BlueDuck, I have 2 different formulas. One formula specific to the BN# and one formula for the WB. The last drawing I had the time to run was on 4/4/12's PB. I had 21# in my pool for the WB and 3# in my pool for the PB#. As I have been working on my formula I have been able to reduce the number from when I first had a Matrix moment and came up with this formula. I used to have a pool of between 50-53#'s. But the more I studied the result of my formula I was able to find that the number following the splits was showing whether the number was h/l. I was then able to create a grid based on that and that has made it much easier and quicker to put together the pool which now runs between 21-26#'s.
The PB drawing for 4/4/12 my pool consited of WB 1,5,6,8,19,22,24,28,31,32,33,35,36,38,39,43,45,47,49,53,59 and my pool for the PB#was 2,4,6
The WB came from my formula result 613388004068662525179 and 883919283019423166672
For the BN# my formula result was 41374369267037171248. The PB result is interpreted differently. With the BN, the lead number tells me what the range is for the BN. In this case the lead number was for so where you see = 20, the formula tells me to go up 4 and down 4. The 20 tells me according to my scale that the number will be low, the 1st 3 numbers of my BN result then tell me where the number range.
4
the result of my BN looks like this 0425531=20=2
6
The PB draw for 4/4/12 was 01-24-33-45-49 PB 6
I have a grid and scale for the WB and the BN because I see them as a seperate draw.