Still can't find anyone who want's to play your game, keep trying I am sure there is someone
out there. Since you still feel the need to attack my digit system I must attemp to convence
you of the error of your ways. Eyerything posted above about the symbols or graphics means
nothing and shows your total lack of understanding. Around 20 members and I have formed
a private group where we can talk about the digit system without your comments cluttering
up the yard. I posted a question to the group members asking them a similar question to the
one I ask you now. Lets say that I gave you a power ball ticket and told you with 100% certainty
that 5 of the numbers were on the ticket. How many tickets would you need to purchase to ensure
a jackpot. Of the total tickets how many lower prizes of 3 of 5 and 4 of 5 would you end up with.
I told you way back I knew what I was doing but you don't seem to be able to pass up the chance
to take a dump anywhere you are not wanted. I thought you could read between the lines as to
just what I was doing when I posted this system but you missed it by a lightyear. Someday I will
post my intentions and then you will really feel like a JA. I will give another little hint as I feel so
good about the changes that have been made.
Enough of that now on to the lesson. The main idea behind the digit system is the selection of the
digits. Close to 80% of all draws contain 5 or 6 digits that make up the five numbers within any set.
This is not random nor is this information gotten from viewing past drawings. If you check any number
lottery you can find this information within the whole matrix of sets, Six number lotteries will be a
little different but the same principles apply. The drawings will always follow the matrix. If 37% of
the total sets have 2 odd numbers then 37% of the draws will have 2 odd numbers. Just looking and
studying the matrix will give a person a very good Idea of how to play and thus the digit system is born.
You think that all of this is junk and useless to the point that it has no value in helping someone play
a better set and I think you are off your rocker. I had a friend that won $200,000 dollars playing
PB and to talk to them they almost hit the jackpot because they missed by just one number. I wanted
to laugh but did not. First it was a QP that hit the 5 of 5 w/o the powerball. Take some time and make
the calculations above to see just how close they came and that is only if they knew that 5 of the winning
numbers were on that ticket.
Picking 5 or 6 digits to play is not forcing these digits to be drawn, Picking 5 digits to play is very different
then predicting which 5 numbers to play. Picking 5 of 10 gives the odds of 1 in 252 and picking 6 of 10
gives 1 in 210 chance of being correct. Picking 5 of 39 gives odds of 1 in 575757. This first step even at
1 in 200+ odds is a very big order and everyone that has my software will tell you it is very hard to
do. The next step in the digit system is to try and time your play to the days that you think will include
all three base digits 1-2-3. These digits also follow the matrix and the percent of drawings that will have
them can be calculated also. Now if a person plays 5 digits and 3 of them will be 1-2-3 then that person
only needs to select two more digits from seven. This gives odds of 1 in 21 for selecting the correct digits.
Now on most days I can by using some simple common sense and a few other calculations select two
2 digits of the seven that I believe will not be drawn. This leaves me with a 2 of 5 selection that gives odds
of 1 in 10. The last step of the digit system is to select Total digits. Total digits are all digits that make up
a set excluding any single digit number's paded zero. This is the whole digit system, my software has many
tools aimed at helping make the selections but depends very much on how the user defines the data for any
one selection. Picking 5 numbers from a pool of 39 gives odds of 1 in 575757. The methd I have posted can
place the winning set within a very small group compared to all possible sets in the matrix.
Playing a QP is the same as removing 34 numbers so that argument dosen't hold water either. The digit
system is a method that makes it somewhat easy to trap the winning combination within a small percent of
the total sets. Even if I am left with 5,000 sets the odds have been reduced to the point that if many people
played my system then the lottery could not survive. I won't release what I am working on now because it
is unfinished and partly because of what would happen to the lottery. Even if I could trap the winning set
in 5000 drawings 1 out of every 10 attemps this would beat the odds of the game, even if I could trap the
winning set only 2 or 3 times in 100 attemps I would still beat the odds.
I am sure that you could ask anyone using my software if this could be done and they would tell you that it
would be many more times then the 1 in 10 attemps. I think I could do it 5 out of 10 draws on average. My
software also has conditional settings for each digit that can allow a person to play up to 8 digits and still be
in the 5000 range. You need to try this and prove it to yourself as I allready know it can be done. My goal is
to trap the winning set in less then 20 sets. This may take me many more years to do on any kind of a
regular bases but that does'n keep me from trying.