Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 6:31 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Dutch court rules woman who won lottery during divorce can keep it all

Topic closed. 32 replies. Last post 11 months ago by LiveInGreenBay.

Page 2 of 3
51
PrintE-mailLink
mikeintexas's avatar - tx avatar-1.gif
Texas Panhandle
United States
Member #136843
December 20, 2012
1258 Posts
Offline
Posted: December 30, 2015, 1:05 am - IP Logged

WOW, that was bad...lol

Thud

Speaking of things Dutch, did you hear about the new movie Ron Howard is directing and starring in?  It's about a music teacher in The Netherlands and is called "Mr. Opie's Holland".

    Bondi Junction
    Australia
    Member #57242
    December 24, 2007
    1102 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: December 30, 2015, 2:42 am - IP Logged

    So, they are going Dutch?

    We all get a lot out of lotteries!

      Bondi Junction
      Australia
      Member #57242
      December 24, 2007
      1102 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: December 30, 2015, 3:02 am - IP Logged

      Wonder if him moving out with the new women 4 yrs earlier had any effect (or is it affect? always get them reversed- lol!)

      She should at least buy him a pair of clogs!

      We all get a lot out of lotteries!

        noise-gate's avatar - images q=tbn:ANd9GcR91HDs4UJhjxO7cmeMQWZ5lB_FOcMLOGicau4V74R45tDgPWrr
        Bay Area - California
        United States
        Member #136477
        December 12, 2012
        4102 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: December 30, 2015, 10:28 am - IP Logged

        l got to thinking: The only way this" ex" could claim a portion of the wife's lottery win was him moving out & in with his new gf-  and the ex & him continued to pool their resources in playing the lottery. ...What are those chances of happening? .anyone,  anyone? Big Smile

        People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it- George Bernard Shaw.

          Avatar
          Kentucky
          United States
          Member #32652
          February 14, 2006
          7295 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: December 30, 2015, 2:31 pm - IP Logged

          You surprised?  I'm not. He probably thought he was going to win twice in a row by ..

          1st: Ditching the wife and moving in with the girlfriend.

          2nd- attempting to royally screw the wife over by getting a share of HER money years after he left.The judge made the correct decision.

          "The judge made the correct decision. "

          I Agree! because this was an easy decision for the judge; she filed for divorce before she won the lottery. A divorce is no different than dissolving any contract and is usually specific on future earnings. Some people believe by suggesting there is a verbal contract between them and lottery winners, they have rights to a portion of the winnings.

            music*'s avatar - nw bookeep.jpg
            Happy California
            United States
            Member #157856
            August 2, 2014
            1506 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: December 30, 2015, 6:53 pm - IP Logged

             I was just reading about prenuptial agreements. I do not know if this is relevant to this discussion but it is an interesting topic. Especially when dealing with Lottery winners.

            Happy New Year !!!

             I've been rich and I've been poor. Believe me, rich is better. 

             Attributed to Joe E. Lewis and others

              Artist77's avatar - batman14

              United States
              Member #121745
              January 16, 2012
              4783 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: December 30, 2015, 7:33 pm - IP Logged

              I believe his moving out four years earlier with a new women affected the judges decision to the effect of"NO LOTTO LOOT"!

              I agree.

              J'aime La France.

                sully16's avatar - sharan
                Ringleader
                Michigan
                United States
                Member #81740
                October 28, 2009
                40293 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: December 30, 2015, 7:37 pm - IP Logged

                Good for her, enjoy!

                Did you exchange a walk on part in the war ?

                For a lead role in a cage?

                 

                                                            From Pink Floyd's " Wish you were here"

                  pantherestates's avatar - Lottery-061.jpg
                  sherman oaks
                  United States
                  Member #157425
                  July 18, 2014
                  28 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: December 31, 2015, 12:08 am - IP Logged

                  Ha!Ha!Ha! That is what he gets!LOL! I am so happy that the wife got to keep all of these funds for herself...the ex doesn't deserve not one penny of it..SmashSmashSmash.perhaps him and his girlfriend can go in together and get their own lotto tixs...in the meantime I hope the wife is laughing all the way to the bank!BananaBananaBananaBananaBanana

                  I'M A WINNER!!!!!!!!Drum

                    Tialuvslotto's avatar - Jailin
                    Texas
                    United States
                    Member #150797
                    December 31, 2013
                    814 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: December 31, 2015, 7:17 am - IP Logged

                    This has got to be THE BEST Christmas lottery story...EVAH!!!

                    And three cheers for the Dutch judicial system who got it right. Party

                    This man has been separated from his wife for 4 years, and while he was shacked up with another woman, had his finances 100% separate and apart from his wife, and he feels he's entitled to half of her winnings from a ticket she bought AFTER they filed for divorce? Is he insane? They were separated in every way possible. That the courts hadn't gotten around to finalizing the divorce is a secondary matter. 

                    And that nonsense about buying tickets together for 30 years means he's entitled to a share is <snip>amamie baloney. I'm sure they also shared incomes and future plans together for those 30 years. Does that mean she's entitled to a share of everything he made or was gifted with after they'd filed for divorce? Puh-lease. 

                    Sometimes, not often, but sometimes karma and irony unite and gifts us with a twofer. This is one of those times. And it is a thing of beauty. Jester Laugh

                    This post has been automatically changed by the Lottery Post computer system to remove inappropriate content and/or spam.

                    "Sometimes, not often, but sometimes karma and irony unite and gifts us with a twofer. This is one of those times. And it is a thing of beauty."  Jester Laugh

                    Right on, as usual, Teddi!  And very well phrased.

                    "There is no such thing as luck; only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe."

                    ~Robert A. Heinlein

                      Avatar
                      NY
                      United States
                      Member #23835
                      October 16, 2005
                      3474 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: December 31, 2015, 12:17 pm - IP Logged

                      "A divorce is no different than dissolving any contract and is usually specific on future earnings."

                      True enough, but the marriage contract isn't dissolved until the divorce is final. That there was a court case at all suggests that the applicable law is similar to what we have in the US, and your finances are assumed to be mingled as long as you're still married. Basing the ruling on the apparent fact that they separated their finances well before she bought the ticket makes obvious sense, but depending on what the law says a judge may not always have that option. There was an article here some time back about a couple that had finalized their divorce, but one of them sued for a share of a lottery prize anyway based (IIRC) on the divorce not stipulating that their finances were completely severed. I think they got some of the money.

                      It's also possible that because they were still married he could have been on the hook for her financial obligations, and may have been stuck paying off her credit cards and mortgage if she'd been hit by a bus instead of bought a winning lottery ticket. It's not equitable if he has to share in her bad fortune but can't share in her good fortune.

                      The obvious take away here is that if you're going to end the actual relationship you should make a point of ending the legal relationship, too.

                        HaveABall's avatar - rocket

                        United States
                        Member #72448
                        March 18, 2009
                        1227 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: December 31, 2015, 4:49 pm - IP Logged

                        Kind of surprised it took that long to divorce him. He made his own bed when he moved in with his girlfriend 4 years ago. Glad to hear that there is still common sense justice in this world.

                        Yeah, Drenick1, apparently this woman is no stranger to prolonged financial & mental anguish and self-esteem dismantling!

                         Surrender

                        Having several millions of dollars in my financial accounts means receiving several valuable services each day!

                        Disney

                          Avatar
                          New Member
                          Maryland
                          United States
                          Member #155454
                          May 19, 2014
                          13 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: December 31, 2015, 10:46 pm - IP Logged

                          Had this been in the US and it were the other way around where the man won the lottery, how many think the soon to be ex wife would have been granted a share?

                            Avatar
                            New Member
                            sarasota,fl
                            United States
                            Member #116801
                            September 19, 2011
                            4 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: January 2, 2016, 9:41 am - IP Logged

                            If it were the other way around in the Dutch courts or the US the man would have had to pay up. The court systems are so frikkin biased. He should at least get alimony or spousal support the woman would've been granted it.

                              pickone4me's avatar - 021414tvlies zpsa453b327.jpg
                              Wisconsin
                              United States
                              Member #104962
                              January 23, 2011
                              1075 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: January 2, 2016, 12:18 pm - IP Logged

                              How would this have played out if this was in reverse?

                              Trump 2016!