Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 3, 2016, 12:35 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Do you like/dislike Gail Howards Advantage Plus program and why?

Topic closed. 50 replies. Last post 2 years ago by Ricklou.

Page 1 of 4
44
PrintE-mailLink

Is the Smart Luck software helpful with Jackpot games?

Yes [ 13 ]  [56.52%]
No [ 10 ]  [43.48%]
Total Valid Votes [ 23 ]  
Discarded Votes [ 7 ]  

United States
Member #124493
March 14, 2012
7023 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 5, 2014, 10:15 pm - IP Logged

I meant to reply to this thread before, but "things" came up.  GiveFive brought up the topic and it is a GREAT TOPIC for lottery players.

Although it did not get much interest.

I just noticed it was closed two days ago.  Some I going to resurrect it.

I made sure to put Gail Howard in the title to avoid any "confusion" from some not to be mentioned LP members.

I also thought to make it a poll as many members suggested that this questions "should" be a poll.

In my opinion and experience, if you want to win more at lotto, and you dont have the GHSL software, then you already have one strike against you.

I like to think I dont  need GH to win, because I like to think I am some sort of psuedo excel wizard, but apparantly my intelligence has gotten in the way of my winning, to the point of where, I am thinking, maybe I should go back to the Smart Luck basics.  And thankfully I remember what they are.

I really Lover  the GH program.

But I also love my excel charts. 

I have made every A+ chart (or transferred) all the A+ charts into excel. 

Except the complicated analytical triad charts. (These are the money charts)

I like the LD (last digit) charts in A+.  But I have found the LD sleepers, can take MONTHS to awaken.  So patience is a virtue.

Also I found the idea to play all the non-smartpick numbers to be a genious idea from the last thread.

I probably thought of that once but lil tommy put that thought on back burner.

Anyway,

If Gail Howard had made her smart luck program pick 3 friendly, she would be a multibillionaire, instead of just a mere multi-millionaire.

Live and Learn.

    BobP's avatar - bobp avatar.png
    Dump Water Florida
    United States
    Member #380
    June 5, 2002
    3102 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: May 8, 2014, 7:23 am - IP Logged

    One can excuse their software not winning jackpots every week due to the high odds.  When your predictor doesn't work for Pick-3/4 . . .

    See, you actually have to know how to win to write software to automate the process. 

    Generating graphs and such may prove useful to some, to trigger their brain into action.  For the rest of us they are simply fluff we pass by on the way to the predictor. 

    While I've never regretted buying the GH software and fire it up to check ideas, one needs more.

    Too bad GH's programmers never got the once promised AI working. 

    BobP

      riscknight's avatar - riscknight
      Athens
      Greece
      Member #133234
      September 24, 2012
      188 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: May 8, 2014, 10:15 am - IP Logged

      One can excuse their software not winning jackpots every week due to the high odds.  When your predictor doesn't work for Pick-3/4 . . .

      See, you actually have to know how to win to write software to automate the process. 

      Generating graphs and such may prove useful to some, to trigger their brain into action.  For the rest of us they are simply fluff we pass by on the way to the predictor. 

      While I've never regretted buying the GH software and fire it up to check ideas, one needs more.

      Too bad GH's programmers never got the once promised AI working. 

      BobP

      See, you actually have to know how to win to write software

      Precisely.

      I voted yes LottoBoner; and, I believe her software and wheels are helpful.

      6/49 dis(assembly)

        lottoburg's avatar - wiggle
        NYC
        United States
        Member #54483
        August 20, 2007
        886 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: May 8, 2014, 4:16 pm - IP Logged

        I meant to reply to this thread before, but "things" came up.  GiveFive brought up the topic and it is a GREAT TOPIC for lottery players.

        Although it did not get much interest.

        I just noticed it was closed two days ago.  Some I going to resurrect it.

        I made sure to put Gail Howard in the title to avoid any "confusion" from some not to be mentioned LP members.

        I also thought to make it a poll as many members suggested that this questions "should" be a poll.

        In my opinion and experience, if you want to win more at lotto, and you dont have the GHSL software, then you already have one strike against you.

        I like to think I dont  need GH to win, because I like to think I am some sort of psuedo excel wizard, but apparantly my intelligence has gotten in the way of my winning, to the point of where, I am thinking, maybe I should go back to the Smart Luck basics.  And thankfully I remember what they are.

        I really Lover  the GH program.

        But I also love my excel charts. 

        I have made every A+ chart (or transferred) all the A+ charts into excel. 

        Except the complicated analytical triad charts. (These are the money charts)

        I like the LD (last digit) charts in A+.  But I have found the LD sleepers, can take MONTHS to awaken.  So patience is a virtue.

        Also I found the idea to play all the non-smartpick numbers to be a genious idea from the last thread.

        I probably thought of that once but lil tommy put that thought on back burner.

        Anyway,

        If Gail Howard had made her smart luck program pick 3 friendly, she would be a multibillionaire, instead of just a mere multi-millionaire.

        Live and Learn.

        Good Topic! It's still necessary to discuss it again and again even though the Topic is so OLD!

        I have had and used A+ since 2000. In my point, A+ is the earliest lotto program 

        and it is a real lotto system with the most users in the current market!

        Its Advantages are as below:

        1) A+ has the better UI and UE than other lotto programs. Users can use it easily and conveniently!

        2) A+ includes the all lotto games in the world almost except the Digit Games

        and it's easy to update their winning record.

        3) Based on the concept of "Lottery Master Guide", A+ is a good tool for statistical analysis for lotto.

        It's really helpful if you use it for statistics only.

        But A+'s Disadvantages are very famous as well as its advantages!

        1) A+'s Auto Smart Picks doesn't work totally!

        2) A+'s Algorithm which supports the program has never been improved and updated since it was born 

        even users complained with it strongly .(Note, I mean the Algorithm only.)

        As a business program, it's very rare indeed. Also, this is a highly irresponsible attitude to customers too!

        This is my main reason to dislike A+.

        3) I have not yet found any real working Strategy for using A+ successfully until now.

        In other words, no person can get the real profit constantly by using A+ I think!

        How about you, LottoBoner?

        4) A+ can not running for Digit Games since its Algorithm. 

        5) We can not found a Forum to discus A+'s use specially except Facebook where Smart Luck has set a

        Thread but you can read some Advertising speech and praise only there.

        I do hope that I can read some valuable strategies about A+'s use here. 

        • Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
        • Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
        • Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.
          SergeM's avatar - slow icon.png
          Economy class
          Belgium
          Member #123700
          February 27, 2012
          4035 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: May 8, 2014, 4:31 pm - IP Logged

          It seems that Texamos, Lottoboner and others are big fans of GH products.

            lottoburg's avatar - wiggle
            NYC
            United States
            Member #54483
            August 20, 2007
            886 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: May 8, 2014, 4:35 pm - IP Logged

            It seems that Texamos, Lottoboner and others are big fans of GH products.

            I did in the Thread of Facebook but my posts have been canceled quickly by Smart Luck.

            • Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
            • Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
            • Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.
              SergeM's avatar - slow icon.png
              Economy class
              Belgium
              Member #123700
              February 27, 2012
              4035 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: May 8, 2014, 4:48 pm - IP Logged

              There is another group account, look for "GailHoward" in FB. You will find LP members there too.

                lottoburg's avatar - wiggle
                NYC
                United States
                Member #54483
                August 20, 2007
                886 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: May 8, 2014, 4:50 pm - IP Logged

                There is another group account, look for "GailHoward" in FB. You will find LP members there too.

                I will. Thanks a lots!!!

                • Saying Lotto #s Can be Predicted means that Lotto's ODD can be reduced down  to an economical level by a system.
                • Saying a Lotto System Works means that we can win constantly (not each draw)  and economically (get a real profit) by using the System.
                • Practice is the only criterion for testing truth.

                  United States
                  Member #124493
                  March 14, 2012
                  7023 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: May 10, 2014, 3:56 pm - IP Logged

                  One can excuse their software not winning jackpots every week due to the high odds.  When your predictor doesn't work for Pick-3/4 . . .

                  See, you actually have to know how to win to write software to automate the process. 

                  Generating graphs and such may prove useful to some, to trigger their brain into action.  For the rest of us they are simply fluff we pass by on the way to the predictor. 

                  While I've never regretted buying the GH software and fire it up to check ideas, one needs more.

                  Too bad GH's programmers never got the once promised AI working. 

                  BobP

                  Thanks for your reply BobP.

                  I don't think the high odds is the problem.  Its the instant gratification that we seek, that causes trouble.  (My number didn't hit, I HAVE to change it.)

                  If the nexus Patriot™ is really real, then we are looking at a five game window.  (6) to be correct.

                  So, If we are wheeling intelligently and within budget, then you have to always assume your wheel will fail for at least five-six games before your number comes up and you can recoup.

                  The GH defined flag is an anomaly for me. Generally ,every time I ignore it, it hits.  Every time I play it it doesn't. (That's not absolutely true)

                  When you say the predictor doesn't work for P3/4, I am not sure what you mean.  I don't think GH has a pick 3/4 application.

                  (I did spend the time once, four hours or so updating the info with the 10 20 30 convention)

                  However I think I pressed enter, instead of F10 (save), and all that work was lost.

                  To know how to win, you must also know how to lose.  You must budget. 

                  Who/what is this predictor that we get to after passing all the fluff?  The Graph is the Grail.  (The Grail has grails within it.)

                  Similar to those Russian dolls.

                   Its not such a ABSTRACT LOTTO concept. 

                  The GH software is adequate in my opinion.  But I feel I need more too.

                  But I have come to the conclusion that more is sometimes less.

                  AI is something for sci-fi movies and transhumanists.

                  GH only has ONE programmer.  From what I have heard, he spends most of his time trying to keep up with the MS updates.  I guess thats why he hasn't refined the program.  The DOSBOX solution was a great one that he had.

                  One of my biggest dislikes of the A+ program, is that you have to use the keyboard.

                  I prefer to do my lottery workout supine on my king size water bed.  (I wish!!!)

                  Everytime I have to sit up to use the keyboard I get pissed.  And my chair is not ergonomically satisfactory.  It really begins to hurt my ass after a four hour workout.


                    United States
                    Member #124493
                    March 14, 2012
                    7023 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: May 11, 2014, 6:15 pm - IP Logged

                    See, you actually have to know how to win to write software

                    Precisely.

                    I voted yes LottoBoner; and, I believe her software and wheels are helpful.

                    Thank you for you post RiscKnight.

                    The odd thing I dont use the gail howard wheels.  Maybe its a problem with budget.

                    I did make my own wheel in Excel once.  I have been using it everyday with crappy results, so I decided to scrap it today.

                    I went back to one of my "original" wheels.  I found a prinout of it in one of my old notebooks, and I have decided to go back to it, because the new and improved wheel just was not showing any results, although I did learn some good programming stuff in order to make it.

                    Mostly the built in programming in excel, such as the   =IF(M117="X",M$52,"") the kind of programming for dummies.

                    I did learn how to do the array lookups to make my wheel, and I am going to try to keep it in the scrapped wheels for skip analysis.

                     

                    Just basically a small file where I track, gaps, sum, spread, groups, high and low.

                     

                    Z1Z2Z3Z4N1N2N3N4N5100F5F4R4Z1Z2Z3LH S1S2S3S4S5LongskpΣL6
                    22106711152665209196,26E 2 O 332041161041121184603310
                    2200671118287022122118,28E 3 O 2310402610444013560369
                    23006710111347756N/AE 2 O 35005026103411119460201
                    23006711141553988N/AE 2 O 3320502610471013460320
                    0202141531353613122212115,35E 2 O 3022222147133201641401530
                    1202610113738102323128N/AE 3 O 2 302 3216134150145630250
                    110061122232890221717N/AE 3 O 2 200 2026142240135641004
                    1202610113536983029266,36E 3 O 2302 3216134320135630230
                    120071015232984221619N/AE 1 O 421030270312107572475
                    2003673536371213130306,36 & 7,37E 2 O 3203232610321075602700
                    021010122023339823132110,20E 3 O 22102121030021065101729

                    I know it looks like my cat just vomited, but the paste was kind of askew, and I dont care to fix it, but you get the idea.  Also some cells have incorrect data because of the scraping and deleting of rows, a lot of my source data was removed, but I dont really need to fix it just yet.

                    The wheel gold does have some interesting handicapping features and high low, sum tracking as well.

                    I may use it to post some predictions on other states if I find the spare time.

                    Good Luck RiscKnight!!


                      United States
                      Member #124493
                      March 14, 2012
                      7023 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: May 11, 2014, 6:20 pm - IP Logged

                      Ok I tried to make it look less like my cats furball and upchucked lunch, ok, I quit.

                       

                      Z1Z2Z3Z4N1N2N3N4N5100F5F4R4Las digiteoZ1Z2Z3?LH N1S1S2S3S4S5LongskpΣL6g1g2g3g4g5
                      22106711152665209196,26E 2 O 3320?41161041121184603310
                      2200671118287022122118,28E 3 O 2310?402610444013560369
                      23006710111347756N/AE 2 O 3500?5026103411119460201
                      23006711141553988N/AE 2 O 3320?502610471013460320
                      0202141531353613122212115,35E 2 O 3022?222147133201641401530
                      1202610113738102323128N/AE 3 O 2 302?3216134150145630250
                      110061122232890221717N/AE 3 O 2 200?2026142240135641004
                      1202610113536983029266,36E 3 O 2302?3216134320135630230
                      120071015232984221619N/AE 1 O 4210?30270312107572475
                      2003673536371213130306,36 & 7,37E 2 O 3203?232610321075602700
                      021010122023339823132110,20E 3 O 2210?2121030021065101729
                        riscknight's avatar - riscknight
                        Athens
                        Greece
                        Member #133234
                        September 24, 2012
                        188 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: May 12, 2014, 3:50 am - IP Logged

                        LottoBoner you don't have to be a Programmer to win the Lottery; and don't worry about the looks of your 'Excel Analysis'.

                        Lots of folks still develop their strategies on a plain piece of paper with only a pen... that is the only thing they need and they do great.

                        The 'feedback' from Gail's Program is a valuable asset! 

                        You just have to keep trying pal... That's what we all do, right?

                        And I know that you don't give up... People who don't give up LottoBoner, they have better chances to see Lady Luck smiling at them! 

                        Good Luck To You As Well!

                        6/49 dis(assembly)

                          clifford1944's avatar - Lottery-050.jpg
                          Broken Arrow Oklahoma
                          United States
                          Member #85721
                          January 21, 2010
                          159 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: May 12, 2014, 1:21 pm - IP Logged

                          I don't have the A+ but sure like the LMG.  It opened my eyes to playing the lottery.

                          Home, home where I wanted to be.

                            RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
                            mid-Ohio
                            United States
                            Member #9
                            March 24, 2001
                            19816 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: May 12, 2014, 3:29 pm - IP Logged

                            One can excuse their software not winning jackpots every week due to the high odds.  When your predictor doesn't work for Pick-3/4 . . .

                            See, you actually have to know how to win to write software to automate the process. 

                            Generating graphs and such may prove useful to some, to trigger their brain into action.  For the rest of us they are simply fluff we pass by on the way to the predictor. 

                            While I've never regretted buying the GH software and fire it up to check ideas, one needs more.

                            Too bad GH's programmers never got the once promised AI working. 

                            BobP

                            "See, you actually have to know how to win to write software to automate the process." 

                            Players who know how to win aren't interested in automating the process to make it easier for others to win.  And others who think they know how to win have to first win to prove it or they wasting their time trying to program the process.

                             * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
                               
                                         Evil Looking       


                              United States
                              Member #124493
                              March 14, 2012
                              7023 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: May 12, 2014, 6:02 pm - IP Logged

                              Good Topic! It's still necessary to discuss it again and again even though the Topic is so OLD!

                              I have had and used A+ since 2000. In my point, A+ is the earliest lotto program 

                              and it is a real lotto system with the most users in the current market!

                              Its Advantages are as below:

                              1) A+ has the better UI and UE than other lotto programs. Users can use it easily and conveniently!

                              2) A+ includes the all lotto games in the world almost except the Digit Games

                              and it's easy to update their winning record.

                              3) Based on the concept of "Lottery Master Guide", A+ is a good tool for statistical analysis for lotto.

                              It's really helpful if you use it for statistics only.

                              But A+'s Disadvantages are very famous as well as its advantages!

                              1) A+'s Auto Smart Picks doesn't work totally!

                              2) A+'s Algorithm which supports the program has never been improved and updated since it was born 

                              even users complained with it strongly .(Note, I mean the Algorithm only.)

                              As a business program, it's very rare indeed. Also, this is a highly irresponsible attitude to customers too!

                              This is my main reason to dislike A+.

                              3) I have not yet found any real working Strategy for using A+ successfully until now.

                              In other words, no person can get the real profit constantly by using A+ I think!

                              How about you, LottoBoner?

                              4) A+ can not running for Digit Games since its Algorithm. 

                              5) We can not found a Forum to discus A+'s use specially except Facebook where Smart Luck has set a

                              Thread but you can read some Advertising speech and praise only there.

                              I do hope that I can read some valuable strategies about A+'s use here. 

                              Thanks for your reply Lottoburg.

                              Unfortunately your avatar is so goofy i cant help but have trouble taking you seriously.

                              Have you tried this one?

                              Goofy.svg

                               

                              But to answer your question number 3.

                              You can find some real profit if you use A+ in a chair and not supine or in drunken repose.

                              You have to print out a lot of reports also.

                              Take the oklahoma 5/36 game for instance.  I can see using the companion number chart  Chart 8, that 28/29 hit a lot.

                              Approximately 56 times.  (Its not current as my autoupdater is not working for some reason on one of my computers and I still have not called to find the problem)

                              So I print out that report.  Either using chart A (neighboring pairs) or 9 (companion pairs)

                              And I count about how many times they hit together per year.  (So I can make more of an educated guess)

                              The benefit in using chart A in stead of 9 is time based on how much data there is for your draw.

                              Chart 9 will kill your time by doing the triad and quad and quint calculations.

                              Its better to run that chart once and print out the overall report (which shows the best of the best) and have a hard copy of that, before you start doing specific pair or triad summary reports.

                              A and 9 print out both the same reports but since NY has over 6 thousand draws, I prefer to use A.

                              Then I find the best third number with those two.   21

                              So now I can do a one power number wheel. with either 21  28   29.  Keeping the others in the wheel.

                              or you can just do a three power number wheel, with  21  28  29  and just mix and match other numbers.

                              21 28 29 have hit 11 times have have yet to hit in 2014.  (well my data goes only to jan 9 of 2014, so it may have hit already!!!