Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 20, 2017, 10:53 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

has anyone received 1.7 yet??

Topic closed. 24 replies. Last post 13 years ago by vick.

Page 2 of 2
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
N.ireland
United Kingdom
Member #2962
December 6, 2003
69 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 8, 2004, 12:22 pm - IP Logged

Hi Vick let us know if it is any quicker.

    Avatar

    Canada
    Member #2859
    November 23, 2003
    463 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: March 8, 2004, 1:00 pm - IP Logged

    yes it seems quicker, at least at the default 30,000 sample rate,

      Avatar
      langley b.c.
      Canada
      Member #3313
      January 10, 2004
      155 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: March 8, 2004, 6:05 pm - IP Logged

      running mine at 12000 samples as my computer is looking at 74 hours to process at 30000 samples  it seems to me that if we were dealing at 650 samples with 1.6 and now we are at 12000 to 30000 samples we will have to have a much better prediction

        Avatar

        Canada
        Member #2859
        November 23, 2003
        463 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: March 8, 2004, 6:43 pm - IP Logged

        i'm hoping that it now selects some of the past draws results

        for instance on my slower computer i have it running at 30,000 and it said it would take about 16 to 19 hrs

        on my faster computer i have it at 50,000 and it says about the same 16 to 19 hours

        i notice that it doesn't show any numbers predicted as it goes, mabye it waits to finish till the end to show all 10 ????? though it does show a progress like  at 15,000 string builds it will say 50 % done, i guess because 15,000 is 1/2 of 30,000, but i hope it's not 50 % just for say 1 or 2 numbers !!! i hope it's 50 % for all 10 !!!!!!!

         

        Goodluck

          Avatar
          langley b.c.
          Canada
          Member #3313
          January 10, 2004
          155 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: March 8, 2004, 7:19 pm - IP Logged

          i think this could be a very long process coming up with the numbers to play[but i'am not complaining ] if it does the job of at least giving me 3 numbers every other draw i will be more than happy! my setting is at 12000 i wont be done until tomorrow night its too bad the program didnt detail the most ideal setting on the game you play it sure would be alot less monkeying around!!! as ron popeil said in his informercials JUST SET IT AND FORGET IT! lol!

            Avatar

            Canada
            Member #2859
            November 23, 2003
            463 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: March 9, 2004, 1:44 am - IP Logged

            took about 14 hours on

              paul762's avatar - lion

              United Kingdom
              Member #3002
              December 11, 2003
              477 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: March 9, 2004, 2:28 am - IP Logged

              not even received mine yet, but i thought it was meant to be quicker!! 74 hour predictions are just no use to me, i play dailies !!

                Avatar

                Canada
                Member #2859
                November 23, 2003
                463 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: March 9, 2004, 9:32 am - IP Logged

                paul if you have a fast computer and are using a low sample and low ball count i think it goes pretty quick

                  Avatar
                  langley b.c.
                  Canada
                  Member #3313
                  January 10, 2004
                  155 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: March 9, 2004, 5:39 pm - IP Logged

                  hey vick what numbers did it predict want to do a comparison???? pm me in my mail box and i will do the same!!!! maybe this way we can find out faster the ideal setting for the can 6/49

                    Avatar

                    Canada
                    Member #2859
                    November 23, 2003
                    463 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: March 9, 2004, 7:55 pm - IP Logged

                    i sent a pm to you lotto man

                    well i've run 4 sets so far with my 649 and 1 of the set had 1 number from the last draw, so at least that's fixed at least for now !