Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited August 12, 2022, 10:14 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Top House leader balks at plan to use Pa. lottery for tax relief

Apr 25, 2006, 7:27 am

Share this news story on Facebook
Tweet this news story on Twitter
Pennsylvania LotteryPennsylvania Lottery: Top House leader balks at plan to use Pa. lottery for tax relief

A top Pennsylvania House leader has doubts about a key element of a property tax relief plan, threatening to complicate a legislative panel's efforts to produce an acceptable compromise.

House Republican leader Sam Smith, of Punxsutawney, said yesterday he didn't like the idea of transferring about $240 million from the state lottery fund to provide property tax and rent rebates this year for senior citizens.

"I am not comfortable with borrowing money from the Lottery Fund this year," he told reporters, adding it could affect efforts to hammer out a new state budget for the fiscal year starting July 1.

A six-member, House-Senate tax panel met briefly yesterday without reaching a solution. It plans to meet today with leaders of both chambers, along with Gov. Ed Rendell, in an effort to find a compromise on property tax relief that will pass both the House and Senate.

Mr. Smith denied criticism that he, as a GOP leader, is trying to prevent Democrat Rendell from getting political credit for lowering property taxes before the November election. "That's utterly ridiculous," Mr. Smith said.

House Democratic Whip Mike Veon, of Beaver Falls, said the panel is about "90 percent there" on a property tax compromise bill, but several important facets remain unresolved.

The panel is trying to increase, from the current $15,000 to either $25,000 or $30,000, the annual income limits for seniors to qualify for property tax and rent rebates. The maximum rebate is now $500 a year, which the panel would like to increase to $650.

But doing so will cost about $200 million, Mr. Veon said. He favors transferring that amount from the Lottery Fund for two years and then repaying the lottery account by using the projected $1 billion in slots revenue.

In addition to that $200 million, an additional sum, of $20 million to $40 million, might be needed to help lower property taxes in three cities — Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Scranton.

That's because they wouldn't be eligible for one of the tax-relief bill's key provisions — a tax-shifting plan, where school districts could vote on increasing their income taxes and reducing their property taxes. That additional funding would initially come out of the Lottery Fund.

Mr. Rendell said the Lottery Fund can afford such a temporary transfer, since it's now at about $3 billion, compared to $1.9 billion three years ago.

But Mr. Smith expressed reservations, saying the Legislature shouldn't endanger the Lottery Fund's main purpose of providing senior citizen transportation programs and pharmaceutical programs.

Mr. Smith said that working out a solution on property taxes might have to be worked into the larger context of the new state budget, which probably won't be adopted until June 30.

Some legislators have been hoping to have the full House and Senate approve a property tax relief bill before the May 16 primary, as a way of helping incumbents who face challengers.


We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

2 comments. Last comment 16 years ago by TheGameGrl.
Page 1 of 1
jeffrey's avatar - moon
Hamilton, OH
United States
Member #4162
March 27, 2004
277 Posts

I like senior citizens and all that but how about tax relief for everyone.

    TheGameGrl's avatar - Lottery-012.jpg
    A long and winding road
    United States
    Member #17083
    June 10, 2005
    6644 Posts

    "Borrow" money?Ohh please. The Lottery makes oodles in interest alone by witholding payouts for up to six weeks to large claimants,let alone those that do go unclaimed. Its constantly re-investing itself for the sake of profits. There need not be any borrowing when its the citizens funds to begin with. How about across the board gasoline relief, utility releif, or higher medical care benefits for state residences? PA needs to learn that as a commonwealth , it needs to work for the *common* good of the tax payers. 

    Count your smiles.