- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 5:13 pm
You last visited
April 23, 2024, 3:34 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Still interested in the Digit System?Prev TopicNext Topic
-
The last three games all contain 40 to 44 balls in the set. As you can see NJ and PA fall below the 80% floor, while surprisingly AZ remains above. Again the colors remain the same for all charts. If a color is missing in a chart, it means that pattern didn't make the top 25. The reason some patterns are not colored: Colors were used to ensure at least the top 5 in every chart was compared among all other charts. Additionally, any pattern that had more than 200 hits in any chart was colored......oh, don't forget to ask for a quick pick with a 0 (zero) in the front digit pattern.
NJ4/40 4856 AZ5/41 4889 PA5/44 5566 FRONT DIGIT PATTERN TOTALS FRONT DIGIT PATTERN TOTALS FRONT DIGIT PATTERN TOTALS 01223 326 01123 354 01123 372 01123 320 01223 353 01233 341 01233 316 00123 321 01223 322 00123 301 01233 260 00123 320 11223 174 01122 237 11223 191 12233 159 00122 227 01133 178 11233 146 00112 214 11233 165 01122 139 11223 183 12233 165 00112 138 00223 155 00223 160 00223 136 01112 145 02233 159 00122 133 00012 134 00233 157 00133 132 00113 131 01122 151 00233 129 11233 122 00122 138 00113 127 01222 120 00112 137 01133 125 01133 119 00113 135 01112 112 02233 118 00133 129 02233 112 12233 116 11123 113 11123 109 11123 115 12333 112 12223 93 02223 107 12223 108 01113 89 00133 103 01112 103 01222 87 01113 98 02333 103 02333 86 12223 96 01222 101 12333 84 00023 94 01113 95 01333 77 00233 87 01333 87 02223 70 11222 74 00012 83 3720 4083 4125 76.61% 83.51% 74.11% -
Looking for lottery numbers is a lot like buying soap. You can get so involved in the comparison process, you forget what you're looking for. With soap, it's the ads, slogans, price per pack, price per bar, price per ounce; somebody out there has already determined the price per bubble depending on water temperature.
Same with numbers. Hot, cold, hi/lo, even/odd, due/overdue, repeats, followers, leaders and wallflowers. We know making simple things complicated is easy. I'm a pro at it.
All those little charts are nice and tell a part of the story. We can see that this pattern comes out more than that pattern and that's all well and good. I have no doubt that the top patterns wil continue to produce as they have.
A front five digit pattern is pretty much set in stone. But as the chart below shows even the 5 digit patterns that produce the most hits tend to stay out a long time. This is based on Texas data. Would it be better to use 3 or 4 digit patterns and add an addtional digit or two on our own? Maybe.
Chart below shows the set, longest the set has stayed out, how long it is currently out, and the number of hits. *83 is the lowest total for longest out. That doesn't mean it stays out that long consistently, just that it has been out that long.
N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 LONGEST CURRENT HITS 0 1 1 2 3 108 0 208 0 1 2 2 3 133 5 207 0 1 2 3 3 83 7 164 0 0 1 2 3 90 16 156 0 1 1 2 2 129 34 112 0 0 1 1 2 147 24 112 0 0 1 2 2 104 12 108 0 0 2 2 3 119 15 96 1 1 2 2 3 180 4 94 0 2 2 3 3 115 96 87 1 2 2 3 3 193 3 79 1 1 2 3 3 282 93 79 0 0 1 1 3 238 1 77 0 1 1 3 3 166 72 72 0 1 2 2 2 189 8 72 0 0 1 3 3 193 121 72 0 0 2 3 3 161 11 63 0 1 1 1 2 200 9 63 0 0 0 1 2 248 40 60 -
So what about three or four digits? Would using those improve the possibility of a hit? A couple of points are interesting here. Using a five digit set, there is only one possible position each can fall in. Using a smaller pattern we now have more positions availabe for a hit. If we use 2 digits, they can fall in first and second, 2 & 3, 3 & 4, or 4 & 5.
Three digits can fall in 1, 2, 3, or 2, 3, 4, or 3, 4, 5. Four digits either 1, 2, 3, 4 or 2, 3, 4, 5.
Sounds a bit cracked until you consider 1) in a 5/39 you aren't going to have more than 4 different digits in the front set of any draw and 2) the most common front digit pattern contains 3 different digits. The chart in the last post shows the top 4 patterns contain all 4 digits, but the 15 that follows contain only 3. By focusing on 3 or four digits, we allow ourselves room to add a digit or two of out choice.
But which is better? Focusing on 3 or four?
The following chart is a comparison of the two. In each case, you can see that focusing on smaller sets increase the possibility of a hit, while lowering the longest out odds. I'm hoping this will prove true in the back digits as well. I'll post those results later today.
N1 N2 N3 Longest Current Hits N1 N2 N3 N4 Longest Current Hits 1 1 2 15 0 809 0 1 1 2 32 0 432 1 2 2 19 3 811 1 1 2 3 37 0 346 0 1 1 22 0 753 0 1 2 2 40 5 387 0 1 2 22 5 767 0 1 2 3 52 7 320 0 0 1 23 1 690 0 0 1 2 54 12 324 1 2 3 23 0 701 1 2 3 3 59 7 278 2 2 3 28 2 723 2 2 3 3 63 3 212 2 3 3 38 3 587 1 2 2 2 64 8 169 1 1 1 45 9 279 1 2 2 3 64 3 380 0 2 2 48 2 292 0 0 1 1 68 1 244 0 0 2 52 11 256 1 1 2 2 69 4 281 2 2 2 55 2 295 0 2 2 3 71 15 183 3 3 3 75 42 153 0 0 2 2 88 15 146 1 1 3 76 1 231 0 1 1 3 94 1 149 1 3 3 78 10 213 0 1 1 1 96 9 145 0 1 3 80 65 148 0 0 1 3 99 65 113 0 0 0 106 14 233 1 1 1 2 100 9 171 0 2 3 121 11 132 2 2 2 3 118 2 141 0 0 3 310 110 35 2 3 3 3 125 42 88 0 3 3 519 110 36 1 1 3 3 127 10 104 -
Gary
Here is a old dos program that allowed one to add digits for both 1st and 2nd positions for each number
I might convert it to 64-bit, let me know if interested. Really busy right now so it could be awhile
RL
-
Good Morning RL!
Any help appreciated ALWAYS! We're all in the same boat.
Some days my end seems to be sinking. That's when the fun really starts though. No complaints. I've been meaning to rewrite the tracking program so you and Steve made that happen. Along the way I got a new idea or two. Just have to go back to the notes and see where they lead.
Back digits are not coming out the way I hoped.
Front digits are more predictable, stable, and we know there are only 56 patterns in a 5/39.
An experiment tracking 3s and 4s may be the way to go as far as homing in on back digit combinations. Tomorrow, the plan is to update all the files, recalculate, and post predictions for various states starting this week.
My real concern is those pesky back digits which jump around like fleas on an angry dog. Tracking 5 back digits shows, at most, 3 hits over the history of the game. Tracking 4 produces 6. Three digits will produce good hit totals, but the longest out range remains in the 100s. Tracking 2 back digits seems the way to go. Those were calculated in the summary chart. Mostly informational, not reflecting a working hypothesis but it would make sense to do since the object is to use three front digits and two back digits to make sets.
My thinking is since there are only 4 possible digits, five places to fill, and most permutations contain only 3 digits, it makes sense. It might make too much sense in this case. We will post an experiment and see.
-
Previously I asked the following:
So the question you must ask yourself is it easier to correctly choose 5 or less ending digits than it is choosing the balls themselves?
Jimmy
Prediciting the back or ending digits was always going to be the hardest problem to solve not the front digits. The digits system shows alot of promise, but fundamentally I don't think it is any easier predicting 5 or less ending digits than it is predicting the ball themselves.
Using Powerball as an example in a 5/59 game lets say I always predict exactly 4 unique ending digits for the next draw. I believe this happens roughly 40% of the time. I have reduced the game to a 5/23 or 5/24 game by my choice of playing exactly 4 unique ending digits. Lets assume 5/24. The odds of matching 5/24 are 1 in 42504. Well thats alot better than 1 in 5 million for matching 5/59 but to get those odds I still had to exactly match the 4 ending digits. If I was playing in a lottery pool then I might consider the digit system where you could cover more of the ending digit combos but as an individual player in the big jackpot games I just don't see an advantage. There would have to be alot more filters in play other than the ending digits themselves to make it usable.
But don't let me discourage any research I would love for someone to prove me wrong!
Jimmy
-
Jim
The digits and numbers have the same exact odds and from this way of thinking there would be no
advantage for using digits over numbers. I don't play the big games because of the odds and the digit
system is just another way to filter out numbers that is based on the frequency of digit hits. All lottery
systems, programs or any other method is nothing more then a filter or series of filters. They accept or
reject based on some information that when broken down to it's core is a simple filter. I always like to
start with something that has some predictable element. In a 5-3x matrix the base digits 1-2-3 all hit
togeather around 70% of the time. This is no big supprise because around 70% of possible sets in the
matrix also have the digits 1-2-3. This is something that must be if the game is fair and some would say
"big woop", that also means I have to choose from these same 70% which is way too many to play. What
the digit system tries to do is build a smart set. I say that if you are going to play then build a set that
has the best chance of hitting, not necessarly in the next draw but overall. Thousands to tickets are sold
each day with numbers like 01-02-03-04-05 or 02-04-06-08-10 and they have the same exact odds of hitting
in the next draw as any other set but these type sets don't cover enough ground so to speak. Digit counts,
base digit counts, high / low counts all produce smarter sets if used correctly. Lets say that you have a closed
container with 7 red marbles and 3 blue marbles. If you select one marble at random even though all the
marbles have the same exact odds of being selected you can expect that around 7 out of 10 will be red. I
would bet on red every time and just take the 30% misses as an expected loss. Find the red marbles in
a game and play them. There are many critics that like to take the safe route and just proclaim that nothing
can be done to improve ones play, BUNK. What most people don't think about is the level that a system must
be able to perform at to reach the winners platform. My digit system at least for me is not based on how much
I win but how close I came and it's repeatability. I very very often come within one click of a mouse from winning
a JP but if you judged the system on jp wins then what would be the verdict. The other jimmy want's to backtest
the sets without regard for the inputs selected, My backtest, test how many of the inputs I selected correctly
without regard to how much I won or any other information. If I make the correct selections then I win, I am
always looking for more predictable values to use with or to replace the existing.
RL
-
Jim,
Although I agree you have a valid question, I suppose the ultimate answer lies with the individual. From my perspective I've tried to relate the idea of digital systems from a basic statistical approach.
I don't agree that the first and last digits are the hardest to predict. In theory, the first, second, fourth, and fifth back digits are MORE predictable than the third. After charting the first and second, first and fifth and last two back digits in 11(?) games, there is no surprise that digits 1 and 2 appear as the top back digits in the first position. And no surprise that the higher digits (7,8,9) appear most often as the last digit in any permutation.
I haven't spent a great deal of time on RL's Lexi approach at the moment, but from what I have seen and read, by narrowing the fields from the bookends, we should be capable of locating each positional value, within a certain range. In the way I'm looking at the Lexi, there may be a lot going on that hasn't been discovered.
I'll leave the proving, dispproving, daring, and the I win/You lose scenarios for those more inclined. The major challenge is finding the data and determining what, why, how, and if, it can be applied. And of those, often the biggest challenge is making the visible apparent in a simple manner.
Anyone who posts on any forum should accept the impossibility of 100% agreement on any topic. So it would go against my loose-cannon-non-conformity to expect anyone to conform to my methods, manners, or madness. The only exceptions to this rule are 1) people with IDs 2 points below a rock, 2) people with IQs equal to crash dummies, and 3) those drinking MAGIC JU-JU.
-
Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on May 7, 2011
Jim,
Although I agree you have a valid question, I suppose the ultimate answer lies with the individual. From my perspective I've tried to relate the idea of digital systems from a basic statistical approach.
I don't agree that the first and last digits are the hardest to predict. In theory, the first, second, fourth, and fifth back digits are MORE predictable than the third. After charting the first and second, first and fifth and last two back digits in 11(?) games, there is no surprise that digits 1 and 2 appear as the top back digits in the first position. And no surprise that the higher digits (7,8,9) appear most often as the last digit in any permutation.
I haven't spent a great deal of time on RL's Lexi approach at the moment, but from what I have seen and read, by narrowing the fields from the bookends, we should be capable of locating each positional value, within a certain range. In the way I'm looking at the Lexi, there may be a lot going on that hasn't been discovered.
I'll leave the proving, dispproving, daring, and the I win/You lose scenarios for those more inclined. The major challenge is finding the data and determining what, why, how, and if, it can be applied. And of those, often the biggest challenge is making the visible apparent in a simple manner.
Anyone who posts on any forum should accept the impossibility of 100% agreement on any topic. So it would go against my loose-cannon-non-conformity to expect anyone to conform to my methods, manners, or madness. The only exceptions to this rule are 1) people with IDs 2 points below a rock, 2) people with IQs equal to crash dummies, and 3) those drinking MAGIC JU-JU.
Like I said I'm not here to discourage anyone. I choose to look for patterns versus numbers or digits. Patterns are much more interesting to me and when I say patterns I do mean patterns not numbers. I play the numbers that fall under the patterns not the other way around. That is the area I have chosen to research. Could be I have taken the wrong path. As far as drinking MAGIC JU-JU if that is whiskey then I fall into that category.
Good luck with your research.
Jimmy
-
Quote: Originally posted by jimjwright on May 7, 2011
Like I said I'm not here to discourage anyone. I choose to look for patterns versus numbers or digits. Patterns are much more interesting to me and when I say patterns I do mean patterns not numbers. I play the numbers that fall under the patterns not the other way around. That is the area I have chosen to research. Could be I have taken the wrong path. As far as drinking MAGIC JU-JU if that is whiskey then I fall into that category.
Good luck with your research.
Jimmy
Jim,
I don't know about wrong paths, I see different routes to explore. Hopefully, they all lead to the same destination. But for all I know, I'm on the wrong path. And like Thomas Edison, for the one way I've learned to do a thing, I've learned 1000 ways not to do it.
Yes, it is hard to compare and contrast two systems when I know nothing about one of them. And I acknowledge I know nothing about your system, so I'm at a loss.
Patterns are particularly appealing. I likely overlook them not knowing what I am seeing.
But in my view, anyone who takes the time to look for, discover, and build relationships with numbers is far ahead of the norm. A goal and a plan to achieve it is always more effective than haphazardly waiting for fate to lend a hand. And yet, fate steps in at the oddest times leaving us to wonder what is the purpose of the plan if is not working?
Maybe it's nothing more than fate's means of providing the necessary hope we all need to push forward through disaster. Maybe we all deserve T-shirts that say "I survived the lottery to play another day?"
Whiskey doesn't qualify as MAGIC JU-JU.
-
Twice I've mentioned the low digits tend to hang out as back digits in the first and second position. Apparently I promised to post the charts at some point and miserably failed. For that I apologize.
A short explanation: What you see in the chart as 12, or 13, or 14, etc isthe back digits in the first two numbers of a set. 12 could be 01, 02 or 01, 12, or 11, 12, or any combination showing 1 and 2 as the back digits in the first two numbers of the set.
Remember, the front digits in any 5/39 can only be a 0,1,2, or 3. Highlighted in yellow are the combinations that do not contain at least one digit that can be played as a front and back digit.
Hopefully this helps clarify why it is not necessary to look for more than 5 or 6 digits to make the entire set.
AZ541 4889 PA544 5566 NJ540 4856 TX537 2743 FL536 5514 IL539 5662 BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS 12 144 12 163 12 140 24 73 12 203 12 197 13 138 13 142 13 118 12 70 13 180 13 165 14 127 14 140 23 114 13 64 23 163 23 146 35 126 23 135 34 113 34 64 24 158 14 143 23 118 24 130 14 104 23 63 34 142 24 142 24 116 34 125 25 101 25 59 14 136 25 136 34 104 25 123 24 98 26 58 45 134 34 132 45 102 45 117 67 98 36 58 15 127 16 122 15 101 15 106 15 94 14 57 36 121 35 121 25 96 35 100 35 93 45 57 17 118 46 115 CA539 6503 GA539 5476 NC539 1648 VAD544 4001 VAN544 5187 BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS 12 188 12 154 12 54 12 115 12 145 23 168 23 151 15 48 13 115 13 144 13 165 13 122 34 45 24 115 34 125 34 152 34 118 13 39 35 108 23 124 14 144 15 116 23 38 25 97 25 119 24 137 16 116 36 37 34 89 36 116 35 136 14 114 17 34 15 88 45 115 45 135 24 111 45 34 45 87 14 114 25 130 35 109 14 32 23 86 15 111 15 114 25 107 89 32 36 85 24 107 56 107 45 107 24 31 14 84 46 106 -
Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on May 8, 2011
Twice I've mentioned the low digits tend to hang out as back digits in the first and second position. Apparently I promised to post the charts at some point and miserably failed. For that I apologize.
A short explanation: What you see in the chart as 12, or 13, or 14, etc isthe back digits in the first two numbers of a set. 12 could be 01, 02 or 01, 12, or 11, 12, or any combination showing 1 and 2 as the back digits in the first two numbers of the set.
Remember, the front digits in any 5/39 can only be a 0,1,2, or 3. Highlighted in yellow are the combinations that do not contain at least one digit that can be played as a front and back digit.
Hopefully this helps clarify why it is not necessary to look for more than 5 or 6 digits to make the entire set.
AZ541 4889 PA544 5566 NJ540 4856 TX537 2743 FL536 5514 IL539 5662 BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS 12 144 12 163 12 140 24 73 12 203 12 197 13 138 13 142 13 118 12 70 13 180 13 165 14 127 14 140 23 114 13 64 23 163 23 146 35 126 23 135 34 113 34 64 24 158 14 143 23 118 24 130 14 104 23 63 34 142 24 142 24 116 34 125 25 101 25 59 14 136 25 136 34 104 25 123 24 98 26 58 45 134 34 132 45 102 45 117 67 98 36 58 15 127 16 122 15 101 15 106 15 94 14 57 36 121 35 121 25 96 35 100 35 93 45 57 17 118 46 115 CA539 6503 GA539 5476 NC539 1648 VAD544 4001 VAN544 5187 BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS BACK DIGIT TOTALS 12 188 12 154 12 54 12 115 12 145 23 168 23 151 15 48 13 115 13 144 13 165 13 122 34 45 24 115 34 125 34 152 34 118 13 39 35 108 23 124 14 144 15 116 23 38 25 97 25 119 24 137 16 116 36 37 34 89 36 116 35 136 14 114 17 34 15 88 45 115 45 135 24 111 45 34 45 87 14 114 25 130 35 109 14 32 23 86 15 111 15 114 25 107 89 32 36 85 24 107 56 107 45 107 24 31 14 84 46 106 Gary,
Below is a random sample of draws in 5/42 matrix. 49 draws only, but I do not expect to see much of a difference when looking at all the draws. Out of 49 draws in 42 so over 85% of draws one of base digits i.e. 1, 2, 3 was drawn irrespective of position as back digit. Position-wise out of those 42 draws, in 32 draws, so 76%, it was in position 1 or 2 in a set. Then in 65% of draws they do show up as back digits in either pos.1 or 2 or both.
SAT 05/07/11 08 12 25 32 37
THU 05/05/11 03 10 16 19 42
TUE 05/03/11 01 02 04 29 33
SAT 04/30/11 02 09 15 37 40
THU 04/28/11 04 06 10 17 37
TUE 04/26/11 02 10 23 30 37
SAT 04/23/11 07 17 18 23 32
THU 04/21/11 11 12 21 25 27
TUE 04/19/11 06 11 12 17 30
SAT 04/16/11 02 09 11 35 36
THU 04/14/11 07 08 10 12 29
TUE 04/12/11 08 13 15 24 25
SAT 04/09/11 01 06 34 40 42
THU 04/07/11 16 26 27 33 40
TUE 04/05/11 02 06 24 36 41
SAT 04/02/11 02 10 27 34 35
THU 03/31/11 02 09 11 25 36
TUE 03/29/11 01 17 29 30 37
SAT 03/26/11 01 02 09 26 29
THU 03/24/11 21 27 32 38 39
TUE 03/22/11 09 10 17 27 29
SAT 03/19/11 10 22 23 26 42
THU 03/17/11 06 17 19 23 36
TUE 03/15/11 02 10 15 25 32
THU 03/12/11 04 08 20 26 34
TUE 03/10/11 03 17 22 28 31
SAT 03/08/11 05 08 14 23 33
THU 03/05/11 02 07 23 30 32
TUE 03/03/11 09 16 22 32 39
SAT 03/01/11 04 22 29 32 39
THU 02/26/11 05 07 17 29 32
TUE 02/24/11 11 14 27 30 38
SAT 02/22/11 22 33 34 36 42
THU 02/19/11 20 21 33 36 41
TUE 02/17/11 18 30 34 39 41
SAT 02/15/11 01 13 24 32 35
THU 02/12/11 02 20 22 23 40
TUE 02/10/11 17 19 29 34 38
SAT 02/08/11 03 04 09 40 42
THU 02/05/11 09 18 22 23 31
TUE 02/03/11 10 21 22 25 27
SAT 02/01/11 07 09 10 19 28
THU 01/29/11 01 06 10 22 42
TUE 01/27/11 15 18 25 28 37
SAT 01/25/11 05 08 10 15 30
THU 01/22/11 17 23 26 28 36
TUE 01/20/11 01 06 28 31 34
SAT 01/18/11 08 17 25 30 33
THU 01/15/11 12 17 20 30 36Adam
-
Adam,
I agree with that. This is a portion of the final file for AZ5/41 that deals with every back digit pair from 00 to 99 through every position (first and 2nd, 1st and 3rd, 1st and 4th, 1st and 5th,....to 4th and 5th). This sorted data demonstrates the truth of your statement perfectly. Base Digits (0,1,2,3, and sometimes 4) do fall irrespective of position.
In most cases I err on the conservative side when posting charts but attempt to post a sufficient amount to demonstrate key points.
Thank you for pointing that out!
BACK DIGIT TOTALS 1&3 TOTALS 1&4 TOTALS 1&5 TOTALS 2&3 TOTALS 2&4 TOTALS 2&5 TOTALS 3&4 TOTALS 3&5 TOTALS 4&5 TOTALS 12 144 18 121 10 102 15 154 45 105 30 70 55 92 89 96 15 94 45 144 13 138 11 92 12 102 14 145 90 95 40 70 65 91 01 95 85 94 34 121 14 127 13 92 11 100 25 128 57 93 57 67 45 86 34 95 03 88 25 117 35 126 15 90 13 96 24 107 56 92 50 64 95 84 02 91 05 87 15 115 23 118 14 86 17 92 34 103 34 88 51 64 54 83 67 90 35 87 23 111 24 116 10 85 16 88 12 96 68 87 52 64 64 83 78 89 84 86 35 105 34 104 12 85 14 86 13 95 80 87 42 63 15 82 12 87 55 84 13 103 45 102 16 85 24 83 33 95 67 85 62 63 34 82 24 86 64 84 14 102 15 101 33 84 18 80 35 91 48 84 71 63 53 81 45 85 75 84 12 100 25 96 20 82 21 79 45 89 91 84 72 62 85 81 80 85 44 79 04 99 16 93 29 81 29 79 23 83 03 80 92 62 05 80 57 83 25 78 03 94 26 92 35 79 22 78 55 81 25 78 87 61 25 77 56 82 95 76 24 94 56 79 27 78 35 76 44 79 79 76 38 60 75 77 23 81 65 73 02 82 36 78 17 76 19 75 32 77 23 74 61 60 35 76 90 81 14 72 05 82 37 78 28 76 30 75 11 73 58 74 00 59 24 75 79 75 74 72 78 73 46 78 25 75 26 74 54 72 78 74 49 59 04 72 81 74 04 71 89 73 57 76 26 75 27 74 18 71 01 73 53 59 44 71 91 74 83 71 01 70 68 76 21 72 28 73 21 70 12 72 54 59 84 71 13 73 24 70 90 69 17 75 23 71 37 70 65 69 89 72 96 59 93 71 68 72 45 69 69 68 27 70 39 68 20 69 19 67 59 70 04 58 74 70 70 72 93 69 94 66 18 69 19 67 44 69 29 67 02 68 60 58 33 69 36 71 94 67 67 65 58 69 37 67 23 68 42 67 46 67 84 58 42 69 92 69 54 66 91 65 78 69 40 67 36 68 28 66 47 67 31 57 43 66 14 66 33 59 79 63 -
Quote: Originally posted by garyo1954 on May 8, 2011
Adam,
I agree with that. This is a portion of the final file for AZ5/41 that deals with every back digit pair from 00 to 99 through every position (first and 2nd, 1st and 3rd, 1st and 4th, 1st and 5th,....to 4th and 5th). This sorted data demonstrates the truth of your statement perfectly. Base Digits (0,1,2,3, and sometimes 4) do fall irrespective of position.
In most cases I err on the conservative side when posting charts but attempt to post a sufficient amount to demonstrate key points.
Thank you for pointing that out!
BACK DIGIT TOTALS 1&3 TOTALS 1&4 TOTALS 1&5 TOTALS 2&3 TOTALS 2&4 TOTALS 2&5 TOTALS 3&4 TOTALS 3&5 TOTALS 4&5 TOTALS 12 144 18 121 10 102 15 154 45 105 30 70 55 92 89 96 15 94 45 144 13 138 11 92 12 102 14 145 90 95 40 70 65 91 01 95 85 94 34 121 14 127 13 92 11 100 25 128 57 93 57 67 45 86 34 95 03 88 25 117 35 126 15 90 13 96 24 107 56 92 50 64 95 84 02 91 05 87 15 115 23 118 14 86 17 92 34 103 34 88 51 64 54 83 67 90 35 87 23 111 24 116 10 85 16 88 12 96 68 87 52 64 64 83 78 89 84 86 35 105 34 104 12 85 14 86 13 95 80 87 42 63 15 82 12 87 55 84 13 103 45 102 16 85 24 83 33 95 67 85 62 63 34 82 24 86 64 84 14 102 15 101 33 84 18 80 35 91 48 84 71 63 53 81 45 85 75 84 12 100 25 96 20 82 21 79 45 89 91 84 72 62 85 81 80 85 44 79 04 99 16 93 29 81 29 79 23 83 03 80 92 62 05 80 57 83 25 78 03 94 26 92 35 79 22 78 55 81 25 78 87 61 25 77 56 82 95 76 24 94 56 79 27 78 35 76 44 79 79 76 38 60 75 77 23 81 65 73 02 82 36 78 17 76 19 75 32 77 23 74 61 60 35 76 90 81 14 72 05 82 37 78 28 76 30 75 11 73 58 74 00 59 24 75 79 75 74 72 78 73 46 78 25 75 26 74 54 72 78 74 49 59 04 72 81 74 04 71 89 73 57 76 26 75 27 74 18 71 01 73 53 59 44 71 91 74 83 71 01 70 68 76 21 72 28 73 21 70 12 72 54 59 84 71 13 73 24 70 90 69 17 75 23 71 37 70 65 69 89 72 96 59 93 71 68 72 45 69 69 68 27 70 39 68 20 69 19 67 59 70 04 58 74 70 70 72 93 69 94 66 18 69 19 67 44 69 29 67 02 68 60 58 33 69 36 71 94 67 67 65 58 69 37 67 23 68 42 67 46 67 84 58 42 69 92 69 54 66 91 65 78 69 40 67 36 68 28 66 47 67 31 57 43 66 14 66 33 59 79 63 Gary,
I think that looking at the total of base digits in the game can tell the story abt. what we can expect. For example looking at 1170 games in 5/42 game
I can see that :
1 base digit occurred - once only
2 base digits occurred- 23 times
3 base digits occurred- 84 times
4 base digits occurred- 235 times
5 base digits occured- 359 times
6 base digits occurred- 287 times
7 base digits occurred- 150 times
8 base digits occurred- 29 times
9 base digits occurred- 2 times
Of course, the fact that 5 base digits occurred 359 times i.e. 30% of the time does not mean that their distribution was : 2-2-1 as it could have been for example
2-3-0. However they show up together 65% of the time in my game, which is negatively biased by digit 4 in the matrix. In 5/39 matrix they should come up, the
three of them together, ar. 70% of the time which only confirms what RL calls them as freebies.
I think that 2 biggest challanges are:
1. to be able to predict how many times they will hit, each of them base ones and
2. correctly guess none-base digits.
As to the second point, perhaps an analysis of occurrence of pairs of non- base digits might help determine which ones are most likely to hit together?
-
Adam,
I've uploaded a Excel summary file (all542Finalindex) which provides a baseline for any 5/42 game. If you haven't seen it, you might want to compare it to the results of the game you play. It's about 62K so it shouldn't take long to download.
Once you open it, you will see the chart for the pairs and trips in the back digits, front digit patterns, individual digit breakdowns, mixed digits, prime numbers, etc.
I wrote it to help (me) get a better understanding of the setting for the 5/37 in Texas. It has been expanded for 39, 40, 41, 44, and now 42 ball games. There will a few items (front digit patterns with 4 in the second position) that cannot occur in your game. Ignore those, they should show 0 (zero) anyway.
There are no formulas in the worksheet, so it can sorted, sifted, rainbow colored, charted, cut, pasted, or whatever, without loss of data.