NYC United States
Member #117,979
October 19, 2011
1,847 Posts
Offline
So... for tom. mid, I will use Wed. 6/19 Mid 8347 and apply formulas to it, to potentially create new winning numbers. I will use this set because it seems to be trending, according to my tracking:
-/-/B/S
-/B/S/+
B/-/S/-
-/-/S/B
-/S/B/-
S/-/B/-
B/S/-/-
B/-/-/S
-/B/-/S
S/B/-/-
S/-/-/B
-/S/-/B
8347 converted:
7297 - 7848 - 3246 - 7242
7396 - 8296 - 3336 - 3237
7837 - 8836 - 8232 - 7332
Reason why I chose 8347... because in NY, last week likes to play into next week (Wed. to Wed)
Wisconsin United States
Member #123,284
February 17, 2012
4,964 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by New York on Jun 26, 2013
They're not. These are my formulas... I created them on my own. I don't use Robert Walsh. I got the book, too... I just used some of his info and put some twists on his info. ;)
I play strictly mirrors... as you can see in my formula sets. I also track different and play different.
You contradicted yourself.
You wrote you don't use Robert Walsh yet you also wrote, not only do you have his
book you used some of his info and put some twists to his info.
I mean I know it's really a popular thing to do is to hate this guy here on L.P. but at the same
give the guy some credit. Your acting like you have nothing to do with him and what your doing
is truly orginal and your formulas without his book/information ect..
You use the terms connectors and Mini tracking sheet those are Robert Walsh terms for sure,
I don't have his book but I have seen those words used on his sales page.
Just give the man a little bit of credit...that's all I'm saying.
NYC United States
Member #117,979
October 19, 2011
1,847 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by Nikkicute on Jun 26, 2013
You contradicted yourself.
You wrote you don't use Robert Walsh yet you also wrote, not only do you have his
book you used some of his info and put some twists to his info.
I mean I know it's really a popular thing to do is to hate this guy here on L.P. but at the same
give the guy some credit. Your acting like you have nothing to do with him and what your doing
is truly orginal and your formulas without his book/information ect..
You use the terms connectors and Mini tracking sheet those are Robert Walsh terms for sure,
I don't have his book but I have seen those words used on his sales page.
Just give the man a little bit of credit...that's all I'm saying.
I apologize Nikki. I agree, I did act wrong and contradicted myself. It real late and I'm not thinking before saying.
I do have Robert Walsh book and I do wanna acknowledge him because his formulas helped me create mirror formulas. I used his ying yang formulas and changed them to the mirror formulas.
Destiny, that's why you don't see them in his book.
I don't know why people hate the book so much... It isn't bad at all. I learned a lot from it. It was very informative. It helped get wins. I'm still improving too, only now, I got some twists to his ideas.
So yeah... Robert, right here on LP, I wanna be the first to say thank you for your book. It helped me get some money and create some ideas for myself to improve my pick 4 game. I'm still learning but hopefully soon, I'll become a master and get big bucks! Hopefully, all of us here on LP can work together with ideas and advice for the next winning number!
Wisconsin United States
Member #123,284
February 17, 2012
4,964 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by New York on Jun 26, 2013
I apologize Nikki. I agree, I did act wrong and contradicted myself. It real late and I'm not thinking before saying.
I do have Robert Walsh book and I do wanna acknowledge him because his formulas helped me create mirror formulas. I used his ying yang formulas and changed them to the mirror formulas.
Destiny, that's why you don't see them in his book.
I don't know why people hate the book so much... It isn't bad at all. I learned a lot from it. It was very informative. It helped get wins. I'm still improving too, only now, I got some twists to his ideas.
So yeah... Robert, right here on LP, I wanna be the first to say thank you for your book. It helped me get some money and create some ideas for myself to improve my pick 4 game. I'm still learning but hopefully soon, I'll become a master and get big bucks! Hopefully, all of us here on LP can work together with ideas and advice for the next winning number!
Ignore my last post guys, it's negative.
NY
Awwww, that was really a nice thing to do New York!! I'm sure Robert is happy! lol
Your right, that's what it's all about, working together for wins.
I know I was told by other L.P. members not to buy the book but I am curious
and plan on purchasing it anyway, don't hate me guys! lol
I think you maybe onto something New York with your new twist, nothing wrong with
trying to improve what already has worked for you, since you posted his book did help
NYC United States
Member #117,979
October 19, 2011
1,847 Posts
Offline
Hey Carli,
These are the final formulas I would like converted to excel:
+/-/S/B
+/B/S/-
B/+/S/-
-/+/B/S
-/S/B/+
S/-/B/+
B/S/+/-
B/+/-/S
+/B/-/S
S/B/-/+
S/-/+/B
-/S/+/B
+/+/B/S
+/B/S/+
B/+/S/+
+/+/S/B
+/S/B/+
S/+/B/+
B/S/+/+
B/+/+/S
+/B/+/S
S/B/+/+
S/+/+/B
+/S/+/B
-/-/B/S
-/B/S/+
B/-/S/-
-/-/S/B
-/S/B/-
S/-/B/-
B/S/-/-
B/-/-/S
-/B/-/S
S/B/-/-
S/-/-/B
-/S/-/B
B/+/+/-
B/+/-/+
B/-/+/+
+/B/+/-
+/B/-/+
-/B/+/+
+/+/B/-
+/-/B/+
-/+/B/+
+/+/-/B
+/-/+/B
-/+/+/B
B/-/-/+
B/-/+/-
B/+/-/-
-/B/-/+
-/B/+/-
+/B/-/-
-/-/B/+
+/-/B/-
-/+/B/-
-/-/+/B
-/+/-/B
+/-/-/B
+/-/B/B
+/B/B/-
B/+/B/-
-/+/B/B
-/B/B/+
B/-/B/+
B/B/+/-
B/+/-/B
+/B/-/B
B/B/-/+
B/-/+/B
-/B/+/B
(B/S/S/S) (S/B/S/S) (S/S/B/S) (S/S/S/B)
If you can, can you please label them too.. or have them made in the order I posted above. Now guys, reason why I chose these sets were because these hit very oftenly. I backtested.
You don't play all the numbers... these are just there and than you pick yourself the best group of winning numbers you think will come next. Of course you'll know what number(s) to play by studying overdue pairs, sums, trends, and connectors.
United States
Member #124,487
March 14, 2012
7,021 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by New York on Jun 26, 2013
Hey Carli,
These are the final formulas I would like converted to excel:
+/-/S/B
+/B/S/-
B/+/S/-
-/+/B/S
-/S/B/+
S/-/B/+
B/S/+/-
B/+/-/S
+/B/-/S
S/B/-/+
S/-/+/B
-/S/+/B
+/+/B/S
+/B/S/+
B/+/S/+
+/+/S/B
+/S/B/+
S/+/B/+
B/S/+/+
B/+/+/S
+/B/+/S
S/B/+/+
S/+/+/B
+/S/+/B
-/-/B/S
-/B/S/+
B/-/S/-
-/-/S/B
-/S/B/-
S/-/B/-
B/S/-/-
B/-/-/S
-/B/-/S
S/B/-/-
S/-/-/B
-/S/-/B
B/+/+/-
B/+/-/+
B/-/+/+
+/B/+/-
+/B/-/+
-/B/+/+
+/+/B/-
+/-/B/+
-/+/B/+
+/+/-/B
+/-/+/B
-/+/+/B
B/-/-/+
B/-/+/-
B/+/-/-
-/B/-/+
-/B/+/-
+/B/-/-
-/-/B/+
+/-/B/-
-/+/B/-
-/-/+/B
-/+/-/B
+/-/-/B
+/-/B/B
+/B/B/-
B/+/B/-
-/+/B/B
-/B/B/+
B/-/B/+
B/B/+/-
B/+/-/B
+/B/-/B
B/B/-/+
B/-/+/B
-/B/+/B
(B/S/S/S) (S/B/S/S) (S/S/B/S) (S/S/S/B)
If you can, can you please label them too.. or have them made in the order I posted above. Now guys, reason why I chose these sets were because these hit very oftenly. I backtested.
You don't play all the numbers... these are just there and than you pick yourself the best group of winning numbers you think will come next. Of course you'll know what number(s) to play by studying overdue pairs, sums, trends, and connectors.
Carli, thanks for your time and hard work!
This sure looks like a lot of B S to me.
I am just messing with you man. Its a good technique if you are willing to put in the time and take it all the way into the endzone.
It took me a while to understand mirrors, and the whole "B" terminology just really throws me.
Can you replace that B with a M?
Why B?
Also I have found that a lot of numbers are sometimes one off because, you can also apply a ++/--
or -2/+2. But that would be more formulas.
(And you could still do a plus 2 and still be one off.)
Using that VBA back testing tracker method mentioned by another poster, you might find that there is a +2 scenario that outperforms certain +1 at certain times.
Florida United States
Member #66,573
October 30, 2008
3,547 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by New York on Jun 26, 2013
Hey Carli,
These are the final formulas I would like converted to excel:
+/-/S/B
+/B/S/-
B/+/S/-
-/+/B/S
-/S/B/+
S/-/B/+
B/S/+/-
B/+/-/S
+/B/-/S
S/B/-/+
S/-/+/B
-/S/+/B
+/+/B/S
+/B/S/+
B/+/S/+
+/+/S/B
+/S/B/+
S/+/B/+
B/S/+/+
B/+/+/S
+/B/+/S
S/B/+/+
S/+/+/B
+/S/+/B
-/-/B/S
-/B/S/+
B/-/S/-
-/-/S/B
-/S/B/-
S/-/B/-
B/S/-/-
B/-/-/S
-/B/-/S
S/B/-/-
S/-/-/B
-/S/-/B
B/+/+/-
B/+/-/+
B/-/+/+
+/B/+/-
+/B/-/+
-/B/+/+
+/+/B/-
+/-/B/+
-/+/B/+
+/+/-/B
+/-/+/B
-/+/+/B
B/-/-/+
B/-/+/-
B/+/-/-
-/B/-/+
-/B/+/-
+/B/-/-
-/-/B/+
+/-/B/-
-/+/B/-
-/-/+/B
-/+/-/B
+/-/-/B
+/-/B/B
+/B/B/-
B/+/B/-
-/+/B/B
-/B/B/+
B/-/B/+
B/B/+/-
B/+/-/B
+/B/-/B
B/B/-/+
B/-/+/B
-/B/+/B
(B/S/S/S) (S/B/S/S) (S/S/B/S) (S/S/S/B)
If you can, can you please label them too.. or have them made in the order I posted above. Now guys, reason why I chose these sets were because these hit very oftenly. I backtested.
You don't play all the numbers... these are just there and than you pick yourself the best group of winning numbers you think will come next. Of course you'll know what number(s) to play by studying overdue pairs, sums, trends, and connectors.
Carli, thanks for your time and hard work!
New York,
I just saw this post now , so I apologize for delay.
Florida United States
Member #66,573
October 30, 2008
3,547 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LottoBoner on Jun 27, 2013
This sure looks like a lot of B S to me.
I am just messing with you man. Its a good technique if you are willing to put in the time and take it all the way into the endzone.
It took me a while to understand mirrors, and the whole "B" terminology just really throws me.
Can you replace that B with a M?
Why B?
Also I have found that a lot of numbers are sometimes one off because, you can also apply a ++/--
or -2/+2. But that would be more formulas.
(And you could still do a plus 2 and still be one off.)
Using that VBA back testing tracker method mentioned by another poster, you might find that there is a +2 scenario that outperforms certain +1 at certain times.
I wish I knew how to implement the VBA Back Test tracker , but I dont .
If anybody else knows how and wants to give it a try , Please do.
Or if someone can give me the VBA , I can do the rest.
I tried looking on some help websites but didnt find anything that I thought would accomplish the goal.
NYC United States
Member #117,979
October 19, 2011
1,847 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LottoBoner on Jun 27, 2013
This sure looks like a lot of B S to me.
I am just messing with you man. Its a good technique if you are willing to put in the time and take it all the way into the endzone.
It took me a while to understand mirrors, and the whole "B" terminology just really throws me.
Can you replace that B with a M?
Why B?
Also I have found that a lot of numbers are sometimes one off because, you can also apply a ++/--
or -2/+2. But that would be more formulas.
(And you could still do a plus 2 and still be one off.)
Using that VBA back testing tracker method mentioned by another poster, you might find that there is a +2 scenario that outperforms certain +1 at certain times.
Thanks LB!
Reason why I had B because I was using R.W. terminology and B meant to substitute. For example, substitute 0 for 5, 4 for 9, etc. I didn't like B either, so I used M, because it makes more sense (mirror). Also, everyone on LP is more familiar with mirrors.
Only reason why I forgot to replace all those B's was because I was too lazy to go into word and change it to M... LOL, it's a bunch of B's so I left it that way. Sorry for the confusion though.
Yes to your sentences after Why B? I noticed as well, that you can still apply formulas to new numbers created from an original formula. It'll be more formulas but it would create a better outcome of a winning number.
Using that VBA back testing tracker method mentioned by another poster, you might find that there is a +2 scenario that outperforms certain +1 at certain times.
NYC United States
Member #117,979
October 19, 2011
1,847 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by New York on Jun 26, 2013
So... for tom. mid, I will use Wed. 6/19 Mid 8347 and apply formulas to it, to potentially create new winning numbers. I will use this set because it seems to be trending, according to my tracking:
-/-/B/S
-/B/S/+
B/-/S/-
-/-/S/B
-/S/B/-
S/-/B/-
B/S/-/-
B/-/-/S
-/B/-/S
S/B/-/-
S/-/-/B
-/S/-/B
8347 converted:
7297 - 7848 - 3246 - 7242
7396 - 8296 - 3336 - 3237
7837 - 8836 - 8232 - 7332
Reason why I chose 8347... because in NY, last week likes to play into next week (Wed. to Wed)
Hey LB,
See how it's always one off or 1 up 1 down. Today's midday for NY was 7974. In the list above we had really close ones:
7369, 7848, 3246 (this is a connector), 7837, and 8836.
Of course, the 8347 was a great number to use to create 7974 due to my tracking, however, I applied the wrong formula. The fomula I was suppose to apply was from this set:
Hey Carli,
These are the final formulas I would like converted to excel:
+/-/S/B
+/B/S/-
B/+/S/-
-/+/B/S
-/S/B/+
S/-/B/+
B/S/+/-
B/+/-/S
+/B/-/S
S/B/-/+
S/-/+/B
-/S/+/B
+/+/B/S
+/B/S/+
B/+/S/+
+/+/S/B
+/S/B/+
S/+/B/+
B/S/+/+
B/+/+/S
+/B/+/S
S/B/+/+
S/+/+/B
+/S/+/B
-/-/B/S
-/B/S/+
B/-/S/-
-/-/S/B
-/S/B/-
S/-/B/-
B/S/-/-
B/-/-/S
-/B/-/S
S/B/-/-
S/-/-/B
-/S/-/B
B/+/+/-
B/+/-/+
B/-/+/+
+/B/+/-
+/B/-/+
-/B/+/+
+/+/B/-
+/-/B/+
-/+/B/+
+/+/-/B
+/-/+/B
-/+/+/B
B/-/-/+
B/-/+/-
B/+/-/-
-/B/-/+
-/B/+/-
+/B/-/-
-/-/B/+
+/-/B/-
-/+/B/-
-/-/+/B
-/+/-/B
+/-/-/B
+/-/B/B
+/B/B/-
B/+/B/-
-/+/B/B
-/B/B/+
B/-/B/+
B/B/+/-
B/+/-/B
+/B/-/B
B/B/-/+
B/-/+/B
-/B/+/B
(B/S/S/S) (S/B/S/S) (S/S/B/S) (S/S/S/B)
If you can, can you please label them too.. or have them made in the order I posted above. Now guys, reason why I chose these sets were because these hit very oftenly. I backtested.
You don't play all the numbers... these are just there and than you pick yourself the best group of winning numbers you think will come next. Of course you'll know what number(s) to play by studying overdue pairs, sums, trends, and connectors.