Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 4, 2016, 11:14 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Look at this craziness in NY!

Topic closed. 17 replies. Last post 10 years ago by CASH Only.

Page 1 of 2
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #3676
February 10, 2004
425 Posts
Offline
Posted: July 30, 2006, 8:15 pm - IP Logged
July 29, 2006 LOTTO Drawing - 6 Jackpot Winner(s) in $8,000,000.00 LOTTO Drawing - Second prize pays $152,427.00 to 1 winner(s) 
 
 
July 29, 2006 LOTTO Winning Numbers:
5 - 10 - 15 - 25 - 30 - 35 BONUS NUMBER 53
Prize
Level
Numbers
Matched
Prize
Amount
No. of
Winners
First6 out of 6 numbers$8,000,000.006
Winning Counties: Dutchess, Erie
Second5 out of 6 numbers + bonus number$152,427.001
Winning Counties: Monroe(QP)
Third5 out of 6 numbers$69.00544
Fourth4 out of 6 numbers$9.004,829
Fifth3 out of 6 numbers$1.0055,886
    JAP69's avatar - alas
    South Carolina
    United States
    Member #6
    November 4, 2001
    8790 Posts
    Online
    Posted: July 30, 2006, 8:23 pm - IP Logged

    Those are the number sequences that you see talked about around here that players say they would not play.

    Nahhhhhhh it's not gonna happen.

    My signature says it all.

    WHATT

      Fibonacci's avatar - Lottery-050.jpg
      New York, NY
      United States
      Member #39471
      May 16, 2006
      2696 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: July 30, 2006, 8:24 pm - IP Logged

      Yea and all the so-called experts tell you never play straight or close to straight combinations like that. The joke's on them...

      $$$

        Avatar
        NY
        United States
        Member #23835
        October 16, 2005
        3474 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: July 30, 2006, 9:00 pm - IP Logged


        It's always good to remember that the expertise of most so-called experts is more often in their ability to market themselves than to offer sound opinions or useful info. This result reminds me of an article I once saw that claimed 1,2,3,4,5,6 is an unlikely combination because double digit numbers are more likely to be drawn than single digit numbers. As if that wasn't stupid enough, the article said nothing about how many winners there would be if 1,2,3,4,5,6 were actually drawn. It's also interesting to see the proof of how many people played a combination that so many others would have said was an unlikely combination.

          Avatar

          United States
          Member #1826
          July 11, 2003
          2645 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: July 31, 2006, 12:44 am - IP Logged

          It's all random.

          (insert signature here)

            Amazing Grace's avatar - lion
            rainbow lake
            Canada
            Member #25177
            November 2, 2005
            10764 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: July 31, 2006, 1:35 am - IP Logged

            Whats nice about those number are now you play

            3,6,9,13,16,19,23,26,29,33,36,39

            1,8,4,11,14,18,21,24,28,31,34,38,41,44,48

            Dont know if that lottery goes that high, choose from the numbers that apply and win some cash,

            Hang on to them for a few draws, Let me know if you get some wins

              Amazing Grace's avatar - lion
              rainbow lake
              Canada
              Member #25177
              November 2, 2005
              10764 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: July 31, 2006, 1:47 am - IP Logged
              Wed, Jan 18, 200622-37-38-44-55-59, Bonus: 16
              Sat, Jan 14, 200612-15-29-47-55-57, Bonus: 11
              Wed, Jan 11, 200601-02-04-15-24-57, Bonus: 26
              Sat, Jan 7, 200603-37-40-46-47-48, Bonus: 14
              Wed, Jan 4, 200610-15-20-25-38-51, Bonus: 43
                Avatar
                Morrison, IL
                United States
                Member #4657
                May 13, 2004
                1884 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: July 31, 2006, 8:04 am - IP Logged

                Yea and all the so-called experts tell you never play straight or close to straight combinations like that. The joke's on them...

                They only say that because it's likely you'll end up sharing the jackpot if you do.


                  United States
                  Member #379
                  June 5, 2002
                  11296 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: July 31, 2006, 11:59 am - IP Logged

                  Have all of you forgotten my rants about NY Lotto? The only reason the 5/6 and 4/6 payouts were so low is that the NY Lotto return is only 38%-40%.


                    United States
                    Member #17555
                    June 22, 2005
                    5582 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: August 1, 2006, 1:06 am - IP Logged

                    5-10-15-20-25-30

                    1-2-3-4-5-6

                    25-26-27-28-29-30

                    15-16-17-18-19-20

                    Those above and many more consecutives, fives, decades, and other biases, are just that. They're biased because of their presentation so to speak. Humans tend to make order out of chaos.

                    But here's where people have a problem understanding.

                    The number sets such as these, 3-14-17-22-29-30,  being somewhat distributed evenly don't leave strong impressions in the mind. 

                    It was just it's time for 3-14-17-22-29-30 combo to show. It might not come again for a thousand years. That's the fundamental explanation I have to offer, when people around me always use the biased version as their proof of how unlikely it is for those consecutive numbers to show. 

                    The lottery balls are an equal opportunity entity.

                      Avatar

                      United States
                      Member #1826
                      July 11, 2003
                      2645 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: August 1, 2006, 1:28 am - IP Logged

                      Have all of you forgotten my rants about NY Lotto? The only reason the 5/6 and 4/6 payouts were so low is that the NY Lotto return is only 38%-40%.

                      The only reason? Sure it played a part, but look at the numbers. An awful lot of people like multiples of 5, and seeing as was the winning combo, that played a part too.

                      (insert signature here)

                        Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
                        Zeta Reticuli Star System
                        United States
                        Member #30470
                        January 17, 2006
                        10345 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: August 1, 2006, 10:36 am - IP Logged

                         Wonder what Gail Howard would say about this one:

                        July 29, 2006 LOTTO Winning Numbers:
                        5 - 10 - 15 - 25 - 30 - 35 BONUS NUMBER 53

                        Since she (and other lotto "gurus") advise never playing numbers like that. 


                          United States
                          Member #379
                          June 5, 2002
                          11296 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: August 1, 2006, 1:31 pm - IP Logged

                          Meanwhile the NY Lottery is introducing its June "winner" of $45m now. Probably because of the recent record low 4/6 and 5/6 prizes.

                            Amazing Grace's avatar - lion
                            rainbow lake
                            Canada
                            Member #25177
                            November 2, 2005
                            10764 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: August 3, 2006, 3:24 am - IP Logged
                            Lotto
                            Wed, 8/2/2006
                            02-03-16-26-43-52, Bonus: 57
                            3,6,9,13,16,19,23,26,29,33,36,39,43 (43) should have been included in above string
                              Amazing Grace's avatar - lion
                              rainbow lake
                              Canada
                              Member #25177
                              November 2, 2005
                              10764 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: August 3, 2006, 3:29 am - IP Logged
                              Third5 out of 6 numbers$69.00544
                              Fourth4 out of 6 numbers$9.004,829
                              Fifth3 out of 6 numbers$1.0055,886

                               

                              Canadian lottos  3 out of 6 $10.00

                              4 out of 6 50 to 100 $

                              5 out of 6 1500$ to 3000 $

                              not all of them but close

                              this lotto is bad all should boycott it until they raise lower level prizes.

                              Just takes a Email to get the ball rolling.