Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 2, 2016, 11:40 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

N.Y. couple wins $162M lottery jackpot - but owes $1M

Topic closed. 64 replies. Last post 7 years ago by computerhead723.

Page 5 of 5
51
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #81843
October 31, 2009
856 Posts
Offline
Posted: January 12, 2010, 5:15 am - IP Logged

Traffic Cameras? LOL!!!

Here the the cameras are billed as traffic controls, to regulate the lights. To make things move along smoother with 'Science'.

 I live I a small town and it is getting so that there is no ingress or egress without the watchful eye of the cameras. They do not save lives here; they monitor them. The first ones I saw go up were in a major city on a road that led directly to a new semiconductor chip plant built by China. Only one main road there.

 If they are for traffic control as we are told, I see no correlation at intersections where one vehicle is waiting for a light to change. There is no automated improvement from these cameras. The amber alert signs also have cameras. If all this technology is for amber alerts, why not just come out and say it?

 The number and frequency of cameras in England is astronomical. If one was traveling in an auto, there is no way you could do it without observation. Is this for more freedom or it's implied guarantees of freedom's ring?

 Believe what you want about these “lifesavers”, the implied intent and application are two different things. But then again facts do not easily change conventional, popular and traditional views. It is too much for non-critical thinkers to view something outside of their comfort zone. Facts only confuse the fantasy. Everything you know to be true about this is wrong.

 Does that twist you hat around or what?

    rdgrnr's avatar - walt
    Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
    United States
    Member #73904
    April 28, 2009
    14903 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: January 12, 2010, 5:35 am - IP Logged

    Traffic Cameras? LOL!!!

    Here the the cameras are billed as traffic controls, to regulate the lights. To make things move along smoother with 'Science'.

     I live I a small town and it is getting so that there is no ingress or egress without the watchful eye of the cameras. They do not save lives here; they monitor them. The first ones I saw go up were in a major city on a road that led directly to a new semiconductor chip plant built by China. Only one main road there.

     If they are for traffic control as we are told, I see no correlation at intersections where one vehicle is waiting for a light to change. There is no automated improvement from these cameras. The amber alert signs also have cameras. If all this technology is for amber alerts, why not just come out and say it?

     The number and frequency of cameras in England is astronomical. If one was traveling in an auto, there is no way you could do it without observation. Is this for more freedom or it's implied guarantees of freedom's ring?

     Believe what you want about these “lifesavers”, the implied intent and application are two different things. But then again facts do not easily change conventional, popular and traditional views. It is too much for non-critical thinkers to view something outside of their comfort zone. Facts only confuse the fantasy. Everything you know to be true about this is wrong.

     Does that twist you hat around or what?

    Twist my hat around? That done commenced my head to spinnin'! lol


                                                 
                         
                                             

     

     

     

     

                                                                                                       

    "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                                --Edmund Burke

     

     

      myzeus's avatar - Apollo
      Ohio
      United States
      Member #59677
      March 24, 2008
      78 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: January 16, 2010, 4:27 am - IP Logged

      i was overdrawn $9.99 on my checking account and wells fargo charges me $35.00 for being overdrawn.

      Sandy

        computerhead723's avatar - lightbulb
        Buffalo
        United States
        Member #54397
        August 17, 2007
        245 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: January 24, 2010, 1:47 pm - IP Logged

        NOW I SEE WHY SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THEIR WINNINGS THROUGH A BLIND TRUST.The bad luck has already started for these poor people. i feel sorry for them.

        dude  just  what  do  you  consider  poor ??

        even  the  gov.  gave  them  $$809,000........homeless  people  don't  get  a  dime ......none  of  the  winnings  will  go  to  the  poor !!

        Mail For You

          computerhead723's avatar - lightbulb
          Buffalo
          United States
          Member #54397
          August 17, 2007
          245 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: January 28, 2010, 5:15 pm - IP Logged

          No Pity!Banana