"Lottery Lawyer" Jason Kurland charged with robbing jackpot winners of millions

Aug 18, 2020, 6:48 pm (57 comments)

Insider Buzz

Self-branded New York attorney is accused of stealing millions from his clients

By Kate Northrop

The self-titled "Lottery Lawyer" attorney who advised dozens of significant jackpot winners across the country is now being charged by New York federal prosecutors for stealing millions of dollars from his clients.

Jason "Jay" Kurland has been charged with conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering in an indictment revealed today.

Prosecutors are estimating that Kurland stole more than $80 million from his clients throughout his long-running scheme. One of his victims won the record-breaking $1.5 billion Mega Millions lottery jackpot in 2018, the second-largest jackpot to-date and the largest payout to a single player ever. Another winner he stole from won a $245 million Powerball jackpot in 2018. The cumulative winnings of all his victims over time amounts to about $3 billion.

Kurland has represented players from every corner of the nation, even appearing on national television to offer advice to lottery players everywhere.

"The biggest mistake people make is doing it on their own," he said of winning a big prize in 2019. "All the horror stories you hear is when people do it on their own."

An ironic statement, given the context.

According to prosecutors, Kurland advised the lottery winners to invest in entities managed by co-conspirators, which included former securities broker Frank Smookler, Christopher Chierchio, who is supposedly a big-name player in a Genovese crime family, and Frankie Russo.

Gerald J. McMahon, Chierchio's defense attorney, dismissed these accusations as fraudulent charges and claimed that his client was not involved in organized crime.

"If he were not Italian, there would be no accusation of this nature," he stated.

For pushing jackpot winners to invest in the co-conspirators' entities, Kurland was allegedly rewarded some of the cash. On the other end, Smookler, Chierchio, and Russo siphoned money from the investments.

Prosecutors described the schemers' lavish lifestyles in court documents, saying that they "profited handsomely" from their crimes and enjoyed the luxuries of "flying private jets, taking exotic vacations, buying boats, paying country club dues and even 'wrapping' luxury cars."

"Lottery winners can't believe their luck when they win millions of dollars, and the men we arrested this morning allegedly used that euphoric feeling to their advantage," FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge William Sweeney said. "The FBI New York discovered how these victims were persuaded to put large chunks of their cash into investments that benefited the defendants. Rather than try their luck at the lottery, these men resorted to defrauding the victims to get rich, but their gamble didn't pay off."

Thanks to Raven62 for the tip.

Lottery Post Staff

Comments

GiveFive's avatarGiveFive

How long will it be until we'll see this story on "American Greed"?  G5

NY10

What ???? Ha ha ha ha

Thief in so called gentleman’s clothing ha ha ha ha

andl's avatarandl

Will the identity of the 1.5 billion dollar win be revealed in court? How do you conceal that?

hearsetrax's avatarhearsetrax

😒why am I not surprised by this story ??

and even worse b4 Virginia became an anonymous state, I was going to call this guy Crazy

lejardin's avatarlejardin

So much for "trust me I will help you". 

lejardin's avatarlejardin

Quote: Originally posted by lejardin on Aug 18, 2020

So much for "trust me I will help you". 

"The lottery winners paid between $75,000 and $200,000 in upfront payments to hire Mr. Kurland and his law firm, according to court papers. Mr. Kurland then charged monthly fees of between $15,000 and $50,000". 

After persuading the lottery winners to invest, the four men then spent some of the funds on golf club memberships, yachts, private jets, a Porsche and other luxury cars and shopping sprees at stores like Fendi, prosecutors said.

Law enforcement officials had been wiretapping the men’s phone calls for months, including conversations in which they discussed whether they might go to jail.

gr8ter's avatargr8ter

Quote: Originally posted by lejardin on Aug 18, 2020

"The lottery winners paid between $75,000 and $200,000 in upfront payments to hire Mr. Kurland and his law firm, according to court papers. Mr. Kurland then charged monthly fees of between $15,000 and $50,000". 

After persuading the lottery winners to invest, the four men then spent some of the funds on golf club memberships, yachts, private jets, a Porsche and other luxury cars and shopping sprees at stores like Fendi, prosecutors said.

Law enforcement officials had been wiretapping the men’s phone calls for months, including conversations in which they discussed whether they might go to jail.

Greed will catch up with these wolves in sheeps clothing.  May these winners recoup their money.  It stinks that you don't know who to trust.

Big Joey

Gasp

Thud

Twitching in a Grand Mal Seizure

Yikes

I was going to use him, If I ever won big

Grovel's avatarGrovel

Why would anyone be taking investment advice from a lawyer?

TheMeatman2005's avatarTheMeatman2005

Quote: Originally posted by gr8ter on Aug 18, 2020

Greed will catch up with these wolves in sheeps clothing.  May these winners recoup their money.  It stinks that you don't know who to trust.

“Lottery Lawyer” and Three Co-Conspirators Indicted in $107 Million Scheme to Defraud Lottery-Winning Clients

Taken from Justice.gov

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Eastern District of New York
quicksloth35

I am glad this happened. This is supposedly why you want to use a huge law firm when claiming a JP, to reduce chances of snake-isms like this.

 

I, also, was going to at least consider using this guy, however, I would have passed on investment advice, especially giving him access to my $$$.

 

Judging by the company he keeps, JK probably would have had me whacked for that!

TheGameGrl's avatarTheGameGrl

Firm believer in handling your own finances. Allow your tax advisor to handle the irs paperwork. Beyond that be your own advocate for sound investments.

KY Floyd's avatarKY Floyd

"The lottery winners paid between $75,000 and $200,000 in upfront payments to hire Mr. Kurland and his law firm, according to court papers. Mr. Kurland then charged monthly fees of between $15,000 and $50,000". 

I've always figured that those claiming on behalf of winners and putting their names out there for the public would have to deal with the annoyances the winners would avoid by concealing their own identities, and they deserve to be compensated for that. At the same time I've always been under the impression that this guy  was charging more than he should. Even in a Long Island office 50k per month is enough for a full time staff of 5 to answer the phone and throw away the mail, and still leave something for the lawyer that's not dealing with the hassles. I also figured that smart clients would use him once, then look for a certified financial planner and a different lawyer to deal with ongoing stuff.

"This is supposedly why you want to use a huge law firm when claiming a JP, to reduce chances of snake-isms like this."

Powers of attorney and signatories to the bank accounts are the first step in protecting your money. It's not completely fool-proof, but another good step is paying for advice by the hour and using well-established companies with well-known names for the actual investing.

There's a lawyer in MA who has represented a few MA winners (not sure about any from out of state), and I recall an article in which he said he just charges for his actual time to create a trust and claim the prize. Figuring he'd catch some of the hassles I  thought he  should probably charge more, but I've  always had the impression he might be a good guy to handle the claim process. And while using a competent lawyer from a firm of any size is good for taking care of the basic process, I think they should find a nondescript guy with a name like John Smith who lives in a very large city (with plenty of other John Smiths) to be the name (and face, if necessary) that the lottery releases to the public. No reason to make it easy for the general public to find an address or phone number to pester.

Bleudog101

Wow.    New York doesn't play and they'll pay dearly.

May have to look up to see where Bernie Maddov (spelling) ended up with his white collar Ponzi schemes.  That Pharmacy rip off artist that raised the price of a drug that was 15 years old by over 700% was recently in the news.   He wanted a cell phone in the prison so he could conduct more business, also from NY.

music*'s avatarmusic*

Excellent comments by Lottery Post Members, Thank You. 

 Here in Fresno, CA there are plenty of lawyers to choose from. I will require a Living Revocable Trust. A Will does not cut it here in my State.

  I do not have all the answers so I will seek professional advice. 

 We have to be grateful for the New York Federal Prosecutors for catching these defendants. They are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. It does not appear very well for them. I am not in favor of trying defendants in the press. Allow the legal process in this free Country to work.

CDanaT's avatarCDanaT

Hopefully, should these allegations be proven true, these sharks get caged for many years.

GiveFive's avatarGiveFive

Quote: Originally posted by lejardin on Aug 18, 2020

"The lottery winners paid between $75,000 and $200,000 in upfront payments to hire Mr. Kurland and his law firm, according to court papers. Mr. Kurland then charged monthly fees of between $15,000 and $50,000". 

After persuading the lottery winners to invest, the four men then spent some of the funds on golf club memberships, yachts, private jets, a Porsche and other luxury cars and shopping sprees at stores like Fendi, prosecutors said.

Law enforcement officials had been wiretapping the men’s phone calls for months, including conversations in which they discussed whether they might go to jail.

If The FBI was wiretapping the men's phone calls for months, then somebody had to have gone to the FBI and complained.  My guess is that it was one of the victims.

I just downloaded and read the actual complaint/court documents.  There is a date in it showing a wire transfer of $12,500,00 from one of the victims accounts to an account owned by the defendants.  There are other multi-million dollar wire transfers from the other victims bank accounts to the defendants as well. 

Also, there are threats of bodily harm being done by the defendants to the victims and their family members. One of the victims was threatened with being forced to watch as his child's teeth were ripped out.  The threat against the victims wife was not as specific or graphic as the threat to his son, but I imagine it was rather nasty.  All caught on tape by The FBI too.  These idiots have a big problem on their hands. G5

noise-gate

Jason is a crafty one.

* Isn't that like you visiting the dentist, and the person working on your teeth says " you good looking,single yes?  l have a daughter your age that is not married, has no boyfriend and is beautiful- l show you picture."Cool

frank0sport16

@lejardin RE your quote ...

"The lottery winners paid between $75,000 and $200,000 in upfront payments to hire Mr. Kurland and his law firm, according to court papers. Mr. Kurland then charged monthly fees of between $15,000 and $50,000". 

If I were to win a big jackpot, and then if someone quoted me upfront and monthly figures similar to those above, I'd immediately recognize them as red flags, especially the monthlies since over time they'd end up costing you way, way more than the upfronts.

Financial and legal counsels should not need to be paid more than once to file jackpot claims, and should not need to be paid any more than what they may normally charge for any type service. You set the tone, not them.

Unless otherwise, any after taxes-expenses cash option payment you receive should be broken down into three parts -- (1) "spend now" money, no than more than a max of 10% (assuming a small jackpot, larger jackpots would reduce the spend now percentage); (2) reserve and trust accounts, totaling at least 50% of whatever is not "spend now" money if a small jackpot, greater percentage for larger jackpots; (3) cash flow account which pays out a specific fixed monthly amount over 30 to 40 years, at least 50% of whatever is not "spend now" money if a small jackpot, lesser percentage for larger jackpots. Any unspent portion of the monthly payouts can be returned to the cash flow account, or can be added to the reserve and trust accounts.

Choose advice wisely, invest wisely, spend and save wisely, live within specific boundaries.


Thanx-A-Lot. Stay Safe And Well

darthfury78

When it comes to representing Lotto winners money, use their money to invest (like Warren Buffet)in blue chip stocks. The Feds can't charge a person who uses the money in that matter. As long as they do not use it on themselves, it's all good. Surrender

LotterMe57

What an IDIOT. And I'm sorry to say but the bit about "If he were not Italian, there would be no accusation of this nature," he stated." That excuse only applies to.....well you know. All good things DO come to an end.

dannyct

It is very important to get independent, professional legal and financial advice. State Lotteries have a responsibility to give advice in this area. The UK Lottery help winners get access to reputable advisors.

dpoly1's avatardpoly1

"Make sure that you go to a Lawyer"

SURE

Hit With Stick

lejardin's avatarlejardin

Quote: Originally posted by GiveFive on Aug 19, 2020

If The FBI was wiretapping the men's phone calls for months, then somebody had to have gone to the FBI and complained.  My guess is that it was one of the victims.

I just downloaded and read the actual complaint/court documents.  There is a date in it showing a wire transfer of $12,500,00 from one of the victims accounts to an account owned by the defendants.  There are other multi-million dollar wire transfers from the other victims bank accounts to the defendants as well. 

Also, there are threats of bodily harm being done by the defendants to the victims and their family members. One of the victims was threatened with being forced to watch as his child's teeth were ripped out.  The threat against the victims wife was not as specific or graphic as the threat to his son, but I imagine it was rather nasty.  All caught on tape by The FBI too.  These idiots have a big problem on their hands. G5

GiveFive and Frank0sport:  I agree with both your responses and I think the victims must have learned or suspected something just was not right.

The complaint showed several transfers to and from the defendants.  I just cant understand how these nutcases thought they would never be caught, ESPECIALLY Jason.  I am not sure why would they bring in another person by loaning money was that part of their "investment" plan lol?  And to make those horrible threats makes these people more than just scammers.

Additionally, those upfront fees seem high, red flags absolutely.  I would get a couple of other estimates to see whom is out of line.   Seems to me you will need to hire an attorney for advice on how to claim, set up a land/family trust but after that, what need is there for an attorney?  Kurland was charging $15,000 to $50,000 a month?  What in the world for?

More important than an attorney would be a CPA, imo.  If you need more legal advice you can find another one who charges an hourly charge.  Probably using more than one is a good idea as questions come up.  Exactly what frank0sport said, YOU set the tone. 

In researching I found that Goldman Sachs handles high income clients and think a good choice.  But have to admit like a few others here thot Kurland would have been a good choice.  Sure would like to be able to handle my own finances.  Of course all depends on the amount of the jackpot.

Kurland just shot himself in the foot, threw his whole business away.  Now, just maybe? Those investment losers went after Kurland and threatened him like they did the other guy?  Offered him a deal he "could not refuse"?  Ok, slim chance lol.

This whole story is very sad.

MrLotto$

They should've done it themseves... Smh

frank0sport16

From right here on Lottery Post, two articles on what to do, and what not to do ....

1 ....  Six Things To Do Before Claiming Your Prize

2 .... Twelve Things -NOT- To Do If You Win The Lottery


Thanx-A-Lot, Stay Safe, Well and Wise.

welington

If a lawyer sound too good to be true  ,you better watch out. Money makes people do some crazy things .You may need another lawyer to check on your lawyer and an account to check on your lawyers

GiveFive's avatarGiveFive

Quote: Originally posted by lejardin on Aug 19, 2020

GiveFive and Frank0sport:  I agree with both your responses and I think the victims must have learned or suspected something just was not right.

The complaint showed several transfers to and from the defendants.  I just cant understand how these nutcases thought they would never be caught, ESPECIALLY Jason.  I am not sure why would they bring in another person by loaning money was that part of their "investment" plan lol?  And to make those horrible threats makes these people more than just scammers.

Additionally, those upfront fees seem high, red flags absolutely.  I would get a couple of other estimates to see whom is out of line.   Seems to me you will need to hire an attorney for advice on how to claim, set up a land/family trust but after that, what need is there for an attorney?  Kurland was charging $15,000 to $50,000 a month?  What in the world for?

More important than an attorney would be a CPA, imo.  If you need more legal advice you can find another one who charges an hourly charge.  Probably using more than one is a good idea as questions come up.  Exactly what frank0sport said, YOU set the tone. 

In researching I found that Goldman Sachs handles high income clients and think a good choice.  But have to admit like a few others here thot Kurland would have been a good choice.  Sure would like to be able to handle my own finances.  Of course all depends on the amount of the jackpot.

Kurland just shot himself in the foot, threw his whole business away.  Now, just maybe? Those investment losers went after Kurland and threatened him like they did the other guy?  Offered him a deal he "could not refuse"?  Ok, slim chance lol.

This whole story is very sad.

When you read the complaint, it's hard to see or know the back-story of what else had been going on that the FBI was aware of because those details aren't in the complaint.

However, a newspaper like the NY Times with good crackerjack investigative reporters got those back story details and printed them.  Here's a few goodies from The NYT article that I read;

Kurland was doing wire transfers of huge amounts of money out of the lottery winners accounts because he had access to them as well as the winners themselves.  He was transferring the money to his associates accounts and they then lavished themselves by using that money to buy mansions, jets, country club memberships, expensive jewelry etc.  They also kicked back money to Kurland for performing the wire transfers.

One of Kurland's associates was a long time member of The Columbo crime family in New York City and The FBI has been watching him for years. He was heard to say on the wire tap tapes "The FBI has been watching me for years. So what? I laugh at them."  It could be that The FBI stumbled upon what Kurland and his associates had been doing. It's possible that none of the winners approached The FBI with a complaint because they may not have had any idea that Kurland was robbing them blind.  The now deceased father of guy who was a Columbo Family member was also a mafioso.  While he was alive, The FBI was well aware of him being a Captain in The Columbo Family.  In the past, his son was tried but was found not guilty of mafia related crimes.

The threats that were made to do bodily harm were made against a man who owned a jewelery store.  He "borrowed" $250,000 from Kurland's associates and had promised to pay them back with $400,000 in a set period of time.  Except he didn't.  As heard on the wire tap tapes, the mobster then called him threatening to "rip every tooth out of your son's head."  Kurland was not named in the count within the complaint that detailed the threats. 

Last but not least, the law firm on Long Island that Kurland was a partner in was asked for a comment. Their comment was simply "We are working to remove Mr. Kurland as a partner."   If Kurland is found guilty, or if he negotiates a plea deal, his days as a lawyer are over.  My guess is that he'll eventually be disbarred. G5

Artist77's avatarArtist77

On a lunch break with this work from home schedule and decided to check lp news. I almost fell out of my chair. I am shocked.

JoeBigLotto's avatarJoeBigLotto

I was right 😂 l said the first thing l do is fire my lawyer and financial advicers. Nobody tells me how to spend my money.

Artist77's avatarArtist77

He ruined a good career!

I planned to see him also if I won and I am an attorney!!!

No attorney should be telling you what specific investments to buy. Generally yes but not steering you to specific funds.  There are also ethical rules that bar attorneys from personally profiting so yes, he will lose his license.  For example, when I had a trust drawn up for property and other assets (I went to a specialist trust attorney), she reminded me as a client that she was not permitted to serve as an executor of the trust (should I die) since she drew up the original trust document. That would be a conflict of interest.

After your attorney draws up the paperwork for you to claim the winnings, a specialized place like Goldman Sachs, etc. should take over. Now there might be tax questions for your attorney each year but that is different. However, if you win hundreds of millions of dollars, GS and others will still charge fees to manage your money based on a percentage of your assets so it can get expensive very quickly.

Artist77's avatarArtist77

Quote: Originally posted by frank0sport16 on Aug 19, 2020

@lejardin RE your quote ...

"The lottery winners paid between $75,000 and $200,000 in upfront payments to hire Mr. Kurland and his law firm, according to court papers. Mr. Kurland then charged monthly fees of between $15,000 and $50,000". 

If I were to win a big jackpot, and then if someone quoted me upfront and monthly figures similar to those above, I'd immediately recognize them as red flags, especially the monthlies since over time they'd end up costing you way, way more than the upfronts.

Financial and legal counsels should not need to be paid more than once to file jackpot claims, and should not need to be paid any more than what they may normally charge for any type service. You set the tone, not them.

Unless otherwise, any after taxes-expenses cash option payment you receive should be broken down into three parts -- (1) "spend now" money, no than more than a max of 10% (assuming a small jackpot, larger jackpots would reduce the spend now percentage); (2) reserve and trust accounts, totaling at least 50% of whatever is not "spend now" money if a small jackpot, greater percentage for larger jackpots; (3) cash flow account which pays out a specific fixed monthly amount over 30 to 40 years, at least 50% of whatever is not "spend now" money if a small jackpot, lesser percentage for larger jackpots. Any unspent portion of the monthly payouts can be returned to the cash flow account, or can be added to the reserve and trust accounts.

Choose advice wisely, invest wisely, spend and save wisely, live within specific boundaries.


Thanx-A-Lot. Stay Safe And Well

Well since they disclosed their fees upfront, that is not an issue and is what the firm was supposed to do. That amount of money is not unreasonable. Even the monthly fees are not unreasonable if the client asked them to oversee the money. The issue is the theft of the money and steering the winner to personal investments where there was a conflict of interest.

lejardin's avatarlejardin

Quote: Originally posted by Artist77 on Aug 20, 2020

Well since they disclosed their fees upfront, that is not an issue and is what the firm was supposed to do. That amount of money is not unreasonable. Even the monthly fees are not unreasonable if the client asked them to oversee the money. The issue is the theft of the money and steering the winner to personal investments where there was a conflict of interest.

Hey Artist long time......not sure who has been hiding you or me lol.

I am obviously out of touch since I think the fees are very high but then again I am not a lottery winner, unfortunately.

Artist77's avatarArtist77

Quote: Originally posted by lejardin on Aug 20, 2020

Hey Artist long time......not sure who has been hiding you or me lol.

I am obviously out of touch since I think the fees are very high but then again I am not a lottery winner, unfortunately.

Hey Lejardin:

Been doing the work at home thing since mid March due to Covid in DC. DC is still in phase 2 and no phase 3 in sight. Most offices , if not all , are still closed.  If you are work at home, they expect you to be constantly available so I feel like I never get a break. And this may go to the end of the year. Miss my life in DC during the day. Constant zoom meetings...lol.

Hope you have been staying well.

scentcrazy

To me this is huge. He was already the "go to" lottery expert that media outlets often went to for sound bites. I am sure more than a few of us would have considered using his services had we ever one the big one. 

As if winning wasn't hard enough, finding competent, trustworthy and honest professionals is a whole 'nother ballgame.

scentcrazy

Should be "had we ever WON the big one"

KY Floyd's avatarKY Floyd

"I think the fees are very high"

It would be helpful to know how the fees were determined. Somebody who wins $900 million before taxes may well require more legal and financial services than somebody who wins $10 or $50 million, or they might not. I'm really curious if those fees are all based on actual work, or if he just convinced those with deeper pockets to pay more for a given amount of work.

Even at $500 an hour 200k would cover 400 hours of work. I'm willing to consider that there might be a legitimate justification for that much work before moving on to the monthly maintenance work (50k is another 100 hours every month), but I'm awfully skeptical. I'm even more skeptical that all of the work would be done by the big name that might actually deserve a $500 hourly fee, so I'd figure that either there's more work or more of a ripoff.

Artist77's avatarArtist77

Fees for name law firm partners typically are over $500 an hour.  $1000 per hour is not uncommon for a well known law firm partner or a senior partner.

JoeBigLotto's avatarJoeBigLotto

The biggest problem is that people love money more than they love you. So if you win the lottery that is fantastic 😉 but you are still just another obstacle course ⛳ to the money.

music*'s avatarmusic*

Quote: Originally posted by Artist77 on Aug 20, 2020

Hey Lejardin:

Been doing the work at home thing since mid March due to Covid in DC. DC is still in phase 2 and no phase 3 in sight. Most offices , if not all , are still closed.  If you are work at home, they expect you to be constantly available so I feel like I never get a break. And this may go to the end of the year. Miss my life in DC during the day. Constant zoom meetings...lol.

Hope you have been staying well.

The American public needs honest updates of when vaccines will be made available. I have heard different times.

noise-gate

Quote: Originally posted by music* on Aug 21, 2020

The American public needs honest updates of when vaccines will be made available. I have heard different times.

Honesty in politics ended with the death of Lincoln. Nowadays politicians invent their own brand of " truth." Just because politicians go around kissing babies & handing out lollipops, that in of itself does not mean they honest. In some cases, "lies are viewed as the new truth." Just take a look around. Oh, about the vaccine...

music*'s avatarmusic*

Quote: Originally posted by noise-gate on Aug 21, 2020

Honesty in politics ended with the death of Lincoln. Nowadays politicians invent their own brand of " truth." Just because politicians go around kissing babies & handing out lollipops, that in of itself does not mean they honest. In some cases, "lies are viewed as the new truth." Just take a look around. Oh, about the vaccine...

"Oh, about the vaccine..."  Do you have an update on when a vaccine will be available to Americans?"

 Telling between a lie and the truth is at the heart of America. Politicians tell both the truth and the lies in order to get re-elected. They answer to their constituents. Leadership is when America is placed first. The U.S. Constitution is still alive. 

 America sees both the rich and the poor. Equality is in our founding documents. This battle will continue for eternity.

noise-gate

Quote: Originally posted by music* on Aug 21, 2020

"Oh, about the vaccine..."  Do you have an update on when a vaccine will be available to Americans?"

 Telling between a lie and the truth is at the heart of America. Politicians tell both the truth and the lies in order to get re-elected. They answer to their constituents. Leadership is when America is placed first. The U.S. Constitution is still alive. 

 America sees both the rich and the poor. Equality is in our founding documents. This battle will continue for eternity.

Do l have an update? Well l am working overtime in my garage putting my own concoction together & will be doing trial therapy on family members " before bringing it to market".. which by the way is a lie. But stay tuned..

welington

Greed at it's best .If you can't trust your lawyer just put the money in the bank  live off the interest . Multiple banks 

Subscribe to this news story