- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 5:22 pm
You last visited
April 19, 2024, 4:40 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Hidden opportunities within abbr. wheelsPrev TopicNext Topic
-
Quote: Originally posted by Hyperdimension on December 13, 2004
Continue with the experiment..
Peter Rosendahl special section page has the next wheel 15,6,3,4 in 15 lines
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 7
1 2 3 4 5 8
1 2 3 4 5 9
1 2 3 4 5 10
6 7 8 9 10 11
6 7 8 9 10 12
6 7 8 9 10 13
6 7 8 9 10 14
6 7 8 9 10 15
1 11 12 13 14 15
2 11 12 13 14 15
3 11 12 13 14 15
4 11 12 13 14 15
5 11 12 13 14 15
But he says it has other advantages (hidden opportunities?), here the Covermaster detailed report:
6 5 4 3 % Total Acc %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - 6 1000 19.98002 19.98002
- - 1 7 1500 29.97003 49.95005
- - 2 4 1500 29.97003 79.92008
- - 3 7 300 5.99401 85.91409
- - 5 4 150 2.99700 88.91109
- 1 4 0 375 7.49251 96.40360
- 2 3 0 150 2.99700 99.40060
- 5 0 0 15 0.29970 99.70030
1 4 0 0 15 0.29970 100.00000
What do you see to think that the C(15,6,3,4)=15 wheel is better than the C(15,6,3,4)=14? What are the hidden advantages?
I need your help
Regards
and here:
for the 3 if 6 class
5=555
6=2500
8=1500
9=150
10=300
So you better reconsider the use of that report
as accurate...
-
Quote: Originally posted by BobP on December 12, 2004
Quote: Originally posted by Nick Koutras on December 11, 2004
Robert,
It is known that the detailed report of the Covermaster
is *wrong* and we have discuss this some time back.
So on a Design(22,6,3,6)=77 using the cover(22,6,3,3)=77
we will have out of the 74,613 blocks the following:
16,632 will hit 11 of the 3 if 6
55,440 will hit 14
and only 2,464 blocks will have 20 3 if 6 hits.
The same of course applies on your design of 18,6,3,3...
Iliya Bluskov's Lot Book shows the same breakdown of (22,6,3,3)=77 as CoverMaster's Detailed Report, that with six winning numbers among the 22 there will be a minimum of 20, 3# hits.
We shouldn't confuse this with the 96.7% chance of doing better such as 2, 4# wins or even better, each has its odds, but the complaint there is only a 3.3% chance of 20, 3# wins is mis-leading as that's the best feature, your high percentage shot at winning a larger prize !!!
BobP
Robert with all the respect what Ilyia is claiminhg
is wrong since it is using thye Covermaster report.
The correct numbers for 3 if 6 on 22,6,3,3 cover as follows:
1=77
11=16632
14=55440 20=2464
I repost since I missed the class
that 77 sets only have *1* hit
Below are these lines that produce those 77 hits
1 2 3 4 5 6 1
1 2 7 8 9 10 1
1 2 11 12 13 14 1
1 2 15 16 17 18 1
1 2 19 20 21 22 1
1 3 7 11 15 19 1
1 3 8 12 16 20 1
1 3 9 13 17 21 1
1 3 10 14 18 22 1
1 4 7 12 17 22 1
1 4 8 11 18 21 1
1 4 9 14 15 20 1
1 4 10 13 16 19 1
1 5 7 13 18 20 1
1 5 8 14 17 19 1
1 5 9 11 16 22 1
1 5 10 12 15 21 1
1 6 7 14 16 21 1
1 6 8 13 15 22 1
1 6 9 12 18 19 1
1 6 10 11 17 20 1
2 3 7 12 18 21 1
2 3 8 11 17 22 1
2 3 9 14 16 19 1
2 3 10 13 15 20 1
2 4 7 11 16 20 1
2 4 8 12 15 19 1
2 4 9 13 18 22 1
2 4 10 14 17 21 1
2 5 7 14 15 22 1
2 5 8 13 16 21 1
2 5 9 12 17 20 1
2 5 10 11 18 19 1
2 6 7 13 17 19 1
2 6 8 14 18 20 1
2 6 9 11 15 21 1
2 6 10 12 16 22 1
3 4 7 8 13 14 1
3 4 9 10 11 12 1
3 4 15 16 21 22 1
3 4 17 18 19 20 1
3 5 7 10 16 17 1
3 5 8 9 15 18 1
3 5 11 14 20 21 1
3 5 12 13 19 22 1
3 6 7 9 20 22 1
3 6 8 10 19 21 1
3 6 11 13 16 18 1
3 6 12 14 15 17 1
4 5 7 9 19 21 1
4 5 8 10 20 22 1
4 5 11 13 15 17 1
4 5 12 14 16 18 1
4 6 7 10 15 18 1
4 6 8 9 16 17 1
4 6 11 14 19 22 1
4 6 12 13 20 21 1
5 6 7 8 11 12 1
5 6 9 10 13 14 1
5 6 15 16 19 20 1
5 6 17 18 21 22 1
7 8 15 17 20 21 1
7 8 16 18 19 22 1
7 9 11 14 17 18 1
7 9 12 13 15 16 1
7 10 11 13 21 22 1
7 10 12 14 19 20 1
8 9 11 13 19 20 1
8 9 12 14 21 22 1
8 10 11 14 15 16 1
8 10 12 13 17 18 1
9 10 15 17 19 22 1
9 10 16 18 20 21 1
11 12 15 18 20 22 1
11 12 16 17 19 21 1
13 14 15 18 19 21 1
13 14 16 17 20 22 1
And below is the Design i used to test these results:
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 7 8 9 10
1 2 11 12 13 14
1 2 15 16 17 18
1 2 19 20 21 22
1 3 7 11 15 19
1 3 8 12 16 20
1 3 9 13 17 21
1 3 10 14 18 22
1 4 7 12 17 22
1 4 8 11 18 21
1 4 9 14 15 20
1 4 10 13 16 19
1 5 7 13 18 20
1 5 8 14 17 19
1 5 9 11 16 22
1 5 10 12 15 21
1 6 7 14 16 21
1 6 8 13 15 22
1 6 9 12 18 19
1 6 10 11 17 20
2 3 7 12 18 21
2 3 8 11 17 22
2 3 9 14 16 19
2 3 10 13 15 20
2 4 7 11 16 20
2 4 8 12 15 19
2 4 9 13 18 22
2 4 10 14 17 21
2 5 7 14 15 22
2 5 8 13 16 21
2 5 9 12 17 20
2 5 10 11 18 19
2 6 7 13 17 19
2 6 8 14 18 20
2 6 9 11 15 21
2 6 10 12 16 22
3 4 7 8 13 14
3 4 9 10 11 12
3 4 15 16 21 22
3 4 17 18 19 20
3 5 7 10 16 17
3 5 8 9 15 18
3 5 11 14 20 21
3 5 12 13 19 22
3 6 7 9 20 22
3 6 8 10 19 21
3 6 11 13 16 18
3 6 12 14 15 17
4 5 7 9 19 21
4 5 8 10 20 22
4 5 11 13 15 17
4 5 12 14 16 18
4 6 7 10 15 18
4 6 8 9 16 17
4 6 11 14 19 22
4 6 12 13 20 21
5 6 7 8 11 12
5 6 9 10 13 14
5 6 15 16 19 20
5 6 17 18 21 22
7 8 15 17 20 21
7 8 16 18 19 22
7 9 11 14 17 18
7 9 12 13 15 16
7 10 11 13 21 22
7 10 12 14 19 20
8 9 11 13 19 20
8 9 12 14 21 22
8 10 11 14 15 16
8 10 12 13 17 18
9 10 15 17 19 22
9 10 16 18 20 21
11 12 15 18 20 22
11 12 16 17 19 21
13 14 15 18 19 21
13 14 16 17 20 22
Conclusions are yours.
Nick
-
Hi Nick:
I wasn't aware Bluskov knew of CoverMaster let alone used it for the book.
Not using the Detailed Report . . . Your wheel above using the [Tools] [Find] testing the combination 01 03 04 12 15 18 in the Find Tool I get 20 lines with a 3# win each hi-lited. I don't understand the error. BobP -
Quote: Originally posted by Nick Koutras on December 14, 2004
Quote: Originally posted by Hyperdimension on December 13, 2004
Hi,
The 15,6,3,4 Wheel made by Adolf Muehl has 14 lines
... <wheel deteleted>
Here is sample of *wrong* reporting of hits by covermaster
3=13
4=194
5=882
6=1651
7=1519
8=632
9=110
10=4
With all the respect Nick Koutras, where did you find this? I have not idea what you try to show here and covermaster does not show anything like that anywhere. Can you advice what you present here and how did you generate this?If you have something to do, at least do it well...
-
As for the wheels analysis, to clear the matter, I'll use my own analysis tool (hopefully no wrong reports included).
The 15,6,3,4 Wheel made by Adolf Muehl has 14 lines
01 02 03 05 12 14
01 02 07 09 10 11
01 02 08 09 11 13
01 03 06 09 11 14
01 04 06 07 08 12
01 04 07 10 13 15
02 03 04 08 14 15
02 04 06 10 12 13
02 05 06 07 12 15
03 04 05 09 12 15
03 07 08 10 11 13
04 05 11 12 14 15
05 06 08 10 13 15
07 08 09 10 13 14
and gives
Details information on 3 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 3 0-3 3-7 4-5 4 0.88%
0 0 0 2 1-5 2-10 1-5 28 6.15%
0 0 0 1 1-6 1-11 0-6 212 46.59%
0 0 0 0 8 1-2 4-5 3 0.66%
0 0 0 0 7 3-4 3-4 10 2.20%
0 0 0 0 6 4-6 2-4 41 9.01%
0 0 0 0 5 5-8 1-4 118 25.93%
0 0 0 0 4 7-9 1-3 39 8.57%
0h 455 455 455 211 0 0 0 455
0% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 46.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Details information on 4 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 2 1-2 1-6 0-9 1-5 3 0.22%
0 0 1 0-3 1-10 0-10 0-5 204 14.95%
0 0 0 5 2-3 2-5 2-4 12 0.88%
0 0 0 4 1-4 2-7 1-4 54 3.96%
0 0 0 3 2-7 1-9 0-4 238 17.44%
0 0 0 2 3-8 1-9 0-3 464 33.99%
0 0 0 1 6-10 0-7 0-3 390 28.57%
0h 1365 1365 1158 0 0 0 0 1365
0% 100.00% 100.00% 84.84% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Details information on 5 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 1 0-1 0-5 1-11 0-7 0-3 84 2.80%
0 0 4 0 6 2 2 1 0.03%
0 0 3 0-4 1-7 1-7 0-4 24 0.80%
0 0 2 0-5 1-9 1-7 0-3 243 8.09%
0 0 1 0-6 1-11 0-8 0-3 1316 43.82%
0 0 0 8 2 2 2 1 0.03%
0 0 0 7 0-4 1-5 0-2 22 0.73%
0 0 0 6 2-5 1-6 0-2 65 2.16%
0 0 0 5 2-7 0-7 0-2 400 13.32%
0 0 0 4 5-9 0-5 0-2 589 19.61%
0 0 0 3 6-10 0-5 0-2 258 8.59%
0h 3003 2919 1335 0 0 0 0 3003
0% 100.00% 97.20% 44.46% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Details information on 6 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 0-1 3-6 3-10 0-4 0 14 0.28%
0 2 0-2 1-5 2-9 2-5 0-2 12 0.24%
0 1 0-4 0-7 1-11 0-6 0-3 732 14.63%
0 0 6 0 4 3 1 1 0.02%
0 0 5 1-3 2-6 1-5 0-2 9 0.18%
0 0 4 0-5 1-7 0-5 0-2 81 1.62%
0 0 3 1-6 0-9 0-6 0-2 539 10.77%
0 0 2 1-8 1-10 0-6 0-2 1645 32.87%
0 0 1 3-9 1-10 0-5 0-2 1640 32.77%
0 0 0 9 1-4 0-4 0-1 47 0.94%
0 0 0 8 2-5 0-4 0-1 143 2.86%
0 0 0 7 4-7 0-3 0-1 128 2.56%
0 0 0 6 6-7 0-2 0-1 14 0.28%
0h 4991 4247 332 0 0 0 0 5005
0% 99.72% 84.86% 6.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Coverage information
------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
P M Tested Covered Covered% Uncovered Uncovered%
------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
2 2 105 105 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 3 455 455 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 4 1365 1365 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 5 3003 3003 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 6 5005 5005 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 7 6435 6435 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
3 3 455 244 53.62637% 211 46.37363%
3 4 1365 1365 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
3 5 3003 3003 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
3 6 5005 5005 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
3 7 6435 6435 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
4 4 1365 207 15.16484% 1158 84.83516%
4 5 3003 1668 55.54446% 1335 44.45554%
4 6 5005 4673 93.36663% 332 6.63337%
4 7 6435 6432 99.95338% 3 0.04662%
5 5 3003 84 2.79720% 2919 97.20280%
5 6 5005 758 15.14486% 4247 84.85514%
5 7 6435 2805 43.58974% 3630 56.41026%
6 6 5005 14 0.27972% 4991 99.72028%
6 7 6435 126 1.95804% 6309 98.04196%
If you have something to do, at least do it well...
-
As for Peter Rosendahl special section page wheel 15,6,3,4 in 15 lines
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 7
1 2 3 4 5 8
1 2 3 4 5 9
1 2 3 4 5 10
6 7 8 9 10 11
6 7 8 9 10 12
6 7 8 9 10 13
6 7 8 9 10 14
6 7 8 9 10 15
1 11 12 13 14 15
2 11 12 13 14 15
3 11 12 13 14 15
4 11 12 13 14 15
5 11 12 13 14 15
Details information on 3 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 5 0 3 7 30 6.59%
0 0 0 1 4 7 3 150 32.97%
0 0 0 0 7 4 4 150 32.97%
0 0 0 0 3 12 0 125 27.47%
0h 455 455 455 275 0 0 0 455
0% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 60.44% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Details information on 4 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 5 0 0 4 6 15 1.10%
0 0 1 4 0 8 2 150 10.99%
0 0 0 5 3 3 4 150 10.99%
0 0 0 2 8 2 3 300 21.98%
0 0 0 1 7 7 0 750 54.95%
0h 1365 1365 1200 0 0 0 0 1365
0% 100.00% 100.00% 87.91% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Details information on 5 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 5 0 0 0 5 5 3 0.10%
0 1 4 0 0 9 1 75 2.50%
0 0 5 0 4 2 4 75 2.50%
0 0 2 3 5 3 2 300 9.99%
0 0 1 4 4 6 0 750 24.98%
0 0 0 8 2 2 3 300 9.99%
0 0 0 3 9 3 0 1500 49.95%
0h 3003 2925 1800 0 0 0 0 3003
0% 100.00% 97.40% 59.94% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Details information on 6 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 4 0 0 0 10 0 15 0.30%
0 5 0 0 5 1 4 15 0.30%
0 2 3 0 5 4 1 150 3.00%
0 1 4 0 5 5 0 375 7.49%
0 0 5 4 1 2 3 150 3.00%
0 0 3 7 0 3 2 300 5.99%
0 0 2 4 7 2 0 1500 29.97%
0 0 1 7 4 3 0 1500 29.97%
0 0 0 6 9 0 0 1000 19.98%
0h 4990 4450 1000 0 0 0 0 5005
0% 99.70% 88.91% 19.98% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Coverage information
------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
P M Tested Covered Covered% Uncovered Uncovered%
------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
2 2 105 105 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 3 455 455 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 4 1365 1365 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 5 3003 3003 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 6 5005 5005 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
2 7 6435 6435 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
3 3 455 180 39.56044% 275 60.43956%
3 4 1365 1365 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
3 5 3003 3003 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
3 6 5005 5005 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
3 7 6435 6435 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
4 4 1365 165 12.08791% 1200 87.91209%
4 5 3003 1203 40.05994% 1800 59.94006%
4 6 5005 4005 80.01998% 1000 19.98002%
4 7 6435 6435 100.00000% 0 0.00000%
5 5 3003 78 2.59740% 2925 97.40260%
5 6 5005 555 11.08891% 4450 88.91109%
5 7 6435 1785 27.73893% 4650 72.26107%
6 6 5005 15 0.29970% 4990 99.70030%
6 7 6435 105 1.63170% 6330 98.36830%
If you have something to do, at least do it well...
-
Quote: Originally posted by BobP on December 14, 2004
Hi Nick:
I wasn't aware Bluskov knew of CoverMaster let alone used it for the book.
Not using the Detailed Report . . . Your wheel above using the [Tools] [Find] testing the combination 01 03 04 12 15 18 in the Find Tool I get 20 lines with a 3# win each hi-lited. I don't understand the error. BobP
BobP,I have tested this 6,22,3,3 wheel. I think it is a misunderstanding here. Well, you test the wheel as if you have a 6 hit (3if6). In this case, you can have 20-3# wins at the same time as the table below illustrates:
Details information on 6 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0 0 0 60 0 16 77 0.10%
0 1 0 10 35 21 10 7392 9.91%
0 0 3 8 33 24 9 9240 12.38%
0 0 2 12 27 28 8 55440 74.30%
0 0 0 20 15 36 6 2464 3.30%
0h 74536 67144 2464 0 0 0 0 74613
0% 99.90% 89.99% 3.30% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
However, in case we have only 3 numbers correct among those 22 (3if3), we can have only 1-3# possible:
Details information on 3 hits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Total %
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 0 0 1 12 36 28 1540 100.00%
0h 1540 1540 1540 0 0 0 0 1540
0% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
So, Nick Koutras, if you test the wheel as 3if6, then there possibly is something wrong with your analysis. Perhaps, this 3if6 you mention is a typo and you mean 3if3.If you have something to do, at least do it well...
-
Hi,
Apapogeas previously compare between the next 2 wheels (1 random and 1 optimized):
I have picked a random wheel to optimize with multiple hits in mind.
A C(6,11,4,5)=10 wheel is
1 2 3 5 9 10
1 2 5 7 8 11
1 3 4 6 7 10
1 3 4 6 8 10
1 4 5 6 9 11
2 3 4 6 10 11
2 3 5 7 8 10
2 4 6 7 8 9
3 5 7 8 9 11
5 7 8 9 10 11
An multiple hit optimized C(6,11,4,5)=10 wheel is
1 2 3 5 9 11
1 2 3 5 10 11
1 2 3 6 7 8
1 4 5 7 8 11
1 4 6 8 9 10
2 3 4 5 6 11
2 3 4 7 9 10
2 3 5 8 9 11
2 3 5 8 10 11
5 6 7 9 10 11
Then Apapogeas says the second wheel (the optimized) is better and shows his results in a previous post reply..
Nick Koutras..
The analysis of the LottoDesignerXL by Nick Koutras also show that the optimized wheel is better than the random wheel, how?
With the Universal Wheel Rating (UWR), Nick says UWR is a single number that can compare wheel quality, this single number can be used to compare any construction with equal parameters. The smaller the UWR the better the Lotto Design (wheel) is.
Automatically gets the next results:
UWR
LD( 11, 6, 4, 5) = 10 - 351 (for the random wheel)
LD( 11, 6, 4, 5) = 10 - 339 (for the optimized wheel)
Now I am trying to understand Nick Koutras about the wrong report by Covermaster.. if someone can help..
RegardsConsciousness order chaos.
-
Continue:
I found the next wheel LDo( 24, 6, 3, 6)= 15 analyzed by Koutras years ago (1999):
7 8 13 20 22 23
3 5 7 14 17 19
3 4 7 10 18 24
4 9 11 13 16 19
1 13 14 18 23 24
1 4 5 17 20 21
5 11 12 18 21 22
5 10 13 15 17 23
4 6 8 14 15 22
2 3 6 9 21 23
2 11 15 19 20 24
1 8 9 10 19 22
2 10 12 14 16 20
6 8 12 16 17 24
1 3 7 12 15 16
Statistics:
T On M Tested Covered % Uncovered %
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2 On 2 : 276 209 75.72464 67 24.27536
2 On 3 : 2,024 2,008 99.20949 16 0.79051
2 On 4 : 10,626 10,626 100.00000 0 0.00000
2 On 5 : 42,504 42,504 100.00000 0 0.00000
2 On 6 : 134,596 134,596 100.00000 0 0.00000
3 On 3 : 2,024 300 14.82213 1,724 85.17787
3 On 4 : 10,626 5,289 49.77414 5,337 50.22586
3 On 5 : 42,504 35,720 84.03915 6,784 15.96085
3 On 6 : 134,596 131,922 98.01331 2,674 1.98669
4 On 4 : 10,626 225 2.11745 10,401 97.88255
4 On 5 : 42,504 4,140 9.74026 38,364 90.25974
4 On 6 : 134,596 35,304 26.22961 99,292 73.77039
5 On 5 : 42,504 90 0.21174 42,414 99.78826
5 On 6 : 134,596 1,635 1.21475 132,961 98.78525
-----------------------------------------------------------------
340,034
Consciousness order chaos.
-
Continue:
And now the Covermaster Report of same wheel (Koutras said it has something wrong)
T if M Tested Covered % Not Covered %
----------------------------------------------------
2 If 2 : 276 209 75.72464 67 24.27536
2 If 3 : 2,024 2,008 99.20949 16 0.79051
2 If 4 : 10,626 10,626 100.00000 0 0.00000
2 If 5 : 42,504 42,504 100.00000 0 0.00000
2 If 6 : 134,596 134,596 100.00000 0 0.00000
2 If 7 : 346,104 346,104 100.00000 0 0.00000
3 If 3 : 2,024 300 14.82213 1,724 85.17787
3 If 4 : 10,626 5,289 49.77414 5,337 50.22586
3 If 5 : 42,504 35,720 84.03915 6,784 15.96085
3 If 6 : 134,596 131,922 98.01331 2,674 1.98669
3 If 7 : 346,104 345,938 99.95204 166 0.04796
4 If 4 : 10,626 225 2.11745 10,401 97.88255
4 If 5 : 42,504 4,140 9.74026 38,364 90.25974
4 If 6 : 134,596 35,304 26.22961 99,292 73.77039
4 If 7 : 346,104 159,578 46.10695 186,526 53.89305
5 If 5 : 42,504 90 0.21174 42,414 99.78826
5 If 6 : 134,596 1,635 1.21475 132,961 98.78525
5 If 7 : 346,104 14,040 4.05658 332,064 95.94342
6 If 7 : 346,104 270 0.07801 345,834 99.92199
Which is the wrong part of the Covermaster report?
RegardsConsciousness order chaos.
-
Well, I have this question too for Nick Koutras. The detailed reports show all the information needed for a wheel in terms of hits produced. As far as I know, covermaster returns correct detailed reports (at least all of them match with my own results so far).
As for the coverage information, sometimes covermaster returns wrong results (mostly on xif7) cases.
Anyway, what is wrong with CoverMaster detailed reports?If you have something to do, at least do it well...