Tanhauser Gates Holy See (Vatican City State)
Member #139,275
February 18, 2013
254 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by SergeM on Nov 17, 2013
Leapfrogs or adjacent numbers or consecutives ... .
LOTTO
1
2
3
4
5
6
C
_
_
_
1/10/2011
1
2
10
18
28
41
29
4
2:2
_
5/10/2011
17
18
20
23
24
41
1
4
2:2
1
8/10/2011
11
14
19
30
38
41
17
0
_
1
12/10/2011
2
11
18
20
39
42
24
0
_
4
15/10/2011
25
27
29
31
42
44
17
0
_
2
19/10/2011
12
14
16
18
21
41
15
3
3:1
3
22/10/2011
6
7
17
19
22
25
2
2
2:1
3
26/10/2011
3
9
14
15
28
30
17
2
2:1
1
29/10/2011
3
8
22
25
37
41
12
0
_
1
2/11/2011
2
3
18
21
31
35
7
2
2:1
3
5/11/2011
4
14
21
25
33
42
39
0
_
1
9/11/2011
8
22
24
31
42
45
28
0
_
2
12/11/2011
4
7
23
28
38
41
11
0
_
3
16/11/2011
16
18
20
22
35
40
1
0
_
2
19/11/2011
8
10
18
24
28
30
2
0
_
1
23/11/2011
4
6
9
12
33
45
3
2
2:1
2
26/11/2011
6
22
35
36
38
39
8
4
2:2
1
30/11/2011
6
8
10
27
29
44
17
0
_
0
3/12/2011
4
10
14
19
35
40
5
2
2:1
1
7/12/2011
3
4
9
11
38
39
42
4
2:2
4
10/12/2011
2
6
10
22
40
41
33
2
2:1
4
The outer right column counts the scoring adjacent numbers or leapers that are not repeaters! I want them pure.
The second last column counts the adjacent numbers in a drawing results by groups. 2:2 stands for (1,2)+(28,29), or simply 4 adjacent numbers, or four consecutive numbers, or twice delta 1.
This is a local 6+C out of 45. I only mentally do the count, but I programmed it in Excel. You can make it your game to chase those numbers.
Hello again Serge M:
Thank you for your extensive explanation.
I see that the numbers adjacentes are very important for you.
I hope that they will be also for me, when I learn to eliminate the "not valid" adjacents ones in every drawing.
(Then, they can be a really interesting group of numbers).
I will study your chart slowly when I´ll have time, because the part of " 2:2, 2:1 ", etc., I have not assimilated it still very well.
mid-Ohio United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by lottolot on Nov 18, 2013
Hi RJOh:
The adjacents numbers , i think, are only one moregroup of numbers to considering.
I dont think we can obtain a great prize only with these numbers.
In addition it is necessary to consider more groups of numbers, as for example the more frequent numbers(hot) or the infrequent numbers (cold).
With the sum of all of them optimized, probably, some day, let's be able to obtain some great prize, or more surely not...
Cheers
With jackpot games a system only has to work a few times and the one using it only has to get lucky once. I have a system that's almost as simple that I got lucky with back in February and missed winning my state's Classic Lotto jackpot by one number, I even posted it on the prediction board.
Since then it could have picked the winning combinations another six times but the luckiest I got was a match 4. I still play ten lines every drawing using that system hoping to get lucky again with all six numbers the next time.
* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *