Iowa Lottery security chief bent on determining identity of jackpot winner

Jan 10, 2012, 6:18 pm (66 comments)

Hot Lotto

The mystery began on Thursday, Dec. 23, 2010. Time: 3:24 p.m. Scene: a QuikTrip, 4801 N.E. 14th St., near Interstate Highway 35/80 in Des Moines.

Somebody bought a Hot Lotto ticket there. Six days later, the ticket turned into a $16.5 million winner. Then the ticket went unclaimed for 364 days, 22 hours and 10 minutes.

At 2:10 p.m. on Dec. 29, two attorneys from the prominent Des Moines firm Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts PC presented the ticket, one hour and 50 minutes before it was to expire.

But the winner remains hidden.

The main person responsible for unraveling the mystery: an Army veteran and former police officer named Steve Bogle, Iowa Lottery vice president for security.

There is more at stake in this case than millions of dollars. The integrity of the Iowa Lottery is on the line. If anonymous, faceless trusts claim major prizes, it undermines public confidence and gives the impression of impropriety in the game, Bogle said.

"It doesn't work if people don't believe everybody has the same odds of winning," he said. "There is nothing to suggest anything improper has been done here, but we need to check every angle to know if the ticket was legally obtained, legally possessed and legally claimed."

The ticket was signed by Crawford Shaw of Bedford, N.Y. Shaw signed as trustee for Hexam Investments Trust. Shaw, 76, is also an attorney. He is not the winner. He represents the person or people who won. Shaw has said he plans to meet with Iowa Lottery officials this week.

"I think everything will be OK when all the facts are put on the table," Shaw said.

They'll have to be. If the person or persons behind the trust Shaw represents aren't known to lottery officials, they won't get paid.

"If we can't get that information, there is no way I can recommend to (Iowa Lottery CEO) Terry Rich that they pay this ticket," Bogle said.

So Bogle is both detective and honor guard in the strangest jackpot in the 26 years of Iowa Lottery history. He won't reveal the specific steps he's taking to verify the claim, but Bogle was a lawman for 36 years and has handled cases from murder to petty theft. He knows his way around an investigation.

Bogle 'a person who does things right'

Bogle joined the lottery in August 2011 after retiring as a brigadier general in the Iowa Army National Guard.

He knew he wanted to be a lawman in his early teens, in part from watching Jack Webb TV shows such as "Dragnet" and "Adam-12."

A 1975 East High School alumnus, Bogle joined the Guard at 17 and became an MP. Eventually, he became a Des Moines police officer. Then Bogle got mad at the Des Moines police department and wanted to quit. He can't remember what ticked him off.

"It shows how important it really was," Bogle said in retrospect. "The only thing I knew how to do was be a cop or a soldier. I decided I didn't want to be in that position ever again and got serious about my education."

He worked overnight shifts and went to school full time to earn a pre-law degree in 1986 from Grand View University, then called Grand View College. In the middle of his studies, he took a year to become a helicopter pilot for the Guard, flying rescue missions out of Fort Hood, Texas, and other locations.

After leaving the police force, he became director of the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation, the state's top criminal investigation agency.

Nobody is better suited to lead the investigation than Bogle, said Gene Meyer, Bogle's longtime friend and former director of the Iowa Department of Public Safety, which houses the investigation division.

"If you want something handled right and with great integrity, there is no question Steve will take care of it," Meyer said. "He is a person who does things right. He has great vision and he earns his opportunities."

Little made public about the winner

Even Bogle seems to be as puzzled as the public about the elusive winner.

"Like everyone else, I want to know where this ticket has been for the last year," Bogle said. "Basically, we start at the end — the day it was claimed — and work backward."

Large jackpots are generally claimed within a few days of announcement of the winning numbers. A prize of $600,000 went unclaimed in 1987, the largest sum left on the table in Iowa. Dozens of smaller prizes, as much as $250,000, have gone unclaimed.

Little has been made public about the person who bought the ticket. Iowa Lottery officials have reviewed store surveillance camera footage. They declined to identify the gender of the person or whether the individual paid with cash or debit card. (Credit cards may not be used to buy lottery tickets.)

The lottery has received dozens of claims the ticket was stolen. Such claims are common when big jackpots are awarded, officials said, though they plan to investigate the veracity of each claim. The alleged theft victims, however, all failed to sign the ticket. Under Iowa law, a lottery ticket is a "bearer instrument," which means the person who possesses the ticket owns it — unless the ticket is signed. Even the actual winner or winners never signed the ticket, instead delegating the task to Shaw as a trustee.

However, lottery officials are certain the ticket is genuine. They just don't know who bought it.

Principal players await parlor scene

The lottery player from December 2010 bought 10 plays over five Hot Lotto drawings for a total of $10. The player selected two sets of six numbers to be played in drawings on Dec. 25 and 29, 2010, and Jan. 1, 5 and 8, 2011.

The winning numbers were 3, 12, 16, 26, 33 and a Hotball of 11. The winner hit on the second of the five drawings on Dec. 29, 2010. At the time, the ticket was worth $16.5 million as an annuity payment.

That annuity pot has decreased because of the slumping stock market since the drawing. It is now worth a $14.3 million annuity. The one-time cash payment value of the ticket remains at about $10.8 million. The winner or winners have 60 days from claiming the prize to select cash or annuity payment.

But before that, the mystery must have a parlor scene — a literary term for the climax of crime novels where the true culprit, or in this case, lottery winner, is revealed.

Shaw says that's coming this week. Lottery officials say they're ready to meet when Shaw is.

"No lives are on the line here," Bogle said. "That's different than a lot of the cases in my career. This one, though, I think there's going to be a happy ending."

News story photo(Click to display full-size in gallery)

Des Moines Register

Comments

savagegoose's avatarsavagegoose

ok so i think i see the difference with our anonymous ,and usa's. here the person is known to the state as the winner, but  identity  remains anonymous to the public. seems even the lotto officials are left in the dark in usa's version.

but wait not all lotto  is gov ran any more is is it? its  private companies.  why should there be laws   making oyu reveal idientity to a private corp?

sure the statew needs to know, they need to know when u sell a peice of gold worth more than $500, but private  companies?

Stack47

Whomever purchased the ticket came within an hour and 50 minutes of having the ticket expire and watched the annuity value drop by $2.2 million. Had the ticket been validated exactly the same way two weeks after the drawing, there would be no news story. The real question is why wait until the last hour to cash; the identity of the person who actually bought the ticket is not important unless the ticket was stolen or maybe purchased by an illegal alien.

If the Lottery doesn't pay, the law firm will sue and be might be asked to prove how the ticket was purchased. It's very strange that is was necessary for a NY lawyer to sign for the trust when it was made by Iowa law firm.

JAP69's avatarJAP69

They declined to identify the gender of the person or whether the individual paid with cash or debit card. (Credit cards may not be used to buy lottery tickets.)

So if they find out it was purchased with a debit card what then.

I see it was a N.Y. lawyer. What if the ticket was purchased in Iowa and mailed to the person in N.Y.?

JAP69's avatarJAP69

Quote: Originally posted by JAP69 on Jan 10, 2012

They declined to identify the gender of the person or whether the individual paid with cash or debit card. (Credit cards may not be used to buy lottery tickets.)

So if they find out it was purchased with a debit card what then.

I see it was a N.Y. lawyer. What if the ticket was purchased in Iowa and mailed to the person in N.Y.?

Might be a touchy area of law if it was purchased by someone other than the owner of the ticket and mailed to the owner of the ticket.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001302----000-.html

maringoman's avatarmaringoman

The purchaser is so stupid. All this drama they brought it unto themselves. I always thought a month or two

is reasonable time to wait before claiming jp but 2 hours to the expiry? and then to add to the confusion,

Einstein is trying to hide behind a trust. Yes dummy, that appears very fishy. This is getting more and more

bizarre.

RJOh's avatarRJOh

Quote: Originally posted by maringoman on Jan 10, 2012

The purchaser is so stupid. All this drama they brought it unto themselves. I always thought a month or two

is reasonable time to wait before claiming jp but 2 hours to the expiry? and then to add to the confusion,

Einstein is trying to hide behind a trust. Yes dummy, that appears very fishy. This is getting more and more

bizarre.

If the state want winners to claim their prizes within two months then they should change the rules.  Some states only allow six months.

maringoman's avatarmaringoman

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Jan 10, 2012

If the state want winners to claim their prizes within two months then they should change the rules.  Some states only allow six months.

My bad. I guess what I meant was if you do it within the first two months, not too many eyebrows will be raised. 

The ticket owner seems to want privacy and anonymity but now they won't get that. Even people who don't

care for things like these are curious.

sully16's avatarsully16

This is a very strange story.

MrJackpot

We all have to look at it from the winner's point of view, winning a decent size jackpot of this size is a very life changing event and can cause an array of ; should I and shouldn't I; thoughts to occur. It's probably taken them a year to finally grasp the concept of being newly found wealth and get over the jitters of being new money. By being said, it shows that now being able to over come the temptation of claiming for a year that once the funds are deposited into their account they are more likely able to hold back from blowing their millions. Just my opinion.

rdgrnr's avatarrdgrnr

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Jan 10, 2012

If the state want winners to claim their prizes within two months then they should change the rules.  Some states only allow six months.

Roger that. The winner shouldn't have to be jumping through hoops when he's following the rules.

Unless they have evidence of criminal activity and not just the usual weirdoes claiming it's their ticket with no proof, they should give the man his money posthaste.

Cletu$2's avatarCletu$2

Quote: Originally posted by rdgrnr on Jan 10, 2012

Roger that. The winner shouldn't have to be jumping through hoops when he's following the rules.

Unless they have evidence of criminal activity and not just the usual weirdoes claiming it's their ticket with no proof, they should give the man his money posthaste.

I Agree!   I think they were convinced that nobody was going to claim the jackpot and they had the idea that they could keep it.And then somebody threw a wrench into the works and had the odasity to claim it.Now they are scrambling around looking for loopholes so they don't have to pay up.At least that's my take on the situation.

KY Floyd's avatarKY Floyd

Quote: Originally posted by rdgrnr on Jan 10, 2012

Roger that. The winner shouldn't have to be jumping through hoops when he's following the rules.

Unless they have evidence of criminal activity and not just the usual weirdoes claiming it's their ticket with no proof, they should give the man his money posthaste.

Yup. As soon as they have an individual claiming to be the owner of the ticket they should write a check just like Texas did when Willis Willis' ticket was presented for payment.

mcginnin56

Mmmmmmmm............its good to have drama. Be it a pretty dull world  Sleep    if everyone did exactly what they were supposed to do. Doting all those i's crossing all those T's. If it get's people's attention, scratching their heads, getting some people pissed off.......... more power to them.     Hurray!

OldSchoolPa's avatarOldSchoolPa

Quote: Originally posted by rdgrnr on Jan 10, 2012

Roger that. The winner shouldn't have to be jumping through hoops when he's following the rules.

Unless they have evidence of criminal activity and not just the usual weirdoes claiming it's their ticket with no proof, they should give the man his money posthaste.

But you have to admit this is a bit wacky.  Almost suspicious given that the person waited until the last day to claim in this manner. It would lead me and most reasonable people to suspect something is amiss in this case.  But as I understand it, all the person has to do is come forward to this investigator.  He or she will not be unnecessarily exposed to the media.  Besides, everyone knows who Brad Duke is and where he lives and he is having no problems.  Let me win and I could go either way, claim it anonymously or have a huge press conference with me showing up in a flashy stretch limosine with streamers and signs proclaiming, "JUST WON THE LOTTERY!"  When the begging commences, I have an easy solution for all of it..."a polite sorry but check with your bank for that as I am not in that business".....followed by a move to an undisclosed address in the US and frequent travel around the world. 

Now come on Powerball, give me some HOPE and drastic CHANGE for my 2012 bank account balance!

Just say NO to DRUGS and Obama in 2012...or just quit drinking the Kool-Aid...it's spiked!

Subscribe to this news story