Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 10:44 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

21 Combinations

Topic closed. 108 replies. Last post 8 years ago by turtle0747.

Page 4 of 8
51
PrintE-mailLink
CARBOB's avatar - FL LOTTERY_LOGO.png
ORLANDO, FLORIDA
United States
Member #4924
June 3, 2004
5893 Posts
Online
Posted: March 16, 2009, 6:17 pm - IP Logged

Jim,

 Would you please give a little more detail on what you mean by rotation!!

Moses,

  I received a PM from you, but there was no message!!!

    Avatar
    UK
    United Kingdom
    Member #9650
    December 15, 2004
    222 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: March 16, 2009, 6:21 pm - IP Logged

    Hi Jim

    I originally called this loop as "Rotating Bridging Board"

    Every selected 7 numbers from the belt is one sequnce or one rotation!

    The loop start repeating itself every 6280 rotations or 6280 x 7 = 43960 numbers

    Hope this helps

    Moses

      Avatar
      UK
      United Kingdom
      Member #9650
      December 15, 2004
      222 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: March 16, 2009, 6:35 pm - IP Logged

      Hi Jimmy

      It was suppose to be sent as PM but came on forum!!!

      Is either me or things are going bananas!

      BTW, you have developed the G-tech lottery gaming software which I called it the

      Master Lottery Software!

      Congratulations to you.

      Now, compare the data produces from this loop to the actual lottery drawn order, they are absolutely identical!

      Moses

        Avatar
        UK
        United Kingdom
        Member #9650
        December 15, 2004
        222 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: March 16, 2009, 6:43 pm - IP Logged

        Hello Hans

        Sorry in previous post I called you Jimmy by mistake!

        I tried to produce 30 numbers as requested but unfortunately it is impossible to create them! The most I can do is 29 numbers and I don't think they are very accurate but if you want them you can have them!

        Moses

          jimjwright's avatar - Yellow 3.png
          Park City, UT
          United States
          Member #69864
          January 18, 2009
          993 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: March 17, 2009, 12:56 am - IP Logged

          Hello Moses,

          It actually appears that 3 out of 4 new rotations are repeating after a certain point.  Meaning for every 4 rotations you only get 1 new unique permuation?  At that rate to get through all possible 433 billion permutations would require 4*433 billion rotations?  Wow thats alot.  I guess I need to roll up my sleeves I'm going to be here a while.

          At 6280 do you just re-seed the loop and start over with a different A C B seeding?  How do you know what to use as new seeding values to match gtech?

          I noticed in your 25000+ sets that 6280 was the switching point between your 4 sets.  I assume this was chosen because of this repeating nature.

          In your lines of 21 I assume your combining 3 sets of 7 due to belief that a single drawing (i.e. 7 numbers) is made up from multiple bridges?

          I had my own theory on breaking lottery so I had already written some highly optimized code that would search thru combinations comparing against upto 50 draws at a time.  Unfortunately my theory didn't hold water because you could not predict future draws from my selected 15 numbers.  So I was able to adapt my multi-threaded application to do your loop/bridge/belt algorithm in about 1 hour since I already had the framework in place.  I haven't hooked up the multi-threaded part of it yet but will when I have time this coming weekend.  Right now I can permutate thru 1 billion rotations in 10 minutes comparing matches against 50 past draws.  Thats not a typo that is 1 billion rotations in 10 minutes comparing against 50 draws.  I'm in the States, (Utah one of the few states without lottery, have to travel to Idaho), but since this is your theory, and your work I'm comparing those rotations against the first 50 UK draws to see what I find that may be of help to you.

          So in 1 loop even with the repeating nature after 6280 rotations will I find the first UK lotto in drawn order using your algorithm or do I need to (re-seed for lack of better word) after 6280 rotations.  Like I said I can do 6 billion rotations in 1 hour single-threaded.  If I can find a way to rotate multi-threaded I could quadruple that with my quad processor.  My background is I'm a senior software engineer that writes low level network file system drivers for 20 years.  My expertise is in writing high performing distributed software.

          Anyway just want to say good job on your theories and your observations.  People are so focused on you just giving out lines that they are not focusing on some of your other observations like digitial endings.  Anyway I read that other thread you mentioned from start to finish twice this weekend and each time learned something new after playing with my software and observing the rotations myself.  Guess I need to read it again to know what to do after 6280.

          I seriously don't know if your theory (I mean fact) holds true (I will be a believer for sure if I wake up in the morning having found the rotation to draw 1 of UK lotto in drawn order) but my gut feeling from eyeballing the rotations and eyeballing the UK draws is that they look very similiar indeed, especially the drawn order aspect of it.  I'll let you know what I find in first 50 draws if anything.  Maybe you already know the results.  I chose the first 50 draws because the other UK lotteries did not exist yet.  I'm one of those people that does not believe in completely random.  I believe an edge can always be found but most times to find the edge means solving a problem in fashion that may be counter-intuitive if that makes sense.

          See ya and keep up the research.  For others asking questions you need to ask Moses, not me, this is his work not mine.  My theory failed miserably as far as prediction goes.   I was about to switch over to Pick3 with my tail between my legs but decided to see if I could lend assistance to the loop/belt.  I don't have anything against Pick3 but I would rather lose alot and then win big.  Thats why I play keno/craps when in Vegas.  But at this point I'm so tired of losing it would feel nice to win a small pot.  Good luck to everybody.

          Jimmy

            jimjwright's avatar - Yellow 3.png
            Park City, UT
            United States
            Member #69864
            January 18, 2009
            993 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: March 17, 2009, 1:12 am - IP Logged

            Hello Moses

            By the way Moses don't give me the answer to 6280 I want to try and figure it out myself but I do think some action needs to be done at that particular junction point than to continue to rotate to predominantly repeating permutations.

            Jimmy

              jimjwright's avatar - Yellow 3.png
              Park City, UT
              United States
              Member #69864
              January 18, 2009
              993 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: March 17, 2009, 4:01 am - IP Logged

              Well heres is what the loop looks like after 23 and 6279 very similiar.

                 23.    49-25-26-33-21-16-36   21-26-49-01-08-29-27-40-02-11-22-34-14-24-32-10-45-39-15-30-43-09-13-23-19-37-41-44-28-38-42-17-31-06-04-05-46-18-35-48-12-47-07-20-03-25-33-16-36
               6279.  24-49-26-33-21-16-36   21-26-24-01-08-29-27-25-02-11-22-34-14-12-32-10-45-39-15-30-43-09-13-23-19-37-41-44-28-38-42-17-31-06-04-05-46-18-35-48-40-47-07-20-03-49-33-16-36

              I don't see the mathematical reason though.  6279*7=43953 which is evenly divisible by 49 at 897.  I need to study it more and follow how the numbers move about the belt.

              It is interesting that some of the numbers that are off are by 1/2.

              See ya

              Jimmy

                Avatar
                UK
                United Kingdom
                Member #9650
                December 15, 2004
                222 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: March 17, 2009, 4:57 am - IP Logged

                Hi Jimmy

                Firstly, I won't give any clue and just let you to figure it out for yourself but don't make it difficult and search for easy solution!

                Secondly, the only problem with this loop is to develop all the possible combinations is the storage, as your database increases the speed of computer reduces!

                I managed to get the loop to rotate about 2.6 millions before it crashed!

                 

                Moses

                  Avatar
                  UK
                  United Kingdom
                  Member #9650
                  December 15, 2004
                  222 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: March 17, 2009, 5:16 am - IP Logged

                  So in 1 loop even with the repeating nature after 6280 rotations will I find the first UK lotto in drawn order using your algorithm or do I need to (re-seed for lack of better word) after 6280 rotations.  Like I said I can do 6 billion rotations in 1 hour single-threaded.  If I can find a way to rotate multi-threaded I could quadruple that with my quad processor.  My background is I'm a senior software engineer that writes low level network file system drivers for 20 years.  My expertise is in writing high performing distributed software.

                  Anyway just want to say good job on your theories and your observations.  People are so focused on you just giving out lines that they are not focusing on some of your other observations like digitial endings.  Anyway I read that other thread you mentioned from start to finish twice this weekend and each time learned something new after playing with my software and observing the rotations myself.  Guess I need to read it again to know what to do after 6280.

                  Hi Jimmy

                  You make me cry, I am so flattered and must admit I worked very hard for 12 years to understand ins and outs the lottery! It took a lot of information and gathering that how or what G-tech try to achieve! Thanks anyways and the final section of my theory to be developed and at that point there won't be lottery anymore! You will have that section too after I receive reply from UK government!

                  Moses 

                    katie3618's avatar - hair
                    Washington
                    United States
                    Member #52494
                    May 27, 2007
                    33 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: March 18, 2009, 6:14 pm - IP Logged

                    Aloha Moses,

                     Please create a 6/56 combination. 

                    Mahalo,

                    Katie

                      katie3618's avatar - hair
                      Washington
                      United States
                      Member #52494
                      May 27, 2007
                      33 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: March 18, 2009, 6:38 pm - IP Logged

                      Aloha Moses,

                       Please create a 6/56 combination. 

                      Mahalo,

                      Katie

                      Aloha Moses,

                       Please disregard the previous post. Please create a 5/56 combination.

                      Mahalo,

                      Katie

                        Avatar
                        UK
                        United Kingdom
                        Member #9650
                        December 15, 2004
                        222 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: March 19, 2009, 3:08 pm - IP Logged

                        Hello katie

                        I am afraid I cannot produce lines for any even numbers 50/52/54/56 etc, the data will be inaccurate!

                        BTW. Has anyone attempted to filter the 21 combination? As an example, line 01 has so many matches to line 23

                        25 01 27 04 31 09 37 16 45 26 08 40 22 07 42 29 15 03 43 34 24 (01)

                        07 35 22 47 11 12 31 02 20 39 43 26 04 34 03 42 15 16 19 44 48 (23) Line 23 has so many matches to line 13

                        40 13 11 43 17 45 03 26 30 16 32 34 02 41 48 06 24 05 29 42 39 (13)

                        I think these lines can be reduced by quite a bit and perhaps once the links or connection discovered between the lines we would see clearer pattern!

                         

                        Moses

                          katie3618's avatar - hair
                          Washington
                          United States
                          Member #52494
                          May 27, 2007
                          33 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: March 19, 2009, 7:24 pm - IP Logged

                          Aloha Moses,

                           Thanks for the insight of the combinations. I will give it a try!

                          Mahalo,

                          Katie

                            jimjwright's avatar - Yellow 3.png
                            Park City, UT
                            United States
                            Member #69864
                            January 18, 2009
                            993 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: March 20, 2009, 5:34 am - IP Logged

                            Hello,

                            Well I had my program using your Sat Full Loop/Belt definition do 200 billion rotations but it never found the UK Lotto Draw 1  30,03,05,44,14,22,10 in exact order.  Of course after 6280 rotations the rotations were mostly repeating and I didn't divert the algorithm to account for this so maybe that is why.  Unless something is done at 6280 to modify the algorithm then I'm convinced that you will never find draw 1 or any other draw for that matter in exact order.

                            I'm leaning towards the draw being broken up into 3 parts when comparing against the belt.  If a draw is represented as A-B-C-D-E-F-BB, then it seems at casual inspection A-B-C can be found in exact order and D-E-F in exact order, I have not really seen any relationship for BB (i.e. bonus ball) yet.  So I started looking at only the UK saturday draws looking for unusual draws out of the ordinary.  In particular the following two caught my eye.

                            Draw 706.   10,09,11,13,02,16,26

                            Draw 682.    01,49,20,42,43,44,09

                            They caught my eye because of the consecutive nature of them.  Comparing them against the belt yielded an interesting characteristic or telltell signature.  Spot checking additional draws yielded same signature.  Now I need to check all the rest of the draws this weekend when I have more time to see if signature exists for all draws and if it yields a relationship that can link A-B-C with D-E-F.

                            Jimmy

                              CARBOB's avatar - FL LOTTERY_LOGO.png
                              ORLANDO, FLORIDA
                              United States
                              Member #4924
                              June 3, 2004
                              5893 Posts
                              Online
                              Posted: March 20, 2009, 6:56 am - IP Logged

                              Hello katie

                              I am afraid I cannot produce lines for any even numbers 50/52/54/56 etc, the data will be inaccurate!

                              BTW. Has anyone attempted to filter the 21 combination? As an example, line 01 has so many matches to line 23

                              25 01 27 04 31 09 37 16 45 26 08 40 22 07 42 29 15 03 43 34 24 (01)

                              07 35 22 47 11 12 31 02 20 39 43 26 04 34 03 42 15 16 19 44 48 (23) Line 23 has so many matches to line 13

                              40 13 11 43 17 45 03 26 30 16 32 34 02 41 48 06 24 05 29 42 39 (13)

                              I think these lines can be reduced by quite a bit and perhaps once the links or connection discovered between the lines we would see clearer pattern!

                               

                              Moses

                              I tried to do the 6/53 table in Excel, but to no avail. But, if you were able to do it, isn't there a chance the strings would be different lengths? One string might have 17 numbers, another might have 20 numbers, etc