example for you guys understand my point of view
Predictions
for 6th March 2004
USA Powerball
Line |
Prediction
|
PBall |
1 |
6, 14, 30, 34, 41 |
37 |
2 |
6, 12, 13, 41, 46 |
17 |
3 |
7, 17, 27, 28, 40 |
33 |
4 |
6, 7, 9, 25, 27 |
2 |
5 |
7, 12, 28, 30, 46 |
35 |
6 |
12, 25, 30, 33, 46 |
2 |
7 |
7, 14, 16, 28, 40 |
35 |
8 |
1, 9, 16, 33, 36 |
30 |
9 |
1, 6, 28, 30, 41 |
3 |
10 |
2, 6, 13, 25, 41 |
40 |
11 |
9, 12, 31, 33, 40 |
39 |
12 |
14, 17, 27, 30, 33 |
40 |
13 |
12, 13, 33, 39, 49 |
7 |
14 |
9, 17, 18, 31, 48
|
8 |
from http://www.lottodynamics.com/powerball.html
03/06/04 Sat powerball winner
9 17 46 49 51 B: 9
Can anyone tell what method they have used for the perdiction?The purpose of the study of their method is to make sure "whether they use a auto-prediction machine or these are just quick picks.A good system will provide you prediction with some regulation you may find while A very good one hide secrets inside of them.lets check this out
Lets take a look at their whole pred numbers of each position.
1 2 6 7 9
12 13 14 16 17
25 27 28
30 31 33 34
40 41 46 48 49
Obviouly they ignored each position analysis.46 should
be put at the third pos and 49 at fourth position.BesidesEven with 22 numbers with 4+1 correct numbers they already have predicted,they only hit 2+0 within 14 draws.---so they used a worse filtering method.
goose