Search

Hot Lotto
Kansas is the ninth MUSL member to offer HL. It joined this week, a month after HL went to computerized drawings.
Mar 17, 2006, 9:54 am - CASH Only - Jackpot Games Forum

Hot Lotto coming to KS this month?Reply
I couldn't find anything either CASH Only when I look at Kansas Website or Powerball website. I'll check Powerball again on March 12. If Kansas is included, then they have to deal with computerized drawings in Hot Lotto beginning last month and grade report card goes down.
Mar 3, 2006, 1:34 pm - Just6ntlc - Jackpot Games Forum

Multi-state game
If the blue game starts drawing numbers, I think MM will be the best because CA is in it. I like the computerized drawings because security is very important thanks to terrorist attacks.
Jul 29, 2005, 2:39 pm - Just6ntlc - Jackpot Games Forum

Lucky For LifeReply
Cash, you're beginning to sound like Jimmy now-- switching to computerized drawings? In other words, RIGGED drawings? Cash, have you lost your MIND? The LFL Ticket Cost IS one dollar TOO high BUT it's a wonderful number field. Get over it, it's not being retired (still no word on the website which leads me to think they KNOW it's profitable-- for them AND us.)
Dec 6, 2006, 10:05 pm - Greg - Jackpot Games Forum

Wisconsin SuperCash $$Reply
https://www.lotterypost.com/videos a great watch. (scroll down to.... why we hate computerized drawings) Jon
Aug 14, 2022, 11:01 pm - whynot789 - Jackpot Games Forum

Why is keno so hard to win?Reply
I went to this bar/restaurant that my sister likes, and it has the computerized keno game. I thought I'll play a 3 spot for ten dollars for five games 78-79-80. Wouldnt you know it the sucker comes in and more than covers the check. But I just won't play computerized drawings. But I suspect paying attentio to the grid patterns is the way to go. Ironically Pick-10 is a mechanical drawing but since it's not televised we have to take thier word for it.
Nov 18, 2008, 6:25 pm - MysteryMan424 - Jackpot Games Forum

Hoosier LottoReply
The game went 84 draws without a winner on its previous record of $42M, and that was before the switch to computerized drawings. You can't say, Well, this year had this many winners, and this year had this many winners, but since no one has won in a year, that must mean the game is rigged . The previous record shows that it is not only mathematically possible, but also realistically possible for a lottery game to have periods of time without a winner that are much longer than other periods of t
Nov 9, 2007, 10:43 pm - Guru101 - Jackpot Games Forum

Picking your own numbers.Reply
Scorpio said some things that really do make you go 'hmmmmmmmmm'......... interesting indeed. Problem is, the balls are randomly drawn, they can't pick which ones will hit, that I'm convinced of. Now, if they go to computerized drawings, I'm done with PB forever.
Jul 22, 2007, 3:07 am - guesser - Jackpot Games Forum

CT Classic Lotto 2/6/07Reply
I have been divided about Connecticut CL for some time. On one hand it pays out 52%, which makes it a far better game than the 6/59 where I live. On the other, Connecticut should be a Hot Lotto member, computerized drawings or not. AFAIK the game never got to $5 million in 2006. BTW Connecticut has had a 6/44 game since 1989, including Wild Card Lotto in the late 1990s.
Feb 4, 2007, 2:26 pm - CASH Only - Jackpot Games Forum

Does hindsight have you frustrated?Reply
If your hindsight was as good as your foresight then you would have played the winning numbers. It's always easy to think you played the wrong numbers after loosing. The problem with the WA state lottery is that it's computer drawn and the prizes suck. Both Quinto and Lotto rarely get big. The recent $11 million run is a rare exception. Quinto rarely breaks $2 million any more. Even the Oregon Megabucks has been in a slump and it also suffers from computerized drawings.
Mar 26, 2006, 3:18 pm - dvdiva - Jackpot Games Forum