N.C. United States
Member #56,003
October 28, 2007
877 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by amber123 on Nov 28, 2016
He didn't win crap. And watch how how convenient the answer is...in that he doesn't have to prove a thing. Whenever I ask on LP for proof, they get all defensive and come up with every excuse as to why they can't prove it.
I don't know how to upload pics.
My dog ate the copies of the tickets.
kind of reminds me of this guy in the Navy.
called himself the G-Lover. always talking about
how big his unit was.
one day he came in to work wearing sweat pants.
before he could get changed into his overalls
four girls held him down and yanked them to
his ankles.
guess what his name was after that!
"know your limitations, but excede your expectations"
Kentucky United States
Member #32,651
February 14, 2006
10,302 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by grwurston on Nov 27, 2016
What is so hard to understand about this method?
219. One is in the middle position in that particular order which is middle low high. The position has nothing to do with the system. It is the order of the numbers that counts. Lowest #1, middle #2, highest #9. The middle number is 2.
No matter how you arrange it, the one is the lowest number and nine is the highest number, so therefore two has to be the middle number.
Which is the whole idea of the system, the middle number is the key number, in other words the group you use. It doesn't matter what order it is in, you always use the middle number. I repeat, The Middle Number is not the lowest number, not the highest number, but the number in between them. The position doesn't matter.
Take the number 357. What's the middle number? It's the 5. Take 753, the middle number is 5. Take 375, 573, 735, 537, the middle number is always the 5, because the 3 is the lowest number, the 7 is the highest number, so 5 is the middle number because it is between them. So you would play the Group 5 numbers.
Another example. Number 427. The middle number is 4. Why? Because 2 is the lowest number, 7 is the highest number. Now what is in between them? The 4. So therefore, 4 is the middle number. 247, 274, 724, 472, 742, the order doesn't matter because 4 is always between the lowest # 2 and the highest # 7, and is always going to be the middle number. So therefore you would play the Group 4 numbers.
If anyone can explain it any better, go right ahead.
"What is so hard to understand about this method?"
It looks pretty simple to me: pick one digit 1 to 8 and create box combinations where the digit picked is in the middle from low to high. The digits "1" and "8" create eight combinations, "2" and "7" create fourteen, "3" and "6" eighteen and "4" and "5" create twenty.
"219. One is in the middle position in that particular order which is middle low high."
The digit "1" isn't the middle digit and that example has nothing to do with the video method.
"Take the number 357. What's the middle number? "
From low to high or high to low it's the digit "5" and either way creates the same 20 box combos.
"If anyone can explain it any better, go right ahead."
Someone made the observation by boxing three digits and placing them into a low to high or high to lower order they can separate the total 120 box 6 way combos into four groups. The confusion seems to be, some people don't understand all 120 box 6-way combos are included and the fact some digits can be low and middle, middle and high, or all three.
Any guarantee is conditional based on picking which of the 8 digits will be the middle digit in any high/low order.
Okay, so my next question is....Would it be logical to say that those eight combos are "self-reliant", meaning only one of those combos can win obviously, so the middle number 1 in fact means nothing?
Oklahoma United States
Member #155,199
May 11, 2014
1,996 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LottoAce on Nov 28, 2016
If you won in Ga. Congrats,
do you have a picture of the winning tickets?
I couldn't find your name on the yesterdays winner list either.
Because I didn't post on the prediction board. I did try the system personally and won with it and then followed that up by posting predictions in the OKLAHOMA thread using the system and won the following two nights in a row so far (check the thread out for yourself since you guys apparently think everyone here is either stupid or a liar)........did your mothers not show you folks enough love as a child?
United States
Member #164,719
March 12, 2015
3,506 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LottoAce on Nov 28, 2016
just for the record. I never called anyone on lottopost an idiot.
at least not in this forum topic.
I'll answer it because there not going to.
"What damage would I do if I removed one set from the eight combos?"
1) save yourself a buck.
2)nothing...because there was never a win
gaurantee to screw up in the first place.
but you knew that already.
let it go amber123.
its pointless...and its causing people
to resort to childish namecalling.
I realize the Political Thread has gotten pretty heated lately.
I thought we were better than that at LottoPost?
I wasn't referring to you when I talked about the idiot remark..
But you are absolutely right. What's the point right?
At this juncture we have basically two groups.
One: The ones who are still convinced they are correct.
Two: The ones who used to think they were correct, and have to save face, which is understandable. How do I know this you may be asking? When I ask very specific questions, there are no answers that satisfy the criteria.
So the only thing to do is to let people voice their opinion and let go..........
Atlantic City, NJ United States
Member #163,208
January 23, 2015
50 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by amber123 on Nov 28, 2016
YES he is guaranteeing a win without saying the word guarantee. There are a lot of ways to say the same word without using it. He does say "IMAGINE PLAYING ONLY". meaning these combos are all you need to win.
What a load of crap !
You people need to record your own voices and listen back to the recording, you'll be amazed.
I know he's talking about a boxed win for 30th time already. How many times do I have to keep repeating myself?
I KNOW IT"S BOXED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019
Now I'm going to mix the order up to convince you people I know it's a box system.
201 031 140 105 601 710 081 901
And you write that If my KEY digit 1 shows, I win correct? Playing these eight combos right?
ISN'T MY KEY DIGIT THE NUMBER 1, YES OR NO?
DID I PLAY THE CORRECT GROUP, 201 031140 105 601 710 081 901?????????????????????????????????
The winning number that night was 129. I FREAKING LOST !
DO YOU SEE MY KEY DIGIT IN THE NUMBER 129?????????
This system is flawed because it doesn't cover all the combos for the key digit!!!!!!!!
What part don't you people understand?
The key digit 1 has 36 combinations, no doubles, and triples.
NOT EIGHT !
He guaranteed a 'BOXED' winNOT A STRAIGHT, and only if all 3 digits are different and your key digit is drawn. why do you worry about how he said this or that????????????????????
pretty simple concept to understand, why do you not???????????????????????
to answer your questions:
Q: MY KEY DIGIT THE NUMBER 1, YES OR NO?
A: if you picked 1 as your key digit, then yes, 1 is your key middle digit
Q: DID I PLAY THE CORRECT GROUP, 201 031 140 105 601 710 081 901?????????????????????????????????
A: not if you played them 'straight'. Only if you played them boxed.
United States
Member #164,719
March 12, 2015
3,506 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LifesAGamble on Nov 28, 2016
He guaranteed a 'BOXED' winNOT A STRAIGHT, and only if all 3 digits are different and your key digit is drawn. why do you worry about how he said this or that????????????????????
pretty simple concept to understand, why do you not???????????????????????
to answer your questions:
Q: MY KEY DIGIT THE NUMBER 1, YES OR NO?
A: if you picked 1 as your key digit, then yes, 1 is your key middle digit
Q: DID I PLAY THE CORRECT GROUP, 201 031 140 105 601 710 081 901?????????????????????????????????
A: not if you played them 'straight'. Only if you played them boxed.
United States
Member #164,719
March 12, 2015
3,506 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LottoAce on Nov 28, 2016
kind of reminds me of this guy in the Navy.
called himself the G-Lover. always talking about
how big his unit was.
one day he came in to work wearing sweat pants.
before he could get changed into his overalls
four girls held him down and yanked them to
his ankles.
guess what his name was after that!
Yanked what to his ankles, his sweat pants? I have to know the facts before making a reasonable response.
N.C. United States
Member #56,003
October 28, 2007
877 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by SWMcCaig on Nov 28, 2016
Because I didn't post on the prediction board. I did try the system personally and won with it and then followed that up by posting predictions in the OKLAHOMA thread using the system and won the following two nights in a row so far (check the thread out for yourself since you guys apparently think everyone here is either stupid or a liar)........did your mothers not show you folks enough love as a child?
So it went from three nights in a row to two nights in a row.
when I simply asked, "do you have anything to substatiate
your claim."
tell you what. I'll take you at your word for the first night.
and I won't bother to look up on the Ok thread.
I don't think everyone is stupid. and I don't believe
that everyone is a liar.
but I would be foolish to consider investing time
and money into a system, without demanding
proof that it works.
you wouldn't invest in a company without
checking into the books would you?
three draws don't mean anything over
the long haul.
I am currently developing my own system
I have two months in a row of winning statistics.
and I'm not sure I trust it yet...
my mother had a full time job. didn't have time to cuddle with me.
but that was when the blue dog democrats were in office.
you still won't hear me blameing her for any of my mistakes in life.
"know your limitations, but excede your expectations"
United States
Member #164,719
March 12, 2015
3,506 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by LifesAGamble on Nov 28, 2016
it's only my 4th attempt to enlighten you.
and I lost count of all the other members who tried to enlighten you.
but somehow, I suspect you are just being sarcastic
Look, I'm going to finalize this sh1t!!!!
I'm not making money by taking advantage of this never ending thread.
I'm not trolling.
I'm not being sarcastic or anything eles.
You may have attempted 4 times, but not to my satisfaction, sorry, don't take it personal.
How come no one ever answers my specific questions? JIt always seems just when I get a new revelation on how to explain my thoughts, and make step by step questions, they don't respond?
South Carolina United States
Member #155,837
May 31, 2014
2,001 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by amber123 on Nov 28, 2016
I wasn't referring to you when I talked about the idiot remark..
But you are absolutely right. What's the point right?
At this juncture we have basically two groups.
One: The ones who are still convinced they are correct.
Two: The ones who used to think they were correct, and have to save face, which is understandable. How do I know this you may be asking? When I ask very specific questions, there are no answers that satisfy the criteria.
So the only thing to do is to let people voice their opinion and let go..........
Let's make LP great again !
Saving your own face.
Btw i just reread the title of this thread.
Are you the well meaning person who is lost.
Mybad the entire time we thought you was referring to the person who youtube video it is..