dr san
In the top image we can see that 37-38-39 ruled the day for the drawings shown and it looks
very tempting but what would be the first number group. Lets say that we would have played
01-02-03 for the first numbers and 37-38-39 for the last numbers. Only 3 sets fall into the
ranges set. 3x3=9 pairings and then we have to fill in the other 3 numbers. We have numbers
04 to 36 or 33 unused numbers and there are 5,456 combinations of 3 in 33. Now if we start
with 9 pairs of end numbers it would take 9 x 5,456=49,104 lines to cover a JP hit but what if,
lets say, that the winning set started with something like 01-03 or ended with 37-39, no JP. I
have a series of follower programs that track which numbers / digits show best in the next draw
after a number, I don't use them anymore. I can track by singles, pairs, triples etc but I still wind
up with too many choices.
Some data is very misleading and while it would have been a good bet to play 37-38-39 as the
last number for the games shown, it's not until it's well into the series that these stand out and
by that time the hit rates could be winding down. Short term tracking offers some value but
expecting two of these events to happen within the same drawing is rare and even if they do
then that's just the beginning, we still need three more numbers.
RL