Welcome Guest
You last visited January 17, 2017, 7:50 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

# Win \$1800.00 Daily

Topic closed. 49 replies. Last post 8 years ago by RJOh.

 Page 2 of 4

Win \$1800.00 Daily Will This System Work?

 Looks like a winner. [ 13 ] [18.84%] Looks like a loser. [ 54 ] [78.26%] I've fixed it see my post below. [ 2 ] [2.90%] Total Valid Votes [ 69 ] Discarded Votes [ 6 ]
mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
19894 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 12:55 am - IP Logged

Sure that's the risk if we selected ANY random 200 out of 1000 numbers not to play and played  the other 800, but this is a little different because the  200 already hit in the last 200 draws and now each of those 200  individually faces a 1 in 1000 chance of being drawn again, while your odds of winning with the 800 plays is pretty good at 80%.  If profit weren't a consideration we'd take an 80 side of an 80/20 wager every time.  The question is whether our chances are better then 80% if we cast out the notion numbers don't have a memory of having already won in Pick-3.   I mean, we're predicting Pick-3 all the time, there has to be something to that not to be wasting our time doing so.   Mathematically none of our systems can work so that's not proof they shouldn't be played.

BobP

Mathematically none of our systems can work so that's not proof they shouldn't be played.

That's probably more true when you're talking about a system that is played twice a week to win a MegaMillions or PowerBall jackpot of \$100M+.  The potential reward is big enough that the risk can be shared with others

* you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket *

Dump Water Florida
United States
Member #380
June 5, 2002
3112 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 2:20 am - IP Logged

Mathematically none of our systems can work so that's not proof they shouldn't be played.

That's probably more true when you're talking about a system that is played twice a week to win a MegaMillions or PowerBall jackpot of \$100M+.  The potential reward is big enough that the risk can be shared with others

Pick-3 is a negative expectation game, the math will always show a system losing over time.   This means the player must make correct decisions as to what to play and when to play for any such system to play at a profit over time.

Playing 800 numbers out of 1000, many might say it's hard to lose if a little thought goes into it.  You'll likely win 8 times out of 10 without even trying, though we want to win 10 times out of 10.  What's the two additional wins gonna take?

BobP

New York, NY
United States
Member #39471
May 16, 2006
2696 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 8:44 am - IP Logged

All I can say is LOL! I could have sworn I saw Bernie Madoff hatching this system.

\$\$\$

Wisconsin
United States
Member #1303
March 27, 2003
1508 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 8:53 am - IP Logged

Recessions are a time when people are often willing to take a chance.  What with banks paying 1.75% for a CD and former blue chip stocks dropping like rocks, foreclosed houses selling on ebay for under ten grand in Mich, Ohio and Pa, wagering starts to look like a way to get a quick return on investment.

BobP

You may be correct in the idea of some people willing to take a chance.   But if they have \$500 laying around, they aren't in such bad shape.  We have millions without paychecks, and more being turned out on the street seemingly every day..  People that still have a regular income coming o them should just appreciate that.

============

How can you tell if a politician is lying?

New York, NY
United States
Member #39471
May 16, 2006
2696 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 8:58 am - IP Logged

The probability of a number that hit in the last 200 repeating in the next 200 is still mathematically 1/1000.

IOW the probability of any individual number in the 200 list is the same as any individual number in the 800 list.

However the prob of that the next draw will be from last 200 draws is only1/4 times the probability of its being from the 800 list. But that's ONLY because 800 is more than 200 not becxause they have not been drawn!

\$\$\$

United States
Member #13130
March 30, 2005
2171 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 9:36 am - IP Logged

Sure that's the risk if we selected ANY random 200 out of 1000 numbers not to play and played  the other 800, but this is a little different because the  200 already hit in the last 200 draws and now each of those 200  individually faces a 1 in 1000 chance of being drawn again, while your odds of winning with the 800 plays is pretty good at 80%.  If profit weren't a consideration we'd take an 80 side of an 80/20 wager every time.  The question is whether our chances are better then 80% if we cast out the notion numbers don't have a memory of having already won in Pick-3.   I mean, we're predicting Pick-3 all the time, there has to be something to that not to be wasting our time doing so.   Mathematically none of our systems can work so that's not proof they shouldn't be played.

BobP

Seems I misunderstood the question. I took "will this system work?" to mean "will this system profit the person using it?"

I considered a continuous growing net loss proof enough that this system shouldn't be played.

Good luck.

In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.

New York, NY
United States
Member #39471
May 16, 2006
2696 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 9:48 am - IP Logged

Here's a test of this Madoff Scheme on the state of GA (E). I take the last 200 straights in GA (without repeaters) from Feb 28 backwards. Then I play the 800 undrawns from Mar 1 to yesterday, Mar 12.

It took 224 of the previous draws to get 200 different straights (there were 24 repeaters). Numbers drawn from each from Mar 1 to Mar 12 are highlighted in GreenaHere are the 200 different straights that hit in GA (E) up to feb 28, 2009.

001 003 005 006 014 017 018 020 025 026 029 031 033 034 038 053 054 056 074 078 081 088 094 098 100 108 110 117 120 127 133 135 138 160 166 167 169 173 178 186 189 193 208 216 221 222 234 238 242 248 251 252 256 264 268 270 292 294 297 299 317 321 329 331 335 336 339 341 344 345 346 347 349 357 359 361 369 379 381 385 390 409 414 427 431 434 435 436 443 447 450 451 469 471 477 486 490 493 498 503 508 509 521 525 526 535 539 540 542 547 550 555 565 567 576 578 593 601 602 619 622 628 639 641 645 648 650 660 666 668 671 676 684 689 691 698 711 712 713 716 722 726 732 750 767 771 774 775 777 781 782 783 784 786 796 806 808 809 817 819 821 827 839 840 842 849 850 861 870 873 878 882 885 887 889 896 908 913 914 915 918 924 929 942 943 944 954 959 969 972 973 976 977 981 986 993 995 997 998 999

The 800 list follows

000 002 004 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 015 016 019 021 022 023 024 027 028 030 032 035 036 037 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 055 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 075 076 077 079 080 082 083 084 085 086 087 089 090 091 092 093 095 096 097 099 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 111 112 113 114 115 116 118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 128 129 130 131 132 134 136 137 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 161 162 163 164 165 168 170 171 172 174 175 176 177 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 187 188 190 191 192 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 217 218 219 220 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 235 236 237 239 240 241 243 244 245 246 247 249 250 253 254 255 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 265 266 267 269 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 293 295 296 298 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 318 319 320 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 330 332 333 334 337 338 340 342 343 348 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 358 360 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 380 382 383 384 386 387 388 389 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 410 411 412 413 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 428 429 430 432 433 437 438 439 440 441 442 444 445 446 448 449 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 470 472 473 474 475 476 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 487 488 489 491 492 494 495 496 497 499 500 501 502 504 505 506 507 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 522 523 524 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 536 537 538 541 543 544 545 546 548 549 551 552 553 554 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 566 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 577 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 620 621 623 624 625 626 627 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 640 642 643 644 646 647 649 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 661 662 663 664 665 667 669 670 672 673 674 675 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 685 686 687 688 690 692 693 694 695 696 697 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 714 715 717 718 719 720 721 723 724 725 727 728 729 730 731 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 768 769 770 772 773 776 778 779 780 785 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 807 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 818 820 822 823 824 825 826 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 841 843 844 845 846 847 848 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 871 872 874 875 876 877 879 880 881 883 884 886 888 890 891 892 893 894 895 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 909 910 911 912 916 917 919 920 921 922 923 925 926 927 928 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 955 956 957 958 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 970 971 974 975 978 979 980 982 983 984 985 987 988 989 990 991 992 994 996

\$\$\$

New York, NY
United States
Member #39471
May 16, 2006
2696 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 10:01 am - IP Logged

Here's a test of this Madoff Scheme on the state of GA (E). I take the last 200 straights in GA (without repeaters) from Feb 28 backwards. Then I play the 800 undrawns from Mar 1 to yesterday, Mar 12.

It took 224 of the previous draws to get 200 different straights (there were 24 repeaters). Numbers drawn from each from Mar 1 to Mar 12 are highlighted in GreenaHere are the 200 different straights that hit in GA (E) up to feb 28, 2009.

001 003 005 006 014 017 018 020 025 026 029 031 033 034 038 053 054 056 074 078 081 088 094 098 100 108 110 117 120 127 133 135 138 160 166 167 169 173 178 186 189 193 208 216 221 222 234 238 242 248 251 252 256 264 268 270 292 294 297 299 317 321 329 331 335 336 339 341 344 345 346 347 349 357 359 361 369 379 381 385 390 409 414 427 431 434 435 436 443 447 450 451 469 471 477 486 490 493 498 503 508 509 521 525 526 535 539 540 542 547 550 555 565 567 576 578 593 601 602 619 622 628 639 641 645 648 650 660 666 668 671 676 684 689 691 698 711 712 713 716 722 726 732 750 767 771 774 775 777 781 782 783 784 786 796 806 808 809 817 819 821 827 839 840 842 849 850 861 870 873 878 882 885 887 889 896 908 913 914 915 918 924 929 942 943 944 954 959 969 972 973 976 977 981 986 993 995 997 998 999

The 800 list follows

000 002 004 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 015 016 019 021 022 023 024 027 028 030 032 035 036 037 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 055 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 075 076 077 079 080 082 083 084 085 086 087 089 090 091 092 093 095 096 097 099 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 111 112 113 114 115 116 118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 128 129 130 131 132 134 136 137 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 161 162 163 164 165 168 170 171 172 174 175 176 177 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 187 188 190 191 192 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 217 218 219 220 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 235 236 237 239 240 241 243 244 245 246 247 249 250 253 254 255 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 265 266 267 269 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 293 295 296 298 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 318 319 320 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 330 332 333 334 337 338 340 342 343 348 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 358 360 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 380 382 383 384 386 387 388 389 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 410 411 412 413 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 428 429 430 432 433 437 438 439 440 441 442 444 445 446 448 449 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 470 472 473 474 475 476 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 487 488 489 491 492 494 495 496 497 499 500 501 502 504 505 506 507 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 522 523 524 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 536 537 538 541 543 544 545 546 548 549 551 552 553 554 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 566 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 577 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 620 621 623 624 625 626 627 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 640 642 643 644 646 647 649 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 661 662 663 664 665 667 669 670 672 673 674 675 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 685 686 687 688 690 692 693 694 695 696 697 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 714 715 717 718 719 720 721 723 724 725 727 728 729 730 731 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 768 769 770 772 773 776 778 779 780 785 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 807 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 818 820 822 823 824 825 826 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 841 843 844 845 846 847 848 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 871 872 874 875 876 877 879 880 881 883 884 886 888 890 891 892 893 894 895 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 909 910 911 912 916 917 919 920 921 922 923 925 926 927 928 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 955 956 957 958 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 970 971 974 975 978 979 980 982 983 984 985 987 988 989 990 991 992 994 996

GA (E). Ten (10) of last 12 draws came from the 800 list (slightly higher than the 4:1 expected).

Cost at 25 cents  \$2400   Revenue  \$2225 loss \$125 even when the returns were above the mathematical average.   LOL.

Now notice that no hits have come from numbers with digits beginning with 0,1, 3, 8. Now you can narrow down an filter. With some additional filtering work the scheme can transmogrify into a system.

Another strategy: Notice where ealry signs of possible clusters are showing.

Numbers between 481 and 496. I would look for another hit in that window.

Numbers between 552 and 570

Between 570 and 608

Between 608 and 632

 DATE N1 N2 N3 3/12/2009 7 0 3 3/11/2009 7 9 6 3/10/2009 6 3 2 3/9/2009 2 1 2 3/8/2009 9 3 8 3/7/2009 0 9 4 3/6/2009 4 9 6 3/5/2009 4 8 1 3/4/2009 3 6 2 3/3/2009 5 5 2 3/2/2009 5 7 0 3/1/2009 6 0 8

\$\$\$

NASHVILLE, TENN
United States
Member #33372
February 20, 2006
1044 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 9:29 pm - IP Logged

Go back several years and record the drawings.  Using this method, see how often you would meet disaster and lose.

Several years for a daily drawing, that's 365 drawings per year.  Consider the previous 200 drawings for each of those drawings, that's 365 x 200 = 73,000 drawings per year.  That's a lot of work to prove that if you had \$800 to gamble daily, you might have a chance of making a \$100 profit.  I doubt anyone with the time to do the figuring would have \$800 to gamble.

Evidently I am misunderstanding the system.  From what I gathered one is to take the total combinations of 1,000 and remove 200 of them.  So let us take just one year of data and apply the algorithym.

Recording one year of a P3 game will result in 730 drawing.  Starting with the oldest drawing, remove 200 of the drawn numbers from the total population of 1,000.  Now the question becomes "Is the winning number contained within the 800 that remain?"  There can only be two possible answers; either yes or no.

Now remove the oldest drawing; black it out; delete it; stomp on it; whatever.  Do the algorithym again.  Use only the first 200 drawings and answer the question "Is the winning number contained within the 800 that remain?"

As you move down the list of previous winning numbers, record how many times "yes" was an answer versus how many times "no" was the answer.  My guess is that you will see more "no" answers than "yes" answers.

As you move down the list, also record the distances between "yes".  Forget about "no" for now; just concentrate on the "yes".  What will you see?  Will you find out that there must be, should be, could be, at least three draws between one "yes" and the next "yes"?  If so, this gives you a window of opportunity.  One can be reasonably assured of a return of some sort on one's investment if one played within the boundaries.  I say "reasonably" for this is the lottory we are taking about and anyone who has studied lotto knows that when you think you have something figured out, the numbers shift away from what you were thinking: far away; past Pluto; into a Black Hole.

Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

United States
Member #13130
March 30, 2005
2171 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 13, 2009, 10:31 pm - IP Logged

Yeah, each draw requires itself plus the previous 200 drawings (or nearest 200 "unique" drawings), so if you wanted to backtest a years worth, you'd need 365 + 200 + a cushion of about 30 days. About 600 numbers. Whatever timeframe you wanted to test for, you'd need that plus ~250 days.

In neo-conned Amerika, bank robs you.
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store, not a govnoment agency.

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
19894 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 14, 2009, 12:14 am - IP Logged

Evidently I am misunderstanding the system.  From what I gathered one is to take the total combinations of 1,000 and remove 200 of them.  So let us take just one year of data and apply the algorithym.

Recording one year of a P3 game will result in 730 drawing.  Starting with the oldest drawing, remove 200 of the drawn numbers from the total population of 1,000.  Now the question becomes "Is the winning number contained within the 800 that remain?"  There can only be two possible answers; either yes or no.

Now remove the oldest drawing; black it out; delete it; stomp on it; whatever.  Do the algorithym again.  Use only the first 200 drawings and answer the question "Is the winning number contained within the 800 that remain?"

As you move down the list of previous winning numbers, record how many times "yes" was an answer versus how many times "no" was the answer.  My guess is that you will see more "no" answers than "yes" answers.

As you move down the list, also record the distances between "yes".  Forget about "no" for now; just concentrate on the "yes".  What will you see?  Will you find out that there must be, should be, could be, at least three draws between one "yes" and the next "yes"?  If so, this gives you a window of opportunity.  One can be reasonably assured of a return of some sort on one's investment if one played within the boundaries.  I say "reasonably" for this is the lottory we are taking about and anyone who has studied lotto knows that when you think you have something figured out, the numbers shift away from what you were thinking: far away; past Pluto; into a Black Hole.

Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.

You didn't misunderstand the system. Granted, every time you go one record back, you have already looked at 199 or those 200 drawings but it's still seems like a lot of work for the potential reward.  First you have to find a place that pays \$900 for a straight hit on a dollar ticket.

I guess if I played pick3 it wouldn't seem like a lot of work because I actually wrote a similar routine in my analyzing program to check winning numbers for the jackpot games I play but with jackpot games I'm not investing \$800 hoping to win \$100 .  The routine checks the average or median hits rates of each winning number for a period of 100 or more previous drawings  to see if numbers that are hitting more or less than their normal rate are more likely to hit next.  I can vary the period of time by number of drawings and/or the average or median hit rates of each number.  Since I maintain a file of winning numbers for all the games I play, the file structure is already established.  All I have to do set the parameters for the type of search I want to make.

* you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket *

Wyncote,Pa
United States
Member #3206
January 3, 2004
61350 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 14, 2009, 12:01 pm - IP Logged

WHERE I COULD BEGIN WITH A LIST OF 800

Using Ga. eve  example

The 800 list follows

000 002 004 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 015 016 019 021 022 023 024 027 028 030 032 035 036 037 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 055 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 075 076 077 079 080 082 083 084 085 086 087 089 090 091 092 093 095 096 097 099 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 109 111 112 113 114 115 116 118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 128 129 130 131 132 134 136 137 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 161 162 163 164 165 168 170 171 172 174 175 176 177 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 187 188 190 191 192 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 217 218 219 220 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 235 236 237 239 240 241 243 244 245 246 247 249 250 253 254 255 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 265 266 267 269 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 293 295 296 298 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 318 319 320 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 330 332 333 334 337 338 340 342 343 348 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 358 360 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 380 382 383 384 386 387 388 389 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 410 411 412 413 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 428 429 430 432 433 437 438 439 440 441 442 444 445 446 448 449 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 470 472 473 474 475 476 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 487 488 489 491 492 494 495 496 497 499 500 501 502 504 505 506 507 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 522 523 524 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 536 537 538 541 543 544 545 546 548 549 551 552 553 554 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 566 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 577 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 620 621 623 624 625 626 627 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 640 642 643 644 646 647 649 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 661 662 663 664 665 667 669 670 672 673 674 675 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 685 686 687 688 690 692 693 694 695 696 697 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 714 715 717 718 719 720 721 723 724 725 727 728 729 730 731 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 768 769 770 772 773 776 778 779 780 785 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 807 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 818 820 822 823 824 825 826 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 841 843 844 845 846 847 848 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 871 872 874 875 876 877 879 880 881 883 884 886 888 890 891 892 893 894 895 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 909 910 911 912 916 917 919 920 921 922 923 925 926 927 928 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 955 956 957 958 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 970 971 974 975 978 979 980 982 983 984 985 987 988 989 990 991 992 994 996

You will find a winner

Once a week from sums 12-16 most likely

Wyncote,Pa
United States
Member #3206
January 3, 2004
61350 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 14, 2009, 12:04 pm - IP Logged
 12 15 1.9% 039 048 057 066 129 147 156 183 228 237 246 255 354 363 444 13 15 1.9% 049 058 067 139 148 157 229 247 265 283 337 355 364 445 616 14 15 1.9% 059 068 077 149 158 176 239 257 266 284 338 356 374 446 455 15 14 1.8% 069 087 159 168 177 249 258 267 348 366 375 393 456 474 16 14 1.8% 079 187 196 259 277 286 358 367 394 448 457 466 556 880

Remove the duplicates

*****************************

Find the top key digit(s) from the above

 Key Numbers: 0 14 19.2% 039 048 057 066 049 058 067 059 068 077 069 087 079 880 1 16 21.9% 129 147 156 183 139 148 157 616 149 158 176 159 168 177 187 196 2 19 26.0% 129 228 237 246 255 229 247 265 283 239 257 266 284 249 258 267 259 277 286 3 21 28.8% 039 183 237 354 363 139 283 337 355 364 239 338 356 374 348 366 375 393 358 367 394 4 23 31.5% 048 147 246 354 444 049 148 247 364 445 149 284 374 446 455 249 348 456 474 394 448 457 466 5 22 30.1% 057 156 255 354 058 157 265 355 445 059 158 257 356 455 159 258 375 456 259 358 457 556 6 23 31.5% 066 156 246 363 067 265 364 616 068 176 266 356 446 069 168 267 366 456 196 286 367 466 556 7 21 28.8% 057 147 237 067 157 247 337 077 176 257 374 087 177 267 375 474 079 187 277 367 457 8 19 26.0% 048 183 228 058 148 283 068 158 284 338 087 168 258 348 187 286 358 448 880 9 16 21.9% 039 129 049 139 229 059 149 239 069 159 249 393 079 196 259 394
Wyncote,Pa
United States
Member #3206
January 3, 2004
61350 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 14, 2009, 12:11 pm - IP Logged
048 147 246 354 444 049 148 247 364 445 149 284 374 446 455 249 348 456 474 394 448 457 466
066 156 246 363 067 265 364 616 068 176 266 356 446 069 168 267 366 456 196 286 367 466 556
These are the box version..to continue
Remove all non-clean numbers
Numbers that are not:
two highs and a low
two lows and a high
two evens and an odd
two odds and an even
all even , all odd or doubles
******************
147  354  049 148 247 364  149  374   249 348 456  394  457   156  067 265   176  356  069 168 267   196  367
Wyncote,Pa
United States
Member #3206
January 3, 2004
61350 Posts
Offline
 Posted: March 14, 2009, 12:27 pm - IP Logged