Please rate the site's download speedPrev TopicNext Topic

• dx123

  

  somewhere
  Canada
  Member #39,918
  May 24, 2006
  154 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 5:09 am

  ▲▼

  Hi Todd>>

  Using Firefox 3.0.1 with Windows XP PRO SP3-2G's mem and 512 video...very fast, but nothing notable during the past 2 weeks.

  Loaded most of the LINKS at left and from the drop-down for a check and honestly saw no change to note. I am fine with the situation as presented. Hope this helps. I will be adding more mem and another tandem SLI videocard in the next few weeks. Now that may cause a surprise!!
  

  yt

  dx123
• Lucky

  

  25

  Ohio
  United States
  Member #20
  December 20, 2000
  57,693 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 6:38 am

  ▲▼

  Pages loading, and posting threads much faster - I see a big difference !!

  Good Luck
• jackpotismine

  

  Kunming
  China
  Member #57,908
  January 23, 2008
  6,117 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 6:53 am

  ▲▼
  In response to Lucky

  Quote: Originally posted by Lucky on Aug 6, 2008

  Pages loading, and posting threads much faster - I see a big difference !!

  Todd, it is faster especially when you are "replying". It use to be a lot slower. Good job!!! You are defintely THE MAN!!!! Thanks!

  

  I believe in Occam's razor:

  The Simplest Answer is Usually Correct.
• calabs

  

  25

  United States
  Member #27,049
  November 26, 2005
  40,273 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 8:12 am

  ▲▼

  Most definitely faster than 2 weeks ago....!  I'm also no longer getting that nasty error message every time I try to reply... :)

  Thanks Todd!
• kkkathleen

  

  south houston, TX
  United States
  Member #46,358
  September 8, 2006
  893 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 8:35 am

  ▲▼

  For those of us who know how to turn on the computer and somehow stumble thru ( I know I can't be the only one out here) It seems faster to me. Thanks Todd!
• mrmst

  

  Glen Burnie, MD
  United States
  Member #427
  June 27, 2002
  208 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 8:56 am

  ▲▼

  Speed seems the same for me - Vista with IE 7.0 at work using a T1 internet connection.

  MrMST

  Good luck and have a Disney Day ºoº
• sorensonfan41

  

  Talking Rock, GA
  United States
  Member #60,367
  April 15, 2008
  398 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 10:14 am

  ▲▼

  I haven't noticed much difference, personally.  I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.16 on cable internet and Windows XP.  I have used IE 7, but I haven't used that to access LP in the past 2 weeks, though.

  A Gold account on Lottery Post:  $4.95

  A Millionaire Jumbo Bucks scratcher:  $20

  Airfare and hotel in March 2007 to see The Price Is Right before Bob Barker retired:  $600-something

  Winning something to get a trip to a district office:  Priceless
• Fraserm

  

  Plymouth, MI
  United States
  Member #23,027
  October 6, 2005
  42 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 12:05 pm

  ▲▼

  Definitely faster for me.
• Rocket 455

  

  North Kentucky
  United States
  Member #53,338
  July 4, 2007
  3,563 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 12:45 pm

  ▲▼

   Bringing up the past lottery results and prediction post seems faster now. Otherwise LP Pages have always loaded pretty fast.

  "Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were, but without it we go nowhere." -Carl Sagan
  
  
• jackhammerjohn

  

  texas
  United States
  Member #873
  November 22, 2002
  3,918 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 12:51 pm

  ▲▼

  Seems about the same for me. I have never really had any problems with LP

  John
• KyMystikal

  

  Florence, Alabama
  United States
  Member #8,658
  November 13, 2004
  2,037 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 12:53 pm

  ▲▼

  It is a lot faster then before. I did a results search on the 11 combination on midday in Ky for all available history and it came back in 0.5000 seconds

  I love doubles and remember, it's just a game!!!!!!
• txpolo

  

  United States
  Member #173
  April 8, 2002
  6,114 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 1:52 pm

  ▲▼

  It is faster.

   WTG all Winner$.

   

   
• Stack47

  

  Kentucky
  United States
  Member #32,651
  February 14, 2006
  10,301 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 1:53 pm

  ▲▼

  I noticed the difference when I clicked on the link to this thread because it certainly seemed faster.
• CCHS13

  

  Illinois
  United States
  Member #46,703
  September 23, 2006
  3,692 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 1:55 pm

  ▲▼

  Im happy with the speed, I just hope it stays that way.  Thanks for your hard work

  Men Lie Women Lie Numbers Dont
• psykomo

  

  United States
  Member #4,877
  May 30, 2004
  5,289 Posts
  Offline
  Aug 6, 2008, 2:00 pm

  ▲▼
  In response to Fraserm

  Quote: Originally posted by Fraserm on Aug 6, 2008

  Definitely faster for me.

  ........................................

  >>>>>>>>>>>THANK'ss

  Psykomo