Okay, just a few observations on positional tracking and how it deals with randomness, filtering, numerical cycling (single & pairs), and numerical succession (ascending & descending).
1) Florida: After two cycles of pre-draws and official draws, the combination of (1) and (0) have been drawn together. These numbers can be completely removed AS A PAIR from the next draw as a means of filtering as they're very unlikely to be drawn together again. As single independent digits, they still have a fair chance of being drawn again, though.
2) New York: Starting with the 4/18 Evening draw, position (A) has seen the independent digits drawn in succession (sequence) with 5,6, then 7. I refer to this as a triple succession as most are double succession, and, way more common than triples. I see where the number (8), as well as all combinations beginning with this digit, can be completely removed. Remember, we're dealing with a cycle that must now produce the same thing again...in this case, the number (8) in position (A).
3) Doubles: Generally, after two cycles of doubles in the same position, all of the doubles IN THAT POSITION can be removed. I wouldn'e remove all of them because doubles usually return in one of the two remaining positions on the next draw. Not all the time, but a fair amount of the time. As a note, keep an eye on the state of Ohio as doubles have been drawn consecutively in positions (A) & (B). This cycle of doubles is finished for those positions, but are very likely to appear in either (A) & (C), or, (B) & (C) on tomorrow's mid-day draw.
4) I simply assigned this particular event "the flip-flop" which describes how only (2) digits, in a single position, are selected from one draw to next for (3) cycles including all the pre-draws. Such states currently meeting this criteria are Delaware in position (B), Missouri in position (A), Texas in position (B), and Kentucky in position (C). This is a means for filtering out what's least likely to happen again based on the cycling of all these parameters SEVERAL TIMES...which must happen again in order for the player to lose on them. Hope this helps somebody's overall approach out there.
Granted, any of this is possible again, but we're dealing with the overall odds after 2-3 cycles...very slim.
L.L.