Coin Toss's Blog

Wayback machine time travels old websites

About the Wayback Machine

Browse through 85 billionweb pages archived from 1996 to a few months ago. To start surfing theWayback, type in the web address of a site or page where you would liketo start, and press enter. Then select from the archived datesavailable. The resulting pages point to other archived pages at asclose a date as possible. Keyword searching is not currently supported.

http://www.archive.org/web/web.php

http://archive.bibalex.org,  the Internet archive at the New Library of Alexandria, Egypt, mirrors the Wayback Machine. Try your search there when you have trouble connecting to the Wayback servers.

Entry #106

Amero to become USA's new currency when dollar collapses

This is from Pravda, so it may or may not be valid, might just be disinformation. I am kind of disturbed by the picture of the amero, though, maybe it's jusy a photoshop job.

If true, this article is very disturbing.

_______________________________________

 

Amero to become USA's new currency when dollar collapses


Pictures of the new currency that will supposedly replace the US
dollarhave appeared on the Russian Internet. The United States is reportedlyworking on the new currency, the amero, which will be common for theUSA, Mexico and Canada. The unstable financial situation in the world,the collapsing oil pricesand the growing foreign debt of the United States may eventually crushthe US dollar as the world’s major currency. Needless to say that theUS authorities reject the rumors and promise to keep the dollar afloat.

Amero notes have no portraits of US presidents onthem and resemble the Belarussian rubles. For example, there is animage of a deer depicted on a 50-amero note, whereas a picture of apyramid of Mexican Indians can be seen on a 100-amero note.

The amero follows the model of the European Union and its euro.It brings up the idea that the new currency can be adopted by the USA,Canada and Mexico within the scope of the North American Union, whichthe Bush administration established in 2005 under the Security andProsperity Partnership of North America (SPP).

On April 6, 2005, the US Treasury announced theformation of the Financial Services Working Group to assist in theSPP’s ‘prosperity’ plans. According to its own press release, the USTreasury’s Financial Services Working Group said it “will play acritical role in the SPP.”

Conspiracy theorists contend that the governments ofthe United States, Canada, and Mexico are already taking steps toimplement such a currency, as part of a "North American Union (NAU)" Nocurrent members of any country's government have officially stated adesire to create such a body, nor introduce a common currency.

The idea for a North American currency union wasfirst proposed in 1999 by Canadian economist Herbert G. Grubel. Asenior fellow of the conservative Fraser Institute think-tank, hepublished a book titled The Case for the Amero in September 1999, theyear that the euro became a virtual currency. Another Canadianthink-tank, the C.D. Howe Institute, advocates the creation of a sharedcurrency between Canada and the United States .

After the report came out, center-left nationalistgroups in Canada expressed their opposition to any currency unionbecause they view it as an attempt by American businesses to gainaccess to Canada 's extensive natural resources while dismantling thenation's social services. The 100,000 member strong Council ofCanadians, a progressive advocacy group, has declared one of itscentral issues to be the threat of "deep integration".

Dr. Robert Pastor, in a 2001 book, suggested acommon currency should be a foundation of "macro economic cooperation"among the three NAFTA countries. However, the 2005 Independent TaskForce on North America, which he chaired, did not recommend a commoncurrency, nor does Pastor in the section for additional and dissentingviews suggest a common currency should be a goal.

http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/106779-amero-0

Entry #105

It's Closer Than You Think

It is now closer to reality than you think

You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows.

One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble.

In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.

"What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.

"Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."

The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.

Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.

A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.

The judge sentences you to life in prison.

This case really happened.

On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term.

How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire ?

It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.

Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.

Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed Man with a Kalashnikov rifle (AK-47), walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.

The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)

Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.

For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearm still owned by private citizens.

During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.

Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."

All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.

When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.

How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kinda like cars.

Sound familiar?

WAKE UP AMERICA , THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.

"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."

--Samuel Adams

Entry #104

Liberals clinically mad, concludes top psychiatrist

Liberals clinically mad, concludes top psychiatrist
Eminent doctor makes case leftist ideology is a mental disorder
Posted: November 12, 2008
6:33 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

WASHINGTON– Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifyingthemselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is making thecase that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

"Basedon strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberalsrelentlessly undermine the most important principles on which ourfreedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book,"The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness.""Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normalresponsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental governmentmeet their needs from cradle to grave."

While politicalactivists on the other side of the spectrum have made similarobservations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a lifevirtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wingconspiracy."

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treatedmore than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist andexamined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certifiedforensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric trainingat the University of Chicago.

Rossiter says the kind ofliberalism being displayed by both Barack Obama and his Democraticprimary opponent Hillary Clinton can only be understood as apsychological disorder.

"A social scientist who understandshuman nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntarycooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "Apolitical leader who understands human nature will not ignoreindividual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and workethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on thepopulation – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands humannature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates andover-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reducesthem to wards of the state – as liberals do."

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

    * creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
    * satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
    * augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
    * rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.


"Theroots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearlyidentified by understanding how children develop from infancy toadulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefsof the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whinesabout imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeksabove all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their ownlives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."
Entry #103

Post election poem

THIS IS A SPECIAL POEM FOR MY DEMOCRAT FRIENDS!

 

 No Hard Feelings...

 

 The election day is over,

 

 The talking is done.

 

 My party lost, your party won.

 

 So let us be friends,

 

 Let arguments pass.

 

 I'll hug my elephant,

 

 You kiss your a**

.

Entry #102

Great Orators of the Democratic Party...then and now

Great Orators of the Democratic Party...

'One man with courage makes a majority.'
- Andrew Jackson

The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.'
- Franklin D. Roosevelt

'The buck stops here.'
- Harry S. Truman

'Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.'
- John F. Kennedy


And for today's democrats...


'It depends what your definition of 'IS' is?''
- Bill Clinton

'That Obama - I would like to cut his NUTS off.'
- Jesse Jackson

'Those rumors are false .... I believe in the sanctity of marriage.'
- John Edwards

'I invented the Internet'
- Al Gore

'The next Person that tells me I'm not religious, I'm going to shove my rosary beads up their ***.'
- Joe Biden

'America is--is no longer, uh, what it--it, uh, could be, uh what it wasonce was...uh, and I say to myself, 'uh, I don't want that future, uh,uh for my children.' ''
- Barack Obama

'I have campaigned in all 57 states.
- Barack Obama

'You don't need God anymore, you have us democrats.'
- Nancy Pelosi (said back in 2006)

'Bill is the greatest husband and father I know. No one is more faithful, true, and honest than he.'
- Hillary Clinton (said back in 1998)

Entry #101

Reminder

Reminder


During this political season, it is good to be reminded of these wise words:   
 
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. 
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. 
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away men's initiative and independence.
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves. 
                                                     
                                                                                --Abraham Lincoln
Entry #99

Strange Days Strange Skies

STRANGE DAYS  STRANGE SKIES

LIFE EXPECTANCY DROPS TO 69.3 YEARS IN THE USA
HOW MUCH IS 8 YEARS OF YOUR LIFE WORTH?
In2003 life expectancy in the USA was 77.6 years. The drop to 69.3 yearssince 2003, a drop of over 8 years is startling information.  Thisperiod of time just happens to coincide with a time when there has beennon-stop spraying of chemtrails coast to coast on an almost dailybasis.  There is plenty of scientific research proving that anyincrease in airborne particulates causes a corresponding increase inthe death rate of the exposed population so imo the chemtrails are aglaringly obvious factor in this significant drop in expected life span.

TO PUT IT BLUNTLY IT APPEARS THAT THE CHEMTRAILS ARE ROBBING EVERYONE IN THE USA OF 8 YEARS OF LIFE.

Ioriginally found the life expectancy stats headlined in an article atRense.com. The original article has since disappeared off the Rensesite.

http://imageevent.com/firesat/strangedaysstrangeskies?z=3&c=4&n=1&m=-1&w=4&x=0&p=14

Entry #98

Sunday Complaints

*Sunday Complaints*

After church one Sunday morning, a mother commented, "The choir was awful this morning."

The father commented, "The sermon was too long."

Their 7-year-old daughter added, "You've got to admit it was a pretty good show for a dollar."
Entry #93

Where to live after you retire

Where to live after Retirement
 
You can live in Phoenix, Arizona where.....  
1. You are willing to park 3 blocks away because you found shade. 
2. You've experienced condensation on your butt from the hot water in the toilet bowl.  
3. You can drive for 4 hours in one direction and never leave town. 
4. You have over 100 recipes for Mexican food. 
5. You know that 'dry heat' is comparable to what hits you in the face when you open your oven door.  
6 The 4 seasons are: tolerable, hot, really hot, and ARE YOU KIDDING ME??!!  
 
You can Live in California where... 
1. You make over $250,000 and you still can't afford to buy a house.  
2. The fastest part of your commute is going down your driveway. 
3. You know how to eat an artichoke. 
4. You drive your rented Mercedes to your neighborhood block party. 
5. When someone asks you how far something is, you tell them howlongit will take to get there rather than how many miles away it is.
6. The 4 seasons are: Fire, Flood, Mud, and Drought
 
You can Live in New York City where... 
1. You say 'the city' and expect everyone to know you mean Manhattan.  
2. You can get into a four-hour argument about how to get from Columbus Circle to Battery Park, but can't findWisconsin on a map.  
3.You think Central Park is 'nature,' 
4. You believe that being able to swear at people in their own language makes you multi-lingual.  
5. You've worn out a car horn. 
6. You think eye contact is an act of aggression. 
 
You can Live in Minnesota where... 
1. You only have four spices: salt, pepper, ketchup, and Tabasco. 
2. Halloween costumes fit over parkas. 
3. You have more than one recipe for moose. 
4. Sexy lingerie is anything flannel with less than eight buttons. 
5. The four seasons are: winter, still winter, almost winter, and construction.
 
  You can Live in the Deep South where...
1. You can rent a movie and buy bait in the same store. 
2. 'y'all' is singular and 'all y'all' is plural.  
3. 'He needed killin'' is a valid defense.  
4.Everyone has 2 first names: Billy Bob , Jimmy Bob, Mary Sue, Betty Jean, MARY BETH, etc.  
 
You can live in Colorado where...
1. You carry your $3,000 mountainbike atop your $500 car. 
2. You tell your husband to pick up Granola on his way home and he stops at the day care center.  
3. A pass does not involve a football or dating.  
4. The top of your head is bald, but you still have a pony tail.  
 
You can live in the Midwest where...
1. You've never met any celebrities, but the mayor knows your name.  
2. Your idea of a traffic jam is ten cars waiting to pass a tractor.  
3. You have had to switch from 'heat' to 'A/C' on the same day.  
4. You end sentences with a preposition: 'Where's my coat at?'  
5. When asked how your trip was to any exotic place, you say, 'It was different!'  
 
  AND You can live in Florida where.. 
1. You eat dinner at 3:15 in the afternoon. 
2. All purchases include a coupon of some kind -- even houses and cars.  
3. Everyone can recommend an excellent dermatologist. 
4. Road construction never ends anywhere in the state. 
5 Cars in front of you are driven by headless people.
 
 
Entry #92