- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 6:13 am
You last visited
May 16, 2024, 6:13 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Digit string projection for P2,P3,P4,P5 Games.Prev TopicNext Topic
-
Hi Carter, can you please do a recent data workout from beginning to end in one post? Also, once we get the numbers do we have to create new set after every draw?
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 18, 2023
one important note though, none of them hit straight as is within the string as you see..
I will have to check pattern progression to see if some would have hit straight
If not..
Does anyone have suggestions on how to filter combinations not to miss most of those potential straights?!?!
With such limited combinations should be possible to optimally filter so you dont miss too many?
I'm bad with that part
For filter use adobeas system on his blog named Key digits for pick 3 and pick 4.
-
Quote: Originally posted by lottoswe on Nov 21, 2023
For filter use adobeas system on his blog named Key digits for pick 3 and pick 4.
I checked that and I'm not sure that quite helps me, what I'm trying to do is...
I keep getting the combination let's say 610
but I am often missing the correct permutation I think the word is? so it might come out 016 or 106
I am trying to hit straight and wondering what I may be able to implement to help ensure the straight hit
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 22, 2023
I checked that and I'm not sure that quite helps me, what I'm trying to do is...
I keep getting the combination let's say 610
but I am often missing the correct permutation I think the word is? so it might come out 016 or 106
I am trying to hit straight and wondering what I may be able to implement to help ensure the straight hit
Use system vertically. If you have same number last 2 draws on position 1 then you have 4 numbers to play next 2-3 draws .
I found example in Nebraska Pick 3:
nov 10 9 1 0
nov 8 9 9 8
nov 7 3 9 3
nov 4 4 9 5
nov 3 4 1 2
Nov 3 and nov 4 number on pos1 is 4. Adobeas system shows to play 2 7 9 6 next 3-4 draws. On nov 8 drawn number on pos1 is 9.
Then you have nov7 and nov8 on pos2 number 9 is drawn. If you have 2 9's then expect 0 2 1 4 in next 3-4 draws. On nov10 is drawn number 1 on pos2.
-
Quote: Originally posted by lottoswe on Nov 23, 2023
Use system vertically. If you have same number last 2 draws on position 1 then you have 4 numbers to play next 2-3 draws .
I found example in Nebraska Pick 3:
nov 10 9 1 0
nov 8 9 9 8
nov 7 3 9 3
nov 4 4 9 5
nov 3 4 1 2
Nov 3 and nov 4 number on pos1 is 4. Adobeas system shows to play 2 7 9 6 next 3-4 draws. On nov 8 drawn number on pos1 is 9.
Then you have nov7 and nov8 on pos2 number 9 is drawn. If you have 2 9's then expect 0 2 1 4 in next 3-4 draws. On nov10 is drawn number 1 on pos2.
ya I'm just not sure if this would necessarily work for how this system works let's see when I explain...
so I've basically fully learned the system in this thread and it leaves you with a 3 or 4 digit string...
ex 1223 or 1234
the hit comes from a makeup of that string
ex. sets 123-122-134
so you know all the exact digits within the set that will hit, the exact combo boxed but just not in which variation ex. 123, 321, 231, 213
from what I'm understanding your showing how to find the key digit or missing digit if you had the pair, as in what other numbers might be coming..
I know what numbers are coming and I know the timeframe (7-14 days roughly) I just don't know the order it will come in (ex. 213 or 123..
I'm not looking for key digits, I'm trying to figure how to best optimize hitting the combination correctly for straight play when I already know the digits of the hit..
an important note like I think I kinda mentioned is the timeframe, because the timeframe is longer and not "hit every draw" system you play a low amount of sets (3-5) over a certain time period (7-14 days) to get your hit.
you just want to have the correct order when it does eventually hit..like a boxed combo that you are optimizing into a straight.
I'm looking for best methods for this
I think because the timeframe can be between 7 and sometimes even 21 days thats what makes this very tricky
the timeframe isn't consistent but the hit will usually come a max of 20 days
-
Positional wheel for triad 680 or variations(27), filter front 68x, 86x from 27 picks and you have 6 picks to wage
000
006
008
060
066
068
080
086
088
600
606
608
660
666
668
680
686---3 picks
688
800
806
808
860
866--3 picks
868
880
886
888Pick 3 Positional Wheel
Only available at Lottery Post
https://www.lotterypost.com/wheels/positional -
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 24, 2023
Positional wheel for triad 680 or variations(27), filter front 68x, 86x from 27 picks and you have 6 picks to wage
000
006
008
060
066
068
080
086
088
600
606
608
660
666
668
680
686---3 picks
688
800
806
808
860
866--3 picks
868
880
886
888Pick 3 Positional Wheel
Only available at Lottery Post
https://www.lotterypost.com/wheels/positionalhey adobea,
here's something I've been considering and don't know if this makes as much sense..
I realize you need to limit the sets as much as possible because the hit can sometimes be a long timeframe but it does come..
what I've kind of been considering..
what I'm usually doing is getting down to my 3 digit string and then working out the "pattern progression" R2-R8 of that final string, whatever that final set is I was just using that...for example 603 is the final set after pattern progression of final string R2-R8
but because I'm testing both the digit method and set method I am taking both final string from both ways of doing it (set + digit), doing the pattern progression and taking the top set from each..ex 603 and 117 are final sets for each after doing pattern progression on R2-R8 ex final strings digit: 603 and set; 1177...
that gives me 2 combinations from 2 different ways of doing it for the same timeframe..
then I am finding the top pair in the pattern progression and playing them front pair both ways for example...
603 is the set after final string pattern progression R2-R8 and 03 is the top pair in pattern progression so play
036- 306
so if I do that for both the set and digit workouts I would get 4 sets
I know this might be somewhat hard to understand but I think you might..
what do you think of that method of getting my sets over say wheeling something that would give me 6 sets?
full example
603 digit version is the most prevalent combo in final string pattern progression, and 03 is top pair
117 set version is the most prevalent combo in final string pattern progression, and 17 is top pair
my sets to Play are 036, 306, 171, 711
what do you think of that?
I've just been trying to come up with best way to hit the straight like I said and wondering if this might work better then wheeling something for more sets?
but you have more experience, I am interested in your feedback on my idea, thank you :)
added: because the way my mind kind of interpret it is by wheeling a single pattern you are putting all your eggs in one basket hoping the pattern hits? which might hypothetically by odds increase timeframe or likelihood it hits? the way I was thinking about allows for 2 patterns to be played but very measured for same timeframe
it's just I am noticing the timeframe is all over the place in the testing of my state, it will come within the month but at random times so does this still fit into a consistent Waging strategy?
unless I am doing something wrong but I think I know this quite well now
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 7, 2023
ok let me try an example..
From: SUN 10/08/23 ~ Thru: TUE 11/07/23 MON 11/06/23 4-1-7 SUN 11/05/23 8-8-0 SAT 11/04/23 9-6-8 FRI 11/03/23 9-0-3 THU 11/02/23 2-2-4 WED 11/01/23 6-4-0 TUE 10/31/23 9-2-1 MON 10/30/23 0-7-5 SUN 10/29/23 9-4-5 SAT 10/28/23 5-5-9 FRI 10/27/23 6-3-0 THU 10/26/23 2-9-0 WED 10/25/23 7-5-5 TUE 10/24/23 0-6-5 MON 10/23/23 6-1-2 SUN 10/22/23 6-1-5 SAT 10/21/23 4-0-8 FRI 10/20/23 5-2-2 THU 10/19/23 9-9-8 WED 10/18/23 0-9-1 TUE 10/17/23 4-2-7 MON 10/16/23 1-5-6 SUN 10/15/23 7-6-1 SAT 10/14/23 1-0-5 FRI 10/13/23 4-4-1 THU 10/12/23 8-5-0 WED 10/11/23 3-4-2 TUE 10/10/23 7-7-2 MON 10/09/23 6-4-5 SUN 10/08/23 1-2-2
apply 645 to the 4 strings...
99220011338877
22990088337711
88117700993322
77001199883322 I believe I see patterns..
920-290-387-873-701-170
front pairs = 92, 29,09,90,38,87,17,70,71 > hits 091, 290, 921
lets reduce further next draw 772
9900113388
9900883311
8811009933
0011998833
901-109- 831-138-983-893-938
front pairs- 90-09-83-13-98-89-93-38 - hits 091, 903
you can see from both strings the prominent pattern was 09,90 and they both hit front pairs, I guess this may be what you mean by finding/following pattern?
Also I was wondering for this system and alot of your others that include the strings, could you explain further/provide examples of how you breakdown your patterns into playable sets?
It seems what comes out of the strings most often in your examples is the front pairs but less examples on how to best reduce down to 5-10 picks for ideal straight play?
there is a lot of mention of "waging strategy"and "time frame" but it is difficult to utilize those tools without more clearly understanding how to reduce/form consistent playable sets (5-10 sets) from patterns or front pairs in strings.
Would you kindly be able to show more detailed examples of this by chance? I feel it could be applied to so many of your systems and really help understand how to pair these patterns/ front pairs optimally with "waging strategy + time frame"..
I still usually come out with way too many sets using the strings, yet you seem to consistently be able to reduce to 10 sets in a consistent method..
perhaps this involves some form of wheeling, traids? etc. that some of us may not fully understand hindering us from taking advantage of the patterns/ front pairs worked through the strings. Even just some baseline insights for reduction of patterns/front pairs into the final playable sets would be so greatly appreciated.
Thank you so very much any input is appreciated
Lets break down the odds of digit games:
P2> 1 in 100> A lead digit reduces odd to 1/10
P3> 1 in 1000> a front pair reduces to 1/10
P4> 1 in 10000> a front triad reduces to 1 in 10
P5> 1 in 100000> a front Quads reduces to 1 in 10
You see all digit games has 10 elements 0 through 9, similar rules(digit replacenent-repeats).
The difference btw games is the prize tags and repeatability> frequent digits repeats occur the higher the game type.
Waging > Is a subjective decision>
Str8 wager<
Double front pairs pays more with less picks
Front pairs pays more with less picks
Pattern projection and pick selection:
You are getting few digits out 10 elements to focus on, these few sets(variation of same sets) projects pairs,
doubles with frequencies easily observed to reduces your picks.
Combos 123> 6 variations>$6> prize $500
Time frame should be less or equal to target prize , so $6 for 20 draws is still less than the prize.
This combo 123 can be reduced to just 3 picks observing patten projection, eg
112233
113322
113322
221133
Pattern projection> 1122-2211--2233-3322-3322--1133-1133-1133> front pairs 13-32, double front 33,11 is considered by frequency. Lets filter our front pairs for sets to play
1-1-1
1-1-2
1-1-3
1-2-1
1-2-2
1-2-3
1-3-1
1-3-2>>>3 picks
1-3-3
2-1-1
2-1-2
2-1-3
2-2-1
2-2-2
2-2-3
2-3-1
2-3-2
2-3-3
3-1-1
3-1-2
3-1-3
3-2-1
3-2-2-- 3picks
3-2-3
3-3-1
3-3-2
3-3-3So you wage only 3 picks out 27 for the set 123 variation.
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 24, 2023
hey adobea,
here's something I've been considering and don't know if this makes as much sense..
I realize you need to limit the sets as much as possible because the hit can sometimes be a long timeframe but it does come..
what I've kind of been considering..
what I'm usually doing is getting down to my 3 digit string and then working out the "pattern progression" R2-R8 of that final string, whatever that final set is I was just using that...for example 603 is the final set after pattern progression of final string R2-R8
but because I'm testing both the digit method and set method I am taking both final string from both ways of doing it (set + digit), doing the pattern progression and taking the top set from each..ex 603 and 117 are final sets for each after doing pattern progression on R2-R8 ex final strings digit: 603 and set; 1177...
that gives me 2 combinations from 2 different ways of doing it for the same timeframe..
then I am finding the top pair in the pattern progression and playing them front pair both ways for example...
603 is the set after final string pattern progression R2-R8 and 03 is the top pair in pattern progression so play
036- 306
so if I do that for both the set and digit workouts I would get 4 sets
I know this might be somewhat hard to understand but I think you might..
what do you think of that method of getting my sets over say wheeling something that would give me 6 sets?
full example
603 digit version is the most prevalent combo in final string pattern progression, and 03 is top pair
117 set version is the most prevalent combo in final string pattern progression, and 17 is top pair
my sets to Play are 036, 306, 171, 711
what do you think of that?
I've just been trying to come up with best way to hit the straight like I said and wondering if this might work better then wheeling something for more sets?
but you have more experience, I am interested in your feedback on my idea, thank you :)
added: because the way my mind kind of interpret it is by wheeling a single pattern you are putting all your eggs in one basket hoping the pattern hits? which might hypothetically by odds increase timeframe or likelihood it hits? the way I was thinking about allows for 2 patterns to be played but very measured for same timeframe
it's just I am noticing the timeframe is all over the place in the testing of my state, it will come within the month but at random times so does this still fit into a consistent Waging strategy?
unless I am doing something wrong but I think I know this quite well now
if 03 is top, then filter 03 from picks below
000
003
006
030
033--3 picks
036
060
063
066
300
303
306
330
333
336
360
363
366
600
603
606
630
633
636
660
663
666 -
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 24, 2023
Lets break down the odds of digit games:
P2> 1 in 100> A lead digit reduces odd to 1/10
P3> 1 in 1000> a front pair reduces to 1/10
P4> 1 in 10000> a front triad reduces to 1 in 10
P5> 1 in 100000> a front Quads reduces to 1 in 10
You see all digit games has 10 elements 0 through 9, similar rules(digit replacenent-repeats).
The difference btw games is the prize tags and repeatability> frequent digits repeats occur the higher the game type.
Waging > Is a subjective decision>
Str8 wager<
Double front pairs pays more with less picks
Front pairs pays more with less picks
Pattern projection and pick selection:
You are getting few digits out 10 elements to focus on, these few sets(variation of same sets) projects pairs,
doubles with frequencies easily observed to reduces your picks.
Combos 123> 6 variations>$6> prize $500
Time frame should be less or equal to target prize , so $6 for 20 draws is still less than the prize.
This combo 123 can be reduced to just 3 picks observing patten projection, eg
112233
113322
113322
221133
Pattern projection> 1122-2211--2233-3322-3322--1133-1133-1133> front pairs 13-32, double front 33,11 is considered by frequency. Lets filter our front pairs for sets to play
1-1-1
1-1-2
1-1-3
1-2-1
1-2-2
1-2-3
1-3-1
1-3-2>>>3 picks
1-3-3
2-1-1
2-1-2
2-1-3
2-2-1
2-2-2
2-2-3
2-3-1
2-3-2
2-3-3
3-1-1
3-1-2
3-1-3
3-2-1
3-2-2-- 3picks
3-2-3
3-3-1
3-3-2
3-3-3So you wage only 3 picks out 27 for the set 123 variation.
very interesting, thank you for the feedback.
But essentially from what I can see from your breakdown of the positional wheeling + sets it's..
the top pair within the final string (R2 + R8) played as a front pair with the digits that make up the final string...
ex.
final string digits were 123
top pair in pattern progression was 32
you play the top pair as a front pair and the key digit (or 3rd digit) are the digits that make up the final string 321-322-323
for 3 sets, same thing for your second example/post.
I have been doing some extensive backtracking with my home draw Ontario both Midday+ Evening I started from the beginning of the year January 2023 and it takes ALOT of time and data analysis. I am trying to practice and notice any trends in the patterns like you said before I'd do any real wagering.
There are certain trends I feel like I'm noticing. I will try and make a post about it in the thread. It will take a bit of time.
But essentially big picture what I'm getting out of this is and your feedback..
because you extracted the top pair from final string (R2-R8) and used the digits within the final string to formulate your final sets, the sets to play + the hits you should be targeting should be a variation of the final string (or all digits of the hit should be within the final string). This is kind of exactly what I've been seeing in my data and the most measured wagering strategy.
One thing I noticed in my testing/practice is final strings that ended up being 4 digits instead of 3 (because an additional draw would reduce the string to less then 3 so I stop there - ex. after 6 draw (digit version) I have a 4 digit string so I stop at 6 draws) I am noticing more hit frequency because it allows for an additional key digit or variable for the hit.
I will try and show/explain alot of what im seeing so far in my backtesting practice at some point like I said.
I've only gotten through a couple months because it takes so long analyzing both draws (midday/evening), creating noting/breaking down all the strings week to week, breaking down all the pattern progression, pairs, trends, hits that occurred within the data etc., then going back and analyzing it and I'm documenting everything so I can see how the trends flow through week by week.
I am basically doing a digit version breakdown for each week of the year starting from January 2023 (since it takes roughly a weeks worth of draws to breakdown a full digit version of the strings) and also a set version for the week- both draws Midday+ evening, and seeing how it's trends, top pattern progression pairs, combo's etc performs week to week to get a feel for timeline and if it makes sense to play that way (adding in fresh sets with a next weeks or fresh weeks worth of draw data) since it produces such relatively low sets to Play, and you can't expect it to hit the way you want everytime.
Like I said I'll try and make a post about what I think im seeing.
If you have any additional feedback regarding what I've just shared would be greatly appreciated, thanks for all your help. I'm getting there! and continuing to learn :)
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 25, 2023
very interesting, thank you for the feedback.
But essentially from what I can see from your breakdown of the positional wheeling + sets it's..
the top pair within the final string (R2 + R8) played as a front pair with the digits that make up the final string...
ex.
final string digits were 123
top pair in pattern progression was 32
you play the top pair as a front pair and the key digit (or 3rd digit) are the digits that make up the final string 321-322-323
for 3 sets, same thing for your second example/post.
I have been doing some extensive backtracking with my home draw Ontario both Midday+ Evening I started from the beginning of the year January 2023 and it takes ALOT of time and data analysis. I am trying to practice and notice any trends in the patterns like you said before I'd do any real wagering.
There are certain trends I feel like I'm noticing. I will try and make a post about it in the thread. It will take a bit of time.
But essentially big picture what I'm getting out of this is and your feedback..
because you extracted the top pair from final string (R2-R8) and used the digits within the final string to formulate your final sets, the sets to play + the hits you should be targeting should be a variation of the final string (or all digits of the hit should be within the final string). This is kind of exactly what I've been seeing in my data and the most measured wagering strategy.
One thing I noticed in my testing/practice is final strings that ended up being 4 digits instead of 3 (because an additional draw would reduce the string to less then 3 so I stop there - ex. after 6 draw (digit version) I have a 4 digit string so I stop at 6 draws) I am noticing more hit frequency because it allows for an additional key digit or variable for the hit.
I will try and show/explain alot of what im seeing so far in my backtesting practice at some point like I said.
I've only gotten through a couple months because it takes so long analyzing both draws (midday/evening), creating noting/breaking down all the strings week to week, breaking down all the pattern progression, pairs, trends, hits that occurred within the data etc., then going back and analyzing it and I'm documenting everything so I can see how the trends flow through week by week.
I am basically doing a digit version breakdown for each week of the year starting from January 2023 (since it takes roughly a weeks worth of draws to breakdown a full digit version of the strings) and also a set version for the week- both draws Midday+ evening, and seeing how it's trends, top pattern progression pairs, combo's etc performs week to week to get a feel for timeline and if it makes sense to play that way (adding in fresh sets with a next weeks or fresh weeks worth of draw data) since it produces such relatively low sets to Play, and you can't expect it to hit the way you want everytime.
Like I said I'll try and make a post about what I think im seeing.
If you have any additional feedback regarding what I've just shared would be greatly appreciated, thanks for all your help. I'm getting there! and continuing to learn :)
CONTINUED...
one follow up thought after you read my previous post..
this is why I was asking about permutation specifically/only (order of hit) and saying that I know the digits of the hit coming because I am seeing the hit that comes and is made up of the digits of the final string.
and I was also noticing it is often but not always the most frequent 3 digit set breakdown from the pattern progression (R2-R8) so I have been considering treating that as an additional filter. (maybe that's going to far with filtering and stick with top pair? read more I outline why..)
once I get that 3 digit set (boxed basically), I am trying to figure out how to play the correct permutation of it to hit the straight..
it's why I was playing around with that idea I suggested
ex. if 017 is the top combination in the final string pattern progression, I am looking at 017 down through R2-R8, taking the top pair from it ex. 01 and playing that front pair but both ways ex. sets 017-107..
It's actually very similar logic to what you showed in your example
it's why my inital questions in recents posts was very specific to permutations, if I think I've filtered all the way down to the final set that will hit.
but now thinking about your example further I guess it's an argument/difference of..
do I filter all the way down to the exact combo I think will hit and permuate with it... (like my example grab top 3 digit combo in pattern progression play top pair of it front but both ways)..
or do I find the top pair, play it just front pair as is, with all the digits in the final string.
I guess that's essentially the difference.
The reason I am even pondering this is because of what im seeing in the data + where the hits are coming from..
it's also because like I said in my data that ended in 4 digit strings (instead of 3) the hit comes with more frequency/shorter timeframe/more often overall (because the hit doesnt ALWAYS come overall, we know that its not perfect)
I'm also testing the set version at same time, this all potential extends the data or variables abit for same timeframe but gets the hit more often therefore im trying to see...
does it make sense to extract a couple good guesses for what the total 3 digit hit (boxed) could be (via pattern progression) and permuate with those 2 or 3 options for the straight hit?
I think you may understand what I mean/getting at
like I said I can show in an additional post at some point too clear breakdown of my data
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 24, 2023
ya I'm just not sure if this would necessarily work for how this system works let's see when I explain...
so I've basically fully learned the system in this thread and it leaves you with a 3 or 4 digit string...
ex 1223 or 1234
the hit comes from a makeup of that string
ex. sets 123-122-134
so you know all the exact digits within the set that will hit, the exact combo boxed but just not in which variation ex. 123, 321, 231, 213
from what I'm understanding your showing how to find the key digit or missing digit if you had the pair, as in what other numbers might be coming..
I know what numbers are coming and I know the timeframe (7-14 days roughly) I just don't know the order it will come in (ex. 213 or 123..
I'm not looking for key digits, I'm trying to figure how to best optimize hitting the combination correctly for straight play when I already know the digits of the hit..
an important note like I think I kinda mentioned is the timeframe, because the timeframe is longer and not "hit every draw" system you play a low amount of sets (3-5) over a certain time period (7-14 days) to get your hit.
you just want to have the correct order when it does eventually hit..like a boxed combo that you are optimizing into a straight.
I'm looking for best methods for this
I think because the timeframe can be between 7 and sometimes even 21 days thats what makes this very tricky
the timeframe isn't consistent but the hit will usually come a max of 20 days
If you expect 1223 or 1234 and adobeas system show that you can expect numbers 0 2 1 4 (in next 3-4 draws, that's inside your time frame) on position 1 then you can play:
122
123
124
223
234
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 25, 2023
very interesting, thank you for the feedback.
But essentially from what I can see from your breakdown of the positional wheeling + sets it's..
the top pair within the final string (R2 + R8) played as a front pair with the digits that make up the final string...
ex.
final string digits were 123
top pair in pattern progression was 32
you play the top pair as a front pair and the key digit (or 3rd digit) are the digits that make up the final string 321-322-323
for 3 sets, same thing for your second example/post.
I have been doing some extensive backtracking with my home draw Ontario both Midday+ Evening I started from the beginning of the year January 2023 and it takes ALOT of time and data analysis. I am trying to practice and notice any trends in the patterns like you said before I'd do any real wagering.
There are certain trends I feel like I'm noticing. I will try and make a post about it in the thread. It will take a bit of time.
But essentially big picture what I'm getting out of this is and your feedback..
because you extracted the top pair from final string (R2-R8) and used the digits within the final string to formulate your final sets, the sets to play + the hits you should be targeting should be a variation of the final string (or all digits of the hit should be within the final string). This is kind of exactly what I've been seeing in my data and the most measured wagering strategy.
One thing I noticed in my testing/practice is final strings that ended up being 4 digits instead of 3 (because an additional draw would reduce the string to less then 3 so I stop there - ex. after 6 draw (digit version) I have a 4 digit string so I stop at 6 draws) I am noticing more hit frequency because it allows for an additional key digit or variable for the hit.
I will try and show/explain alot of what im seeing so far in my backtesting practice at some point like I said.
I've only gotten through a couple months because it takes so long analyzing both draws (midday/evening), creating noting/breaking down all the strings week to week, breaking down all the pattern progression, pairs, trends, hits that occurred within the data etc., then going back and analyzing it and I'm documenting everything so I can see how the trends flow through week by week.
I am basically doing a digit version breakdown for each week of the year starting from January 2023 (since it takes roughly a weeks worth of draws to breakdown a full digit version of the strings) and also a set version for the week- both draws Midday+ evening, and seeing how it's trends, top pattern progression pairs, combo's etc performs week to week to get a feel for timeline and if it makes sense to play that way (adding in fresh sets with a next weeks or fresh weeks worth of draw data) since it produces such relatively low sets to Play, and you can't expect it to hit the way you want everytime.
Like I said I'll try and make a post about what I think im seeing.
If you have any additional feedback regarding what I've just shared would be greatly appreciated, thanks for all your help. I'm getting there! and continuing to learn :)
The odds of the game remains the same. The string projection gives you a window to plan your waging strategy.
-
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 25, 2023
The odds of the game remains the same. The string projection gives you a window to plan your waging strategy.
makes sense, I'm going to post an example of what im seeing to show you exactly what I mean
I think you may find it interesting..
it's because like I'm saying and you were showing in your examples-- it's makes most sense to target a hit that is made up of all the digits of the final string.
The way I've decided to additionally filter it is to extract the top 3 digit combination from the pattern progression (which obviously will often contain the top pair anyway) because the hit that comes within the string is often that combo! so why not filter to that for focused wagering? pretty cool and actually makes sense as you always advised "play close attention to pattern progression"
and I started focusing on that as I began to see it occur often enough for focused wagering
what my data is seeing is to hopefully optimize this..
I'll post an example soon and I think you will find interesting
-
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 25, 2023
The odds of the game remains the same. The string projection gives you a window to plan your waging strategy.
Also yes but then I consider like you said...
Time frame should be less or equal to target prize , so $6 for 20 draws is still less than the prize.
this is true but what happens when you determine your set timeframe is 20 draws and your sets to play don't hit straight within 20 draws let's say 4/5 times you play in total?
ex.
6$ x 20 draws = 120 expense - didn't get straight hit
6$ x 20 = 120 expense - didn't get straight hit
6$ x 20 = 120 expense - didn't get straight hit
6$ x 20 = 120 expense - didn't get straight hit
so far we are negative $480
5th time we get the straight hit on let's say 16th draw we finally hit it exactly with correct permutation..
6$ x 18 = $108 expense , hit the straight $500 - 108$ expense = 392 profit on that 5th cycle HOWEVER
$392 profit on that 5th cycle of playing
- $480 on all other cycles
= - $88 overall
so what I'm trying to do is optimize to avoid that scenario by increasing chances for straight hit (correct permutation-pattern is hitting but not optimally) over same timeframe, or optimize to avoid this scenario and still profit..
you tell me if the idea/where I'm going with this makes sense when I post my example and what my brain is seeing in my work..