|Posted: August 31, 2006, 11:23 am - IP Logged|
Can't think of it right now Keith. So... I don't think so..... not and still keep the sums in the correct rows.
We want to experiment with 3 oldest or missing sums stuff anyway.....so lets do that for a while. Vertical only...we already have that.
Plus..... we could keep the doubles and singles the way they are in vertical lines and number the horizontal lines anyway. Number them 1 through 22 for singles..... just keeping in mind that horizontal lines 21 and 22 are not equal to the rest as far as due rates.
Same for doubles.... keep the 10 vertical sums the same while numbering the horizontal 1 through 32 ////// keeping in mind the horizontal lines in the doubles ...33 through 40 are not equal and will not hit at the same rate.
Hey.... we know to separate doubles and singles for that reason .and can remember horizontal double lines hit at half the rate as Single lines right? Sure ....no biggie.
So..... Singles numbered 1....through 22
doubles 1 through 40
We can do anything we want right? Lets try quads as far as they will go for each chart.... still separate but .... cut up the numbers as evenly as we can ....at least down to the 20th. line on Singles .......and the 32 line on the doubles.... Heck ..we will just leave the others left over hanging out ...by themselves. LOL
It will work just fine over 90% of the time ++++ We might come up with a way to anticipate the left overs later on.
P.S. We still need to keep the Zero One numbers identified by color or what not. That is a great big easy tracking filter for us ...as demonstrated last night. Once you get use to them they stick out like ...... ...... well.......... elephants! Better than that ....easy to spot when they are not around . LOL
The only real failure .....is the failure to try.
Luck is a very rare thing....... Odds not so much.
Odds never change .....but probability does.