Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Jan 30, 2014
Whether we admit it or not , all our workouts and bets are sectional, why? 'cos you bet a section on each event by using filters (sum,roots, .....). So why not take most of filters out of the equation by setting a limit for N. For P4/ P3, the limit is 9 (but you have 10 elements), hope you see the connection between N=9 and number of pool elements(10), so subsetting my pool with N=7,6..does not change the number of elements(10), if the assumed criteria is used. Lets use the ONTARIO data to expain my approach to subsets>
ONT>P3>EVE
Every subset is valid for a time frame (you may have overlapping sets, but format is OLD to NEW).
Take any draw set,1/ my criteria is position 1 and 2 to generate a subset, 2/form a pair with pos 1 and 2
of subset and 3/ reducing the subset by deleting common digit of DRAW set and SUBSET.
DRAW SUBSET PAIRS Reduced Subset reduced pair (R)
781 1360 16-10-36-30 360 36-30 7,8
(don't pair 13) (common digit 1)
148 3546 34-36-54-56 356 35-36 1,8
718 6013 61-63-01-03 603 60-63 7,8
NOW you have this base 36,36,63 to turn into cash > hits 360,542,638 all str8 .Remnants > remaining digits of Draw set when SUBSET is reduced, eg draw 781 had subset 1360, the digit 1 was the reducer, remaining 7,8 (this are mostly your x), Though you're reducing N, R placed you back in the POOL.
Note that the pair 36 overlaps for old and recent workouts, this gives a high degree of certainty for youto wage higher for str8 hits, is about prize RATIO not the nimble hit ratio!