Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 8, 2016, 10:57 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

AMAZING: Minnesota man wins back-to-back lottery jackpots

Topic closed. 41 replies. Last post 10 years ago by justxploring.

Page 2 of 3
4.52
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar
California
United States
Member #46824
October 1, 2006
270 Posts
Offline
Posted: February 15, 2007, 9:35 pm - IP Logged

Re Mega Millions and Super Lotto Plus....I will let you all know when that happens to me!!!!!

    Avatar
    Coastal Georgia
    United States
    Member #2653
    October 30, 2003
    1866 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: February 15, 2007, 9:37 pm - IP Logged

    Lots of us would love to hit ONCE !

    Proof positive that if it's " your time " it is your time.

    ...DD

     

                                   

                  

     

     

      JAP69's avatar - alas
      South Carolina
      United States
      Member #6
      November 4, 2001
      8790 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: February 15, 2007, 9:51 pm - IP Logged

      Could be a Lottery Post member using Todds wheels. ROFL

      Does not say how many tickets were purchased for each draw.

      MAGA

        Thoth's avatar - binary
        Findlay, Ohio
        United States
        Member #4855
        May 28, 2004
        400 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: February 15, 2007, 9:54 pm - IP Logged

        The odds are are almost atronomical...

        The odds of winning once are 1 in ...

        (31!)/((31-5)!)/(5!)=169,911

        So twice in a row is...169,911 x 169,911

        28,869,747,921

        Hmm...about 1 in 28.87 billion

         

         

        ~Probability=Odds in Motion~

          Avatar

          Honduras
          Member #20982
          August 29, 2005
          4715 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: February 15, 2007, 10:16 pm - IP Logged

          "the odds of it happening are virtually incalculable"

          Geez.  Has anyone ever considered making it illegal for morons to be reporters? The odds are extremely steep and extremely easy to calculate. If the odds of doing it once are 1 in 170,000 then the odds of doing it twice are 1 in 170,000^2, assuming the guy only bought two tickets.

          If he bought more tickets the odds go down. If he bought two tickest for each of those drawings but not for any other day then the odds were 1 in 85,000^2. Assuming he's been buying tickets for that game regularly the odds go down every day he plays. The odds of any one person having back to back wins will always be steep even for games with relativley low odds, but  with enough people playing enough games it's a virtual certainty that somebody will do it every once ina while.

          I don't think is as easy as to say 170,000 X 2...and i disagree...Is a little easy to do it any day after the first win, but VERY hard to do it the following day...

           

           

          "More Important than winning the state's lotteries is the movie "Red Planet.."..."

            Avatar
            New Jersey
            United States
            Member #21206
            September 4, 2005
            949 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: February 15, 2007, 10:42 pm - IP Logged

            His odds of doing that would be one in 29 billion.  I'd feel ripped of if I beat such odds and only got 50 grand.

              LOTTOMIKE's avatar - cash money.jpg
              Tennessee
              United States
              Member #7853
              October 15, 2004
              11338 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: February 15, 2007, 11:40 pm - IP Logged

              wow.i wish we had a similar matrix here in tennessee...

                dumars798's avatar - batman17
                Atlanta
                United States
                Member #28656
                December 20, 2005
                5675 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: February 16, 2007, 12:48 am - IP Logged

                WTG!!!

                        Smart bets...... Equal Phat Pocket$!

                                     

                             





                  justxploring's avatar - villiarna
                  Wandering Aimlessly
                  United States
                  Member #25360
                  November 5, 2005
                  4461 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: February 16, 2007, 12:52 am - IP Logged

                  The MegaMoney here is 5 numbers.  First 4 numbers from 1 to 44 and the MegaBall 1 to 22

                  Odds are 1:2,986,522 according to the FL web site

                  Last week there was a news article announcing a woman won it a second time (not in a row, but still, twice with those odds!!)   She won $2M on Jan 30 and split a jackpot (winning $320K) in 1998.  Maybe I'm playing the wrong game! 

                  But I really think, in most cases, it's just being at the right place at the right time. (they were quick picks)

                    Coin Toss's avatar - shape barbed.jpg
                    Zeta Reticuli Star System
                    United States
                    Member #30470
                    January 17, 2006
                    10351 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: February 16, 2007, 1:20 am - IP Logged

                    "The MegaMoney here is 5 numbers.  First 4 numbers from 1 to 44 and the MegaBall 1 to 22"

                     So actually, like PB and MM, it's two lottery gmes in one. If you guess right and get the 4 in the 44 matrix, you still have to have the right MegaBall.   

                    Those who run the lotteries love it when players look for consistency in something that's designed not to have any.

                    Lep

                    There is one and only one 'proven' system, and that is to book the action. No matter the game, let the players pick their own losers.

                      Avatar
                      NY
                      United States
                      Member #23835
                      October 16, 2005
                      3474 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: February 16, 2007, 2:13 am - IP Logged

                      I don't think is as easy as to say 170,000 X 2...and i disagree...Is a little easy to do it any day after the first win, but VERY hard to do it the following day...

                       

                       

                      "More Important than winning the state's lotteries is the movie "Red Planet.."..."

                      I didn't say it was 170,000 X 2, I said it was 170,000^2. That's 170,000 squared, or 170,000 X 170,000, which is 85,000 times less likely than 170,000 X 2. 

                      It isn't when the two wins happen that determines the odds. It's how many tickets he had and for how many drawings. The probability of two events happening depend on how many events could happen and the chances for each event to happen. If he bought a single ticket every day for 10 days there would be the possibility of winning on any or all of the ten days. The odds against winning  on any days 1 and 2 would be 1 in 170,000^2. The odds of winning on days 2 and 3 would also be 1 in 170,000^2, the odds of winning on days 3 and 4 would be 1 in 170,000^2, and so on through days 9 and 10. Each 2 day period would have the same 1 in 170,000^2 odds, but he would have had 9 different chances to win on consecutive days, so the odds would then be  1 in (170,000^2)/9. If he bought tickets every day for 30 days it woud be (170,000^2)/29

                      That's assuming he only bought one ticket each day. Buying multiple tickets would reduce the odds against winning that day. Buying 2 tickets would make him twice as likely to win, buying 3 tickets would make him three times as likely to win, etc. If he bought 2 tickets the odds for each day woud be 2 in 170,000 or 1 in 85,000. 2 tickets a day for 10 days straight would then be 1 in (85,000^2)/9, or 4 times more likely.

                      Still, no matter how many tickets he was buying, or how long he'd been buying them, the odds are extremely steep. 

                        Avatar
                        NY
                        United States
                        Member #23835
                        October 16, 2005
                        3474 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: February 16, 2007, 2:17 am - IP Logged

                        His odds of doing that would be one in 29 billion.  I'd feel ripped of if I beat such odds and only got 50 grand.

                        The payouts aren't based on winning twice, and two winners on two consecutive days is the norm. Do you think they should pay a lot more to any two people who win on consecutive days?

                          Badger's avatar - adu50016 NorthAmericanBadger.jpg
                          Wisconsin
                          United States
                          Member #1303
                          March 27, 2003
                          1508 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: February 16, 2007, 7:39 am - IP Logged

                          I'll give the explanation a try.

                          The odds don't increase equally with each extra ball in the lottery.  Every extra ball adds more odds than the previous ball.  Odds of winning a 5/31 jackpot are precisely 1 in 169,911.  Odds in a 5/32 jackpot are 1 in 201,376.  A difference of 31,465.  But the odds of winning a 5/33 jackpot are 1 in 237,336, a difference of 35,960 above the 5/32 game.

                          The formula for figuring out odds is a bit complex, but it can be boiled down to this:

                          Start with the total number of balls.  In the story, this is 31.  There are 5 balls drawn, so multiply 31 x 30 x 29 x 28 x 27.  Then divide that result by 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1.

                          In the 5/36 game you cited, it would be 36 x 35 x 34 x 33 x 32 divided by 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1.

                          For another example, take a 6/49 game, you would do 49 x 48 x 47 x 46 x 45 x 44 divided by 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1, to get odds of 1 in 13,983,816.

                          I hope this helps to explain why each additional number adds more combinations than the previous number.

                          Calculating odds is a d iverting pastime, and most of us do it.  But in the end, it appears that if you are meant to hit, you will, and the odds mean nothing.  Even with the 142 million to one PB odds, someone will eventually beat those odds and hit it.

                          Therefore, I look more at how much I'm spending than what the odds are that I will hit.

                          ============

                          How can you tell if a politician is lying?

                          Answer: His lips are moving.

                            Avatar

                            Honduras
                            Member #20982
                            August 29, 2005
                            4715 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: February 16, 2007, 7:08 pm - IP Logged

                            It also made news on MSNBC..They also used the word: "Virtually Incalculable..

                            Here is the site: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17190964/?GT1=9033

                            KYfloyd, you were right, my bad...

                            I agree with Prob988..I would be unlucky if i beat those odds and just got 50K...

                              Avatar

                              Honduras
                              Member #20982
                              August 29, 2005
                              4715 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: February 16, 2007, 7:30 pm - IP Logged

                              I didn't say it was 170,000 X 2, I said it was 170,000^2. That's 170,000 squared, or 170,000 X 170,000, which is 85,000 times less likely than 170,000 X 2. 

                              It isn't when the two wins happen that determines the odds. It's how many tickets he had and for how many drawings. The probability of two events happening depend on how many events could happen and the chances for each event to happen. If he bought a single ticket every day for 10 days there would be the possibility of winning on any or all of the ten days. The odds against winning  on any days 1 and 2 would be 1 in 170,000^2. The odds of winning on days 2 and 3 would also be 1 in 170,000^2, the odds of winning on days 3 and 4 would be 1 in 170,000^2, and so on through days 9 and 10. Each 2 day period would have the same 1 in 170,000^2 odds, but he would have had 9 different chances to win on consecutive days, so the odds would then be  1 in (170,000^2)/9. If he bought tickets every day for 30 days it woud be (170,000^2)/29

                              That's assuming he only bought one ticket each day. Buying multiple tickets would reduce the odds against winning that day. Buying 2 tickets would make him twice as likely to win, buying 3 tickets would make him three times as likely to win, etc. If he bought 2 tickets the odds for each day woud be 2 in 170,000 or 1 in 85,000. 2 tickets a day for 10 days straight would then be 1 in (85,000^2)/9, or 4 times more likely.

                              Still, no matter how many tickets he was buying, or how long he'd been buying them, the odds are extremely steep. 

                              And i bet that if he bought 2 tickets on day 1 and on day 2 he would have had the same odds as if he had bought it on day 1 and on day 3 or 4 or 5 or any other day that's not consecutive...And that's on of the things i disagree with mathematics, because everyone knows is harder to win a lottery on day 1 and on day 2 (consecutively), than it is to win it on day 1 and on day 3 or any day that's not consecutive...Example..As it happened to you that you win the pick3 one day and win it 5 or 7 days later, but you probably have never won pick3, 2 days in a row or 3 days in a row, why? because is very hard...Is easy to win pick3 one day and win it 15 days later than is to win it consecutively every following day...

                              This example is one of the small things i don't like about mathematics..Example one of the things i don't like about mathematics, is when geometry texbooks instead of selecting definitions that everyone agree on; they select technical definitions and in the end of the year kids don't recall those technical definitions but instead kids recall definitions that sits well with them...

                               

                               

                              "More important than winning the state's lotteries is the movie "Red Planet..".."