mid-Ohio United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by four4me on Aug 12, 2007
PAC then you might as well give up because it's not possible for a system to win constantly.
No system can predict with 100% accuracy 100% of the time. If you had a system that produce one pick 3 straight a week then you found something worth playing.
That's one of the reasons I prefer playing jackpot games. You can lose a lot playing any lottery game but at least with a jackpot game you win once you're probably ahead for life compared with a pick3 game you've got to win often to just stay even.
* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
United States
Member #51,267
April 3, 2007
529 Posts
Offline
No sysem works? Pft! Just look at my threads in the Pick 5 forum. I could NEVER get those kinds of wins without my system. Every game would be a TOTAL loss.
United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Luminus on Aug 13, 2007
No sysem works? Pft! Just look at my threads in the Pick 5 forum. I could NEVER get those kinds of wins without my system. Every game would be a TOTAL loss.
Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,301 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Luminus on Aug 13, 2007
No sysem works? Pft! Just look at my threads in the Pick 5 forum. I could NEVER get those kinds of wins without my system. Every game would be a TOTAL loss.
What is so hard about giving a list of 50 Pick-3 combos and say "these numbers are good in all states"?
And what's worse, somebody will pick 50 numbers, hit 1 of them in the box, and 4 other people will congratulate them. Where I come from if you hand the lottery clerk $50 and get back $41.50, you lost money.
I'm not knocking the predictors; just the people that don't understand you can win anything unless you bet. Do you really believe people are betting over $100,000 a year on Pick-3s, 4s, 5s, and 6s? And some over a $1 million.
What is so hard about giving a list of 50 Pick-3 combos and say "these numbers are good in all states"?
And what's worse, somebody will pick 50 numbers, hit 1 of them in the box, and 4 other people will congratulate them. Where I come from if you hand the lottery clerk $50 and get back $41.50, you lost money.
I'm not knocking the predictors; just the people that don't understand you can win anything unless you bet. Do you really believe people are betting over $100,000 a year on Pick-3s, 4s, 5s, and 6s? And some over a $1 million.
I don't play Pick-3, so I don't understand your point. Playing $50 and getting back $41.50 is loads better than getting back NOTHING. That is what you need to understand. You're not winning anything now, are you? So clearly my system works 99.9% of the time.
What is so hard about giving a list of 50 Pick-3 combos and say "these numbers are good in all states"?
And what's worse, somebody will pick 50 numbers, hit 1 of them in the box, and 4 other people will congratulate them. Where I come from if you hand the lottery clerk $50 and get back $41.50, you lost money.
I'm not knocking the predictors; just the people that don't understand you can win anything unless you bet. Do you really believe people are betting over $100,000 a year on Pick-3s, 4s, 5s, and 6s? And some over a $1 million.
I don't play Pick-3, so I don't understand your point. Playing $50 and getting back $41.50 is loads better than getting back NOTHING. That is what you need to understand. You're not winning anything now, are you? So clearly my system works 99.9% of the time.
"I don't play Pick-3, so I don't understand your point."
You were talking about predictions and I don't see very many atta-boys when somebody hits 2 numbers plus the Mega or Power ball. Most of those are reserved for Pick-3 pickers.
"Playing $50 and getting back $41.50 is loads better than getting back NOTHING."
If they did that every day that would be an 83% winning percentage when 100% just breaking even, but they don't do that everyday. The game odds are 1000 to 1, it's pays 500 to 1 and you think putting up $50 where at the most you can win is $241.50 is a good bet? That’s not even 5 to 1 odds.
"You're not winning anything now, are you?"
Actually in the last 3 week trying a new method, I am in the black. And if I do hit all 5 I'm going to get over 5000 to 1 odds on my money.
"That $244 earned $1,000."
That's around 3 to 1 odds. Did all the previous $244 wagers earn $1000 too?
United States
Member #51,267
April 3, 2007
529 Posts
Offline
Sorry, but you might as well be speaking French to me with all those statistics. I'm not a mathematician. All I know is this: when I played without the system, I didn't win squat. Using the system, I win something. If that's not good enough for you to use a system, then you're playing for all the wrong reasons. I'm not a big time gambler. This is fun for me and winning – ANY win – is an exciting event to me.
When I break this lottery, remember what I said. If Raven62 can beat this thing with a system, I can beat it too!
Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,301 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Luminus on Aug 14, 2007
Sorry, but you might as well be speaking French to me with all those statistics. I'm not a mathematician. All I know is this: when I played without the system, I didn't win squat. Using the system, I win something. If that's not good enough for you to use a system, then you're playing for all the wrong reasons. I'm not a big time gambler. This is fun for me and winning – ANY win – is an exciting event to me.
When I break this lottery, remember what I said. If Raven62 can beat this thing with a system, I can beat it too!
.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking what you're doing and do hope you hit the big one and invite me to the party.
United States
Member #48,616
January 3, 2007
87 Posts
Offline
What if you finally find out that there is no "System" that works? What if you find out that there is nothing that gets you close ......except for the plain old math averages .
***
Not to reopen an old and mildly unpleasant "can of worms", but "the phenomenon" would allow a person to quite literally predict the daily/pick 3 and 4 type games correctly 100% of time without failure.
"Genuinely random numbers occurring in multiple columns are actually intelligent* progressions always forming."
I still haven't been able to objectively determine what the principles and fundamental laws and orders of operation(s) actually are that allow its existence; consequently, I have never been able to make any practical use of the phenomenon.
Someday someone's going to figure all of those things out.
What is so hard about giving a list of 50 Pick-3 combos and say "these numbers are good in all states"?
And what's worse, somebody will pick 50 numbers, hit 1 of them in the box, and 4 other people will congratulate them. Where I come from if you hand the lottery clerk $50 and get back $41.50, you lost money.
I'm not knocking the predictors; just the people that don't understand you can win anything unless you bet. Do you really believe people are betting over $100,000 a year on Pick-3s, 4s, 5s, and 6s? And some over a $1 million.
I don't play Pick-3, so I don't understand your point. Playing $50 and getting back $41.50 is loads better than getting back NOTHING. That is what you need to understand. You're not winning anything now, are you? So clearly my system works 99.9% of the time.
Luminus, are you telling me that you consistently win using that 244 dollar system? And I'm not talking a few free qps.