Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited September 24, 2020, 6:12 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Amid delay in new lottery policy, repeat winners keep on winning

Apr 28, 2018, 10:00 am

Share this news story on Facebook
Tweet this news story on Twitter
Massachusetts LotteryMassachusetts Lottery: Amid delay in new lottery policy, repeat winners keep on winningRating:

It's been a charmed decade for Ali Jaafar. The Watertown man keeps hitting it big on the Massachusetts State Lottery, winning millions of dollars from thousands of scratch tickets.

For the past two years, Jaafar has held the title of the state's winningest lottery player. But he is just one of hundreds of individuals who repeatedly cash in on the Massachusetts lottery.

The lottery does not know how some of these so-called "frequent winners" manage to win so often. Many of these players hold win streaks that Michael Sweeney, executive director of the state lottery, said "defy all mathematical logic or reason." While some people believe these players are coming by their prizes through luck, effort — or both — Sweeney said he's concerned illicit activities, like money laundering, could potentially be involved. And for the last 10 months, he's been working on a way to stop giving the spoils to certain victors.

Payouts flow amid policy delay

Last August, Sweeney said that he was working on a new policy to stop the lottery from making massive payouts to frequent winners. He said that plan would be in place on Oct. 1, 2017. However, more than half a year later, no policy is in effect.

In that time period, close to 80 frequent winners have cashed out more than 4,000 prizes totaling at least $22.8 million, according to an analysis of lottery records obtained through public records requests. From Oct. 1 through mid-March, Jaafar alone won more than 700 prizes — 549 were scratch tickets that hit $1,000 — and collected more than a $1 million.

University of California Berkeley statistics professor Philip Stark calculated that "if every Massachusetts resident spent $5.7 million on scratchers, there would still be less than a 1 in 10 million chance that any of them would win $1,000 as many times as Jaafar" did on scratch tickets.

This improbable wave of luck has brought into question whether a state lottery that touts itself as the nation's most successful may be vulnerable to manipulation.

A lottery spokesman said the agency is now in the "late stages" of implementing the new rule it pledged last year. The policy will flag and freeze payments to people whose repeated good fortune raises suspicions. Win $1,000 or more at least 20 times within 12 months, and the lottery will freeze your future winnings for 90 days. You could cash in again after that freeze, but if you win another 20 times, your prizes will be held for 180 days.

This is more forgiving than Sweeney's original proposal. Last summer, he said he wanted to trigger the freeze at six wins of $1,000 or more in a 12-month period. Had this original limit gone into effect in October, nearly 500 winners would have had to explain their luck. Those players cashed close to 7,200 wins worth about $34.5 million.

"While admittedly perhaps we're not moving as fast as some people would like us to, what we're trying to do is we're trying to get this right," said Sweeney.

He said it took longer than expected to shore up the details of the new policy. Sweeney wanted to come up with language that could withstand legal challenges. He also cited the ongoing process to make the rule a part of the Code of Massachusetts Regulations.

Lottery officials in both Florida and Georgia created new policies in the wake of scrutiny around frequent winning. In Georgia, there have been a handful of lawsuits challenging the state's withholding of big-money prizes through a policy change similar to the one being created in Massachusetts.

"What we are trying to do, and what I think my responsibility is in part, is to try to make our process as thorough and as complete as possible, so that if someone does appeal [a freeze under the policy], we'll have very strong standing in whatever judicial setting," Sweeney said. "What I'm trying to do is to make the process legal, constitutional and for it to stand up in court."

Number of frequent winners keeps increasing

Suspicions around the incredible gambling successes among frequent winners in Massachusetts are not new. State auditors first outlined concerns on the matter nearly 20 years ago in a 1999 audit of the lottery.

"Statistically, these multiple winners would have had to purchase hundreds of thousands to millions of tickets in order for them to win so many prizes and 'beat the odds,' " then-state Auditor Joseph DeNucci wrote in the report. The audit found that the state's top winner won 319 times for a total of $412,482 — or about one-fifth of the wins and the money Ali Jaafar won in 2017.

There has been only one instance in which a state agency has brought a frequent winner to court, according to Sweeney. It was an Appellate Tax Board case against Clarance Jones, of Lynn — the state's most frequent winner for more than a decade. In 2011 the government was unsuccessful in collecting the taxes it argued Jones, who bills himself as a professional gambler, owed.

Ali Jaafar was the top lottery prize-getter last year, winning more than 1,500 times for a fast $2.25 million.

The 59-year-old is not the only lucky member of the Jaafar family. Mohamed Jaafar, 27, and Yousef Jaafar, 25, together won more than 600 times, netting nearly $1 million in total from January 2017 to mid-March. When reached by phone, Ali and Yousef Jaafar said they did not want to speak to a reporter. A young man who answered the door at an address believed to be where the three of them reside also said the family did not want to talk. Ali Jaafar has owned a business called Assorted Phone Cards, Inc. since 1995, and state records show its registered address is the same as Jaafar's home.

Frequent winners appear to have found their paradise in Massachusetts. The state has the most repeat lottery winners in the U.S., according to an analysis of 36 lotteries last year. Between 2011 and 2016, there were 384 frequent winners in Massachusetts. (The winners counted in their analysis won at least $600 a minimum of 50 times.)

New York is the next closest state, with 319 frequent winners between 2010 and 2016. In other words, even with one less year of data, Massachusetts still had by far the highest number of frequent winners.

For the past seven years, the number of frequent winners in Massachusetts, as defined by the policy Sweeney is creating, has increased. The state lottery's total payout to them: more than $396 million.

In Florida and Iowa, frequent winning has been tied to criminal activities. Sweeney is concerned winners here may be engaging in similar illicit actions. Beyond implementing his policy, he said he's made collaborating with law enforcement a top priority since his tenure began in 2015.

"It would be the death of the lottery if people think the games are fixed at all," said Boston College professor Richard McGowan, who studies the gaming industry in Massachusetts.

But McGowan sees the lottery's forthcoming policy as "a bit of an overreaction," saying the number of frequent winners does not necessarily surprise him. He said many of these people are likely addicted to playing the lottery — and deeply invested in beating the odds. People spend hours studying which scratch tickets have unclaimed high prizes, he says, in order to buy up those tickets and better their chances.

"I also would like to know how many scratch tickets these people are buying, and I would probably say they're buying an awful lot of scratch tickets," McGowan said. "So it will be interesting if this policy goes into effect, what's going to happen to those instant ticket sales? I guarantee you they're going to be going down. And so the lottery isn't going to do as well."

McGowan said he thinks the lottery should consider pulling instant tickets after a certain period of time, rather than waiting for them to sell. "That way it would be harder to take advantage if you knew that the big prizes were not taken yet."

He also questioned whether the lottery's policy would be effective: "If a person is this dedicated, they certainly could get a lot of people to cash tickets in for them, and what could the lottery do?"

Les Bernal, of Stop Predatory Gambling, a national group against state-run gambling operations, said he highly doubts law enforcement officials are keeping a close watch on frequent winners.

"When states like Massachusetts aggressively sponsor predatory gambling you get into this quandary. In the past — 40 or 50 years ago — if people were running predatory gambling rings that were illegal, the police would act on this stuff, they would take action," Bernal said. "Now, because states like Massachusetts have put the imprint on predatory gambling... law enforcement more often now sees gambling as a revenue issue, and not as something that they need to attack criminally."

Last year, lottery revenue generated more than $1 billion in local aid distributed among the state's 351 towns and cities.

Within the last month, the lottery has scheduled hearings for seven retailers with "a high frequency of lottery prize claims," according to lottery spokesman Christian Teja, who says zeroing in on businesses that sell lottery products "allows us to make the quickest impact."

"Over the last 10 months, the Massachusetts State Lottery has done more to address this issue than in the prior 20 years," Sweeney said in a statement. "We have started our efforts by focusing on licensed lottery retail agents that have engaged in this activity."

Last August, following a report that found some business owners who sell instant tickets were often cashing in winning tickets for big prizes, too, the lottery suspended at least three of its sales agents in East Boston, Dedham and Revere, banning them from selling products for 30 days. The lottery says suspensions for similar activity at two other stores in Hyde Park and Springfield are pending appeal.

Sweeney said implementing the new rule has been "a big undertaking." He said that while the lottery is mandated to ensure individuals' payouts are garnished to first pay any back taxes and outstanding child support, it is not a law enforcement agency.

"I do think there's been a tendency in the industry to turn the blind eye to this behavior or they chalk it up to, 'Well, that person must be really lucky,' " he said. "I just don't think those are acceptable public responses."

Sweeney hopes the new policy will be on the books within the coming months.

It's possible that once the policy is in place, many of these frequent winners may not feel so lucky.


We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

18 comments. Last comment 2 years ago by maximumfun.
Page 1 of 2
music*'s avatar - DiscoBallGlowing
USN United States Navy
Fresno, California
United States
Member #157851
August 2, 2014
3959 Posts

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck it is probably a duck.

 I am thinking that many other State lotteries are looking at Massachusetts for leadership in this case. 

 The Lottery could limit the offenders to only sell draw games like Powerball and Mega Millions.

             Group Hug   

 "We are all in this together!" 

    United States
    Member #136664
    December 16, 2012
    790 Posts

    The simple fix is not to allow employees or owners to buy tickets at there store Indiana has or had that in place from the start not sure if that is still in effect but that would be a way to help from fraud from the store owners or employees.

      music*'s avatar - DiscoBallGlowing
      USN United States Navy
      Fresno, California
      United States
      Member #157851
      August 2, 2014
      3959 Posts

      The simple fix is not to allow employees or owners to buy tickets at there store Indiana has or had that in place from the start not sure if that is still in effect but that would be a way to help from fraud from the store owners or employees.

      I Agree! This could be one more arrow in the quiver. Prevent fraud!

       "We are all in this together!" 

        Chasing $ Millions.
        White Shores- California
        United States
        Member #136473
        December 12, 2012
        6314 Posts

        Given that there have been winners of lottery jackpots that have said" It was God's plan." Ali could also claim that it is Allah the Benevolent who has been behind his winning streak. As the saying goes "what's good for the goose, is good for the gander!   Right?

         * Voice of Reason *   


        People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it- George Bernard Shaw.

          Think's avatar - lightbulb
          Marquette, MI
          United States
          Member #20540
          August 20, 2005
          881 Posts

          While I agree that this activity looks suspicious, if they withhold the winnings and cant prove wrongdoing then they should have to pay interest on the winnings during the withholding period when they finally pay out the prizes.

            hlamb's avatar - batman47
            New Member
            United States
            Member #116797
            September 19, 2011
            13 Posts

            These are inside jobs. Someone on the inside most likely from the company that manufactures these tickets have contacted these outsiders and are sending the winners to certain stores while also letting their cohorts know what roll and what number ticket. That is the only possible way unless someone within the Lottery's office itself is sending tickets to certain vendors for kickbacks. What's in the dark will eventually come to the light.


              grwurston's avatar - Lottery-012.jpg
              Win Today.
              bel air maryland
              United States
              Member #90247
              April 24, 2010
              9425 Posts

              Scratch off tickets have been cracked before. Maybe he figured it out. Sounds like sour grapes on the part of the Mass. lottery. They don't mind taking in the money, but let someone start winning a lot of it and its Crying. If some one could do the same thing with the Pick 3 or Pick 4, they would make you out to be the biggest cheater ever, because you know, statistically it can't be done. Wink


              "You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra, Hall of Fame baseball player.

              The numbers will tell you what numbers to play. Pay attention to the numbers.

                geerod2001's avatar - DiscoBallGlowing
                United States
                Member #67343
                November 23, 2008
                29 Posts

                Bingo sir!

                  Tucker Black's avatar - Kleber Vieira.jpg
                  Reno, NV
                  United States
                  Member #173299
                  February 25, 2016
                  334 Posts

                  Great article, in case I needed another reason NOT to buy scratch tickets!

                    New York, NY
                    United States
                    Member #140630
                    March 23, 2013
                    10652 Posts

                    Honestly with scratch offs, I would say it’s literally impossible to win that much that many times over such a short period of time frame. I have to agree with the lottery. There are people who cash tickets at discounted prices. It’s d—- near impossible to win that consistently with scratch offs. I have and at times still scratch, but I used to scratch a lot. And it’s not just luck imho.

                    Sometimes you do the right thing just because it’s right.

                      mjwinsmith's avatar - moon

                      United States
                      Member #391
                      June 8, 2002
                      18188 Posts

                      While I agree that this activity looks suspicious, if they withhold the winnings and cant prove wrongdoing then they should have to pay interest on the winnings during the withholding period when they finally pay out the prizes.

                      I Agree!

                      "Don't be a Dummy, Make 'Dat Money"

                      Mjwinsmith's Blog Page:   http://blogs.lotterypost.com/mjwinsmith/

                      "How to Play My Pick-4 System": https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/306450

                      MjWin$mith's Pick-3 Magic Wheels:  https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/294295

                      Pick-3 for Dummies (Best 10 of 40) Table 3 Results: https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/323117

                      "The Palindromes are coming, the Palindromes are coming" https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/203353

                        RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                        United States
                        Member #9
                        March 24, 2001
                        20272 Posts

                        Massachusetts discontinued their Winfall game for the same reasons, and the winners weren't doing anything wrong.  They just spent a lot of money smartly.  If the state wants to know what they are doing, pay them.  After all, it's their intellectual property.  Wink

                         * you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones * 

                        Thumbs Up       

                          United States
                          Member #87366
                          February 23, 2010
                          65 Posts

                          Yeah that winfall game was figured out by one man that had used his plans in another state and after he started in Mass winfall MIT students did the same.Game continued for along time after State knew about it, because State was making money off it.This state Mass always complains about not making enough money when Profits are nearly a Billion dollars.Money from Mass lottery was set up for schools and later changed to general fund, so politicians could use that money for anything.

                            New Member
                            United States
                            Member #162634
                            January 7, 2015
                            1 Posts

                            This story brings to mind people who win the lottery and if they win over a certain amount (I think $50K) can write off loses on their taxes against the taxes they pay on winnings.

                            If I win I plan to do this.

                            What are other people's thoughts and experience with this?