How do you actually pick your numbers?Prev TopicNext Topic

• Brock Lee

  

  us
  Member #231,828
  May 4, 2023
  1,692 Posts
  Online
  Jul 16, 2026, 11:34 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Stat$talker

  Quote: Originally posted by Stat$talker on Jul 16, 2026

    Picking the right viable numberz, iz just az important az uzin the right wheel..

  Often, certain numbaz will scream "pick Mee" , but you gotta hone ya "Ball Whisperer" skillz..

  Most Playaz tune to da wrong channel...the correct channel izz....

                                 🎱  " 50 "

                🎤 "Aaand, We have # "8"...

   

  -Stat$talker 

  how are you able to get close enough to the lottery's equipment so that the balls can hear you whispering to them?

  "don't believe everything you read on the internet." -- abraham lincoln

  "abraham lincoln is a liar." -- william shakespeare
• Stat$talker

  

  Stat$talker

  700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
  United States
  Member #200,634
  September 1, 2019
  5,617 Posts
  Offline
  Jul 17, 2026, 12:11 am

  ▲▼
  In response to Brock Lee

  Quote: Originally posted by Brock Lee on Jul 16, 2026

  how are you able to get close enough to the lottery's equipment so that the balls can hear you whispering to them?

  "the balls can hear you whispering to them?"

  I do like Cesar Milan...on rare occasionz when I play..I put my knee on the Terminal, hold it down, stare at it.,to let LO'z system know, whoo'z Boss

  Like dem Dawgz, LOz are just acting outta fear, ain't used to being amongst Da BIG DAWG.!

   

  -Stat$talker
• Il2c

  

  United States
  Member #247,665
  November 23, 2024
  2,158 Posts
  Online
  Jul 17, 2026, 12:43 am

  ▲▼

  Stat drop more clues. Lol. I like your parables.
• tokecap

  

  Sao Paulo
  United States
  Member #156,153
  June 10, 2014
  12,301 Posts
  Offline
  Jul 17, 2026, 8:49 am

  ▲▼

  Even though the sample size is small (52 valid votes), the results showcase a classic behavioral split between complete detachment and the illusion of control.

  1. The Dominance of Convenience: Quick Picks (34.6%)
  With over a third of the votes, letting the machine decide is the most popular option. Psychologically and mathematically, this makes perfect sense:

  No decision fatigue: Choosing numbers is tedious, especially for regular players.

  Preventing human bias: Humans are notoriously bad at generating true randomness (we tend to spread numbers out visually or avoid consecutive numbers, which actually disrupts true randomness).

  2. The Illusion of the System: Spreadsheets & Homemade Methods (17.3%)
  The second-place finisher is fascinating. Nearly one in five players spends time fueling spreadsheets or creating homemade systems.

  This reflects the deeply ingrained human desire to find patterns in chaos.

  The mathematical reality: Jackpot draw games are memoryless processes. The fact that the number 7 was drawn last week has absolutely zero impact on its chances of being drawn next week. Each draw is a 100% independent event.

  3. "Advanced Systems" vs. Traditional Approaches
  If you combine those who use frequency charts (hot & cold numbers), paid software, AI, and personal spreadsheets, you get about 40.4% of players trying to "beat the system" through data.

  On the flip side, those relying on purely emotional or fixed approaches (birthdays, pure gut feeling, or playing the same numbers forever) make up about 19.3%. This is the "if it's meant to be, it's meant to be" crowd.

  💡 The paradox of the "same set every draw" (5.8%): This is psychologically the most dangerous strategy. People who play the exact same numbers every week enter a psychological trap—they become terrified of skipping a draw, fearing their numbers will hit the exact night they didn't play.

  Ultimately, whether you use a highly complex spreadsheet or let the machine pick randomly, the mathematical odds of winning remain strictly identical. The only real difference is how much time you spend before buying the ticket!
• JustMaybe

  

  us
  Member #228,334
  January 2, 2023
  1,529 Posts
  Online
  Jul 18, 2026, 1:56 am

  ▲▼
  In response to tokecap

  Quote: Originally posted by tokecap on Jul 17, 2026

  Even though the sample size is small (52 valid votes), the results showcase a classic behavioral split between complete detachment and the illusion of control.

  1. The Dominance of Convenience: Quick Picks (34.6%)
  With over a third of the votes, letting the machine decide is the most popular option. Psychologically and mathematically, this makes perfect sense:

  No decision fatigue: Choosing numbers is tedious, especially for regular players.

  Preventing human bias: Humans are notoriously bad at generating true randomness (we tend to spread numbers out visually or avoid consecutive numbers, which actually disrupts true randomness).

  2. The Illusion of the System: Spreadsheets & Homemade Methods (17.3%)
  The second-place finisher is fascinating. Nearly one in five players spends time fueling spreadsheets or creating homemade systems.

  This reflects the deeply ingrained human desire to find patterns in chaos.

  The mathematical reality: Jackpot draw games are memoryless processes. The fact that the number 7 was drawn last week has absolutely zero impact on its chances of being drawn next week. Each draw is a 100% independent event.

  3. "Advanced Systems" vs. Traditional Approaches
  If you combine those who use frequency charts (hot & cold numbers), paid software, AI, and personal spreadsheets, you get about 40.4% of players trying to "beat the system" through data.

  On the flip side, those relying on purely emotional or fixed approaches (birthdays, pure gut feeling, or playing the same numbers forever) make up about 19.3%. This is the "if it's meant to be, it's meant to be" crowd.

  💡 The paradox of the "same set every draw" (5.8%): This is psychologically the most dangerous strategy. People who play the exact same numbers every week enter a psychological trap—they become terrified of skipping a draw, fearing their numbers will hit the exact night they didn't play.

  Ultimately, whether you use a highly complex spreadsheet or let the machine pick randomly, the mathematical odds of winning remain strictly identical. The only real difference is how much time you spend before buying the ticket!

  "The only real difference is how much time you spend before buying the ticket!"

  Every time I play the lottery, I am faced with two choices.

  Spend Money or Spend Time.

  I choose to spend money, I can't afford to lose on both ends 😁 both time and money 💰

  I believe winning the lottery jackpot is a 💯 % factor of luck.

  May Fortuna, goddess of chance or lot vindicate me.
• Il2c

  

  United States
  Member #247,665
  November 23, 2024
  2,158 Posts
  Online
  Jul 18, 2026, 4:47 pm

  ▲▼

  I don't know how he does it but he's always winning.

  Even with quick picks, same results.
• Stat$talker

  

  Stat$talker

  700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
  United States
  Member #200,634
  September 1, 2019
  5,617 Posts
  Offline
  Yesterday, 1:54 am

  ▲▼
  In response to tokecap

  Quote: Originally posted by tokecap on Jul 17, 2026

  Even though the sample size is small (52 valid votes), the results showcase a classic behavioral split between complete detachment and the illusion of control.

  1. The Dominance of Convenience: Quick Picks (34.6%)
  With over a third of the votes, letting the machine decide is the most popular option. Psychologically and mathematically, this makes perfect sense:

  No decision fatigue: Choosing numbers is tedious, especially for regular players.

  Preventing human bias: Humans are notoriously bad at generating true randomness (we tend to spread numbers out visually or avoid consecutive numbers, which actually disrupts true randomness).

  2. The Illusion of the System: Spreadsheets & Homemade Methods (17.3%)
  The second-place finisher is fascinating. Nearly one in five players spends time fueling spreadsheets or creating homemade systems.

  This reflects the deeply ingrained human desire to find patterns in chaos.

  The mathematical reality: Jackpot draw games are memoryless processes. The fact that the number 7 was drawn last week has absolutely zero impact on its chances of being drawn next week. Each draw is a 100% independent event.

  3. "Advanced Systems" vs. Traditional Approaches
  If you combine those who use frequency charts (hot & cold numbers), paid software, AI, and personal spreadsheets, you get about 40.4% of players trying to "beat the system" through data.

  On the flip side, those relying on purely emotional or fixed approaches (birthdays, pure gut feeling, or playing the same numbers forever) make up about 19.3%. This is the "if it's meant to be, it's meant to be" crowd.

  💡 The paradox of the "same set every draw" (5.8%): This is psychologically the most dangerous strategy. People who play the exact same numbers every week enter a psychological trap—they become terrified of skipping a draw, fearing their numbers will hit the exact night they didn't play.

  Ultimately, whether you use a highly complex spreadsheet or let the machine pick randomly, the mathematical odds of winning remain strictly identical. The only real difference is how much time you spend before buying the ticket!

  "The mathematical reality: Jackpot draw games are memoryless processes. The fact that the number 7 was drawn last week has absolutely zero impact on its chances of being drawn next week. Each draw is a 100% independent event."

  Lottery Gamez izz the Object... Mathematical Lawz are intangibly acting upon'em...

  Math needz No memory..itz Lawz are immutable. Duzz Gravity need be reminded whether or not you fell outta bed the last time you rolled past the edge of yo bed?... NOOOPE...cauze It'z a 100% independen event of Yo past, only enactz upon the FUTURE.predicting,You(Object) WILL hit da floooe

  All ANY Lawz need izz the surpassing of the threshold that invokez itz fruition..which later classifyz az,

             "GOT TO BE REAL"

                                         

  Whut you'll find, 🎸

  All the time,  🎸

  Lawz are dealz  🎸

  Bought for "real "  🎸...

  Oooooh,.. Math izz for reeal,

  Who carez if Yo game, my game, her game, hiz game

  GOD'z Math izz heaa to staaye 

                                  (- Cheryl Lynn    )

   

  -Stat$talker 
• Il2c

  

  United States
  Member #247,665
  November 23, 2024
  2,158 Posts
  Online
  Yesterday, 11:00 am

  ▲▼

  Yeah usin dem cheat codezz, still. I'm onto u d(^.^)b

  Show me a game, so I can predict what will happen next as the observer.
• Stat$talker

  

  Stat$talker

  700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
  United States
  Member #200,634
  September 1, 2019
  5,617 Posts
  Offline
  Yesterday, 11:08 am

  ▲▼
  In response to Il2c

  Quote: Originally posted by Il2c on Jul 19, 2026

  Yeah usin dem cheat codezz, still. I'm onto u d(^.^)b

  Show me a game, so I can predict what will happen next as the observer.

                                           

                                 MEEEE?....Cheeat?

                                       GIT REEAL

            And who are you referring to heaa?

  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/359886/8200151

                  Watch dat style-sqwuattin
• Elizabeth03

  

  Nova Scotia
  Canada
  Member #9,934
  December 27, 2004
  1,653 Posts
  Offline
  Yesterday, 11:18 am

  ▲▼

  it has been trial and error. And still working on it. Becoming more successful for me!
• Il2c

  

  United States
  Member #247,665
  November 23, 2024
  2,158 Posts
  Online
  Yesterday, 12:48 pm

  ▲▼

  😄 nobody is cheating for real.
• Stat$talker

  

  Stat$talker

  700 light yrs West of Milky Way Galaxy's Center
  United States
  Member #200,634
  September 1, 2019
  5,617 Posts
  Offline
  Yesterday, 3:13 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Il2c

  Quote: Originally posted by Il2c on Jul 19, 2026

  Yeah usin dem cheat codezz, still. I'm onto u d(^.^)b

  Show me a game, so I can predict what will happen next as the observer.

  "Show me a game, so I can predict what will happen next"

             Ookaay,... Pwrball/Monday, 2morrow 

                           We are All EYEZ 
• Il2c

  

  United States
  Member #247,665
  November 23, 2024
  2,158 Posts
  Online
  Yesterday, 3:32 pm

  ▲▼

  Powerball which state? Sunday 3:22pm here
• KY Floyd

  

  NY
  United States
  Member #23,834
  October 16, 2005
  5,154 Posts
  Offline
  Yesterday, 4:28 pm

  ▲▼

  "the illusion of control. "

  Part of it is closer to delusion of control, but players do have a little bit of actual control over the outcome.

  "psychologically and mathematically, this makes perfect sense "

  I disagree. This is the one way in which players can have some control over the outcome. While most tickets are QPs the 20 to 30% that aren't  QPs aren't a random sample of all possible combinations. By choosing your own numbers you can guarantee that you aren't playing all calendar numbers or a pattern, and you can also try to choose a combination that won't match the other non-random selections other self pick players  may be making. You can't increase your chances of winning the jackpot, but you can increase the chances  of not sharing a jackpot.

  "Humans are notoriously bad at generating true randomness (we tend to spread numbers out visually or avoid consecutive numbers, which actually disrupts true randomness) "

  I've always been puzzled  about how many people seem to think that they're better off picking a set of numbers that's somewhat uniformly spread over the range of numbers in the game. It doesn't make you any less likely to win anything, but a lot of people seem to mistakenly think it gives them a better chance of winning.  You're sort of right if you're thinking "What are the chances the numbers will all be over 40?" but if you only play numbers over 40 you're still playing individual combinations that have exactly the same chance as any of the combinations using uniformly distributed numbers. And that's exactly why players don't need to be good at picking random numbers. Any combination you choose is still random in terms of the probability that it will be chosen. Sure, the the winning combination probably won't be all numbers over 40 but that's only because there are fewer possible combinations with any subset of possible numbers than there are with all of them. If there were prizes for playing a combination that had the same characteristics as the wining combination then it would matter, but the chances of the winning combination being drawn will be the same regardless of how the individual numbers are distributed across the numbers you can choose from.

  "This reflects the deeply ingrained human desire to find patterns in chaos. "

  Just because the conditions that cause the results are chaotic doesn't mean the results won't  show some kind of pattern(s).  The mistake is thinking that the patterns indicate that the process isn't chaotic or random and that any (past) patterns offer any useful insight  into future results.

  "The fact that the number 7 was drawn last week "

  Aside from past results being irrelevant to future results, "the number 7" is never actually drawn. Sometimes a ball with "7" on it is drawn, but the next time a ball with "7" on it is drawn it's most likely a different a ball than the previous time. This one is another example of normal human behavior in attributing characteristics based on a misunderstanding. Similarly, nobody has ever come close to matching a winning combination because the numbers on their ticket are "close" to the winning numbers. Even if each of the balls with the numbers you played started out right next to the balls that were selected they stop being close once the balls start mixing. The real balls that were close were the ones that were closest to popping out when the winning ball popped out. For an RNG game, whether the the selection is truly random or not, we can never really know what was theoretically close because a 7 has no proximity to a 6 or 8 in the RNG process. Close would be whatever combination(s) might have been produced by using whatever seed might have been used immediately before or after the seed that resulted in the winning combination.

  "People who play the exact same numbers every week enter a psychological trap "

  There's your next poll if you want to give it a go. I see plenty of posts from people who think they need to have a chance at every single drawing, and I'm sure that includes plenty of people who don't use the same numbers, but I expect there are also people who play the same numbers but don't feel a need to play every drawing.  I'm one of the people who use the same numbers for an extended period of time, but I don't play every drawing.  For PB I don't  play until the cash value is $250 million, so the last ticket I bought would have been for the Christmas eve drawing. At $5 the comparable MM  entry point would be a cash value of $625 million, but in most recent years PB has offered a few chances to try for a cash jackpot t hat big for only $2. I won't know what  my entry point for MM is until I buy a ticket, but I'm thinking it has to be somewhere north of $750 million cash. Even then, if MM is offering 750 or 800  and PB is offering perhaps 600 I'll figure I could be about twice as likely to win almost as much and save $1 compared to buying the MM ticket.
• SkyLine69

  

  Krypton
  United States
  Member #140,094
  March 11, 2013
  915 Posts
  Offline
  Yesterday, 5:26 pm

  ▲▼

  I worked with Nathan (Firefox) for years and used the same type system he used.  I win some, and I lose some.  Most I ever got was 4/4 in the Texas Two Step back in 2018.

  Stay In The Vortex, you'll be happy you did ..... Random? Seriously? You want me to believe that?