My friend Pumpi.
A supercomputer or just any computer is just a very expensive paper weight and won't do anything for anybody by itself.
Without one or more computer programs it is not worth anything to anybody.
But you, of course, already knew that.
Speed of calculations is of course very important, but only if the right calculations are being made.
Look for a program called MaxHitPro using google, download it and then test it, there is a demo or trial version, I think that now in the newest version it does not ever time out in the demo mode so perhaps you should be able to test it forever if you want to.
I am telling you about that program just to give you an example of what you are talking about, that is a program that will test thousands of "SYSTEMS" (but not so many of them in the demo version) on the past draws, that is using the past draws.
As can more often than not be seen on that program, such a thing can be useless, because what worked for the past draws or on the past draws, more often than not, does not work on the future draws to come.
Why? It has to do with the prediction logic used on those thousands of "SYSTEMS".
Simple systems that use "Wrong Prediction(s) Logic(s), can't cope with a process or processes that are much more complicated than the simple thousands or billions of prediction systems.
-----------------
Prediction systems that work well and or often enough can't be created by those whose prediction logic(s) is or are wrong.
--------------
One must have a prediction logic or predictions logics that do work O.K. or well enough, before they can be put into a program or programs and used.
---------------------------------
In other words: If you don't know how to predict right or well often enough, then any prediction program that you make or can make won't predict right often enough.
------------------
What you say is that possible prediction logics must be put into a program, perhaps thousands, millions or billions of them and then tested to see if one or more of them will work well enough on future draws.
-----------
But Who will know What prediction systems, methods or logics to code into the program so they can be tested by the computer or supercomputer?
Wrong Prediction Logic in, Equals Wrong Prediction Out..
At least this is how it was with a prior version of "MaxHitPro that I tested for the pick 3 game, thousands of useless systems, that is useless for the next future draw, which is the draw that counts.
--------------
And a person who might already know how to predict right, if there is any such a person, surely does not need a supercomputer, he needs his theories put into programs and tested and almost any "Regular" computer should do for that.
Once he refines one or more working systems or methods then they can be put into a new program or programs and used to predict with.
Later newer ideas can again be put into newer programs and tested also, until that person finds his best possible prediction system or method for that particular game.
-------------
A person can't just test any possible prediction methods (Look at MaxHitPro) there could trillions or more of such useless systems.
A person most learn what prediction is all about, how to develop and or find and test possible winning systems, not trash systems.
----------------------------
First of all: Past game's statistics must be used as a base for any future predictions.
Scientific prediction based on past draws is the only right way to go, unless you are a good seer such as NostraDamus and or the Oracle of Delphi or at Delphi.
I call it "Statistical Prediction"
But as with "True Visions" or any other forms of prediction, proper interpretation(s) are a must or needed or the Statistics, Visions, Cards, Astrological or other Reading(s)are useless.
-------------------------
Statistics there are many, but perhaps more often than not we fail in their right interpretation.
-----------
Just to show you the power of their "Right" or of their "Near Right" interpretation, here is a past example of "Statistical Scientific Prediction".
That past prediction was posted by me at or on The Pick 3 Forum nearly a year ago.
-------------------
Texas Evening 18 may 06
Pick 3 3-4-7
Or reduced a little more.
023, 093, 129, 138, 143, 149, 183, 189, 203, 219, 235, 237, 239, 243, 246, 249, 253, 264, 269, 273, 279, 280, 289, 291, 293, 297, 302, 314, 318, 324, 325, 327, 345, 347, 354, 374, 381, 384, 387, 390, 392, 408, 413, 419, 423, 426, 429, 435, 437, 453, 473, 480, 483, 487, 491, 495, 523, 534, 624, 723, 729, 734, 789, 798, 813, 819, 837, 847, 879, 897, 908, 912, 914, 918, 924, 927, 945, 946, 978
76 straight combos.
--------------
I got the 347 Straight 1 time and 4 times also boxed on that one same prediction, in other words I got it 5 times out of the 6 possible times, as pick 3 singles are 6 way numbers.
----------------------------------
Now Next that past prediction Deflated or using Todd's Deflate Pick 3 System:
Output
Tier 5
138(183,318,381,813) 345(354,435,453,534) 347(374,437,473,734) 789(798,879,897,978)
Tier 4
129(219,291,912) 149(419,491,914) 235(253,325,523) 237(273,327,723) 246(264,426,624) 279(297,729,927)
Tier 3
023(203,302) 143(314,413) 189(819,918) 239(293,392) 243(324,423) 249(429,924)
Tier 2
093(390) 384(483) 387(837) 408(480) 487(847) 495(945)
Tier 1
269 280 289 908 946
Input:
023 093 129 138 143 149 183 189 203 219 235 237 239 243 246 249 253 264 269 273 279 280 289 291 293 297 302 314 318 324 325 327 345 347 354 374 381 384 387 390 392 408 413 419 423 426 429 435 437 453 473 480 483 487 491 495 523 534 624 723 729 734 789 798 813 819 837 847 879 897 908 912 914 918 924 927 945 946 978
Filters: No filtering selected
---------------
As you can see, it can be Deflated to only 27 Boxed picks. or to:
20 Straight pick 3 numbers if only Tier 5 is used, which was the most likely right predicted tier for that particular prediction method used at that time.
---------------
So 720 straight singles could be reduced or predicted down to only 20 straight singles.
----------------------------
But four4me is right, it is very unlikely for numbers to be predicted right down to only 1 of them, not so much with the pick 3 but for other lottery games.
---------------
By the way, Don't ask me about that particular prediction of mine or about any other one, they are all more or less unique and after I make them, I hardly ever remember how they are mad, as I don't keep records of how particular predictions are made, some of them more or less similar, but never exactly in the very same way, so far anyway.
-------------
Your friend Fernando.
---------------
Well! I have already wasted several of my free uses of the Deflate 3 and also of the Inspector 3 trying to prove points to people, but is O.K. I still have enough free tries.