Braselton Ga United States
Member #121,659
January 14, 2012
1,126 Posts
Offline
RL would THING have Cash 4 also i could use it match Cash 3 or Cash 4 i believed the old Slider and Thing would work great together. Thank You for all you do for us and your time.
Braselton Ga United States
Member #121,659
January 14, 2012
1,126 Posts
Offline
I am retired now the grand kids keep me busy. I play now when i get the feeling i don't play the big games that often. I take the best line and i play it for 7 days on cash 3 or 4. If i get all 3 or 4 play those str for 7 days.
United States
Member #132,094
August 26, 2012
1,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on May 14, 2017
OMJ
The THING was built around a (rogue-core) so it will handle any type of game and it only generates one line.
At some point the option for more than one line might be added as it's still in the early development stages.
It should not be thought of as a predictor but rather a automated system setup tool. As mentioned above
it's based on the rogue-core so the only difference between pick-3 and mega-millions is the number of values
needed to reduce to a single line. All analysis is focused on rogue values 0 to 3 or in a second stage where
a steps-analysis is used, it's limited to 0 or 1. As in many of my other projects the code that chooses the value
will be coded with universal input/output stages so that the code that makes the actual choice can be swapped
out without having to change anything else in the program. Kind of like using a toaster where we pull out one
slice and drop in another.
I have been thinking about some of the stuff Jade posted in the math forum which may help me figure out where
I went wrong in some of my earlier attempts. I won't know anything for sure until I test it but keeping my fingers
crossed thinking I might know where I went wrong.
Anyway, I have lost interest in doing long winded analysis and want something that will give me my line or lines
at the push of a button. Not as young as I once was and my Priorities seem to be piling up. I got to make cuts
somewhere. I think the THING will be my last lottery program and it will give me plenty to do whenever I feel the
urge. I cashed in a few winning tickets yesterday and the guy at the counter printed a lucky-for-life ticket out by
mistake. I told him I would take it, who knows, maybe it's a winner. After 30 years of writing lottery tools and
then hitting on a quick-pick, priceless.
RL
At the very beginning back on 2003 to 2005 or so, I noticed that I could not analyze a long list of past winning numbers and that I could not take hours trying to figure out which winning number might come out next.
And yes, I saw that I wanted to predict the very next winning number and not some other future winning number that who knows when it might come out.
And it had to be a more or less accurate and quick prediction, I did not have all day.
One or a very few numbers just would not do, but getting a winning number inside a bigger pool of numbers might be more likely to happen.
After all, it was not software making a prediction, but myself and I could only study and use from 1 up to 4 or so past winning numbers, so my prediction for the very next winning number had to come from a very quick study of the last 1 to 4 past winning numbers and I had to produce a good enough size pool of numbers if I wanted the next winning number to be among them.
The prediction logic based on those 1 to 4 past winning numbers had to be always about the same.
I wanted to use as simple a prediction logic as possible.
One day years later I discovered a much more accurate way of predicting and it had the potential to produce (predict) fewer numbers, but it was a much more complicated way and I had to do much more work and I also had to use software, the "core" of the prediction was made by prediction software and then I had to extract-refine what I needed from that using one or a few other software, but the results were much better, almost kind of magical.
Anyhow, all those years on and mostly off trying a few things here and there was just a past time, it was something interesting to do, since many years now, I quit doing all of that, even when I did predict, I hardly ever did, except at the very beginning maybe the first 1 to 3 years.
I did discover 1 or 2 things about pick 3 lottery random and it's prediction.
Prediction, it is all about the prediction logic used, regardless of the use of software and or not.
United States
Member #132,094
August 26, 2012
1,243 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by RL-RANDOMLOGIC on May 14, 2017
OMJ
The THING was built around a (rogue-core) so it will handle any type of game and it only generates one line.
At some point the option for more than one line might be added as it's still in the early development stages.
It should not be thought of as a predictor but rather a automated system setup tool. As mentioned above
it's based on the rogue-core so the only difference between pick-3 and mega-millions is the number of values
needed to reduce to a single line. All analysis is focused on rogue values 0 to 3 or in a second stage where
a steps-analysis is used, it's limited to 0 or 1. As in many of my other projects the code that chooses the value
will be coded with universal input/output stages so that the code that makes the actual choice can be swapped
out without having to change anything else in the program. Kind of like using a toaster where we pull out one
slice and drop in another.
I have been thinking about some of the stuff Jade posted in the math forum which may help me figure out where
I went wrong in some of my earlier attempts. I won't know anything for sure until I test it but keeping my fingers
crossed thinking I might know where I went wrong.
Anyway, I have lost interest in doing long winded analysis and want something that will give me my line or lines
at the push of a button. Not as young as I once was and my Priorities seem to be piling up. I got to make cuts
somewhere. I think the THING will be my last lottery program and it will give me plenty to do whenever I feel the
urge. I cashed in a few winning tickets yesterday and the guy at the counter printed a lucky-for-life ticket out by
mistake. I told him I would take it, who knows, maybe it's a winner. After 30 years of writing lottery tools and
then hitting on a quick-pick, priceless.
RL
What I never liked about lottery numbers predictors is that they try to predict numbers, what I always wanted was a program that would try to predict characters-symbols then I could use such a program to predict with many kinds of "things", it would be more like a universal predictor, most people have very little imagination, they fail to see the potential in some things.
Anyhow, your Thing" seems like a very good "Thing".