Canada
Member #145,682
August 11, 2013
165 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 14, 2023
I told you not to over think! Do you have to play all these groups? have you consider 990088> as 990-998-900-988-0088-088 or filtering a pair from 6C3
You have potential few digits out of 10 , why create issue, waging is subjective, some play only doubles or from pairs, you have to make a selection and stick to it. You know the set 908 is 27 picks, front pairs leaves 3 picks and double front is even less
Canada
Member #145,682
August 11, 2013
165 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 14, 2023
I told you not to over think! Do you have to play all these groups? have you consider 990088> as 990-998-900-988-0088-088 or filtering a pair from 6C3
You have potential few digits out of 10 , why create issue, waging is subjective, some play only doubles or from pairs, you have to make a selection and stick to it. You know the set 908 is 27 picks, front pairs leaves 3 picks and double front is even less
All you need is few picks , max 4 and wage hard for short time, you don't need have 5 straight .
I have really exhausted my explanations, you have a good tool, use it.
These are my last questions if that's OK because I basically got this now..
I just want to ask these last questions and I can follow this as a guideline moving forward, it just has to do with my understanding of combination which I'm poor with..
I promise this is last questions and the rest will be practice
1) you said 908 is 3 picks -- 908, 098 , what's the third if 09-90 is the front pairs?
I see 809, 890 where 90 is still pair but not front?
2) or filtering a pair from 6C3--- can I ask where those pairs are you are referring to? and how might you go about filtering the pair you select?
I promise those are the final 2 questions I have, the rest will be practice +doing the work with exampless
Thank you so much for your feedback :) im so appreciative
Canada
Member #145,682
August 11, 2013
165 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 13, 2023
Reducing R2 to R8 digit by digit starting from draw 1,2,2 onwards
After filtering from draws 122 to 761, I have 3 sets of digits 99,3,8. Lets look at pattern projection
R2-9938 R4-9983 R6-8993 R8-9983
Triads 938-983-893-983-998-899-998> hit 998
Pairs projection> 99-99-99-93-93-38-83-83>
Lets take a look at pattern progression for set 998
From R4 to R8 the set 998 in it's variation is intact, there is a breakwhen you look at R2>99x8, the same applies to pairs. Always look for the most frequent sets before your pick selection.
Deciding to reduce Rs in sets instead of digit by digit.
Starting from 1,2,2(all 1s and 2s deleted),then 6,4,5 onwards
Few draws from 122 to 3 42 was deleted(some data will be lost)
R2-990088
R4-990088
R6-880099
R8-009988
From the set 908, lets do some pattern progression
90-90-09-09-08-08-80(can't consider 08 of R8, why? 00xx88
I have one pair 98 (R8) , projections breaks if you at R2 to R6.
I am doing this in simple way for you to avoid 'Whatabout this',scenario.
Lets look if we got some hits>091-998- 903-880
Like I said, filtering in sets or digits has it pro and cons, the most important thing is pattern progression to select your picks.
Take your time , don't over think is that simple
I just feel like it be tough to hit even a single straight on only 4 sets, I know it just happened on the last example but wouldn't that be very rare and you would have to play the numbers longer then you would want to? (guessing you’d want to play for a week and re-work?)
you say multiple times throughout the thread "the idea is limited sets for straight HARD"
Lets just say the goal is 1 straight a week as timeframe? my bet would be you filter out the straight very often on 4 sets no?
Lets test this further, so in the example you completed.... set strings (Oct 8-11th) and digit strings (Oct 8th 15th)
I went back 2 weeks prior and did the SETS strings again (Sept 25th-29th to get to 3 digits) for the DIGIT strings took much longer (oct 8th-15th) so they will be different..I guess the idea would be to ideally combine them? lets see how they did backtesting further a couple weeks..
Sets sept 25 29th- 234, 996, 919, 717
550088
550088
880055
008855
Triad 508-508-805-085-550-550-055-088-088-880-088-500-500-005 = pattern progression tells me 508, 088
550088> 550, 558, 500,588, 008, 088
Pairs- 55-55-55-55-88-88-88-88-00-00-00-00-08-08-80-08 = 08 top pair with double pairs 55,88,00
Playable: via pattern progression – 508,550,088,500 > or 550, 558, 500, 588, 008, 088
Super reduced list via progression: 508-550-088-500
Digit sept 25th - 0ct 3rd–
2488
2884
8824
8824
Triads> 248-284-824-824 = 824
248-824-824-488-884-882-882 = probably take 882 and 824
8824> 882,884, 824 = does that look good?
Pairs: 24-24-24-88-88-88-88-82-82 = 88 or 24
Playable: 824, 882, 884
For all that data only 1 single set? Seems low because isn’t doubles less likely to occur?
Direct Hits
Oct 5th – 805 (box hit)
Oct 12th – 850 ( straight filtered out but was in sets triads)
Nov 5th – 880 (filtered out but was in sets triads, timeframe is too long?)
The digit version had no hits
The pairs had some hits 342, 427 but not front pair
See the straight was there (sets triads) but filtered out with too aggressive filtering..
I also want to argue the point in target top pairs when you could just extend the sets to play that already exist (ex. Triads that had straight filtered out) instead of pick a set out of a top pair.. get what I mean?
If I wanted to go higher then 4 sets to avoid filtering straight out what would you say is another appropriate amount of sets?
I think I could maybe hit the straight with 10 sets?
This is where the “time frame” and “waging” come into play..
Timeframe = should it be hit a straight within a week? Re-do workout weekly?
Waging = limited sets to hit a single straight
I feel this is hard to accomplish with 4 sets, or should I say duplicate?
But if you extend the waging (10-15 sets) you may be able to fit into timeframe ( 1 week to hit a straight)
You see what I’m asking and the dilemma?
Maybe understanding better how often you should re-work everything (once a week?)
Wondering if the sets would be good to play for a week (7 days) then re-work?
Like I said I would feel more confident extending the waging but I do not know if this is smart..
My guess is it would be unlikely to hit 1 straight a month on only 4 sets consistently?
Any clarity or thoughts would be appreciated..
Now that ive learned im more focused on optimal waging and timeframe..A
I showed I can definitely hit a straight with extended waging (15-20 sets)…
so I posted in here my more filtered list, but my more extended list for ontario ( which I posted in predictions)
It hit straight today 526 (midday) but from the evening numbers so it would've been a miss...
the 526 would've actually been part of my 8 super filtered numbers for evening....592-596-926-526-922-522-226-225
Adobea I wondering your thoughts on this because you said "no middling" so I did numbers for each draw, but had I taken my top 8 sets from each Midday and evening and played both draws I wouldve caught the straight
Any thoughts on this?
Is it just you win some you lose some? or is there some circumstances where you use numbers for both draws (midday/evening) in a state?
United States
Member #76,984
July 10, 2009
10,771 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 11, 2023
Hi Adobea,
I was reducing down to "3 digit" in my other full examples when I completed via sets.
I was less concerned with doing that and more concerned with "fundamentally" doing things properly when I was asking my recent additional questions...
I think the issue is that some of your examples aren't always fully following the instructions or there are a couple errors which causes confusion when you are trying to follow very closely.
you have examples where you are mostly removing digits R2 through R8 and then when im getting different patterns you are advising thats because I should only remove from R2, but you aren't doing that so that can't be the reason? thats a fair confusion.
and now youre saying you told me that only because its easier not because its how you should utilize optimally?...thats just confusing
I am just trying to utilize the strings in the most optimal way.
I understand when people just ask for answers and don't even try or put in the work to do examples, but I have been putting in the work trying to learn with full examples so I think that's pretty unfair to say "im done here" when some are putting in the full work to learn.
Whats the point in even posting the system then?
I will continue to try examples and learn, like I said I just want to progressively get better and learn. I appreciate your feedback.
I will just continue to try examples if you could still provide feedback on the work I post would be greatly appreciated, I am not expecting clarification moving forward unless I show the work. thank you
Carter7, you have "unintentionally" hijackedadobea78'sthread.That is NOT allowed! Have you noticed that adobea78 is not responding?Please startathread ofyourown in the Pick 3 forum or the Prediction forum. You are notposting a system here. You are posting many "examples" for pick 3 that are really predictions for several states. Your info is interesting and needs to be in your ownthread. Use the function tab "New Topic" in the proper forum to start your own thread. Thanks
~Auntie Harve$t Moon 🙂
Canada
Member #145,682
August 11, 2013
165 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by Harve$t Moon on Nov 17, 2023
Carter7, you have "unintentionally" hijackedadobea78'sthread.That is NOT allowed! Have you noticed that adobea78 is not responding?Please startathread ofyourown in the Pick 3 forum or the Prediction forum. You are notposting a system here. You are posting many "examples" for pick 3 that are really predictions for several states. Your info is interesting and needs to be in your ownthread. Use the function tab "New Topic" in the proper forum to start your own thread. Thanks
~Auntie Harve$t Moon 🙂
Ok sorry, I know that I started posting predictions but prior to that I was still asking questions related to the system/method, I will go back to that only.
I was posting some predictions too see this weeek if some of the numbers produced from learning the system might hit, I was only going to do this once for a week.
I know there are other members still reading this system thread and absorbing because I am getting messages asking questions about my examples.
There is still lots to learn with the system and strings. I dont necessarily need Adobea to respond all the time, has provided lots of feedback that I am grateful for thank you!
United States
Member #76,984
July 10, 2009
10,771 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 17, 2023
Ok sorry, I know that I started posting predictions but prior to that I was still asking questions related to the system/method, I will go back to that only.
I was posting some predictions too see this weeek if some of the numbers produced from learning the system might hit, I was only going to do this once for a week.
I know there are other members still reading this system thread and absorbing because I am getting messages asking questions about my examples.
There is still lots to learn with the system and strings. I dont necessarily need Adobea to respond all the time, has provided lots of feedback that I am grateful for thank you!
Thanks for understanding, Carter7! It is still my suggestion that you start your own thread. You have interesting material to share with others and they have expressed their interest to you.
. As you know a system does not change. That's one of the main components that keeps it a system. Your tweaking and adjusting is in effect "changing"adobea78'sposted system or hijacking it.adobea78'ssystemis NOTchanging. It's his system!
.
The future questions that you have about changing adobea78's system (for your own purposes) could be better addressed in a PM to him.
.
If you are still "testing", put "TESTING" in your own thread's title and indicate what you are testing in the topic's body. You should have much success with any and all of your thread(s). You write well, are organized and logical.
Canada
Member #145,682
August 11, 2013
165 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by Harve$t Moon on Nov 17, 2023
Thanks for understanding, Carter7! It is still my suggestion that you start your own thread. You have interesting material to share with others and they have expressed their interest to you.
. As you know a system does not change. That's one of the main components that keeps it a system. Your tweaking and adjusting is in effect "changing"adobea78'sposted system or hijacking it.adobea78'ssystemis NOTchanging. It's his system!
.
The future questions that you have about changing adobea78's system (for your own purposes) could be better addressed in a PM to him.
.
If you are still "testing", put "TESTING" in your own thread's title and indicate what you are testing in the topic's body. You should have much success with any and all of your thread(s). You write well, are organized and logical.
Good luck with all of your lottery endeavors!
Thanks HarvestMoon! I appreciate that
I wouldn't say I was changing the system I was just trying to look at the numbers it generated in a different way at first back when I was still trying to figure it out and prior to me better understanding the system.
I am still trying to get to the point of Adobea's understanding /expertise of getting to 10 or less sets for optimal straight play.
I feel like I'm still learning how he uses this and I haven't even tried the pick 4 portion yet.
If I was able to come up with my own method involving this system/strings I would love to make a seperate thread about it!
I still believe learning how to use this system properly/optimally is the way to go.
Canada
Member #145,682
August 11, 2013
165 Posts Online
I got a message from a member asking to show some backtesting so ill just show some light testing I've done...
following Adobea's instructions exactly for digit version (going down to 3-4 digits over 5-7 days) and set version (going down to 3-4 digits) I made numbers for each week in Ontario starting at the beginning of the year..
CHECK THIS OUT.........
Evening only week numbers gathered over Jan 1st-9th Digit version
92218 is final string R2- (R4-R8 as we know being variations of the same thing)
hit Jan 10th- 189
the next weeks numbers..
Evening only week numbers gathered over Jan 10-18 Set version
226677 - final string
HIT Jan 28th - 622
the next weeks numbers..
Evening only week numbers gathered over Jan 19-26th Digit + set versions
52177 digit final string
551177 set final string
HIT Jan 30th 715 - twice on both strings
HIT Feb 3rd 721 - digit string again
THE NEXT WEEKS NUMBERS!
Evening only week numbers gathered over Jan 27-Feb 2nd Digit + set versions
5938 digit final string
HIT feb 20th 839
THE NEXT WEEK NUMBERS!!!
Evening only week numbers gathered over feb 2nd-8th Digit + set versions
559911 sets final string
5418 digit final string
HIT feb 19 154
HIT feb 22 159
THE NEXT WEEKS NUMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Evening only week numbers gathered over feb 9th-14th Digit + set versions
Canada
Member #145,682
August 11, 2013
165 Posts Online
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 18, 2023
I got a message from a member asking to show some backtesting so ill just show some light testing I've done...
following Adobea's instructions exactly for digit version (going down to 3-4 digits over 5-7 days) and set version (going down to 3-4 digits) I made numbers for each week in Ontario starting at the beginning of the year..
CHECK THIS OUT.........
Evening only week numbers gathered over Jan 1st-9th Digit version
92218 is final string R2- (R4-R8 as we know being variations of the same thing)
hit Jan 10th- 189
the next weeks numbers..
Evening only week numbers gathered over Jan 10-18 Set version
226677 - final string
HIT Jan 28th - 622
the next weeks numbers..
Evening only week numbers gathered over Jan 19-26th Digit + set versions
52177 digit final string
551177 set final string
HIT Jan 30th 715 - twice on both strings
HIT Feb 3rd 721 - digit string again
THE NEXT WEEKS NUMBERS!
Evening only week numbers gathered over Jan 27-Feb 2nd Digit + set versions
5938 digit final string
HIT feb 20th 839
THE NEXT WEEK NUMBERS!!!
Evening only week numbers gathered over feb 2nd-8th Digit + set versions
559911 sets final string
5418 digit final string
HIT feb 19 154
HIT feb 22 159
THE NEXT WEEKS NUMBERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Evening only week numbers gathered over feb 9th-14th Digit + set versions
4866 digit final string
113366 set final string
HIT 366 FEB 24th
HIT 864 Feb 27th
UNREALLLLLLL
one important note though, none of them hit straight as is within the string as you see..
I will have to check pattern progression to see if some would have hit straight
If not..
Does anyone have suggestions on how to filter combinations not to miss most of those potential straights?!?!
With such limited combinations should be possible to optimally filter so you dont miss too many?