Hello Moses,
It actually appears that 3 out of 4 new rotations are repeating after a certain point. Meaning for every 4 rotations you only get 1 new unique permuation? At that rate to get through all possible 433 billion permutations would require 4*433 billion rotations? Wow thats alot. I guess I need to roll up my sleeves I'm going to be here a while.
At 6280 do you just re-seed the loop and start over with a different A C B seeding? How do you know what to use as new seeding values to match gtech?
I noticed in your 25000+ sets that 6280 was the switching point between your 4 sets. I assume this was chosen because of this repeating nature.
In your lines of 21 I assume your combining 3 sets of 7 due to belief that a single drawing (i.e. 7 numbers) is made up from multiple bridges?
I had my own theory on breaking lottery so I had already written some highly optimized code that would search thru combinations comparing against upto 50 draws at a time. Unfortunately my theory didn't hold water because you could not predict future draws from my selected 15 numbers. So I was able to adapt my multi-threaded application to do your loop/bridge/belt algorithm in about 1 hour since I already had the framework in place. I haven't hooked up the multi-threaded part of it yet but will when I have time this coming weekend. Right now I can permutate thru 1 billion rotations in 10 minutes comparing matches against 50 past draws. Thats not a typo that is 1 billion rotations in 10 minutes comparing against 50 draws. I'm in the States, (Utah one of the few states without lottery, have to travel to Idaho), but since this is your theory, and your work I'm comparing those rotations against the first 50 UK draws to see what I find that may be of help to you.
So in 1 loop even with the repeating nature after 6280 rotations will I find the first UK lotto in drawn order using your algorithm or do I need to (re-seed for lack of better word) after 6280 rotations. Like I said I can do 6 billion rotations in 1 hour single-threaded. If I can find a way to rotate multi-threaded I could quadruple that with my quad processor. My background is I'm a senior software engineer that writes low level network file system drivers for 20 years. My expertise is in writing high performing distributed software.
Anyway just want to say good job on your theories and your observations. People are so focused on you just giving out lines that they are not focusing on some of your other observations like digitial endings. Anyway I read that other thread you mentioned from start to finish twice this weekend and each time learned something new after playing with my software and observing the rotations myself. Guess I need to read it again to know what to do after 6280.
I seriously don't know if your theory (I mean fact) holds true (I will be a believer for sure if I wake up in the morning having found the rotation to draw 1 of UK lotto in drawn order) but my gut feeling from eyeballing the rotations and eyeballing the UK draws is that they look very similiar indeed, especially the drawn order aspect of it. I'll let you know what I find in first 50 draws if anything. Maybe you already know the results. I chose the first 50 draws because the other UK lotteries did not exist yet. I'm one of those people that does not believe in completely random. I believe an edge can always be found but most times to find the edge means solving a problem in fashion that may be counter-intuitive if that makes sense.
See ya and keep up the research. For others asking questions you need to ask Moses, not me, this is his work not mine. My theory failed miserably as far as prediction goes. I was about to switch over to Pick3 with my tail between my legs but decided to see if I could lend assistance to the loop/belt. I don't have anything against Pick3 but I would rather lose alot and then win big. Thats why I play keno/craps when in Vegas. But at this point I'm so tired of losing it would feel nice to win a small pot. Good luck to everybody.
Jimmy