about numerical values, vibration resonance,...countless times.  I was just giving some insights so the skeptics won't look at Aaron's method and turn a snickere'd face to it.

 

The validity of that link, with that method I posted is, like I said in the post.....based on the users ability to "mix" the  "base" numbers.  I won't post something I don't use.  What sense would that make?  Ofcourse, however I'm not going to reveal everything.....especially since I use multiple approaches and angles,...remember, I do things like this for a living.

 

:)

 

And Tenaj, I didn't take it personal...lol, no way.  I just thought mocking it, would make it look bad, when it isn't bad at all.  There is no way, you can ever compare any ground numbers method.....like say, the one up one down method, .....to the power of the mystics, spirituality, theology, numerology.  No way.

 

 

    LAVERNE MALONEY's avatar - smallgirl

    United States
    Member #1987
    August 5, 2003
    8968 Posts
    Online
    Posted: February 28, 2006, 1:39 am - IP Logged

    I didn't skim through anything Cashman87, that is how I could pull up a copy of what you stated. It stayed in my mind...

      Avatar

      United States
      Member #28973
      December 26, 2005
      439 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: February 28, 2006, 1:41 am - IP Logged

      But, the statements you made, means, you obviously did not read my posts enough to know what happened with me not being back here untill 2007.

       And you would know about the method I posted.....it is worth as much as your mixing technique/ability.

      So yes, you skimmed through my posts.

       

      It's no big deal bro.  No need to go back and forth, ...cool?

       

      :)

        Tenaj's avatar - michellea
        Charlotte NC
        United States
        Member #17406
        June 18, 2005
        4053 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: February 28, 2006, 1:44 am - IP Logged

        Yes NodCashman, any method that works is powerful, whether it up or down, mystics, theology, dreams, my baby sneezed at 9:19 so I will play 919.  I normally don't laugh at anybody's method, but I am skeptic if someone say they can see the future. 

        Hitting the number is the bottom line.

         

        takeemtothebank

          Avatar

          United States
          Member #28973
          December 26, 2005
          439 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: February 28, 2006, 1:50 am - IP Logged

          I understand, completely.

           

          But, being closed to things like that will only limit your potential.  Be skeptic, yes, ....but why make jokes about it?  I dunno....just kind of bothered me, lol, I apologize for making a big "noise" outta nothin.

           

          If someone saids they can see the future, I will beleive them, untill their performance prooves me wrong.

           

          Why?  Because numerology/Vibration resonance prooves that random is an illusion.

           

          And time is a state of mind.  (more or less, imagination).

          Crazy mumbo jumbo, but, lol, .....I'm open to anything.

           

           

            LAVERNE MALONEY's avatar - smallgirl

            United States
            Member #1987
            August 5, 2003
            8968 Posts
            Online
            Posted: February 28, 2006, 2:00 am - IP Logged

            But, the statements you made, means, you obviously did not read my posts enough to know what happened with me not being back here untill 2007.

             And you would know about the method I posted.....it is worth as much as your mixing technique/ability.

            So yes, you skimmed through my posts.

             

            It's no big deal bro.  No need to go back and forth, ...cool?

             

            :)

            Cashman87, I am not a "bro".

            You skimmed over my name.

            La is the feminine form. 

              Avatar

              United States
              Member #28973
              December 26, 2005
              439 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: February 28, 2006, 2:05 am - IP Logged

              Ah!

               

              I deeply apologize!

               

              Sorry!  Danget!  That's the 3rd time I've done that this week.....

               

              Guess I'm a criminal of "skimming" too.  LOL

               

              Cashman!  You big lunkhead!  lol

                LAVERNE MALONEY's avatar - smallgirl

                United States
                Member #1987
                August 5, 2003
                8968 Posts
                Online
                Posted: February 28, 2006, 2:08 am - IP Logged

                LOL

                That's a laugh. Laughing is good medicine.

                  Avatar

                  United States
                  Member #28973
                  December 26, 2005
                  439 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: February 28, 2006, 2:11 am - IP Logged

                  :)

                   

                  Haha, sure is!

                   

                  Laughing all the way to the bank after getting a pick 4 straight hit is good medicine too!

                   

                  lol, ....haven't experienced it yet, but,.....it'll be cool!  :)

                    emilyg's avatar - cat anm.gif

                    United States
                    Member #14
                    November 9, 2001
                    31354 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: February 28, 2006, 12:30 pm - IP Logged

                    Sorry I couldn't copy and paste the info, it's white lettering. This guy was on radio last night, some pretty wild claims about the lotto, but for anyone who can understand this (I don't):

                    Aaron C. Donahue

                    http://ummo.cc/S_L_R.html

                    back to what this is about - please

                    love to nibble those micey feet.

                     

                                                 

                      LANTERN's avatar - kilroy 28_173_reasonably_small.jpg
                      Tx
                      United States
                      Member #4570
                      May 4, 2004
                      5180 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: March 2, 2006, 3:52 am - IP Logged

                      Time ago, I also tried "Formulas (Kind of) " that is I found them while looking at past draws, but they worked on the past draws only for a few draws, I do find such things every once in a long while, but as they never work for long I very quickly forget about them, my "Regular" methods seem to be some-what more stable, for what-ever that is worth.

                      BibleOnline  ParishesOnline  ChristianRadioOnline   MassOnline   Mass

                      "Ten measures of beauty descended to the world, nine were taken by Jerusalem."

                        truecritic's avatar - PirateTreasure
                        Michigan
                        United States
                        Member #22395
                        September 24, 2005
                        1583 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: March 2, 2006, 10:30 pm - IP Logged

                        I am not sure how that equation comes into play.  Taking the numbers from his chart, as I posted previously, this is how the equation gets the answers he shows.

                        INTEGER(075/p +666) =690

                        Now consider these situations:

                        Using the lowest 3 digit number INTEGER(000/p +666) =666

                        Using the highest 3 digit number INTEGER(999/p +666) =984

                        Do you see what happens?  If that equation is to be used to predict numbers, it has to be able to predict as low as 000 and as high as 999.  Yet it does neither.  666 is as low as it can go.  984 is as high as it can go.  So it isn't clear to me how he uses that whatsoever. 

                          Avatar

                          United States
                          Member #28973
                          December 26, 2005
                          439 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: March 3, 2006, 5:43 am - IP Logged

                          All you need to know is what numbers is used in tha formula, and how they are used.

                           

                          Without that, the formula is useless.

                           

                          And, you still need "mixing".

                           

                          That 748 hit he got in the example was the "formula at it's best".

                           

                          The "formula" is not always at it's best.

                           

                          Numbers are sometimes, 3-4 digits way off.

                           

                          :)

                           

                          But, I will NEVER compare anything to theology/numerology.

                           

                          Nothing... no system, no formula, can beat that method of prediction.

                           

                          :)

                            truecritic's avatar - PirateTreasure
                            Michigan
                            United States
                            Member #22395
                            September 24, 2005
                            1583 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: March 3, 2006, 7:43 pm - IP Logged

                            cashman 87

                            >Without that, the formula is useless.

                            Well...you are right but that is understating it.

                            It is clear from the numbers in his charts that those 3 digit numbers are used.  Regardless of how he chose those numbers he is using a broken equation.  Go back to either the charts posted or to the website and run a few numbers from the charts.  You will see that those are indeed what is inserted into the equation.

                            How he chose the numbers in his charts is irrelevant. 

                            No matter what 3 digit lottery number is entered, the equation is useless because it does not reach the upper numbers nor does it reach the lower numbers.  It is mechanically flawed.  Whether the equation actually worked to predict winning numbers is another issue.  The fact that it cannot predict numbers such as 233, 444, 455, 988, 999 under any circumstances is what makes it flawed. 

                            I suppose one could say that it is effective if you only use it to predict numbers 666 through 984.  But then what do you do the rest of the time?

                              Raven62's avatar - binary
                              New Jersey
                              United States
                              Member #17843
                              June 28, 2005
                              49759 Posts
                              Online
                              Posted: March 3, 2006, 9:09 pm - IP Logged

                              Maybe the results are boxed?

                              ie: 984=489 boxed