Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,302 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Timewalkerv on May 17, 2018
All ends up equaling out at some point for short time. Meaning nothing ? That's the pessimistic quote I've heard 100 times anyway.
Why don't you guys debating systems pick a neutral game and state to play as a grudge match !!! Then reveal what program was used for the event.
"Why don't you guys debating systems pick a neutral game and state to play as a grudge match !!!"
IMO, most of the systems are primitive types of RNGs and the system makers usually leave it up to the reader to create playable picks using vague instructions. It would be refreshing to see a system maker actually follow their creation for at least a month. But they usually post 50 straight/box pick-3s (good for all states) that if played would results in a tremendous loss.
New York, NY United States
Member #140,628
March 23, 2013
11,943 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Stack47 on May 17, 2018
"Why don't you guys debating systems pick a neutral game and state to play as a grudge match !!!"
IMO, most of the systems are primitive types of RNGs and the system makers usually leave it up to the reader to create playable picks using vague instructions. It would be refreshing to see a system maker actually follow their creation for at least a month. But they usually post 50 straight/box pick-3s (good for all states) that if played would results in a tremendous loss.
Interesting point. I would have to say it depends of course. But for fun, it would be interesting without any unnecessary criticism. But from the point of view you speak of, sure. I mean I could, but attention span, and then state to state differences. It would be consuming. The wins depend on the player’s instincts or thoughts. Most systems overall lose. They go hot and cold, what I mean by depends. And imo a good player uses multiple systems and makes a choice. But, good point.
Sometimes you do the right thing just because it’s right.
Life's a game of mathematics, if you can't figure that out I don't know what to tell you.
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,095 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LA Igrok on Apr 18, 2018
Here is a simple test for any lottery player or gambler. Let's say there is a casino roulette. No "zero" or "double zero" sectors. Just 36 numeric sectors enumerated from 1 to 36. If to spin the wheel 36 times in a row then how many unique numbers will play? Your opinions, please?
If to spin the wheel 36 times in a row then how many unique numbers will play? Your opinions, please?
The above query is a hint for any lottery matrix.It reduces your data, helps in STRUCTURING data progression. The answer to the question as important as it my seem, focus should be on the INTENT behind the question.
Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,302 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Soledad on May 17, 2018
Interesting point. I would have to say it depends of course. But for fun, it would be interesting without any unnecessary criticism. But from the point of view you speak of, sure. I mean I could, but attention span, and then state to state differences. It would be consuming. The wins depend on the player’s instincts or thoughts. Most systems overall lose. They go hot and cold, what I mean by depends. And imo a good player uses multiple systems and makes a choice. But, good point.
The first system I used was to simply add up the number of times each pick-3 digit was drawn in the last 6 drawings. The idea is to look for 3 digits that only appeared once or not at all and that was the play. I did some back testing and found there were very few times when there were 3 digits to play and the system totally ignored doubles. The results were similar to what is expected from standard distribution and ordinary cause and effect.
Get a deck of cards, take out an Ace through Ten, shuffle them, draw them one at a time and record the results. Create ten lines with the first line being the first card/number drawn with the second and third. The second line is the second number drawn with the third and the forth. Continue until all ten cards/numbers are used. The results are a 2 if 3 wheel should create at least one box hit in any state with two daily drawings.
As you suggested combine the systems using either starting with the most likely digits to the least, the least likely to the most or any order, creates the same 2 if 3 ten line wheel with the same one box hit in any state with two daily drawing probability. There are many other ways to enter the digits to include doubles and triples.
Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,302 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on May 18, 2018
If to spin the wheel 36 times in a row then how many unique numbers will play? Your opinions, please?
The above query is a hint for any lottery matrix.It reduces your data, helps in STRUCTURING data progression. The answer to the question as important as it my seem, focus should be on the INTENT behind the question.
It's obvious this thread is just a promo for a lottery e-book.