The following is an excerpt of the Koycerin wagering method.
Upon the first presentation of my discovery which we will refer to as "Random Number Displacement" or RND, for brevity, the old belief, which is still the accepted rule of random numbers by most students, was suppose to show that regardless of what happened in the past (results), it would have no bearing on the future. In other words,, if a coin was flipped 10 times and heads came up 10 times, then the odds of heads showing on the 11th toss were the same as the first toss. It was this accepted belief, which I know is wrong, which caused me to question the other accepted belief regarding random numbers.
The above law is not correct since even chances are so seldom one sided as 10 to 1. If there is a 50/50 chance something will occur and after 10 occurences only one thing has occured. The odds are not still 50/50! The odds climb continually against the same occurence happening.
But the accepted law is correct if you start the first time each time, but not if you toss the coin repeatedley. But since you do not anything only once, the accepted law is not right. You do not only play one hand of blackjack in your whole life. Or make only one bet on a horse or a dog, or only bet once on keno or a football game.
To wager means to bet in a continuous fashion on a certain game or games. You never make one bet and quit the rest of your life. It does not matter that you make your bets days or weeks apart or from weekend to weekend, or month to month. You bet continuously. To make more than one bet is when the accepted law cannot be applied.
Now consider this. If any game of chance which is played more than one time does not follow the rule of odds, like it is supposed to when only one bet is made....how can subsequent results (bets) be also ruled by that one occurence rule? How can you say the odds of tossing a coin and catching heads 10 times in a row is the same as tossing that coin once and getting heads? You cant! Just try and see how hard it is to have one side of a coin come up even three or four times in a row...but yet we are told the odds are the same.
All this leads to one conclusion....what has happened has as much influence on what will happen, and games of chance do not have series of events which are unconnected to what occured before and after any individual event.
In other words a random number is not truly random unless there is no past results to define the event. This would mean only the very first occurences is the number or event truly random.
Now we will take this one step further. If we know that past occurences influence future results, then we also must know that certain past occurences will foretell certain future events right? This means that from what has happened we can predict what will happen a good percentage of the time, not 100% but very close.
Incidently, it should be understoos that that the game or event involved is completely unimportant. It does does not matter if you are involved with making bets on football games or horse racing...both can be considered a random event even though we admit a large difference between these two events and others...like slot machines for example.
If past happenings can foretell future events, then think about how one can profit from knowing what will happen a good percentage of the time? We cannot be correct 100% of the time, but we do not need to, to be very successful.
We can be very successful by using what I call "Pattern Verification". This remarkable discovery was only touched upon many years ago by a very clever scientist trying to verify the size of the universe by not using a regular number sequence..like 1,2,3,4, etc... This does the work of calculation without calculating! Although the answer is not always 100% correct, it does not need to be.
I will give you an example;
We know that 1X4 =4,,,,and that 2x4 is 8, and 3x4=12...and 5x4=20. But wait....we left out one...4x4. Suppose we don't know what the answer is to the problem 4x4. We do know that whatever the answer is, it is more than 3x4 and less than 5x4. The answer must be between 13 and 19. Rather than just make a guess, we will average the difference so we can be close to what the real answer might be. Add the 13 to the 19 and we get 32. We added two numbers, so we divide the number by teo...for the average of....guess what..16. Do you see what we just did? We found the answer to 4x4 without directly knowing what the answer was!
In the above example, something else should have been discovered, do you see how past results foretold future ones and then how the correct "patteren" discovered the answer for the problem which we had no answer for?
It is the same with random events or gambling. There are no real random occurences...just results which are "Displaced" temporarily...and by verifying the pattern of displacement we can predict most of the time how the occurence will get back on track.
Lets take a very simple experiment, tossing a coin for example. The normal mathematical expectation should go as follows;
Heads, tails, heads, tails, heads, tails, heads, tails, heads, tails.
This is the way it should go since there is an almost even chance for either side to come up. Although the law of large numbers would dictate that results can be lopsided for a given time in either direction, the mathematical expectation is 50/50. Now when the mathematical expectation deviates from the norm...we have a simplified exaample of RND. An example would be...(H=heads...T=Tails):
H, T, H, T, H, T, H, T, T, T, H, T, H, T, H, T, H, T, T, T, H, T,...etc..
The red signifies RND occuring.
It goes on and on, and my hands are getting tired....LOL