Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited January 19, 2017, 7:50 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Playing recently drawn numbers to win a jackpot

Topic closed. 1046 replies. Last post 3 years ago by str8ca$hhomie.

Page 10 of 70
4.517
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #116268
September 7, 2011
20244 Posts
Offline
Posted: April 12, 2013, 1:04 pm - IP Logged

                               

                                   Wink

    helpmewin's avatar - dandy
    u$a
    United States
    Member #106665
    February 22, 2011
    19964 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: April 12, 2013, 2:06 pm - IP Logged

                                       Wink

    nice video

    number 1 is the leader ------> 2, 3 , 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

    DanceDanceDanceDanceDanceDanceDanceDanceDance

    Let it Snow Snowman

      helpmewin's avatar - dandy
      u$a
      United States
      Member #106665
      February 22, 2011
      19964 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: April 12, 2013, 11:32 pm - IP Logged

      Set of 35 for MM. Fri. Apr. 12, 2013. 

      03 04 07 08 09 10 11 12 14 15 17 19 20 21 22 23 25 27 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 40 41 46 47 48 49 51 53 54

      bonus ball 09

      Mega MillionsFri Apr 12, 201301-10-13-19-21**28x3

      Let it Snow Snowman

        Avatar
        Kentucky
        United States
        Member #32652
        February 14, 2006
        7343 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: April 12, 2013, 11:38 pm - IP Logged

        the performance of certain groups of numbers over hundreds of draws in a game there the possibilities are in the millions.

        Jammy is irrelevant. Its too bad he cant (in his lifetime) figure out that we are NOT playing "hundreds of draws" at a time, but rather just ONE at a time. Conditional bets give us BETTER ODDS on a SINGLE draw.

        I've haven't played every form of gambling game, but in every one of them I've played, when I bet and other players bet, winning or losing those bets was based on the conditions we set. As I tried to point out to Boney in another thread, gambling is timing and what appears to be a great bet like in the Blackjack example, the bad timing of another player changed the outcome. His reply "but over time it equals out", but just like you I wasn't talking about over time.

        "Jammy is irrelevant"

        And to most MM and PB players his odds are irrelevant. Why do we need make complex calculations when with a little common sense and grade school math, anyone can see a group of 35 numbers has a better chance at matching 3, 4, 5 numbers than the other group of 21?

        I have a program that was updated every week until last year and now if I want to analyse any of the games, I have to manually enter the results so it's not up to date. However it still has years of data and the hit/skip charts breaks down how many times each number repeated, skipped one drawing, two, etc. In every game all the number were drawn more times within the last 9 or less drawings then the totals of all the other 10 or more skips. So basically each number in the most recent group of 35, when they are drawn, over 50% of their hits are within nine drawings.

        That doesn't mean we should expect to see it every other drawing, but it should average better than once in 12.


          United States
          Member #116268
          September 7, 2011
          20244 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: April 13, 2013, 11:54 am - IP Logged

          Exactly right Stack, and people who play the lottery (Jammy and Boney don't) can often times have VERY good timing when it comes to playing a certain bonus number or knowing WHEN their set is going to hit. 

          I hit 4+1 AGAIN on the KY Cash Ball and posted 2 days ahead of time that the cash ball was about to hit.

          Timing is not that hard to do for lottery players. No wonder our critics are those who DONT PLAY. lol. lol.

          http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/252172/69


            United States
            Member #116268
            September 7, 2011
            20244 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: April 13, 2013, 8:00 pm - IP Logged

            I wonder if Jammy is wearing a dress today?

              Avatar
              Kentucky
              United States
              Member #32652
              February 14, 2006
              7343 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: April 14, 2013, 4:32 am - IP Logged

              I wonder if Jammy is wearing a dress today?

              I don't know about that, but he made an almost profound statement after a boring lecture about his Monte Hall Carlo simulator.

              "The reason you believe it's silly to keep playing randomly when you're losing is because you BELIEVE you can do better than expected by continually changing your bets. "

              Some of the numbers I use change each drawing and if you're playing recently drawn numbers, yours do too. Had to chuckle when I saw "when you're losing" as if players are betting to lose. I thought most gamblers do something different when what they are doing doesn't work.

              It's starting to become obvious his gambling knowledge comes from skimming through Catlin's articles.


                United States
                Member #93947
                July 10, 2010
                2180 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: April 15, 2013, 1:16 am - IP Logged

                I don't know about that, but he made an almost profound statement after a boring lecture about his Monte Hall Carlo simulator.

                "The reason you believe it's silly to keep playing randomly when you're losing is because you BELIEVE you can do better than expected by continually changing your bets. "

                Some of the numbers I use change each drawing and if you're playing recently drawn numbers, yours do too. Had to chuckle when I saw "when you're losing" as if players are betting to lose. I thought most gamblers do something different when what they are doing doesn't work.

                It's starting to become obvious his gambling knowledge comes from skimming through Catlin's articles.

                "Some of the numbers I use change each drawing..."

                I gathered that from some of your posts.

                "I thought most gamblers do something different when what they are doing doesn't work."

                So did I, especially when they're betting on their own skills, or the skills of athletes, or horses.  Never really thought about this in relation to random lotteries though.

                "It's starting to become obvious his gambling knowledge comes from skimming through Catlin's articles."

                You really should check out that Casino City Times site - a wealth of information.  And the Wizard of Odds site is a great supplement.  Since you seem to know a lot about gambling, you might want to see if they have any openings for consultants.

                  Avatar
                  Kentucky
                  United States
                  Member #32652
                  February 14, 2006
                  7343 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: April 15, 2013, 11:09 am - IP Logged

                  "Some of the numbers I use change each drawing..."

                  I gathered that from some of your posts.

                  "I thought most gamblers do something different when what they are doing doesn't work."

                  So did I, especially when they're betting on their own skills, or the skills of athletes, or horses.  Never really thought about this in relation to random lotteries though.

                  "It's starting to become obvious his gambling knowledge comes from skimming through Catlin's articles."

                  You really should check out that Casino City Times site - a wealth of information.  And the Wizard of Odds site is a great supplement.  Since you seem to know a lot about gambling, you might want to see if they have any openings for consultants.

                  "So did I, especially when they're betting on their own skills, or the skills of athletes, or horses.  Never really thought about this in relation to random lotteries though."

                  I think you'll find the gamblers making a living or just showing a small profit know when to bet and how to bet. Just the fact that not all MM and PB drawings produce a jackpot proves there are times when QPs have a better chance of winning. When 17.5 million MM tickets are sold, there is only a 10% chance of a jackpot winning ticket will be sold.

                  "you might want to see if they have any openings for consultants."

                  No thanks, I've tried to explain the games of Craps to several people and they usually can't understand how rolling a "7" wins some bets and loses other. It's like talking to a fish tank explaining to someone who wants to split face cards in Blackjack why it's a bad idea. It's similar trying to explain that a conditional bet is based on the odds of meeting the condition and not the overall odds.


                    United States
                    Member #116268
                    September 7, 2011
                    20244 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: April 15, 2013, 12:13 pm - IP Logged

                    "So did I, especially when they're betting on their own skills, or the skills of athletes, or horses.  Never really thought about this in relation to random lotteries though."

                    I think you'll find the gamblers making a living or just showing a small profit know when to bet and how to bet. Just the fact that not all MM and PB drawings produce a jackpot proves there are times when QPs have a better chance of winning. When 17.5 million MM tickets are sold, there is only a 10% chance of a jackpot winning ticket will be sold.

                    "you might want to see if they have any openings for consultants."

                    No thanks, I've tried to explain the games of Craps to several people and they usually can't understand how rolling a "7" wins some bets and loses other. It's like talking to a fish tank explaining to someone who wants to split face cards in Blackjack why it's a bad idea. It's similar trying to explain that a conditional bet is based on the odds of meeting the condition and not the overall odds.

                    One sure bet is that if the house is encouraging you to do it, thay are making money off of it. Its no surprise that the lotteries spend millions on advertising the use of QPs and power plays.


                      United States
                      Member #116268
                      September 7, 2011
                      20244 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: April 15, 2013, 12:18 pm - IP Logged

                      I don't know about that, but he made an almost profound statement after a boring lecture about his Monte Hall Carlo simulator.

                      "The reason you believe it's silly to keep playing randomly when you're losing is because you BELIEVE you can do better than expected by continually changing your bets. "

                      Some of the numbers I use change each drawing and if you're playing recently drawn numbers, yours do too. Had to chuckle when I saw "when you're losing" as if players are betting to lose. I thought most gamblers do something different when what they are doing doesn't work.

                      It's starting to become obvious his gambling knowledge comes from skimming through Catlin's articles.

                      To me its obvious that anyone can do better by changing their bets. Only a moron would believe that he CANT do better. Look at what using the same bonus number throughout the MM game would have produced

                      Mega Ball
                      Sorted by Times Drawn
                      #Times
                      Drawn
                      % of
                      Drawings
                      Last
                      Drawn
                      36283.43%12/25/2012
                      07222.69%2/26/2013
                      09222.69%10/2/2012
                      44222.69%3/8/2013
                      20212.57%3/1/2013
                      21212.57%3/29/2013
                      35212.57%3/19/2013
                      38212.57%3/22/2013
                      42212.57%3/5/2013
                      02202.45%8/3/2012
                      06202.45%1/29/2013
                      08202.45%3/15/2013
                      19202.45%1/8/2013
                      29202.45%1/1/2013
                      45202.45%8/31/2012
                      04192.33%12/7/2012
                      13192.33%4/9/2013
                      15192.33%10/12/2012
                      25192.33%6/8/2012
                      34192.33%4/2/2013
                      39192.33%3/12/2013
                      11182.2%11/9/2012
                      22182.2%6/5/2012
                      24182.2%11/27/2012
                      26182.2%9/25/2012
                      03172.08%10/9/2012
                      10172.08%7/26/2011
                      37172.08%7/31/2012
                      40172.08%4/20/2012
                      41172.08%12/14/2012
                      12161.96%12/17/2010
                      30161.96%2/22/2013
                      31161.96%9/7/2012
                      01151.84%1/25/2013
                      05151.84%4/5/2013
                      16151.84%12/18/2012
                      23151.84%3/30/2012
                      33151.84%4/13/2012
                      17141.71%2/1/2013
                      18141.71%8/30/2011
                      27141.71%11/23/2012
                      46141.71%3/26/2013
                      14131.59%1/18/2013
                      32121.47%12/28/2012
                      43121.47%11/25/2011
                      2891.1%4/12/2013

                        United States
                        Member #116268
                        September 7, 2011
                        20244 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: April 15, 2013, 12:23 pm - IP Logged

                        Knowing Jammy and his use of the power of negitive thinking his favorite MM bonus number is 28 and he has hit 9 times in the last 815 drawing. But dont worry, he is certain to make up some ground in the next 10,000 years or so.  (give or take a few 100 years here and there)

                          helpmewin's avatar - dandy
                          u$a
                          United States
                          Member #106665
                          February 22, 2011
                          19964 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: April 15, 2013, 12:31 pm - IP Logged

                                                                          See Ya!

                          Let it Snow Snowman


                            United States
                            Member #116268
                            September 7, 2011
                            20244 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: April 15, 2013, 12:33 pm - IP Logged

                                               JAMMY        Green laugh


                              United States
                              Member #116268
                              September 7, 2011
                              20244 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: April 15, 2013, 12:39 pm - IP Logged

                              Jammy has a lot of real nice classroom knowledge, but Im starting to wonder if they ever let him out into the light of day. Have you ever been exposed to the sunshine Jammy? Do you have a smoking habit Jammy?

                                 
                                Page 10 of 70